Non-invasive evaluation of facial crestal bone with ultrasonography

PLoS ONE

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2017, Pages

  Chan, Hsun Liang ^a   Sinjab, Khaled ^a   Chung, Ming Pang ^a   Chiang, Yi Chen ^a   Wang, Hom Lay ^a   Giannobile, William V ^a,b   Kripfgans, Oliver D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ALVEOLAR BONE; ARTICLE; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; ECHOGRAPHY; ENAMEL; FACIAL BONE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE DISPLAY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MOLAR TOOTH; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; PREMOLAR TOOTH; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH TISSUE; VERY ELDERLY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; TOOTH;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; FACIAL BONES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; TOOTH; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 85011960876     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171237     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Chan HL, Chun YH, MacEachern M, Oates TW. Does Gingival Recession Require Surgical Treatment? Dent Clin North Am. 2015 Oct; 59(4):981-96. doi:10.1016/j.cden.2015.06.010 PMID: 26427577.
2. Ferrus J, Cecchinato D, Pjetursson EB, Lang NP, Sanz M, Lindhe J. Factors influencing ridge alterations following immediate implant placement into extraction sockets. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Jan; 21(1):22-9doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01825.x PMID: 19912273.
3. Braut V, Bornstein MM, Belser U, Buser D. Thickness of the anterior maxillary facial bone wall-A retrospective radiographic study using cone beam computed tomography. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2011 Apr; 31(2):125-31. PMID: 21491011.
4. Fu JH, Yeh CY, Chan HL, Tatarakis N, Leong DJ, Wang HL. Tissue biotype and its relation to the underlying bone morphology. Journal of periodontology. 2010 Apr; 81(4):569-74. doi:10.1902/jop.2009.090591PMID: 20367099.
5. Timock AM, Cook V, McDonald T, Leo MC, Crowe J, Benninger BL, et al. Accuracy and reliability of buccal bone height and thickness measurements from cone-beam computed tomography imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Nov; 140(5):734-44. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.06.021 PMID: 22051495.
6. Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Martinez-Poyer J. In utero analysis of fetal growth: A sonographic weight standard. Radiology. 1991 Oct; 181(1):129-33. doi:10.1148/radiology.181.1.1887021 PMID: 1887021.
7. Chandak R, Degwekar S, Bhowte RR, Motwani M, Banode P, Chandak M, et al. An evaluation of efficacy of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of head and neck swellings. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011 May; 40(4):213-21. doi:10.1259/dmfr/68658286 PMID: 21493877.
8. Friedrich RE, Zustin J, Scheuer HA. Adenomatoid odontogenic tumour of the mandible. Anticancer Res. 2010 May; 30(5):1787-92. PMID: 20592380.
9. Pallagatti S, Sheikh S, Puri N, Mittal A, Singh B. To evaluate the efficacy of ultrasonography compared to clinical diagnosis, radiography and histopathological findings in the diagnosis of maxillofacial swellings. Eur J Radiol. 2012 Aug; 81(8):1821-7. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.04.065 PMID: 21601401.
10. Wakasugi-Sato N, Kodama M, Matsuo K, Yamamoto N, Oda M, Ishikawa A, et al. Advanced clinical usefulness of ultrasonography for diseases in oral and maxillofacial regions. Int J Dent. 2010; 2010:639382. doi: 10.1155/2010/639382 PMID: 20445749.
11. Yamamoto N, Yamashita Y, Tanaka T, Ishikawa A, Kito S, Wakasugi-Sato N, et al. Diagnostic significance of characteristic findings on ultrasonography for the stitch abscess after surgery in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2011 Mar; 47(3):163-9. doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2010.10.015PMID: 21109478.
12. Muller HP, Barrieshi-Nusair KM, Kononen E. Repeatability of ultrasonic determination of gingival thickness. Clinical oral investigations. 2007 Dec; 11(4):439-42. doi:10.1007/s00784-007-0125-0 PMID: 17522899.
13. Muller HP, Kononen E. Variance components of gingival thickness. Journal of periodontal research. 2005 Jun; 40(3):239-44. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0765.2005.00798.x PMID: 15853970.
14. Chan HL, Wang HL, Fowlkes JB, Giannobile WV, Kripfgans OD. Non-ionizing real-Time ultrasonography in implant and oral surgery: A feasibility study. Clinical oral implants research. 2016 Mar 19.
15. Claffey N, Shanley D. Relationship of gingival thickness and bleeding to loss of probing attachment in shallow sites following nonsurgical periodontal therapy. Journal of clinical periodontology. 1986 Aug; 13 (7):654-7. PMID: 3531244.
16. Olsson M, Lindhe J. Periodontal characteristics in individuals with varying form of the upper central incisors. Journal of clinical periodontology. 1991 Jan; 18(1):78-82. PMID: 2045523.
17. Chao YC, Chang PC, Fu JH, Wang HL, Chan HL. Surgical Site Assessment for Soft Tissue Management in Ridge Augmentation Procedures. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2015 Sep-Oct; 35(5): E75-e83. doi:10.11607/prd.2097 PMID: 26357705.
18. De Bruyckere T, Eghbali A, Younes F, De Bruyn H, Cosyn J. Horizontal stability of connective tissue grafts at the buccal aspect of single implants: A 1-year prospective case series. J Clin Periodontol. 2015 Sep; 42(9):876-82. doi:10.1111/jcpe.12448PMID: 26373422.
19. Fu JH, Lee A, Wang HL. Influence of tissue biotype on implant esthetics. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 May-Jun; 26(3):499-508. PMID: 21691596.
20. Lin GH, Chan HL, Wang HL. Effects of currently available surgical and restorative interventions on reducing midfacial mucosal recession of immediately placed single-Tooth implants: A systematic review. J Periodontol. 2014 Jan; 85(1):92-102. doi:10.1902/jop.2013.130064 PMID: 23578250.
21. De Rouck T, Eghbali R, Collys K, De Bruyn H, Cosyn J. The gingival biotype revisited: Transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin as a method to discriminate thin from thick gingiva. J Clin Periodontol. 2009 May; 36(5):428-33. doi:10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01398.x PMID: 19419444.
22. Kan JY, Morimoto T, Rungcharassaeng K, Roe P, Smith DH. Gingival biotype assessment in the esthetic zone: visual versus direct measurement. The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry. 2010 Jun; 30(3):237-43.
23. Zweers J, Thomas RZ, Slot DE, Weisgold AS, Van der Weijden FG. Characteristics of periodontal biotype, its dimensions, associations and prevalence: A systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Oct; 41(10):958-71. doi:10.1111/jcpe.12275 PMID: 24836578.
24. Eghbali A, De Bruyn H, Cosyn J, Kerckaert I, Van Hoof T. Ultrasonic Assessment of Mucosal Thickness around Implants: Validity, Reproducibility, and Stability of Connective Tissue Grafts at the Buccal Aspect. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014 Jul 17.
25. Vera C, De Kok IJ, Reinhold D, Limpiphipatanakorn P, Yap AK, Tyndall D, et al. Evaluation of buccal alveolar bone dimension of maxillary anterior and premolar teeth: A cone beam computed tomography investigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Nov-Dec; 27(6):1514-9. PMID: 23189304.
26. Wang HM, Shen JW, Yu MF, Chen XY, Jiang QH, He FM. Analysis of facial bone wall dimensions and sagittal root position in the maxillary esthetic zone: A retrospective study using cone beam computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014 Sep-Oct; 29(5):1123-9. doi:10.11607/jomi.3348PMID: 25216138.
27. Frost NA, Mealey BL, Jones AA, Huynh-Ba G. Periodontal Biotype: Gingival Thickness as It Relates to Probe Visibility and Buccal Plate Thickness. J Periodontol. 2015 Oct; 86(10):1141-9. doi:10.1902/jop.2015.140394PMID: 26110452.