Compatibility between trust and non - Driving related tasks in UI design for highly and fully automated driving

AutomotiveUI 2016 - 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Adjunct Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 75-80

  Miglani, Abhijai ^b   Diels, Cyriel ^a   Terken, Jacques ^b  

^a Faculty of Engineering and Computing   (United Kingdom)

^b EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Anthropomorphism; Automation; Motion sickness; Non driving related tasks (NDRT); Proxemics; Transparency; Trust; User acceptance; User interface(UI)

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; TRANSPARENCY;

ANTHROPOMORPHISM; MOTION SICKNESS; NON-DRIVING RELATED TASKS (NDRT); PROXEMICS; TRUST; USER ACCEPTANCE;

USER INTERFACES;

EID: 85012000582     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/3004323.3004331     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Ahmadpour N., Robert J.M., Lindgaard G. 2016. Aircraft passenger comfort experience: Underlying factors and differentiation from discomfort. Applied Ergonomics 52: 301-308.
2. Beggiato M., Schleinitz K., Krems J. 2015. What would drivers like to know during automated driving? Information needs at different levels of automation. In Proceedings of the 7th conference on driver assistance.
3. Beggiato M., Krems J. 2013. The evolution of mental model, trust and acceptance of adaptive cruise control in relation to initial information. Transportation Research Part F 18: 47-57.
4. Carlson M. S., Desai M., Drury J., Kwak H., Yanco H.A. 2013. Identifying Factors that influence Trust in Automated Cars and Medical Diagnosis Systems. The Intersection of Robust Intelligence and Trust in Autonomous Systems: Papers from the AAAI Spring Symposium.
5. Diederichs F., Bischoff S., Widlroither H., Reilhac P., Hottelart K., Moizard J. 2015. New HMI Concept for an Intuitive Automated Driving Experience and Enhanced Transitions. In Proceedings of Automotive UI 2015 conference.
6. Diels C., Bos J.E. 2015. User interface considerations to prevent self-driving sickness. In Proceedings of Automotive UI 2015 conference.
7. Diels C., Bos J. E., Hottelart K. and Reilhac P. 2016. Motion Sickness in Automated Vehicles: The Elephant in the Room. In: Gereon Meyer and Sven Beiker (Eds). Road Vehicle Automation 3: 121-129.
8. Ekman F., Johansson M., Sochor J. 2016. Creating appropriate trust for autonomous vehicle systems: A framework for HMI Design. In Proceedings of the 95th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board.
9. Helldin T., Falkman G., Riveiro M., Davidsson S. 2013. Presenting system uncertainty in automotive UIs for supporting trust calibration in autonomous driving. In Proceedings of Automotive UI 2013.
10. Hofstadter D. 1995. Preface 4: The ineradicable eliza effect and its dangers in fluid concepts and creative analogies: computer models of the fundamental mechanisms of thought. Basic Books.
11. Kraus M.J., Sturn J., Reiser J.E., Baumann M. 2015. Anthropomorphic Agents, Transparent Automation and Driver personality: Towards an Integrative Multi-level Model of Determinants for Effective Driver-Vehicle Cooperation in Highly Automated Vehicles. In Proceedings of Automotive UI 2015.
12. Lee J.D. and See. K.A. 2004. Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors 46, 1: 50-80.
13. Meister J. 2015. Survey shows amount of trust in autonomous vehicles. Retrieved June 22, 2016 from http://www.pddnet.com/news/2015/10/surveyshowsamounttrustautonomousvehicles.
14. Payre W., Delhomme P. 2015. Fully automated driving: Impact of Trust and Practice on Manual Control Recovery. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
15. Stockert S., Richardson N.T., Lienkamp M. Driving in an increasingly automated world-Approaches to improve the driver-Automation interaction. Procedia Manufacturing 3: 2889-2896.