Bridging Gaps among Human, Assisted, and Automated Driving with DVIs: A Conceptional Experimental Study

IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems

Volumn 20, Issue 6, 2019, Pages 2096-2108

  Wang, Jiao ^a   Soffker, Dirk ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Autonomous driving; DVI; Non driving related task; Takeover request

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENTS; BRAKES; FLOW VISUALIZATION; JOB ANALYSIS; VEHICLES;

AUTONOMOUS DRIVING; AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES; NON-DRIVING-RELATED TASK; TAKEOVER REQUEST; TASK ANALYSIS; VEHICLE DYNAMICS;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EID: 85051361818     PISSN: 15249050     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2018.2858179     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. T. M. Gasser et al., "Rechtsfolgen zunehmender fahrzeugautomatisierung," Bundesanstalt fuer Strassenwesen, Tech. Rep., 2012, no. F 83.
2. Preliminary Statement of Policy Concerning Automated Vehicles, Nat. Highway Traffic Saf. Admin., Washington, DC, USA, 2013.
3. Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles, document J3016 201609, SAE International, 2016.
4. K. Bengler, K. Dietmayer, B. Farber, M. Maurer, C. Stiller, and H. Winner, "Three decades of driver assistance systems: Review and future perspectives," IEEE Intell. Transp. Syst. Mag., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 6-22, Oct. 2014.
5. S. Petermeijer, P. Bazilinskyy, K. Bengler, and J. de Winter, "Take-over again: Investigating multimodal and directional TORs to get the driver back into the loop," Appl. Ergonom., vol. 62, pp. 204-215, Jul. 2017.
6. A. Eriksson and N. A. Stanton, "Takeover time in highly automated vehicles: Noncritical transitions to and from manual control," Hum. Factors, J. Hum. Factors Ergonom. Soc., vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 689-705, 2017.
7. S. Lapoehn et al., "Interaction design for nomadic devices in highly automated vehicles," in Mensch und Computer 2016-Workshopband, B. Weyers and A. Dittmar, Eds. Gesellschaft für Informatik e. V., Sep. 2016.
8. V. Melcher, S. Rauh, F. Diederichs, H. Widlroither, and W. Bauer, "Take-over requests for automated driving," Procedia Manuf., vol. 3, pp. 2867-2873, Jul. 2015.
9. B. Mok, M. Johns, D. Miller, and W. Ju, "Tunneled in: Drivers with active secondary tasks need more time to transition from automation," in Proc. ACM CHI Conf., 2017, pp. 2840-2844.
10. C. Gold, D. Damböck, L. Lorenz, and K. Bengler, "'Take over!' How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop?" in Proc. Hum. Factors Ergonom. Soc. Annu. Meeting, vol. 57, 2013, pp. 1938-1942.
11. C. Gold, M. Körber, D. Lechner, and K. Bengler, "Taking over control from highly automated vehicles in complex traffic situations: The role of traffic density," Hum. Factors, J. Hum. Factors Ergonom. Soc., vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 642-652, 2016.
12. N. Merat, A. H. Jamson, F. C. H. Lai, and O. Carsten, "Highly automated driving, secondary task performance, and driver state," Hum. Factors, J. Hum. Factors Ergonom. Soc., vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 762-771, 2012.
13. S. Hergeth, L. Lorenz, and J. F. Krems, "Prior familiarization with takeover requests affects drivers' takeover performance and automation trust," Hum. Factors, J. Hum. Factors Ergonom. Soc., vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 457-470, 2017.
14. G. Vasantharaj, "State of the art technologies in automotive HMI," SAE Tech. Paper 2014-01-0258, 2014.
15. H. Strömberg, P. Andersson, S. Almgren, J. Ericsson, M. A. Karlsson, and A. Nåbo, "Driver interfaces for electric vehicles," in Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Automot. User Interfaces Interact. Veh. Appl. (AutomotiveUI), Salzburg, Austria, 2011, pp. 177-184.
16. T. Wellings, J. Binnersley, D. Robertson, and T. Khan, Human Machine Interfaces in Low Carbon Vehicles-Market Trends and User Issues: Low Carbon Vehicle Technology Project: Workstream 13, document HMI 2. 1, 2011.
17. D. Brand, K. Büchele, and A. Meschtscherjakov, "Pointing at the HUD: Gesture interaction using a leap motion," in Proc. 8th Int. Conf. Automot. User Interfaces Interact. Veh. Appl. (AutomotiveUI), 2016, pp. 167-172.
18. S. M. Simmons, J. K. Caird, and P. Steel, "A meta-analysis of in-vehicle and nomadic voice-recognition system interaction and driving performance," Accident Anal. Prevention, vol. 106, pp. 31-43, Sep. 2017.
19. S. Langlois and B. Soualmi, "Augmented reality versus classical HUD to take over from automated driving: An aid to smooth reactions and to anticipate maneuvers," in Proc. IEEE 19th Int. Conf. Intell. Transp. Syst. (ITSC), Nov. 2016, pp. 1571-1578.
20. N. Kim, K. Jeong, M. Yang, Y. Oh, and J. Kim, "'Are you ready to take-over?': An exploratory study on visual assistance to enhance driver vigilance," in Proc. ACM CHI Conf., 2017, pp. 1771-1778.
21. Y. Forster, F. Naujoks, and A. Neukum, "Your turn or my turn?: Design of a human-machine interface for conditional automation," in Proc. 8th Int. Conf. Automot. User Interfaces Interact. Veh. Appl. (Automotive'UI), 2016, pp. 253-260.
22. F. Naujoks, Y. Forster, K. Wiedemann, and A. Neukum, "Improving usefulness of automated driving by lowering primary task interference through HMI design," J. Adv. Transp., vol. 2017, Aug. 2017, Art. no. 6105087.
23. M. Walch, T. Sieber, P. Hock, M. R. K. Baumann, and M. Weber, "Towards cooperative driving: Involving the driver in an autonomous vehicle's decision making," in Proc. 8th Int. Conf. Automot. User Interfaces Interact. Veh. Appl. (Automotiv'UI), 2016, pp. 261-268.
24. A. Miglani, C. Diels, and J. Terken, "Compatibility between trust and non-driving related tasks in UI design for highly and fully automated driving," in Proc. 8th Int. Conf. Automot. User Interfaces Interact. Veh. Appl., 2016, pp. 75-80.
25. M. Biferno and D. Stanley, "The touch-sensitive control/display unit: A promising computer interface," SAE Tech. Paper 831532, 1983.
26. N. B. Sarter and D. D. Woods, "Pilot interaction with cockpit automation II: An experimental study of pilots' model and awareness of the flight management system," Int. J. Aviation Psychol., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1-28, 1994.
27. D. A. Norman, "Categorization of action slips," Int. J. Aviation Psychol., vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 1-15, 1981.
28. J. Bredereke and A. Lankenau, "Safety-relevant mode confusions-Modelling and reducing them," Rel. Eng. Syst. Safety, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 229-245, 2005.
29. D. Wagner, J. A. Birt, M. Snyder, and J. P. Duncanson, "Human factors design guide (HFDG)-For acquisition of commercial off-theshelf subsystems, non-developmental items, and developmental systems," U. S. Dept. Transp. Federal Aviation Admin. Tech. Center, Tech. Rep. DOT/FAA/CT-96/1, 1996.
30. Human Factors in Forward Collision Warning Systems: Operating Characteristics and User Interface Requirements, document J2400-200308, SAE International, 2003.
31. Blind Spot Monitoring System (BSMS): Operating Characteristics and User Interface, document J2802-201001, SAE International, 2010.
32. Driver-Vehicle Interface Considerations for Lane Keeping Assistance Systems, document J3048-201602, SAE International, 2016.
33. Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) Operating Characteristics and User Interface, document J2399-201409, SAE International, 2014.
34. S. G. Hart and L. E. Staveland, "Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research," in Human Mental Workload, P. A. Hancock and N. Meshkati, Eds. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North Holland, 1988.
35. P. Wintersberger, P. Green, and A. Riener, "Am I driving or are you or are we both? A taxonomy for handover and handback in automated driving," in Proc. 9th Int. Driving Symp. Hum. Factors Driver Assessment, Training Vehicle Des., 2017, pp. 333-339.
36. E. H. Hess and J. M. Polt, "Pupil size in relation to mental activity during simple problem-solving," Science, vol. 143, no. 3611, pp. 1190-1192, 1964.
37. S. T. Iqbal, X. S. Zheng, and B. P. Bailey, "Task-evoked pupillary response to mental workload in human-computer interaction," in Proc. ACM CHI Conf., 2004, pp. 1477-1480.
38. K. F. Van Orden, T. P. Jung, and S. Makeig, "Combined eye activity measures accurately estimate changes in sustained visual task performance," Biol. Psychol., vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 221-240, 2000.
39. K. F. Van Orden, W. Limbert, S. Makeig, and T. P. Jung, "Eye activity correlates of workload during a visuospatial memory task," Hum. Factors, J. Hum. Factors Ergonom. Soc., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 111-121, 2001.
40. J. Beatty, "Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources," Psychol. Bull., vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 276-292, 1982.
41. K. Holmqvist, M. Nystrom, R. Andersson, R. Dewhurst, H. Jarodzka, and J. van de Weijer, Eye Tracking: A Comprehensive Guide to Methods and Measures. London, U. K.: Oxford Univ. Press, 2011.
42. R. W. Brower, "Lockheed F-22 raptor," in The Avionics Handbook, C. R. Spitzer, Ed. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 2001.
43. Presse-Information: Audi AI, Audi Mediacenter, Ostfildern, Germany, 2017.
44. S. Chen, T. U. Saeed, and S. Labi, "Impact of road-surface condition on rural highway safety: A multivariate random parameters negative binomial approach," Anal. Methods Accident Res., vol. 16, pp. 75-89, Dec. 2017.