Task-evoked pupillary response to mental workload in human-computer interaction

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 1477-1480

  Iqbal, Shamsi T ^a   Zheng, Xianjun Sam ^b   Bailey, Brian P ^a  

^a University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention; Interruption; Mental workload; Pupil size; Task models; User studies

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; INTERRUPTION; MENTAL WORKLOAD; PUPIL SIZE; TASK MODELS; USER STUDY;

HUMAN ENGINEERING; USER INTERFACES;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 84876745465     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/985921.986094     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Adamzcyk, P.D. and B.P. Bailey. If Not Now When? The Effects of Interruptions at Various Moments within Task Execution. CHI, 2004, to appear.
2. Altmann, E.M. and J.G. Trafton. Memory for Goals: An Activation-Based Model. Cognitive Science, 26, 39-83, 2002.
3. Bailey, B.P., J.A. Konstan and J.V. Carlis. The Effects of Interruptions on Task Performance, Annoyance, and Anxiety in the User Interface. Proceedings Interact, 2001, 593-601.
4. Beatty, J. Task-Evoked Pupillary Responses, Processing Load, and the Structure of Processing Resources. Psychological Bulletin, 91 (2), 276-292
5. Card, S., T. Moran and A. Newell. The Psychology of Human- Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1983.
6. Cutrell, E., M. Czerwinski and E. Horvitz. Notification, Disruption and Memory: Effects of Messaging Interruptions on Memory and Performance. Proceedings of Interact, Tokyo, Japan, 2001, 263-269.
7. Gillie, T. and D. Broadbent. What Makes Interruptions Disruptive? A Study of Length, Similarity, and Complexity. Psychological Research, 50, 243-250, 1989.
8. Hicks, T.G. and W.W. Wierwille. Comparison of Five Mental Workload Assessment Procedures in a Moving-Base Driving Simulator. Human Factors, 21 (2), 129-143, 1979.
9. Hoecks, B. and W. Levelt. Pupillary Dilation as a Measure of Attention: A Quantitative System Analysis. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 16-26.
10. Juris, M. and M. Velden. The Pupillary Response to Mental Overload. Physiological Psychology, 5 (4), 421-424, 1977.
11. McFarlane, D.C. Coordinating the Interruption of People in Human-Computer Interaction. Proceedings of Interact, 1999, 295-303.
12. Miyata, Y. and D.A. Norman. The Control of Multiple Activities. In Norman, D.A. and Draper, S.W. (eds.) User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human- Computer Interaction, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, 1986.
13. Zijlstra, F.R.H., R.A. Roe, A.B. Leonora and I. Krediet. Temporal Factors in Mental Work: Effects of Interrupted Activities. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 163-185, 1999.