Tunneled In: Drivers with active secondary tasks need more time to transition from automation

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn 2017-May, Issue , 2017, Pages 2840-2844

  Mok, Brian ^a   Johns, Mishel ^a   Miller, David ^a   Ju, Wendy ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Autonomous vehicles; Car simulator; Controlled study; Human machine interaction; Transition of control

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOBILE SIMULATORS; CONTROL SYSTEM SYNTHESIS; HAZARDS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; HUMAN ENGINEERING; VEHICLES;

AUTOMATED DRIVING; AUTOMATED VEHICLES; AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES; CAR SIMULATOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRIVING SIMULATOR STUDY; HUMAN MACHINE INTERACTION; RAPID TRANSITIONS;

AUTOMATION;

EID: 85032483642     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/3025453.3025713     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Arie P. van den Beukel and Mascha C. van der Voort. 2013. The influence of time-criticality on Situation Awareness when retrieving human control after automated driving. In 16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2013), 2000-2005.
2. Myra Blanco, Jon Atwood, Holland M. Vasquez, Tammy E. Trimble, Vikki L. Fitchett, Josh Radlbeck, Gregory M. Fitch, Sheldon M. Russell, Charles A. Green, Brian Cullinane, and others. 2013. Human Factors Evaluation of Level 2 and Level 3 Automated Driving Concepts. Vergina Tech, Automated Vehicle Systems Group Research.
3. Avinoam Borowsky and Tal Oron-Gilad. 2016. The effects of automation failure and secondary task on drivers' ability to mitigate hazards in highly or semi-automated vehicles. Advances in Transportation Studies, 1.
4. Karel A. Brookhuis, Gerbrand de Vries, and Dick de Waard. 1991. The effects of mobile telephoning on driving performance. Accident Analysis & Prevention 23, 4: 309-316.
5. Daniel Damböck and Klaus Bengler. Übernahmezeiten beim hochautomatisierten Fahren.
6. Christian Gold, Daniel Dambock, Lutz Lorenz, and Klaus Bengler. 2013. "Take over!" How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop? Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 57, 1: 1938-1942.
7. Toshio Ito, Arata Takata, and Kenta Oosawa. 2016. Time Required for Take-over from Automated to Manual Driving.
8. Tyron Louw, Natasha Merat, and Andrew Hamish Jamson. 2015. Engaging With Highly Automated Driving: To Be Or Not To Be In The Loop? In 8th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design, 189-195.
9. Brian Mok, Mishel Johns, Key Jung Lee, Hillary Ive, David Miller, and Wendy Ju. 2015. Timing of unstructured transitions of control in automated driving. In 2015 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), 1167-1172.
10. Brian Mok, Mishel Johns, Key Jung Lee, David Miller, David Sirkin, Hillary Ive, and Wendy Ju. 2015. Emergency, Automation Off: Unstructured Transition Timing for Distracted Drivers of Automated Vehicles. In Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2015 IEEE 18th International Conference on, 2458-2464.
11. Frederik Naujoks, Christoph Mai, and Alexandra Neukum. 2014. The effect of urgency of take-over requests during highly automated driving under distraction conditions. Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation, Part I: 431.
12. NHTSA. 2013. U.S. Department of Transportation Releases Policy on Automated Vehicle Development | National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Retrieved August 6, 2014 from http://www.nhtsa.gov/About+NHTSA/Press+Releases/U.S.+Department+of+Transportation+Releases+Policy+on+Automated+Vehicle+Development
13. Jonas Radlmayr, Christian Gold, Lutz Lorenz, Mehdi Farid, and Klaus Bengler. 2014. How traffic situations and non-driving related tasks affect the take-over quality in highly automated driving. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2063-2067.
14. Joris C Verster and Thomas Roth. 2011. Standard operation procedures for conducting the on-the-road driving test, and measurement of the standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP). International Journal of General Medicine 4: 359-371.
15. Kathrin Zeeb, Axel Buchner, and Michael Schrauf. 2015. What determines the take-over time? An integrated model approach of driver take-over after automated driving. In Accident Analysis & Prevention 78: 212-221.
16. J2944: Operational Definitions of Driving Performance Measures and Statistics - SAE International. Retrieved September 18, 2016 from http://standards.sae.org/j2944-201506/