Effect of flapless surgery on single-tooth implants in the esthetic zone: A randomized clinical trial

Journal of Periodontology

Volumn 84, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 1747-1754

  Bashutski, Jill D ^a   Wang, Hom Lay ^a   Rudek, Ivan ^a   Moreno, Ildefonso ^b   Koticha, Tapan ^a   Oh, Tae Ju ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Dental implants; Dental implants, single tooth; Oral surgical procedures; Surgical procedures, minimally invasive; Trials, randomized clinical; Wound closure techniques

Indexed keywords

KERATIN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL PROCEDURE; EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GINGIVA; HUMAN; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; JAW; MALE; MAXILLA; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERIODONTICS; RADIOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURGICAL FLAPS; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PLAQUE; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; ALVEOLAR PROCESS; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CROWNS; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS, SINGLE-TOOTH; DENTAL PLAQUE INDEX; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GINGIVA; HUMANS; KERATINS; MALE; MAXILLA; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERIODONTAL INDEX; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE; SURGICAL FLAPS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84883865983     PISSN: 00223492     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2013.120575     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Oliver R. Flapless dental implant surgery may improve hard and soft tissue outcomes. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2011;11:206-207.
2. Lindeboom JA, Van Wijk AJ. A comparison of two implant techniques on patient-Based outcome measures: A report of flapless vs. conventional flapped implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21: 366-370.
3. Blanco J, Alves CC, Nunez V, Aracil L, Munoz F, Ramos I. Biological width following immediate implant placement in the dog: Flap vs. flapless surgery. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:624-631.
4. Blanco J, Nunez V, Aracil L, Munoz F, Ramos I. Ridge alterations following immediate implant placement in the dog: Flap versus flapless surgery. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35:640-648.
5. Becker W, Goldstein M, Becker BE, Sennerby L. Minimally invasive flapless implant surgery: A prospective multicenter study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7(Suppl. 1):S21-S27.
6. Covani U, Barone A, Cornelini R, Crespi R. Soft tissue healing around implants placed immediately after tooth extraction without incision: A clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:549-553.
7. Oh TJ, Shotwell JL, Billy EJ, Wang HL. Effect of flapless implant surgery on soft tissue profile: A randomized controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol 2006;77: 874-882.
8. Azari A, Nikzad S. Flapless implant surgery: Review of the literature and report of 2 cases with computerguided surgical approach. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 66:1015-1021.
9. Ozan O, Turkyilmaz I, Yilmaz B. A preliminary report of patients treated with early loaded implants using computerized tomography-Guided surgical stents: Flapless versus conventional flapped surgery. J Oral Rehabil 2007;34:835-840.
10. Gabri-C Panduri-C D, Katanec D, Grani-C M, Komljenovi-C- Blitva D, Basha M, Susi-C M. Densitometric analysis of dental implant placement between flapless technique and the two-Stage technique - A pilot study. Coll Antropol 2008;32:529-533.
11. Oh TJ, Shotwell J, Billy E, Byun HY, Wang HL. Flapless implant surgery in the esthetic region: Advantages and precautions. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2007; 27:27-33.
12. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-Term efficacy of currently used dental implants: A review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25.
13. Silness J, Loe H. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. II. Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal condition. Acta Odontol Scand 1964;22:121-135.
14. Loe H, Silness J. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. I. Prevalence and severity. Acta Odontol Scand 1963; 21:533-551.
15. Jemt T. Regeneration of gingival papillae after singleimplant treatment. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1997;17:326-333.
16. Goaslind GD, Robertson PB, Mahan CJ, Morrison WW, Olson JV. Thickness of facial gingiva. J Periodontol 1977;48:768-771.
17. Becker W, Goldstein M, Becker BE, Sennerby L, Kois D, Hujoel P. Minimally invasive flapless implant placement: Follow-Up results from a multicenter study. J Periodontol 2009;80:347-352.
18. Campelo LD, Camara Jr. Flapless implant surgery: A 10-Year clinical retrospective analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:271-276.
19. Maló P, Nobre MD. Flap vs. flapless surgical techniques at immediate implant function in predominantly soft bone for rehabilitation of partial edentulism: A prospective cohort study with follow-Up of 1 year. Eur J Oral Implantol 2008;1:293-304.
20. Cannizzaro G, Felice P, Leone M, Checchi V, Esposito M. Flapless versus open flap implant surgery in partially edentulous patients subjected to immediate loading: 1-Year results from a split-Mouth randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol 2011;4:177-188.
21. Sanna AM, Molly L, Van Steenberghe D. Immediately loaded CAD-CAM manufactured fixed complete dentures using flapless implant placement procedures: A cohort study of consecutive patients. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97:331-339.
22. Sennerby L, Rocci A, Becker W, Jonsson L, Johansson LA, Albrektsson T. Short-Term clinical results of Nobel Direct implants: A retrospective multicentre analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:219-226.
23. Brodala N. Flapless surgery and its effect on dental implant outcomes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24(Suppl.):118-125.
24. Heitz-Mayfield LJ, Darby I, Heitz F, Chen S. Preservation of crestal bone by implant design. A comparative study in minipigs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013;24: 243-249.
25. Greenstein G, Cavallaro J. The clinical significance of keratinized gingiva around dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013:24:243-249.
26. Mehta P, Lim LP. The width of the attached gingiva - Much ado about nothing J Dent 2010; 38:517-525.
27. Chung DM, Oh TJ, Shotwell JL, Misch CE, Wang HL. Significance of keratinized mucosa in maintenance of dental implants with different surfaces. J Periodontol 2006;77:1410-1420.
28. Kim BS, Kim YK, Yun PY, et al. Evaluation of periimplant tissue response according to the presence of keratinized mucosa. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;107:e24-E28.
29. Cosyn J, Eghbali A, De Bruyn H, Collys K, Cleymaet R, De Rouck T. Immediate single-Tooth implants in the anterior maxilla: 3-Year results of a case series on hard and soft tissue response and aesthetics. J Clin Periodontol 2011;38:746-753.
30. Fu JH, Lee A, Wang HL. Influence of tissue biotype on implant esthetics. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011; 26:499-508.
31. Tarnow D, Elian N, Fletcher P, et al. Vertical distance from the crest of bone to the height of the interproximal papilla between adjacent implants. J Periodontol 2003; 74:1785-1788.
32. Cosyn J, Eghbali A, Hanselaer L, et al. Four modalities of single implant treatment in the anterior maxilla: A clinical, radiographic, and aesthetic evaluation. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2013;15:517-530.
33. Nisapakultorn K, Suphanantachat S, Silkosessak O, Rattanamongkolgul S. Factors affecting soft tissue level around anterior maxillary single-Tooth implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:662-670.