"Are you ready to take-over?": An exploratory study on Visual Assistance to enhance driver vigilance

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn Part F127655, Issue , 2017, Pages 1771-1778

  Kim, Naeun ^a   Jeong, Kwangmin ^a   Yang, Minyoung ^a   Oh, Yejeon ^a   Kim, Jinwoo ^a  

^a Yonsei University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Automated car; Cognitive science; Takeover; Transition of control; Windshield display

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOBILE DRIVERS; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; HUMAN ENGINEERING; WINDSHIELDS;

COGNITIVE SCIENCE; DRIVING ENVIRONMENT; EXPLORATORY STUDIES; LITERATURE REVIEWS; PERCEIVED USEFULNESS; TAKEOVER; USEFUL FIELD OF VIEW; WINDSHIELD DISPLAYS;

HUMAN REACTION TIME;

EID: 85019542060     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/3027063.3053155     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Abrams, R. A., & Christ, S. E. (2003). Motion onset captures attention. Psychological Science, 14(5), 427-432.
2. Dambock, D., Wei©gerber, T., Kienle, M., & Bengler, K. (2012). Evaluation of a contact analog head-up display for highly automated driving. In 4th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics. San Francisco. USA.
3. Endsley, M. R., & Kiris, E. O. (1995). The out-oftheloop performance problem and level of control in automation. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 37(2), 381-394.
4. Clay, O. J., Wadley, V. G., Edwards, J. D., Roth, D. L., Roenker, D. L., & Ball, K. K. (2005). Cumulative meta-analysis of the relationship between useful field of view and driving performance in older adults: Current and future implications. Optometry & Vision Science, 82(8), 724-731.
5. Edwards, J. D., Myers, C., Ross, L. A., Roenker, D. L., Cissell, G. M., McLaughlin, A. M., & Ball, K. K. (2009). The longitudinal impact of cognitive speed of processing training on driving mobility. The Gerontologist, 49(4), 485-494.
6. Ghazizadeh, M., Lee, J. D., & Boyle, L. N. (2012). Extending the Technology Acceptance Model to assess automation. Cognition, Technology & Work, 14(1), 39-49.
7. Gold, C., Dambock, D., Lorenz, L., & Bengler, K. (2013, September). "Take over!" How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop?. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 57, No. 1, pp. 1938-1942). SAGE Publications.
8. H. (2016). 2. Retrieved June 21, 2016, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0XmRgabsFY
9. H. (2016). Retrieved June 21, 2016, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMSDWYMLVA
10. Haeuslschmid, R., Pfleging, B., & Alt, F. (2016, May). A Design Space to Support the Development of Windshield Applications for the Car. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 5076-5091). ACM. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858336
11. Haeuslschmid, R., Schnurr, L., Wagner, J., & Butz, A. (2015, September). Contact-analog warnings on windshield displays promote monitoring the road scene. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 64-71). ACM. DOI=http://dx.doi.org.access.yonsei.ac.kr:8080/10.1145/2799250.2799274
12. Harbluk, J. L., Noy, Y. I., Trbovich, P. L., & Eizenman, M. (2007). An on-road assessment of cognitive distraction: Impacts on drivers-visual behavior and braking performance. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 39(2), 372-379.
13. Harding, M. (2008). GM Researches High-Tech Windshields to Aid Vision. ABC News.com. (July 17, 2008).
14. Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Advances in psychology, 52, 139-183.
15. He, J., Becic, E., Lee, Y. C., & McCarley, J. S. (2011). Mind wandering behind the wheel performance and oculomotor correlates. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 53(1), 13-21.
16. Lorenz, L., Kerschbaum, P., & Schumann, J. (2014, September). Designing take over scenarios for automated driving How does augmented reality support the driver to get back into the loop?. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 58, No. 1, pp. 1681-1685). SAGE Publications.
17. Miller, D., Sun, A., Johns, M., Ive, H., Sirkin, D., Aich, S., & Ju, W. (2015, September). Distraction becomes engagement in automated driving. InProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 59, No. 1, pp. 1676-1680). SAGE Publications.
18. Mkrtchyan, A. A., Macbeth, J. C., Solovey, E. T., Ryan, J. C., & Cummings, M. L. (2012, September). Using variable-rate alerting to counter boredom in human supervisory control. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 56, No. 1, pp. 1441-1445). Sage Publications.
19. Mok, B., Johns, M., Lee, K. J., Miller, D., Sirkin, D., Ive, P., & Ju, W. (2015, September). Emergency, Automation Off: Unstructured Transition Timing for Distracted Drivers of Automated Vehicles. In 2015 IEEE 18th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (pp. 2458-2464). IEEE.
20. Moore, C. M., Yantis, S., & Vaughan, B. (1998). Object-based visual selection: Evidence from perceptual completion. Psychological science, 9(2), 104-110.
21. Myers, R. S., Ball, K. K., Kalina, T. D., Roth, D. L., & Goode, K. T. (2000). Relation of useful field of view and other screening tests to on-road driving performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 91(1), 279-290.
22. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2013). Preliminary Statement of Policy Concerning Automated Vehicles. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.nhtsa.gov/staticfiles/rulemaking/pdf/A utomated-Vehicles-Policy.pdf
23. Naujoks, F., Mai, C., & Neukum, A. (2014). The effect of urgency of take-over requests during highly automated driving under distraction conditions. Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation, (Part I), 431.
24. Nees, M. A., Helbein, B., & Porter, A. (2016). Speech auditory alerts promote memory for alerted events in a video-simulated self-driving car ride. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 0018720816629279.
25. Owsley, C., & McGwin, G. (2010). Vision and driving. Vision research, 50(23), 2348-2361.
26. Pashler, H. E., & Sutherland, S. (1998). The psychology of attention (Vol. 15). Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
27. Poitschke, T., Ablaßmeier, M., Rigoll, G., Bardins, S., Kohlbecher, S., & Schneider, E. (2008, March). Contact-analog information representation in an automotive head-up display. In Proceedings of the 2008 symposium on Eye tracking research & applications (pp. 119-122). ACM.
28. Pylyshyn, Z. W., & Storm, R. W. (1988). Tracking multiple independent targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spatial vision, 3(3), 179-197.
29. Sagberg, F., & Bjørnskau, T. (2006). Hazard perception and driving experience among novice drivers. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 38(2), 407-414.
30. Scholl, B. J. (2001). Objects and attention: The state of the art. Cognition, 80(1), 1-46.
31. Soro, A., Rakotonirainy, A., Schroeter, R., & Wollstädter, S. (2014, September). Using augmented video to test in-car user experiences of context analog HUDs. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 1-6). ACM. DOI=http://dx.doi.org.access.yonsei.ac.kr:8080/10.1145/2667239.2667302
32. Wickens, C. D. (2002). Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical issues in ergonomics science, 3(2), 159-177.