zUMIs - A fast and flexible pipeline to process RNA sequencing data with UMIs

GigaScience

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 2018, Pages

  Parekh, Swati ^a,b,c   Ziegenhain, Christoph ^a,b,c   Vieth, Beate ^a   Enard, Wolfgang ^a   Hellmann, Ines ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGY OF AGEING   (Germany)

^c KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Digital gene expression; Pipeline; Single cell RNA sequencing; Unique molecular identifiers

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL TISSUE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXON; GENE CLUSTER; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE LIBRARY; GENE MAPPING; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTRON; LIMIT OF QUANTITATION; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; NOTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RNA SEQUENCE; SINGLE CELL RNA SEQUENCING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; HEK293 CELL LINE; HUMAN; PROCEDURES; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SOFTWARE;

GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; HEK293 CELLS; HUMANS; INTRONS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, RNA; SOFTWARE;

EID: 85049379360     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2047217X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giy059     Document Type: Note

References (48)

1. Sandberg R. Entering the era of single-cell transcriptomics in biology and medicine. Nat Methods 2014;11(1):22-4
2. Zheng GXY, Terry JM, Belgrader P, et al. Massively parallel digital transcriptional profiling of single cells. Nat Commun 2017;8:14049
3. Rosenberg AB, Roco CM, Muscat RA, et al. Single-cell profiling of the developing mouse brain and spinal cord with splitpool barcoding. Science 2018;360(6385):176-82
4. Wagner A, Regev A, Yosef N. Revealing the vectors of cellular identity with single-cell genomics. Nat Biotechnol 2016;34(11):1145-60
5. Regev A, Teichmann SA, Lander ES, et al. The Human Cell Atlas. Elife, 2017; 6
6. Parekh S, Ziegenhain C, Vieth B, et al. The impact of amplification on differential expression analyses by RNA-seq. Sci Rep 2016;6:25533
7. Kivioja T, Vähärautio A, Karlsson K, et al. Counting absolute numbers of molecules using unique molecular identifiers. Nat Methods 2012;9(1):72-4
8. Ziegenhain C, Vieth B, Parekh S, et al. Comparative analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing methods. Mol Cell 2017;65(4):631-43.e4
9. Vieth B, Ziegenhain C, Parekh S, et al. powsimR: power analysis for bulk and single cell RNA-seq experiments. Bioinformatics 2017;33(21):3486-3488
10. Ziegenhain C, Vieth B, Parekh, et al. Quantitative single-cell transcriptomics. Brief Funct Genomics 2018; doi:10.1093/bfgp/ely009
11. Lake BB, Ai R, Kaeser GE, et al. Neuronal subtypes and diversity revealed by single-nucleus RNA sequencing of the human brain. Science 2016;352(6293):1586-90
12. Habib N, Avraham-Davidi I, Basu A, et al. Massively parallel single-nucleus RNA-seq with DroNc-seq. Nat Methods 2017;14(10):955-8
13. Macosko EZ, Basu A, Satija R, et al. Highly parallel genomewide expression profiling of individual cells using nanoliter droplets. Cell 2015;161(5):1202-14
14. Svensson V, Natarajan KN, Ly LH, et al. Power analysis of single-cell RNA-sequencing experiments. Nat Methods 2017;14(4):381-7
15. Hashimshony T, Senderovich N, Avital G, et al. CEL-Seq2: sensitive highly-multiplexed single-cell RNA-seq. Genome Biol 2016;17(1):77
16. Petukhov V, Guo J, Baryawno N, et al. Accurate estimation of molecular counts in droplet-based single-cell RNA-seq experiments. bioRxiv 2017;p. 171496
17. Soumillon M, Cacchiarelli D, Semrau S, et al. Characterization of directed differentiation by high-throughput singlecell RNA-seq. bioRxiv 2014
18. Jaitin DA, Kenigsberg E, Keren-Shaul H, et al. Massively parallel single-cell RNA-seq for marker-free decomposition of tissues into cell types. Science 2014;343(6172):776-9
19. Klein AM, Mazutis L, Akartuna I, et al. Droplet barcoding for single-cell transcriptomics applied to embryonic stem cells. Cell 2015;161(5):1187-1201
20. Zilionis R, Nainys J, Veres A, et al. Single-cell barcoding and sequencing using droplet microfluidics. Nat Protoc 2017;12(1):44-73
21. Hochgerner H, L önnerberg P, Hodge R, et al. STRT-seq-2i: dual-index 5' single cell and nucleus RNA-seq on an addressable microwell array. Sci Rep 2017;7(1):16327
22. Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 2013;29(1):15-21
23. Liao Y, Smyth GK, ShiW. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 2014;30(7):923-30
24. DowleM, Srinivasan A. data.table: Extension of 'data.frame." 2017, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=data.table, r package version 1.10.4
25. Smith TS, Heger A, Sudbery I. UMI-tools: modelling sequencing errors in unique molecular identifiers to improve quantification accuracy. Genome Res. 2017
26. Fraley C, Raftery AE. Model-based clustering, discriminant analysis, and density estimation. J Am Stat Assoc 2002;97(458):611-31
27. Fraley C, Raftery AE Enhanced Model-Based Clustering, Density Estimation and Discriminant Analysis Software: MCLUST., J. Classification, 2003, 20, 263-286
28. Vallejos CA, Risso D, Scialdone A, et al. Normalizing singlecell RNA sequencing data: challenges and opportunities. Nat Methods 2017;14(6):565-71
29. Evans C, Hardin J, Stoebel DM. Selecting between-sample RNA-seq normalization methods from the perspective of their assumptions. Brief Bioinform 2017
30. Grün D, van Oudenaarden A. Design and analysis of singlecell sequencing experiments. Cell 2015;163(4):799-810
31. Hendriks GJ, Gaidatzis D, Aeschimann F, et al. Extensive oscillatory gene expression during C. elegans larval development. Mol Cell 2014;53(3):380-92
32. Gaidatzis D, Burger L, Florescu M, et al. Analysis of intronic and exonic reads in RNA-seq data characterizes transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation. Nat Biotechnol 2015;33(7):722-9
33. La Manno G, Soldatov R, Hochgerner H, et al. RNA velocity in single cells. bioRxiv 2017;p. 206052
34. Lake BB, Codeluppi S, Yung YC, et al. A comparative strategy for single-nucleus and single-cell transcriptomes confirms accuracy in predicted cell-type expression from nuclear RNA. Sci Rep 2017;7(1):6031
35. Satija R, Farrell JA, Gennert D, et al. Spatial reconstruction of single-cell gene expression data. Nat Biotechnol 2015;33(5):495-502
36. Butler A, Satija R. Integrated analysis of single cell transcriptomic data across conditions, technologies, and species. bioRxiv 2017;p. 164889
37. Tasic B, Menon V, Nguyen TN, et al. Adultmouse cortical cell taxonomy revealed by single cell transcriptomics. Nat Neurosci 2016;19(2):335-46
38. The TabulaMuris Consortium, Quake SR, Wyss-Coray T, et al. Single-cell transcriptomic characterization of 20 organs and tissues from individual mice creates a Tabula Muris. bioRxiv 2018;p. 237446
39. Han X, Wang R, Zhou Y, et al. Mapping the mouse cell atlas by microwell-seq. Cell 2018;172(5):1091-1107.e17
40. Bagnoli JW, Ziegenhain C, Janjic A, et al. mcSCRB-seq: sensitive and powerful single-cell RNA sequencing. bioRxiv 2017;p. 188367
41. Broad Institute Single Cell Portal. https://portals.broadinstitute.org/single cell/study/dronc-seq-single-nucleus-rna-s eq-on-mouse-archived-brain
42. Law CW, Chen Y, Shi W, et al. voom: precision weights unlock linear model analysis tools for RNA-seq read counts. Genome Biol 2014;15(2):R29
43. Lun ATL, McCarthy DJ, Marioni JC. A step-by-step workflow for low-level analysis of single-cell RNA-seq data with Bioconductor. F1000Res 2016;5
44. Soneson C, Robinson MD. Bias, robustness and scalability in single-cell differential expression analysis. Nat Methods 2018;15(4):255-61
45. Parekh S, Ziegenhain C, Vieth B, et al. Supporting data for 'zUMIs-A fast and flexible pipeline to process RNA sequencing datawith UMIs.' GigaScience Database 2018;http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/100447
46. Grün D, Kester L, van Oudenaarden A. Validation of noise models for single-cell transcriptomics. Nat Methods 2014;11(6):637-40
47. Tian L, Su S, Amann-Zalcenstein D, et al. scPipe: a flexible data preprocessing pipeline for single-cell RNA-sequencing data. bioRxiv 2017;p. 175927
48. Islam S, Zeisel A, Joost S, et al. Quantitative single-cell RNA-seq with unique molecular identifiers. Nat Methods 2014;11(2):163-6