In vitro assessment of bone-implant interface using an acoustic emission transmission test

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine

Volumn 226, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 63-69

  Ossi, Zannar ^a   Abdou, Wael ^b   Reuben, Robert L ^b   Ibbetson, Richard J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b HERIOT WATT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Acoustic emission; Implant primary stability; Osseointegration; Titanium dental implants

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC EMISSION ENERGY; ACOUSTIC EMISSION RECORDINGS; ACOUSTIC ENERGY; ACOUSTIC SENSORS; BONE-IMPLANT INTERFACES; CLINICAL SITUATIONS; EMISSION TRANSMISSION; IN-VITRO; OSSEOINTEGRATION; PENCIL LEADS; SIZE GROUPS; TITANIUM DENTAL IMPLANTS; IMPLANT PRIMARY STABILITIES; PRIMARY STABILITIES;

ACOUSTIC EMISSIONS; ANIMALS; BIOACOUSTICS; BONE; DENTAL PROSTHESES; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); ACOUSTIC EMISSION TESTING; STABILITY; TITANIUM;

ACOUSTIC EMISSION TESTING; DENTAL PROSTHESES;

ACOUSTICS; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CATTLE; DENTAL PROCEDURE; EQUIPMENT; HUMAN; MANDIBLE; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOUND DETECTION; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; VIBRATION;

ACOUSTICS; ANIMALS; CATTLE; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MANDIBLE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY; SURFACE PROPERTIES; VIBRATION;

EID: 84858255001     PISSN: 09544119     EISSN: 20413033     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0954411911428696     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, et al. Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990; 5: 347-359.
2. Ericsson I, Johansson CB, Bystedt H, et al. A histomorphometric evaluation of bone-to-implant contact on machine-prepared and roughened titanium dental implants. A pilot study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994; 5: 202-206.
3. Mombelli A, Muhle T, Bragger U, et al. Comparison of periodontal and peri-implant probing by depth-force pattern analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997; 8: 448-454. (Pubitemid 127688533)
4. Huang HM, Pan LC, Lee SY, et al. Assessing the implant/bone interface by using natural frequency analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000; 90: 285-291.
5. Schliephake H, Sewing A and Aref A. Resonance frequency measurements of implant stability in the dog mandible: experimental comparison with histomorphometric data. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 35: 941-946. (Pubitemid 44542554)
6. Barewal RM, Oates TW, Meredith N, et al. Resonance frequency measurement of implant stability in vivo on implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18: 641-651. (Pubitemid 37281810)
7. Balshi SF, Allen FD, Wolfinger GJ, et al. A resonance frequency analysis assessment of maxillary and mandibular immediately loaded implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005; 20: 584-594. (Pubitemid 41549226)
8. Meredith N, Alleyne D and Cawley P. Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996; 7: 261-267. (Pubitemid 126670532)
9. O'Sullivan D, Sennerby L and Meredith N. Measurements comparing the initial stability of five designs of dental implants: a human cadaver study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000; 2: 85-92.
10. Friberg B, Sennerby L, Linden B, et al. Stability measurements of one-stage Branemark implants during healing in mandibles. A clinical resonance frequency analysis study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999; 28: 266-272.
11. ASTM STP 505. American Society for Testing and Materials P, D1907. Eds. Liptai RG, Harris DO, Tatro CA. Philadelphia, PA: 1972.
12. Nivesrangsan P, Steel JA and Reuben RL. Source location of acoustic emission in diesel engines. Mech Syst Signal Process 2007; 21: 1103-1114. (Pubitemid 44667412)
13. Cormier J, Manoogian S, Bisplinghoff J, et al. The use of acoustic emission in facial fracture detection. Biomed Sci Instrum 2008; 44: 147-152. (Pubitemid 351634326)
14. Samuel S, Cooper MA, Bull JL, et al. An ex vivo study of the correlation between acoustic emission and microvascular damage. Ultrasound Med Biol 2009; 35: 1574-1586.
15. Williams R. Acoustic emission. Bristol, UK: Adam Hilger Ltd, 1980.
16. Davies JP, Tse MK and Harris WH. Monitoring the integrity of the cement-metal interface of total joint components in vitro using acoustic emission and ultrasound. J Arthroplasty 1996; 11: 594-601. (Pubitemid 26303541)
17. Rajachar RM, Chow DL, Curtis CE, et al. Use of acoustic emission to characterize focal and diffuse microdamage in bone. In: Acoustic emission: Standards and technology update, ASM STP 1353. Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials, 1999, pp. 3-21. (Pubitemid 30501295)
18. Hsu NN, Simmons JA and Hardy SC. An approach to acoustic emission signal analysis - theory and experiment. Mater Eval 1977; 35: 100-106.
19. Lekholm U and Zarb G. Patient selection and preparation. In: Branemark PI, Zarb GA and Albrektssoon T (eds) Tissue-integrated prostheses. Osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago, IL: Quintessence, 1985, pp. 199-209.
20. Cowin SC and Van Buskirk WC. Properties of bone. In: Skalak R and Chien S (eds) Handbook of bioengineering. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1987, pp. 2.1-2.27.
21. Qi G. Attenuation of acoustic emission body waves in acrylic bone cement and synthetic bone using wavelet timescale analysis. J Biomed Mater Res 2000; 52: 148-156. (Pubitemid 30490991)