Inclusive and adaptive teaching: Meeting the challenge of diversity in the classroom, second edition

Inclusive and Adaptive Teaching: Meeting the Challenge of Diversity in the Classroom, Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2018, Pages 1-156

  Westwood, Peter ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85048810438     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781351061261     Document Type: Book

References (442)

1. Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education (UK): www.csie.org.uk/inclusion/education-disability.shtml.
2. Cornell University. (2017). Inclusive teaching strategies: www.cte.cornell.edu/teaching-ideas/building-inclusive-classrooms/inclusive-teachingstrategies.html.
3. Inclusive Schools Network: http://inclusiveschools.org/about-isn/.
4. Open Society Foundation. (2015). The value of inclusive education: www.opensocietyfoundations.org/explainers/value-inclusive-education.
5. Queensland Government Department of Education and Training. (2017). Inclusive education policy statement. http://education.qld.gov.au/schools/inclusive/.
6. UNESCO. (2017). Guidelines on the inclusion of learners with disabil -ities in Open and Distance Learning: http://en.unesco.org/news/call piloting-guidelines-inclusion-learners-disabilities-open-and-distance learn.
7. UNICEF. (2017). Inclusive education. www.unicef.org/eca/education_18613.html.
8. Causton, J. & Tracy-Bronson, J. (2015). The educator’s handbook for inclusive school practices. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
9. Knowles, G. (2017). Supporting inclusive practice and ensuring opportunity is equal for all (3rd edn). London: Routledge.
10. Mitchell, D. (2015). Education that fits: Review of international trends in education of students with special educational needs (2nd edn). Canterbury, NZ: University of Canterbury.
11. Mitchell, D. (2016). Diversities in education: Effective ways to reach all learners. London and New York: Routledge.
12. Villa, R.A. & Thousand J.S. (2016). Leading an inclusive school: Access and success for ALL students. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
13. Individual differences. www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/instruct/indiff.html.
14. Shenton, J.M. (2015). Individual differences and factors influencing them: www.slideshare.net/JonalynManalili/individual-differences-53828338.
15. Toth, P. (2014). The role of individual differences in learning. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 11, 4: 183-197. Online at http://epa.oszk.hu/02400/02461/00050/pdf/EPA02461_acta_polytechnica_hungarica_2014_04_12.pdf.
16. Useful information on socio-economic status, poverty and disadvantage is included in Gorski, P. (2008). The myth of the Culture of Poverty. Educational Leader s hip, 65, 7: 32-36. Online at www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/apr08/vol65/num07/The-Mythof-the-Culture-of-Poverty.aspx.
17. See also American Psychological Association. Education and socioeconomic status: www.apa.org/pi/ses/resources/publications/factsheeteducation.aspx.
18. Cushner, K., McClelland, A., & Safford, P.L. (2015). Human diversity and education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
19. Dowker, A. (2013). Individual differences in arithmetic abilities. Hoboken: Taylor & Francis.
20. Ormrod, J.E. (2014). Educational psychology: Developing learners (8th edn). Columbus, OH: Pearson Merrill-Prentice Hall.
21. Weiten, W. (2017). Psychology: Themes and variations (10th edn). Belmont, CA: Cengage-Wadsworth.
22. Information on intellectual disability available through the Australian Disability Clearinghouse at www.adcet.edu.au/inclusive-teaching/specific-disabilities/intellectual-disability/.
23. Managing and teaching students with ADHD: www.ldonline.org/article/5911/.
24. Strategies for teaching students with impaired hearing: www.brighthubeducation.com/special-ed-hearing-impairments/67528-tips-andstrategies-for-teaching-hearing-impaired-students/.
25. Teaching gifted students in the mainstream: www.education.udel.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/GiftedStudents.pdf.
26. Teaching students with impaired vision: www.teachingvisuallyimpaired.com.
27. Teaching students with learning difficulties and disabilities: www.ldaamerica.org/successful-strategies-for-teaching-students-withlearning-disabilities/.
28. Teaching students with physical disabilities: www.brighthubeducation.com/special-ed-physical-disabilities/51778-teaching-strategies-forstudents-with-physical-disabilities/.
29. Westwood, P. (2009). What teachers need to know about students with disabilities. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
30. Hallahan, D.P., Kauffman, J.M., & Pullen, P.C. (2014). Exceptional learners: An introduction to special education (13th edn). Boston, MA: Pearson-Merrill.
31. Heacox, D. & Cash, R.M. (2013). Differentiation for gifted learners. Minneapolis, MN: Free Spirit Publishing.
32. Packer, N. (2017). The teacher’s guide to SEN. Bancyfelin, Carmarthen: Crown House Publishing.
33. Bryant, A. (2016). How can technology help you differentiate your teaching? Kognity website. Available at: www.kognity.com/how-cantechnology-help-you-differentiate-your-teaching/ (accessed 16 September 2017).
34. Croft, J.A. (2017). Differentiation in the science classroom: An overview of strategies to aid in general science instruction. Learning to Teach, 5, 1. Available at http://utdr.utoledo.edu/learningtoteach/vol5/iss1/6.
35. Curriculum adaptations for exceptional students: www.kcdsg.org/files/content/Curriculum-Adaptations-for-Exceptional-Students.pdf.
36. Curriculum modifications and adaptations: Tools for teachers. Institute for the Study of Developmental Disabilities, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN. Available at http://njcdd.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/tools-teacherspart2.pdf.
37. Meidl, T. & Meidl, C. (2011). Curriculum integration and adaptation: Individualizing pedagogy for linguistically and culturally diverse students. Current Issues in Education, 14, 1: 1-29. Available at https://cie.asu.edu/ojs/index.php/cieatasu/article/viewFile/579/148.
38. STEM Learning website: www.stem.org.uk/resources/community/collection/63218/differentiation-science.
39. TeacherVision website contains relevant links to many documents that provide helpful advice on adaptations and modification for students with special needs: www.teachervision.com/teaching-strategies/adaptationsmodifications-students-special-needs.
40. Teaching science to students with visual impairment: www.teaching visuallyimpaired.com/science-adaptations.html.
41. General advice for working with hearing-impaired students (within the context of Universal Design for Learning) may be located online at the Washington University website ‘The Faculty Room’. Available at www.washington.edu/doit/Faculty/Strategies/Disability/Hearing.
42. Allen, M., Webb, A.W., & Matthews, C.E. (2016). Adaptive teaching in STEM: Characteristics for effectiveness. Theory into Practice, 55, 3: 217-224.
43. Garmston, R.J. & Wellman, B.M. (2016). The adaptive school (3rd edn). Lanham. MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
44. Janney, R. & Snell, M.E. (2013). Modifying schoolwork (3rd edn). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
45. National Council for Special Education. (2011). Access to the curriculum for pupils with a variety of special educational needs in mainstream classes: An exploration of the experiences of young pupils in primary school. Trim, Co. Meath: NCSE.
46. Saba, F. & Shearer, R.L. (2018). Transactional distance and adaptive learning. New York and London: Routledge.
47. Tomlinson, C. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners (2nd edn). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
48. Van Tassel-Baska, J. & Little, C.A. (Eds). (2017). Content-based curriculum for high-ability learners (3rd edn). Waco, TX: Prufrock.
49. For information on Explicit Direct Instruction® see: https://dataworksed.com/blog/2014/07/direct-instruction-di-vs-explicit-direct-instruc tion-edi/.
50. Direct Teaching information. KIzlik, B. (2017). On the Aprima website at: www.adprima.com/direct.htm.
51. Longman, D. & Hughes, M. (2006). Whole class teaching strategies and interactive technology: Towards a connectionist classroom: www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/161224.doc.
52. Measuring teacher effectiveness research and commentary: www.rand.org/education/projects/measuring-teacher-effectiveness/research.html.
53. SESS (Special Education Support Service [Ireland]). (2008). Science differentiation in action. Cork: SES Centre. Available at www.sess.ie/resources/science-differentiation-action.
54. Teachers matter: Understanding teachers’ impact on student achievement: www.rand.org/education/projects/measuring-teacher-effectiveness/teachers-matter.html.
55. Williams, K. (2017). Differentiation in the science classroom: www.slideshare.net/williamskristi/differentiation-in-the-science-classroom.
56. Allen, M., Webb, A.W., & Matthews, C.E. (2016). Adaptive teaching in STEM: Characteristics for effectiveness. Theory into Practice, 55, 3: 217-224.
57. Archer, A. & Hughes, C.A. (2011). Explicit instruction: Effective and efficient teaching. New York: Guilford Press.
58. Graham, L., Berman, J., & Bellert, A. (2015). Sustainable learning: Inclusive practices for 21st century classrooms. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
59. Llewellyn, D. (2011). Differentiating science inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
60. Means, B., Bakia, M., & Murphy, R. (2014). Learning online: What research tells us about whether, when, and how. London and New York: Routledge.
61. Skourdoumbis, A. & Gale, T. (2013). Classroom teacher effectiveness research: A conceptual critique. British Educational Research Journal, 39, 5: 892-906.
62. Stockard, J. (2017). The science and success of Englemann’s Direct Instruction. Eugene, OR: NIFDI Press.
63. Westwood, P. (2016). What teachers need to know about differentiated instruction. Melbourne: ACER Press.
64. General information on adapting instructional materials may be found on the Teacher Vision website at www.teachervision.fen.com/teachingmethods/learning-disabilities/6730.html.
65. A guide to ensuring that your e-learning materials are accessible and inclusive. JISC Regional Support Centre, Scotland North and East: Edinburgh. RSC. Available at www.altformat.org/xstandard/A%20guide%20to%20ensuring%20your%20e-learning%20materials%20are%20accessible%20and%20inclusive.pdf.
66. Teaching Made Easy website includes details of ready-to-print resources that can help teachers differentiate worksheets and assignments: www.teachingmadeeasyprint.com.au/.
67. Using technology to support diverse learners: http://azk12.org/home room/2017/01/13/using-technology-to-support-diverse-learners/.
68. Using flexible technology to meet the needs of diverse learners: www.wested.org/online_pubs/kn-05-01.pdf.
69. For details of text-to-speech software see www.techradar.com/news/the-best-free-text-to-speech-software.
70. Ashman, A. (Ed.). (2014). Education for inclusion and diversity (5th edn). Boston, MA: Pearson. See Chapter 5 on curriculum adaptations.
71. Bouck, E.C. (2016). A national snapshot of assistive technology for students with disabilities. Journal of Special Educational Technology, 31, 1: online (n.p.).
72. Bouck, E.C., Meyers, N.K., Hunley, M., Satsangi, R., & Savage, M. (2015). Free computer-based assistive technology to support students with high incidence disabilities in the writing process. Preventing School Failure, 59, 90-97.
73. Cennamo, K., Ross, J., & Ertmer. P. (2013). Technology integration for meaningful classroom use: A standards-based approach (2nd edn). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
74. McKeown, S. & McGlashon, A. (2015). Brilliant ideas for using ICT in the inclusive classroom (2nd edn). Abingdon: Routledge.
75. Sadao, K.C. & Robinson, N.B. (2010). Assistive technology for young children. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
76. Klute, M., Apthorp, H., Harlacher, J., & Reale, M. (2017). Formative assessment and elementary school student academic achievement: A review of the evidence. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. Available at http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs (accessed 4 September 2017).
77. National Dissemination Center for Children with Disabilities (USA) has information on supports, modifications and accommodations. Available at http://nichcy.org/schoolage/accommodations.
78. Pappas, C. (2015/2017). Top 10 text-to-speech software for e-learning: https://elearningindustry.com/top-10-text-to-speech-tts-softwareelearning.
79. TeacherVision website provides some very sound principles on which to base assessment adaptations and accommodations. Available at www.teachervision.fen.com/teaching-methods/educational-testing/4134.html?detoured=1.
80. One of the most comprehensive documents detailing possible testing modifications has been produced by the New York State Education Department and the University of the State of New York. Available at www.p12.nysed.gov/specialed/publications/policy/testaccess/policy guide.htm.
81. DATA Recognition Corporation (DRC). (2017). TABE guidelines to inclusive testing accommodations. Maple Grove, MN: DRC.
82. Popham, W.J. (2016). Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know (8th edn). New York: Pearson.
83. Thurlow, M.L., Lazarus, S.S., Christensen, L.L., & Shyyan, V. (2016). Principles and characteristics of inclusive assessment systems in a changing assessment landscape. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
84. UNESCO. (2017). Inclusive student assessment. Geneva: IBE-UNESCO.
85. Watkins, A. (Ed.) (2007). Assessment in inclusive settings: Key issues for policy and practice. Odense, Denmark: European Agency for Development in Special Needs.
86. Accommodations and modifications for students with impaired vision: www.tsbvi.edu/instructional-resources/3657-vision-accommodations.
87. Accommodations for students with disabilities: www.ccny.cuny.edu/sites/default/files/2014-Reasonable-Accommodations-Faculty-Guideto-Teaching-Students-with-Disabilities.pdf.
88. Glasgow Caledonian University website, Guidance for creating accessible teaching material: www.gcu.ac.uk/student/disability/staffmaterials/guidanceforcreatingaccessibleteachingmaterial/.
89. The LD Online website also provides suggestions for assisting students with learning difficulties: www.ldonline.org/article/8022/.
90. Suggestions for assisting university students with learning disabilities: www.washington.edu/doit/academic-accommodations-studentslearning-disabilities.
91. Teaching for Inclusion: http://web1.modelfarms-h.schools.nsw.edu.au/.
92. University of Tasmania, Creating accessible teaching and support (CATS): www.adcet.edu.au/resource/7338/pathways-9-creating-accessibleteaching-and-support-cats/.
93. Useful notes on accommodations for hearing-impaired students, plus information on assistive technology: www.bestcolleges.com/resources/college-planning-for-deaf-and-hard-of-hearing-students/.
94. Briggs, S. (2016). Meeting special educational needs in primary classrooms: Inclusion and how to do it (2nd edn). London: Fulton.
95. Cowne, E., Frankl, C., & Gershel, L. (2015). The SENCo handbook (6th edn). London: Taylor & Francis.
96. Curran, C.M. & Petersen, A.J. (Eds.). (2017). Handbook of research on classroom diversity and inclusive education practice. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
97. Evans, N.J., Broido, E.M., Brown, K.R., & Wilke, A.K. (2017). Disability in higher education: A social justice approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass-Wiley.
98. Sharples, J., Webster, R., & Blatchford, P. (2015). Making best use of teaching assistants. London: Education Endowment Foundation.
99. Topping, K., Buchs, C., Duran, D., & van Keer, H. (2017). Effective peer learning: From principles to practical implementation. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
100. Abdullah, J. (2012). Developmental coordination disorder and dyspraxia from an occupational therapist’s perspective. In L. Peer & G. Reid (Eds.) Special educational needs: A guide for inclusive practice (pp. 98-111). London: Sage.
101. Abell, M.M., Bauder, D.K., & Simmons, T.J. (2005). Access to the general curriculum: A curriculum and instruction perspective for educators. Intervention in School and Clinic, 41, 2: 82-86.
102. ACARA (Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority). (2010). The shape of the Australian curriculum (Version 2.0). Sydney, NSW: ACARA.
103. ACARA (Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority). (2012). Developing the Australia Curriculum: Overview. Online document at: www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/Curriculum/Overview.
104. ACARA (Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority). (2016). NAPLAN: Adjustments for students with disability. Online document at: www.nap.edu.au/naplan/school-support/adjustments-for-students-withdisability (accessed 4 September 2017).
105. Agbenyega, J.S., & Deku, P. K. (2011). Building new identities in teacher preparation for inclusive education in Ghana. Current issues in Education, 14, 1: 1-37. Online document at: http://cie.asu.edu/ (accessed 8 October 2017).
106. Ahmad, F.K. (2015). Use of assistive technology in inclusive education: Making room for diverse learning needs. Transcience, 6, 2: 62-77.
107. Alchin, G. (2011). Design it right. Special Education Perspectives, 20, 2, 3-4.
108. Alsen, P. (2017). Reflections on strategies of inclusive and engaging learning courses. E-learning Community Website. Online document at: elearning.adobe.com/2017/05/reflections-on-strategies-of-inclusive-and-engaging-learning-courses/ (accessed 8 September 2017).
109. American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. (2015). Definition of intellectual disability. Online document at: http://aaidd.org/intellectual-disability/definition#.Vt60L0Z0Zgs (accessed 7 October 2017).
110. Andersen, I.G. & Andersen, S.C. (2017). Student-centered instruction and academic achievement: Linking mechanisms of educational inequality to schools’ instructional strategy. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38, 4: 533-550.
111. Anderson, G. & Cowart, M. (2012). They are talking: Are we listening? Using student voice to enhance culturally responsive teaching. Teacher Education and Practice, 25, 1: 10-23.
112. Anderson, J., Westwick, J., & Anderson, J. (2016). ‘More alike than different’: Learning about diversity from people with disabilities. Communication Teacher, 30, 3: 159-164.
113. Anderson, L. W. & Krathwohl, D.R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
114. Angelides, P. & Avraamidou, L. (2010). Teaching in informal learning environ -ments as a means for promoting inclusive education. Education, Knowledge & Economy: A Journal for Education and Social Enterprise, 4, 1: 1-14.
115. Apitz, M., Ruppar, A., Roessler, K., & Pickett, K.J. (2017). Planning lessons for students with significant disabilities in high school English classes. Teaching Exceptional Children, 49, 3: 168-174.
116. Armstrong, D., Armstrong, A.C., & Spandagou, I. (2011). Inclusion: By choice or by chance? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15, 1: 29-39.
117. Arrequin-Anderson, M.G. & Esquierdo, J.J. (2011). Overcoming difficulties. Science and Children, 48, 7: 68-71.
118. Assouline, S.G., Ihrig, L.M., & Mahatmya, D. (2017). Closing the excellence gap: Investigation of an expanded talent search model for student selection into an extracurricular STEM program in rural middle schools. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61, 3: 250-261.
119. Athanases, S.Z., Bennett, L.H., & Wahleithner, J.M. (2015). Adaptive teaching for English language arts: Following the pathway of classroom data in preservice teacher inquiry. Journal of Literacy Research, 47, 1: 83-114.
120. Australian Psychological Society. (2012). Understanding specific learning disabilities. Online document at: www.psychology.org.au/publications/tip_sheets/learning/ (accessed 12 June 2017).
121. Ayres, K.M., Douglas, K.H., Lowrey, K.A., & Sievers, C. (2011). I can identify Saturn but I can’t brush my teeth: What happens when the curricular focus for students with severe disabilities shifts. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46, 1: 11-21.
122. Bainbridge, C. (2017). Understanding asynchronous development in children. Online document at: www.verywell.com/asynchronous-development-1449172 (accessed 6 October 2017).
123. Barned, N.E., Knapp, N.F., & Neuharth-Pritchett, S. (2011). Knowledge and attitudes of early childhood pre-service teachers regarding the inclusion of children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 32, 4: 302-321.
124. Barrow, J. & Davidson, J. (2012). Understanding Tourette syndrome. In L. Peer & G. Reid (Eds.) Special educational needs: A guide for inclusive practice (pp. 240-252). London: Sage.
125. Bartlett, S. & Burton, D. (2011). The influence of gender in the classroom: How boys and girls learn. In G. Richards & F. Armstrong (Eds.) Teaching and learning in diverse and inclusive classrooms (pp. 54-64). Abingdon: Routledge.
126. Bashinski, S.M. (2002). Adapting the curriculum to meet the needs of diverse learners. Online document at PBS website at: www.pbs.org/teachers/earlychildhood/articles/adapting.html (accessed 8 September 2017).
127. Beatty, A. & Schweingruber, H. (2017). Seeing students learn science: Integrating assessment and instruction in the classroom. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
128. Behrmann, M. (2012). Assistive technology for young children in special education: It makes a difference. Online document at: www.edutopia.org/assistivetechnology-young-children-special-education (accessed 10 October 2017).
129. Belcastro, S.M. (2017). Ask questions to encourage questions asked. PRIMUS, 27, 2: 171-178.
130. Bell, S. & McLean, B. (2012). Good practice in training specialist teachers and assessors of people with dyslexia. In L. Peer & G. Reid (Eds.) Special educational needs: A guide for inclusive practice (pp. 127-140). London: Sage.
131. Bellert, A. (2015). Effective re-teaching. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 20, 2: 163-183.
132. BEPS (Birmingham Educational Psychology Service: UK). (2015). Standards for inclusion. Online document at: www.beps.org.uk/index.php/disability-equality/standards-for-inclusion (accessed 27 September 2017).
133. Bergey, B.W., Deacon, S.H., & Parrila, R.K. (2015). Metacognitive reading and study strategies and academic achievement of university students with and without a history of reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50: 81-94.
134. Bernstein, B. (1971). Class, codes and control: vol. 1. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
135. Betts, S., Betts, D., & Eckard, L.G. (2007). Asperger Syndrome in the inclusive classroom. London: Jessica Kingsley.
136. Bialka, C.S., Brown, K.S., Morro, D., & Gregory, H. (2017). On their LEVEL: How participation in a university student group shapes members’ perceptions of disability. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 10, 2: 117-135.
137. Biggs, E.E., Carter, E.W., & Gustafson, J. (2017). Efficacy of peer support arrangements to increase peer interaction and AAC use. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 122, 1: 25-48.
138. Blatchford, P., Bassett, P., Brown, P., & Webster, R. (2009). The effect of support staff on pupil engagement and individual attention. British Educational Research Journal, 35, 5: 661-686.
139. Blatchford, R. (2015). Differentiation is out. Mastery is the new classroom buzzword. The Guardian [online], 1 October.
140. Bloom, B.S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook 1 - Cognitive Domain. London: Longman.
141. Bohanon, H. & Wu, M.J. (2014). Developing buy-in for positive behavior support in secondary settings. Preventing School Failure, 58, 4: 223-229.
142. Booth, T. & Ainscow, M. (2011) Index for Inclusion: Developing learning and participation in schools. Bristol: CSIE.
143. Borich, G.D. (2016). Effective teaching methods: Research-based practice (9th edn). Boston, MA: Pearson-Allyn & Bacon.
144. Brackenreed, D. (2011). Inclusive education: Identifying teachers’ strategies for coping with perceived stressors in inclusive classrooms. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 122: n.p.
145. Brock, M.E. & Carter, E.W. (2016). Efficacy of teachers training paraprofes sionals to implement peer support arrangements. Exceptional Children, 82, 3: 354-371.
146. Bruner, J. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
147. Budden, J. (2011). Adapting materials for different age groups. Online document on the British Council website at: www.teachingenglish.org.uk/languageassistant/teaching-tips/adapting-materials-different-age-groups (accessed 10 October 2017).
148. Butler, M., Holloway, L., Marriott, K., & Goncu, C. (2017). Understanding the graphical challenges faced by vision-impaired students in Australian universities. Higher Education Research and Development, 36, 1: 59-72.
149. Butt, R. (2016). Teacher Assistant support and deployment in mainstream schools. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20, 9: 995-1007.
150. Byrne, R. (2013). 7 Ways to create and deliver online quizzes. Online document on the Free technology for teachers website at: www.freetech4teachers.com/2013/07/7-ways-to-create-and-deliver-online.html#.Wa86yfOGPIU (accessed 5 September 2017).
151. Cabus, S.J., Haelermans, C., & Franken, S. (2017). Smart in mathematics? Exploring the effects of in-class-level differentiation using SMARTboard on math proficiency. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48, 1: 145-161.
152. Caldarella, P., Williams, L., Jolstead, K., & Wills, H.P. (2017). Managing student behavior in an elementary school music classroom: A study of class-wide functionrelated intervention teams. Applications of Research in Music Education, 35, 3: 23-30.
153. Çalikoglu, B.S. & Kahveci, N.G. (2015). Altering depth and complexity in the science curriculum for the gifted: Results of an experiment. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 16, 1, Article 6: 1-22.
154. Carnine, D.W., Silbert, J., Kameenui, E.J., Tarver, S.G., & Jongjohann, K. (2006). Teaching struggling and at-risk readers: A Direct Instruction approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson-Merrill-Prentice Hall.
155. Cawthon, S. & Leppo, R. (2013). Assessment accommodations on tests of academic achievement for students who are deaf or hard of hearing: A qualitative metaanalysis of the research literature. American Annals of the Deaf, 158, 3: 363-376.
156. CCSSI (Common Core State Standards Initiative: USA). (2017). About the standards. Online document at: www.corestandards.org/about-the-standards/ (accessed 15 September 2017).
157. Celik, S. & Vuran, S. (2014). Comparison of direct instruction and simultaneous prompting procedure on teaching concepts to individuals with intellectual disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 49, 1: 127-144.
158. Chalmers, C., Carter, M., Cooper, T., & Nason, R. (2017). Implementing ‘big ideas’ to advance the teaching and learning of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15, 1: 25-43.
159. Chopra, R. (2008). Factors influencing elementary school teachers’ attitude towards inclusive education. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Asso -ciation Conference, Edinburgh, 3-6 September.
160. Chu, H.C., Chen, J.M., & Tsai, C.L. (2017). Effects of an online formative peertutoring approach on students’ learning behaviors, performance and cognitive load in mathematics. Interactive Learning Environments, 25, 2: 203-219.
161. Civitillo, S., Denessen, E., & Molenaar, I. (2016). How to see the classroom through the eyes of a teacher: Consistency between perceptions on diversity and differentiation practices. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 16, 1: 587-591.
162. Clay, M. (1993). Reading Recovery: A guidebook for teachers in training. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
163. Collins, L.E. (2016). Take a byte: Technology for 2e students. Parenting for High Potential, 5, 2: 16-19.
164. Colver, M. & Fry, T. (2016). Evidence to support peer tutoring programs at the undergraduate level. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 46, 1: 16-41.
165. Cooper, H., Robinson, J.C., & Patall, E.A. (2006). Does homework improve academic achievement? A synthesis of research. Review of Educational Research, 76, 1: 1-62.
166. Cooper-Martin, E. & Wolanin, N. (2014). Evaluation of the Universal Design for Learning Projects. Rockville, MD: Montgomery County Public Schools.
167. Corn, A.L. & Erin, J.N. (2010). Foundations of low vision: Clinical and functio nal perspectives (2nd edn). New York: American Foundation for the Blind Press.
168. Couzens, D., Poed, S., Kataoka, M., Brandon, A., Hartley, J., & Keen, D. (2015). Support for students with hidden disabilities in universities: A case study. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 62, 1: 24-41.
169. Cox, N. (2017). Enacting disability policy through unseen support: The everyday use of disability classifications by university administrators. Journal of Education Policy, 32, 5: 542-563.
170. Crawford, R. & Jenkins, L. (2017). Blended learning and team teaching: Adapting pedagogy in response to the changing digital tertiary environment. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33, 2: 51-72.
171. Crombie, M. (2012). Literacy. In L. Peer & G. Reid (Eds.) Special educational needs: A guide for inclusive practice (pp. 141-153). London: Sage.
172. CSIE (Centre for the Study of Inclusive Education: UK). (2016). Supporting inclusion: Strategy for 2016-2019. Online document at: www.csie.org.uk/about/strategy.shtml (accessed 24 September 2017).
173. Datchuk, S.M. (2017). A direct instruction and precision teaching intervention to improve the sentence construction of middle school students with writing difficulties. Journal of Special Education, 51, 2: 62-71.
174. Davis, E.A., Janssen, F.J.M., & Van Driel, J.H. (2016). Teachers and science curriculum materials: Where we are and where we need to go. Studies in Science Education, 52, 2: 127-160.
175. de los Arcos, B., Farrow, R., Pitt, R., Weller, M., & McAndrew, P. (2016). Adapting the curriculum: How K-12 teachers perceive the role of Open Educational Resources. Journal of Online Learning Research, 2, 1: 23-40.
176. Debarger, A.H., Penuel, W.R., Moorthy, S., Beauvineau, Y., Kennedy, C.A., & Boscardin, C.K. (2017). Investigating purposeful science curriculum adap -tation as a strategy to improve teaching and learning. Science Education, 101, 1: 66-98.
177. Degener, S. & Berne, J. (2017). Complex questions promote complex thinking. Reading Teacher, 70, 5: 595-599.
178. Delisle, J.R. (2015). Differentiation doesn’t work. Education Week [online], 6 January.
179. DfE & STA (Department for Education, and Standards and Testing Agency: UK). (2017). Performance (P scale) attainment targets for pupils with special educational needs (SEN). London: DfE.
180. DfE (Department for Education: UK). (2012). The School Curriculum: Including all learners. Online document at: www.education.gov.uk/schools/teachingand learning/curriculum/b00199686/inclusion (accessed 3 October 2017).
181. DfE (Department for Education: UK). (2014a). National curriculum in England: Framework for Key Stages 1-4. London: DfE.
182. DfE (Department for Education: UK). (2014b). Statutory guidance for National curriculum in England: Key Stages 1-4. London: DfE.
183. Doabler, C.T., Nelson, N.J., & Clarke, B. (2016). Adapting evidence-based practices to meet the needs of English learners with mathematics difficulties. Teaching Exceptional Children, 48, 6: 301-310.
184. Done, L., Murphy, M., & Watt, M. (2016). Change management and the SENCo role: Developing key performance indicators in the strategic development of inclusivity. Support for Learning, 31, 4: 281-295.
185. Douglas, G., McLinden, M., Robertson, C., Travers, J., & Smith, E. (2016). Including pupils with special educational needs and disability in national assessment: Comparison of three country case studies through an inclusive assessment framework. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 63, 1: 98-121.
186. Duncan, J. (2012). Students with hearing loss. In L. Peer & G. Reid (Eds.) Special educational needs: A guide for inclusive practice (pp. 211-225). London: Sage.
187. Dunn, K. & Darlington, E. (2016). GCSE geography teachers’ experiences of differentiation in the classroom. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 25, 4: 344-357.
188. ECF (Education Consumers Foundation). (2011). Direct instruction: What the research says. Arlington, VA: ECF.
189. Eggen, P. & Kauchak, D.P. (2013). Educational psychology: Windows on classrooms (9th edn). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson-Prentice Hall.
190. Ellis, L. (2005) Balancing approaches: Revisiting the educational psychology research on teaching students with learning difficulties. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
191. Englemann, S. (1999). The benefits of direct instruction: Affirmative action for at-risk students. Educational Leadership, 57, 1: 77-79.
192. ERIC Clearing House on Disabilities and Gifted Education. (2003). Long term effects of inclusion. Online document at: www.hoagiesgifted.org/eric/faq/i-long.html (accessed 1 October 2017).
193. Erickson, H.L. (2012). Concept-based teaching and learning. Geneva: International Baccalaureate Organization.
194. Evins, A.E. (2015). The effects of inclusion classrooms on students with and without developmental disabilities: Teachers’ perspectives on the social, emotional, and behavioral development of all students in inclusion classrooms. Doctoral Papers and Masters Projects, 31. Online document at: http://digitalcommons.du.edu/capstone_masters/31 (accessed 10 October 2017).
195. Farkota, R. (2017). Mathematics: The ongoing crisis. Learning Difficulties Australia Bulletin, 49, 2: 15-16.
196. Feuerstein, R. (1976). Dynamic assessment of cognitive modifiability in retarded performers: The Learning Potential Assessment Device. In B. B. Wolman (Ed.) International encyclopedia of neurology, psychiatry, psychoanalysis and psychology (Section XII). New York: Van Nostrand-Reinhold.
197. Fitzgerald, J. & Radford, J. (2017). The SENCO role in post-primary schools in Ireland: Victims or agents of change? European Journal of Special Needs Education, 32, 3: 452-466.
198. Flannery, K.B. & Kato, M.M. (2017). Implementation of SWPBIS in high school: Why is it different? Preventing School Failure, 61, 1: 69-79.
199. Fleming, J. & Hay, J.A. (n.d.). Learning strategies of deaf and hearing impaired students in higher education. University of Wolverhampton. Online document at: http://docplayer.net/30677846-Learning-strategies-of-deaf-and-hearingimpaired-students-in-higher-education.html (accessed 21 August 2017).
200. Fletcher, J. (2010). Spillover effects of inclusion of classmates with emotional problems on test scores in early elementary school. Online document at: www.researchgate.net/publication/46508723_Spillover_Effects_of_Inclusion_of_Classmates_with _Emotional_Problems_on_Test_scores_in_Early_Elementary_School (accessed 25 September 2017).
201. Fried, L., Konza, D., & Mulcahy, P. (2012). Paraprofessionals implementing a research-based reading intervention. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 17, 1: 35-54.
202. Fry, E. (1977). Fry’s Readability Graph: Clarifications, validity, and extension to Level 17. Journal of Reading, 21, 2: 242-252.
203. Gage, M. (2017). Methods of interoperability: Moodle and WeBWork. Journal of Learning Analytics, 4, 2: 22-35.
204. Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York: Basic Books.
205. Gardner, S. (2017). Counting words: Successful sentences for beginning ESL adult learners using the product approach. TESOL Journal, 8, 2: 367-384.
206. Gatling, A. & Vaughn, M.H. (2015). Engineering encounters: Engineering adaptations. Science and Children, 53, 1: 74-79.
207. Gissel, S.T. (2015). Scaffolding students’ independent decoding of unfamiliar text with a prototype of an eBook-feature. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 14: 439-470.
208. Glaser, R. (1977). Adaptive education: Individual diversity and learning. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston.
209. Glazzard, J. (2013). Critical interrogation of the contemporary discourses associated with inclusive education in England. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 13, 3: 182-188.
210. Glazzard, J. (2014). The Standards Agenda: Reflections of a special educational needs coordinator. Support for Learning, 29, 1: 39-53.
211. Goad, C. (2015). Apps to support diverse learners in the classroom. Edutopia website online document at: www.edutopia.org/blog/apps-support-diverse-learnersclassroom-chester-goad (accessed 8 September 2017).
212. Goddard, A. (1995). From product to process in curriculum planning: A view from Britain. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 5: 258-263.
213. Gormally, C. (2017). Deaf, hard-of-hearing, and hearing signing undergraduates’ attitudes toward science in inquiry-based biology laboratory classes. CBE - Life Sciences Education, 16, 1, Article 6. doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-06-0194.
214. Gorski, P. (2008). The myth of the ‘Culture of Poverty’. Educational Leadership, 65, 7: 32-36.
215. Gorski, P. (2010). Unlearning the deficit ideology and the scornful gaze: Thoughts on authenticating class discourse in education. Online document at: www.edchange.org/publications/deficit-ideology-scornful-gaze.pdf (accessed 5 October 2017).
216. Gould, J. (2017). Towards understanding the under-recognition of girls and women on the autism spectrum. Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice, 21, 6: 703-705.
217. Griffin-Shirley, N., Banda, D.R., Ajuwon, P.M., Cheon, J., Lee, J., Park, H.R., & Lyngdoh, S.N. (2017). A survey on the use of mobile applications for people who are visually impaired. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 111, 4: 307-323.
218. Haelermans, C., Ghysels, J., & Prince, F. (2015). Increasing performance by differentiated teaching? Experimental evidence of the student benefits of digital differentiation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46, 6: 1161-1174.
219. Hagge, J. (2017). Scratching beyond the surface of literacy: Programming for early adolescent gifted students. Gifted Child Today, 40, 3: 154-162.
220. Hall, S. (1997). The problem with differentiation. School Science Review, 78, 284: 95-98.
221. Hamilton, B. (2015). Integrating technology in the classroom: Tools to meet the need of every student. Arlington, VA: International Society for Technology in Education.
222. Harkin, E., Doyle, A., & McGuckin, C. (2015). Screening and assessment of specific learning disabilities in higher education institutes in the Republic of Ireland. Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools, 25, 1: 13-23.
223. Hart, B. & Risley, R.T. (1995). Meaningful differences in everyday experiences of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
224. Hatlen, P. (2017). Responsible inclusion belongs in an array of placement options. Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired. Online document at: www.tsbvi.edu/technology/118-general-1/24-responsible-inclusion-belongsin-an-array-of-placement-options (accessed 24 September 2017).
225. Hattie, J. & Yates, G. (2014). Visible learning and the science of how we learn. London and New York: Routledge.
226. Hayes, L. & Lillenstein, J. (2015). A framework for coherence: College and career readiness standards, multi-tiered systems of support, and educator effectiveness. Special Issues Brief. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
227. Hehir, T., Grindal, T., Freeman, B., Lamoreau, R., Borquaye, Y., & Burke, S. (2016). A survey of the evidence on inclusive education. Sao Paulo: Instituto Alana & Abt Associates.
228. Hemmingsson, H., Lidstrom, H., & Nygard, L. (2009). Use of assistive technology devices in mainstream schools. Students’ perspective. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63, 4: 461-470.
229. Henfield, M.S., Woo, H., & Bang, N.M. (2017). Gifted ethnic minority students and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61, 1: 3-19.
230. Hernandez, D.A., Hueck, S., & Charley, C. (2016). General education and special education teachers’ attitudes towards inclusion. Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals, autumn Issue: 79-93.
231. Hewitt, J., Hewitson, C., O’Toole, G., & Haywood, N. (2009). Sensory access in higher education: Guidance Report 2009. London: Equality Challenge Unit.
232. Hirsch, E.D. (2016). Why knowledge matters: Rescuing our children from failed educational theories. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
233. Hobgood, B. & Ormsby, L. (2011). Inclusion in the 21st century: Differentiating with technology. University of North Carolina website online document at: www.learnnc.org/lp/editions/every-learner/6776 (accessed 7 September 2017).
234. Hoffman, J.V. & Duffy, G.G. (2016). Does thoughtfully adaptive teaching actually exist? A challenge to teacher educators. Theory into Practice, 55, 3: 172-179.
235. Hogan, D. (2014). Why is Singapore’s school system so successful, and is it a model for the West? The Conversation. Online document at: http://the conversation.com/why-is-singapores-school-system-so-successful-and-is-it-amodel-for-the-west-22917 (accessed 2 October 2017).
236. Holland, K. (2012). Vision and learning. In L. Peer & G. Reid (Eds.) Special educational needs: A guide for inclusive practice (pp. 112-126). London: Sage.
237. Hollingsworth, J.R. & Ybarra, S.E. (2009). Explicit Direct Instruction (EDI): The power of the well-crafted, well-taught lesson. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
238. Hong, B.S. (2015). Qualitative analysis of the barriers college students with disabilities experience in higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 56, 3: 209-226.
239. Hornby, G. & Witte, C. (2010). Parent involvement in inclusive primary schools in New Zealand: Implications for improving practice and for teacher education. International Journal of Whole Schooling, 6, 1: 27-38.
240. Hosford, S. & O’Sullivan, S. (2016). A climate for self-efficacy: The relationship between school climate and teacher efficacy for inclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20, 6: 604-621.
241. Howell, D.D., Tseng, D.C., & Colorado-Resa, J. (2017). Fast assessments with digital tools using multiple-choice questions. College Teaching, 65, 3: 145-147.
242. Hsu, C.F. & Huang, I.T. (2017). Are international students quiet in class? The influence of teacher confirmation on classroom apprehension and willingness to talk in class. Journal of International Students, 7, 1: 38-52.
243. Hsu, H.W. (2009). Helping less proficient children in multilevel classrooms. In Language Conference Proceedings (pp. 52-66). University of Essex. Online document at: www.essex.ac.uk/linguistics/department/events/langue/2008/proceedings/pdfs/Hsu%20%20Hsiao-Wen.pdf (accessed 11 June 2017).
244. Hughes, C.A., Morris, J.R., Therrien, W.J., & Benson, S.K. (2017). Explicit instruction: Historical and contemporary contexts. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 32, 3: 140-148.
245. Hunt, E. (2011). Human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
246. Hunt, E. & Jaeggi, S.M. (2013). Challenges for research in intelligence. Journal of Intelligence (open access), 1: 36-54.
247. Ilik, S.S. & Sari, H. (2016). Assessing the effectiveness of direct instruction method in teaching students with learning disabilities about concepts of science and technology lesson. The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education, 6, 1: 31-41.
248. Inclusive Schools Network. (2015). Together we learn better: Inclusive schools benefit all children. Online document at: http://inclusiveschools.org/together-we-learnbetter-inclusive-schools-benefit-all-children/ (accessed 26 September 2017).
249. Institute for the Study of Developmental Disabilities. (1999). Curriculum modifi -cations and adaptations: Tools for teachers. Indiana University, Bloomington, IN. Online document at: http://njcdd.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/toolsteacherspart2.pdf (accessed 17 September 2017).
250. Janney, R.E. & Snell. M.E. (2013). Modifying schoolwork (3rd edn). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
251. Jones, J.P. & Tiller, M. (2017). Using concrete manipulatives in mathematical instruction. Dimensions of Early Childhood, 45, 1: 18-23.
252. Jones, R.E. & Ball, C.R. (2012). Addressing response to intervention imple -mentation: Questions from the field. Psychology in the Schools, 49, 3: 207-310.
253. Jorgensen, R. (2011). Language, culture and learning mathematics: A Bourdieuian analysis of indigenous learning. In C. Wyatt-Smith, J. Elkins, & S. Gunn (Eds.) Multiple perspectives on difficulties in learning literacy and numeracy (pp. 315-329). Dordrecht: Springer.
254. Kalenkoski, C.M. & Pabilonia, S.W. (2017). Does high school homework increase academic achievement? Education Economics, 25, 1: 45-59.
255. Kanfush, P.M. (2014). Dishing Direct Instruction: Teachers and parents tell all! Qualitative Report, 19, 1: 1-13.
256. Kauchak, D.P. & Eggen, P.D. (2012). Learning and teaching: Research-based methods (6th edn). Boston, MA: Pearson.
257. Kauffman, J.M. & Badar, J. (2017). It’s instruction over place - not the other way around! Phi Delta Kappan, 98, 4: 55-59.
258. Kauffman, J.M. & Landrum, T.J. (2012). Characteristics of emotional and behavioral disorders of children and youth (10th edn). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
259. Kauffman, J.M. & Hallahan, D.P. (Eds.). (2005). The illusion of full inclusion: A comprehensive critique of a current special education bandwagon (2nd edn). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
260. Kea, C., Campbell-Whatley, G., & Richards, H.V. (2006). Becoming culturally responsive educators. Tempe, AZ: NCCREST.
261. Kemp, C.R. (2016). Early childhood inclusion in Australia. Infants and Young Children, 29, 3: 178-187.
262. Kendall, L. (2016). Higher education and disability: Exploring student experiences. Cogent Education, 3, 1: Article 1256142.
263. Kilpatrick, S., Johns, S., Barnes, R., Fischer, S., McLennan, D., & Magnussen, K. (2017). Exploring the retention and success of students with disability in Australian higher education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21, 7: 747-762.
264. Kim, J. & Kimm, C.H. (2017). Functional technology for individuals with intellectual disabilities: Meta-analysis of mobile device-based interventions. Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship, 6, 1: 1-22.
265. Kim, J.R. (2011). Influence of teacher preparation programmes on pre-service teachers’ attitude toward inclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15, 3: 355-377.
266. Kim, M.M. (2015). Peer tutoring at colleges and universities. College and University, 90, 4: 2-7.
267. Klute, M., Apthorp, H., Harlacher, J., & Reale, M. (2017). Formative assessment and elementary school student academic achievement: A review of the evidence. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. Online document at: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs (accessed 4 September 2017).
268. Knackendoffel, A., Dettmer, P., & Thurston, L.P. (2017). Collaborating, con -sulting, and working in teams for students with special needs (8th edn). Boston, MA: Pearson.
269. Ko, J., Sammons, P., & Bakkum, L. (2016). Effective teaching. Reading, Berkshire: Education Development Trust.
270. Kochkin, S. (2005). Prevalence of hearing loss. Better Hearing Institute. Online document at: www.betterhearing.org/hearing_loss/prevalence:of_hearing_loss/index.cfm (accessed 1 October 2017).
271. Koldenhoven, J. (1973). Mastery Learning lecture and responses. Pro Rege, 1, 4: 17-18. Online document at: http://digitalcollections.dordt.edu/pro_rege/vol1/iss4/6 (accessed 3 October 2017).
272. Krathwohl, D.R., Airasian, P.W., Cruikshank, K.A., Mayer, R.E., Pintrich, P.R., Raths, J., Wittrock, M., & Anderson, L.W. (2013). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Boston, MA: Pearson Higher Education.
273. Lancaster, J. & Bain, A. (2010). The design of pre-service inclusive education courses and their effects on self-efficacy: A comparative study. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 38, 2: 117-128.
274. Landor, F. & Perepa, P. (2017). Do resource bases enable social inclusion of students with Asperger Syndrome in a mainstream secondary school? Support for Learning, 32, 2: 129-143.
275. Larson, J. (2017). Engagement vs. involvement: Building an inclusive school com -munity. Online document at: http://hivedm.com/engagement-vs-involvementbuilding-an-inclusive-school-community/ (accessed 30 August 2017).
276. LDAA (Learning Disabilities Association of America). (2017). Full inclusion of students with learning disabilities in regular education classrooms. Online document at: ldaamerica.org/advocacy/lda-position-papers/full-inclusion-ofall-students-with-learning-disabilities-in-the-regular-education-classroom/ (accessed 25 September 2017).
277. Legewie, J. & DiPrete, T.A. (2014).The high school environment and the gender gap in science and engineering. Sociology of Education, 87, 4: 259-280.
278. Lennon, S. (2017). Questioning for controversial and critical thinking dialogues in the social studies classroom. Issues in Teacher Education, 26, 1: 3-16.
279. Leslie, V. (2011). Supporting children with physical and sensory disability. In G. Knowles (Ed.) Supporting inclusive practice (2nd edn, pp. 98-117). Abingdon: Routledge.
280. Limbrick, L., Wheldall, K., & Madelaine, A. (2012). Do boys need different remedial reading instruction from girls? Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 17, 1: 1-15.
281. Lindqvist, G. (2013). SENCOs: Vanguards or in vain? Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 13, 3: 198-207.
282. Litster, K. & Roberts, J. (2011). The self-concept and perceived competencies of gifted and non-gifted students: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 11, 2: 130-140.
283. Locke, J., Shih, W., Kretzmann, M., & Kasari, C. (2016). Examining playground engagement between elementary school children with and without autism spectrum disorder. Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice, 20, 6: 653-662.
284. Logsdon, A. (2012). Top 6 reasons parents are important to the special education team. Online document at: http://learningdisabilities.about.com/od/publicschoolprograms/tp/parentparticipa.htm (accessed 14 August 2017).
285. MacBeath, J., Galton, M., Steward, S., MacBeath, A., & Page, C. (2006). The costs of inclusion. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Faculty of Education.
286. MacCullagh, L., Bosanquet, A., & Badcock, N.A. (2017). University students with dyslexia: A qualitative exploratory study of learning practices, challenges and strategies. Dyslexia, 23: 3-23.
287. MacInnis, C. & Hemming, H. (1995). Linking the needs of students with learning disabilities to a whole language curriculum. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 9: 535-544.
288. Mader, J. (2017). How teacher training hinders special-needs students. The Atlantic Daily, 1 March. Online document at: www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2017/03/how-teacher-training-hinders-special-needs-students/518286/ (accessed 26 September 2017).
289. Maeng, J. & Bell, R.L. (2015). Differentiating science instruction: Secondary science teachers’ practices. International Journal of Science Education, 37, 13: 2065-2090.
290. Magno, C. (2014). Portfolio assessment. Online document at: www.slideshare.net/crlmgn/portfolio-assessment-36471837 (accessed 5 September 2017).
291. Maher, D. (2012). Teaching literacy in primary schools using an interactive wholeclass technology: Facilitating student-to-student whole-class dialogic interactions. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 21, 1: 137-152.
292. Male, D.B. (2011). The impact of a professional development programme on teachers’ attitudes towards inclusion. Support for Learning, 26, 4: 182-186.
293. Margot, K. & Rinn, A.N. (2016). Perfectionism in gifted adolescents: A replication and extension. Journal of Advanced Academics, 27, 3: 190-209.
294. Massingill, C.S. (2011). An investigation of inclusionary practices by general education teachers in middle school classrooms. ProQuest LLC Dissertation from University of Maryland, College Park. ERIC document ED534642.
295. Masters, G. (2016). A commitment to growth. Teacher Magazine, 2 November. Online document at: www.teachermagazine.com.au/geoff-masters/article/a-commitment-to-growth?utm_source=Campaign%20Monitor&utm_medium=bulletin&utm_content=November%202%202016 (accessed 2 October 2017).
296. Masters, G. (2017). Improving learning with technology. RD Research Developments [ACER online], October: 1.
297. Matton, K. (2010). Adapting instructional materials for the inclusive classroom. Online document at: http://voices.yahoo.com/adapting-instructional-materials-7257088.html?cat=4 (accessed 3 April 2012).
298. Matuk, C.F., Linn, M.C., & Eylon, B.S. (2015). Technology to support teachers using evidence from student work to customize technology-enhanced inquiry units. Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 43, 2: 229-257.
299. McDonald, J. (2017). Assessment methods: A look at formal and informal techniques. New York University website. Online document at: http://teachereducation.steinhardt.nyu.edu/assessment-methods/ (accessed 7 September 2017).
300. McGowan, V.C., Ventura, M., & Bell, P. (2017). Engineering encounters: Reverse engineering. Science and Children, 54, 8: 68-72.
301. McGregor, K.K., Langenfeld, N., Van Horne, S., Oleson, J., Anson, M., & Jacobson, W. (2016). The university experiences of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 31, 2: 90-102.
302. McKeown, S. & McGlashon, A. (2015). Brilliant ideas for using ICT in the inclusive classroom (2nd edn). Abingdon: Routledge.
303. McLaughlin, G.H. (1969). SMOG Grading: A new readability formula. Journal of Reading, 12: 639-646.
304. McLoyd, V.C. (1998). Socio-economic disadvantage and child development. American Psychologist, 53: 185-204.
305. McMaster, K.L., Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L.S. (2006). Research on peer-assisted learning strategies: The promise and limitations of peer-mediated instruction. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 22, 1: 5-25.
306. McWhirter, P.T., Brandes, J.A., Williams-Diehm, K.L., & Hackett, S. (2016). Interpersonal and relational orientation among pre-service educators: Differential effects on attitudes toward inclusion of students with disabilities. Teacher Development, 20, 1: 1-17.
307. Meyer, H. (2017). Integrating engineering into an urban science classroom. Journal of Urban Learning, Teaching, and Research, 13: 112-123.
308. Mihret, D.G., Abayadeera, N., Watty, K., & McKay, J. (2017). Teaching auditing using cases in an online learning environment: The role of e-portfolio assessment. Accounting Education, 26, 4: 335-339.
309. Miskovic, M. & Curcic, S. (2016). Beyond inclusion: Reconsidering policies, curriculum, and pedagogy for Roma students. International Journal of Multicultural Education, 18, 2: 1-14.
310. Mitchell, D. (2015). Education that fits: Review of international trends in education of students with special educational needs (2nd edn). Canterbury, NZ: University of Canterbury.
311. Mitchell, I., Keast, S., Panizzon, D., & Mitchell, J. (2017). Using ‘Big Ideas’ to enhance teaching and student learning. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 23, 5: 596-610.
312. Monsen, J.J., Ewing, D.L., & Kwoka, M. (2014). Teachers’ attitudes towards inclusion, perceived adequacy of support and classroom learning environment. Learning Environments Research, 17, 1: 113-126.
313. Montenegro, E. & Jankowski, N.A. (2017). Equity and assessment: Moving towards culturally responsive assessment (Occasional Paper No. 29). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois and Indiana University, National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment.
314. Moola, F. (2015). The road to the Ivory Tower: The learning experiences of students with disabilities at the University of Manitoba. Qualitative Research in Education, 4, 1: 45-70.
315. Morano, S. & Riccomini, P.J. (2017). Reexamining the literature: The impact of peer tutoring on higher order learning. Preventing School Failure, 61, 2: 104-115.
316. Moriña, A. (2017). Inclusive education in higher education: Challenges and opportunities. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 32, 1: 3-17.
317. Morisano, D. & Shore, B.M. (2010). Can personal goal setting tap the potential of the gifted underachiever? Roeper Review, 32: 249-258.
318. Moshe, A. (2017). Inclusion Assistants in general education settings: A model for in-service training. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5, 2: 209-216.
319. Mugford, L. (1970). A new way of predicting readability. Reading, 4: 31-35.
320. Mulholland, M. & O’Connor, U. (2016). Collaborative classroom practice for inclusion: Perspectives of classroom teachers and learning support/resource teachers. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20, 10: 1070-1083.
321. Murchland, S. & Parkyn, H. (2011). Promoting participation in schoolwork: Assistive technology use by children with physical disabilities. Assistive Technology, 23, 2: 93-105.
322. Murphy, M.B. & Shapiro, G.R. (2008). NLD from the inside out. London: Jessica Kingsley.
323. Naik, N. (2017). Dual PowerPoint presentation approach for students with special educational needs and note-takers. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 32, 1: 146-152.
324. National Centre for Education Statistics. (2004). Trends in educational equity of girls and women. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences.
325. NCEERA (National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance). (2013). Do disadvantaged students have equal access to effective teaching? NCEE Study Snapshot 2014-4001. Jessup, MD: NCEERA.
326. NCSE National Council for Special Education: Ireland. (2013). Continuum of education provision for children with special educational needs: Review of international policies and practices. NCSE: Trim Co. Meath.
327. NCTL (National College for Teaching and Leadership: UK). (2014). National Award for SEN Coordination: Learning outcomes. London: NCTL.
328. Negrón-Gonzales, G. (2017). Constrained inclusion: Access and persistence among undocumented community college students in California’s Central Valley. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 16, 2: 105-122.
329. NIDCD (National Institute on Deafness and other Communication Disorders). (2017). Specific language impairment. Online document at: www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/specific-language-impairment (accessed 8 October 2017).
330. NIH (National Institutes of Health). (2017). Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. Online document at: www.nimh.nih.gov/health/topics/attentiondeficit-hyperactivity-disorder-adhd/index.shtml (accessed 8 October 2017).
331. NJCLD (National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities). (2017). Compre -hensive assessment and evaluation of students with learning disabilities. Online document at: www.ldonline.org/article/54711/ (accessed 7 September 2017).
332. NSW Legislative Council. (2017). Education of students with a disability or special needs in New South Wales. Report 37/Portfolio Committee 3. Sydney: The Council.
333. Ntombela, S. (2013). Inclusive education and training in South African higher education: Mapping the experiences of a student with physical disability at university. Africa Education Review, 10, 3: 483-501.
334. Nussbaum, D., Chisholm, G., Galloway, R., Dzime-Assison, V., & Doyle, J. (2017). High school students with cochlear implants: Coming together for success. Odyssey: New Directions in Deaf Education, 18: 24-27.
335. O’Neill, G. & McMahon, T. (2009). Student-centered learning: What does it mean for students and lecturers? Online ASHIE Readings. Online document at: www.aishe.org/readings/2005-1/oneill-mcmahon-Tues_19th_Oct_SCL.html (accessed 11 October 2017).
336. Oates, T. (2010). Could do better: Using international comparisons to refine the National Curriculum in England. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.
337. Ofsted (Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills). (2010). Special educational needs and disability review. Available from the Ofsted website at: www.ofsted.gov.uk.
338. Ok, M.W., Rao, K., Bryant, B.R., & McDougall, D. (2017). Universal Design for Learning in pre-K to Grade 12 classrooms: A systematic review of research. Exceptionality, 25, 2: 116-138.
339. O’Shea, A. & Meyer, R.H. (2016). A qualitative investigation of the motivation of college students with nonvisible disabilities to utilize disability services. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 29, 1: 5-23.
340. Özokcu, O., Akçamete, G., & Özyürek, M. (2017). Examining the effectiveness of direct instruction on the acquisition of social skills of mentally retarded students in regular classroom settings. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5, 4: 214-226.
341. Papagiannopoulou, E.A. & Lagopoulos, J. (2017). P300 event-related potentials in children with dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 67, 1: 99-108.
342. Parsons, S.A. (2010). Adaptive teaching: A case study of one third-grade teacher’s literacy instruction. In S. Szabo, T. Morrison, L. Martin, M. Boggs, & L. Raine (Eds.) Building literacy communities. 32nd Yearbook of the Association of Literacy Educators and Researchers (pp. 135-147). Commerce, TX: ALER.
343. Patino, E. (2017). Understanding nonverbal learning disabilities. Online document at: www.understood.org/en/learning-attention-issues/child-learning-disabilities/nonverbal-learning-disabilities/understanding-nonverbal-learningdisabilities (accessed 7 October 2017).
344. Paton, G. (2012). Ofsted inspections may be damaging lessons. The Telegraph (online), 16 March. Online document at: www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/9149277/Ofsted-inspections-may-be-damaging-lessons.html (accessed 10 October 2017).
345. Patterson, A. (2011). Working with the ‘experts’. In G. Richards & F. Armstrong (Eds.) Teaching and learning in diverse and inclusive classrooms (pp. 145-155). Abingdon: Routledge.
346. Paul, J. (2017). How adaptive learning is transforming teaching and learning. Online document at: www.d2l.com/blog/adaptive-learning-transformingteaching-learning/ (accessed 9 September 2017).
347. Perles, K. (2012). Inclusion for special education students: Advantages and benefits. Online document at: www.brighthubeducation.com/special-ed-inclusionstrategies/66128-advantages-and-benefits-of-inclusion/ (accessed 25 September 2017).
348. Peterson, J.M. & Hittie, M.M. (2010). Inclusive teaching: The journey toward effective schools for all learners (2nd edn). Boston, MA: Pearson-Merrill.
349. Piaget, J. (1963). Origins of intelligence in children. New York: Norton.
350. Pikulski, J.J. & Chard, D.J. (2005). Fluency: Bridge between decoding and reading comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 58, 6: 510-519.
351. Pirini, J. (2017). Peer tutoring: A training and facilitation guide. Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
352. Polikoff, M.S. & Porter, A.C. (2014). Instructional alignment as a measure of teaching quality. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36, 4: 399-416.
353. Priyadarshini, S.S. & Thangarajathi, S. (2017). Effect of selected variables on regular school teachers’ attitude towards inclusive education. Journal on Educational Psychology, 10, 3: 28-38.
354. QCAA (Queensland Curriculum and Assessment Authority). (2014). Inclusive practice: Assessment for learning. Brisbane: Queensland Government.
355. Rakap, S. & Parlak-Rakap, A. (2011). Effectiveness of embedded instruction in early childhood special education: A literature review. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 19, 1: 79-96.
356. Räty, L.M.O., Kontu, E.K., & Pirttimaa, R.A. (2016). Teaching children with intellectual disabilities: Analysis of research-based recommendations. Journal of Education and Learning, 5, 2: 318-336.
357. Raveau, M. (2005). Hares, tortoises and the social construction of the pupil: Differentiated learning in French and English primary schools. British Educational Research Journal, 31, 4: 459-479.
358. Reeve, M. (2015). The role of the SENCo: What do you need to know? Online document at: www.specialneedsjungle.com/the-role-of-the-senco-what-do-youneed-to-know/ (accessed 30 August 2017).
359. Regier, N. (2012). 60 formative assessment strategies. Website of Regier Educational Resources. Online document at: www.stma.k12.mn.us/documents/DW/Q_Comp/FormativeAssessStrategies.pdf (accessed 4 September 2017).
360. Reiser, B.J. (2014). Adapting curriculum materials to align with NGSS, Grades K-5. Online document at: www.academia.edu/7006107/Adapting_Curric ulum_Materials_to_Align_with_NGSS_Grades_K-5 (accessed 16 Septem -ber 2017).
361. Reynolds, M., Wheldall, K., & Madelaine, A. (2010). Components of effective early reading interventions for young struggling readers. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 15, 2: 171-192.
362. Reynolds, T. (2016). Striving for discussion: An analysis of a teacher educator’s comments in whole-class conversation. Studying Teacher Education, 12, 2: 205-221.
363. Rinehold, S. (2017). Inquiry based learning. Teacher Magazine [online], ACER, 5 October.
364. Roberts, J.L. & Inman, T.F. (2009). Assessing differentiated student products. Waco, TX: Prufrock.
365. Rosenman, S. & Madelaine, A. (2012). Predicting literacy achievement in young English language learners: A question of language proficiency or of learning difficulty? Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 17, 1: 17-34.
366. Roth, K., Zittel, L., Pyfer, J., & Auxter, D. (2017). Principles and methods of adapted physical education and recreation (12th edn). New York; Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
367. Round, P.N., Subban, P.K., & Sharma, U. (2016). ‘I don’t have time to be this busy.’ Exploring the concerns of secondary school teachers towards inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20, 2: 185-198.
368. Rouse, M. & Florian, L. (2006). Inclusion and achievement: Student achievement in secondary schools with higher and lower proportions of pupils designated as having special educational needs. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 10: 481-493.
369. Rowe, K. (2006). Effective teaching practices for students with and without learning difficulties. Australian Journal of Learning Disabilities, 11, 2: 99-115.
370. Ruijs, N.M., Van der Veen, I., & Peetsma, T.D. (2010). Inclusive education and students without special educational needs. Educational Research, 52, 4: 351-390.
371. Sahragard, R. & Heidari, K. (2017). How much mediation in dynamic assessment for gifted students? Up to critical thinking please! Gifted Education International, 33, 1: 34-44.
372. Santos, R.M. & Ostrosky, M.M. (2011). Understanding the impact of language differences on classroom behaviour. Center on the Social and Emotional Foundations for Early Learning (US). Online document at: http://journal.naeyc.org/btj/200307/Understanding.pdf (accessed 7 October 2017).
373. Schwab, S., Hellmich, F., & Görel, G. (2017). Self-efficacy of prospective Austrian and German primary school teachers regarding the implementation of inclusive education. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 17, 3: 205-217.
374. Scottish Government. (2010). Building curriculum for excellence through positive relationships and behaviour. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
375. Scruggs, T.E. & Mastropieri, M.A. (2017). Making inclusion work with coteaching. Teaching Exceptional Children, 49, 4: 284-293.
376. Serry, T., Oates, J., Ennals, P., Venville, A., Williams, A., Fossey, E., & Steel, G. (2017). Managing reading and related literacy difficulties: University students’ perspectives. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties. Published online 22 June.
377. SESS (Special Education Support Service [Ireland]). (2008). Science differentiation in action. Cork: SES Centre. Online document at: www.sess.ie/resources/science-differentiation-action (accessed 1 September 2017).
378. Shaddock, A., Smyth King, B., & Giorcelli, L. (2007). Project to improve the learning outcomes of students with disabilities in the early, middle and postcompulsory years of schooling: Final Report of University of Canberra-led Consortium. Canberra: Commonwealth Government of Australia.
379. Shariff, S. (2014). How digital reading and adaptive learning are revolutionizing education. Online document at: www.digitalbookworld.com/2014/how-digitalreading-and-adaptive-learning-are-revolutionizing-education/ (accessed 19 September 2017).
380. Shaughnessy, M.F. (2017). A reflective conversation with Marianne Kuzujanakis M.D.: Intricacies of Giftedness. Gifted Education International, 33, 1: 76-86.
381. Shaywitz, B.A., Lyon, G.R., & Shaywitz, S.E. (2006). The role of functional magnetic resonance imaging in understanding reading and dyslexia. Developmental Neuropsychology, 30, 1: 613-632.
382. Showers, A.H. & Kinsman, J.W. (2017). Factors that contribute to college success for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 40, 2: 81-90.
383. Simsek, A. (2016). A comparative analysis of common mistakes in achievement tests prepared by school teachers and corporate trainers. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4, 4: 477-489.
384. Smith Canter, L.L., King, L.H., Williams, J.B., Metcalf, D., & Rhys Myrick Potts, K. (2017). Evaluating pedagogy and practice of Universal Design for Learning in public schools. Exceptionality Education International, 27, 1: 1-16.
385. Smith, F., Hardman, F., Wall, K., & Mroz, M. (2004). Interactive whole class teaching in the National Literacy and Numeracy Strategies. British Educational Research Journal, 30, 3: 395-411.
386. Smith, J., Donlan, J., & Smith, B. (2012). Helping children with autism spectrum conditions through everyday transitions. London: Jessica Kingsley.
387. Smith, S.J. & Lowrey, K.A. (2017). Applying the Universal Design for Learning framework for individuals with intellectual disability: The future must be now. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 55, 1: 48-51.
388. Smutny, J.F., Walker, S.Y., & Honeck, E.I. (2016). Teaching gifted children in today’s preschool and primary classrooms: Identifying, nurturing, and challenging children ages 4-9. Golden Valley, MN: Free Spirit Publishing.
389. Sniatecki, J.L., Perry, H.B., & Snell, L.H. (2015). Faculty attitudes and knowledge regarding college students with disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 28, 3: 259-275.
390. Somers, T. (2017). Content and Language Integrated Learning and the inclusion of immigrant minority language students: A Research Review. International Review of Education, 63, 4: 495-520.
391. Spence, R.S. (2010). The effects of inclusion on the academic achievement of regular education students. Electronic Theses & Dissertations, 369. Online document at: http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd/369 (accessed 17 June 2017).
392. Sternberg, R.J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
393. Teach.com (2017). What is inclusion? Online document at: https://teach.com/inclusive-education/ (accessed 21 November 2017).
394. Thompson, S.A. & Timmons, V. (2017). Authentic inclusion in two secondary schools: ‘It’s the full meal deal. It’s not just in the class. It’s everywhere.’ Exceptionality Education International, 27, 1: 62-84.
395. Tingir, S., Cavlazoglu, B., Caliskan, O., Koklu, O., & Intepe-Tingir, S. (2017). Effects of mobile devices on K-12 students’ achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33, 4: 355-369.
396. Tomlin, C. (2012). Children: More alike than different. Early Childhood News. Online document at: www.earlychildhoodnews.com/earlychildhood/article_view.aspx?ArticleID=535 (accessed online 8 October 2017).
397. Tomlinson, C.A. (2014). The differentiated classroom (2nd edn). Alexandria: ASCD.
398. Topping, K. & Maloney, S. (2005). Introduction. In K. Topping & S. Maloney (Eds.) The Routledge-Falmer Reader in Inclusive education (pp. 1-14), London: Routledge-Falmer.
399. Traxler, J. (2016). Inclusion in an age of mobility. Research in Learning Technology, 24: online, n.p.
400. Tsuei, M. (2017). Learning behaviours of low-achieving children’s mathematics learning in use of helping tools in a synchronous peer-tutoring system. Interactive Learning Environments, 25, 2: 147-161.
401. UNESCO. (2009). Policy guidelines on inclusive education. Paris: UNESCO.
402. UNESCO. (2011). Education: Inclusive education. Online documents at: www.unesco.org/new/en/education/themes/strengthening-education-systems/inclusive-education/.
403. UNESCO. (2017). Different meanings of ‘curriculum’. Online document at: www.unesco.org/new/en/education/themes/strengthening-educationsystems/quality-framework/technical-notes/different-meaning-of-curriculum/ (accessed 14 September 2017).
404. UNICEF. (2014). Parents, family and community participation in inclusive education. New York: UNICEF.
405. UNICEF. (2017). Inclusive education. Online document at: www.unicef.org/education/bege_61717.html (accessed 22 September 2017).
406. University of Nebraska-Lincoln. (2006). Cognitive strategy instruction: Teaching strategies. Online document at: http://cehs.unl.edu/csi/teachingstrategy.shtml (accessed 30 July 2017).
407. Vaillant, D. (2011). Preparing teachers for inclusive education in Latin America. Prospects: Quarterly Review of Comparative Education, 41, 3: 385-398.
408. Valente, J.M. (2017). Rethinking inclusion as mundanity: Insights from an experimental bilingual kindergarten classe LSF at École Maternelle Gabriel Sajus in France. Early Childhood Education Journal, 45, 4: 553-562.
409. Varcoe, L. & Boyle, C. (2014). Pre-service primary teachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education. Educational Psychology, 34, 3: 323-337.
410. Vatterott, C. (2017). One-size-doesn’t-fit-all homework. Educational Leadership, 74, 6: 34-39.
411. Vincente, J. (2017). What teacher collaboration looks like. American Educator, 41, 2: 22-23.
412. Vogt, F. & Rogalla, M. (2009). Developing adaptive teaching competency through coaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 8: 1051-1060.
413. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
414. Wang, M. (1991). Adaptive education strategies: Building on diversity. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
415. Wang, Y., Mu, G.M., Wang, Z., Deng, M., Cheng, L., & Wang, H. (2015). Multidimensional classroom support to inclusive education teachers in Beijing. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 62, 6: 644-659.
416. Warren, S.R., Martinez, R.S., & Sortino, L.A. (2016). Exploring the quality indicators of a successful full-inclusion preschool program. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 30, 4: 540-553.
417. Washburne, C. (1925). Adapting the schools to individual differences. 24th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education: Part 2. Bloomington. IL: NSSE.
418. Watson, S. (2016). The inclusive classroom as the best placement. Online document at: www.thoughtco.com/inclusive-classroom-as-best-placement-3111022 (accessed 26 September 2017).
419. Weedon, C. (2012). The potential impact and influence of the social model of disability. In L. Peer & G. Reid (Eds.) Special educational needs: A guide for inclusive practice (pp. 51-61). London: Sage.
420. Weiten, W. (2017). Psychology: Themes and variations (10th edn). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth-Cengage.
421. Welker, B. (2017). How adaptive learning is changing traditional teaching methods. Online document at: http://www.gettingsmart.com/2017/07/how-adaptivelearning-is-changing-traditional-teaching-methods/ (accessed 9 September 2017).
422. Wendling, B. J. & Mather, N. (2009). Essentials of evidence-based academic interventions. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
423. Westwood, P. (2001). Making special schools ordinary: Is this inspirational or confused thinking? International Journal of Special Education, 16, 1: 7-20.
424. Westwood. P. (2002). Are we making teaching too difficult? A critical look at differentiation in the classroom. Hong Kong Special Education Forum, 5, 1: 13-29.
425. Westwood, P. (2011). The problem with problems: Potential difficulties in using problem-based learning as the core method for teaching mathematics in the primary years. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 16, 1: 5-18.
426. Westwood, P. (2014). Teaching spelling: Exploring commonsense strategies and best practices. London: Routledge.
427. Westwood, P. (2015). Commonsense methods for children with special educational needs (7th edn). London: Routledge.
428. Westwood, P. (2016). What teachers need to know about differentiated instruction. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
429. Whyte, B. & Deane, P. (2017). Best intentions: Using convergent practices divergently. Teachers and Curriculum, 17, 1: 31-37.
430. Wilberger, S. & Palko, S. (2009). Count me in from the start: The power of preschool inclusion. Richmond, VA: Virginia Department of Education, Training and Technical Assistance Centre.
431. Williams, K. (2017). Differentiation in the science classroom. Online document at: www.slideshare.net/williamskristi/differentiation-in-the-science-classroom. (accessed 10 October 2017).
432. Williams, K., Swift, J., Williams, H., & Van Daal, V. (2017). Raising children’s self-efficacy through parental involvement in homework. Educational Research, 59, 3: 316-334.
433. Williamson, P. & McLeskey, J. (2011). An investigation into the nature of inclusion problem-solving teams. Teacher Educator, 46, 4: 316-334.
434. Willings, C. (2016). Teaching students with visual impairments: Accommodations and modifications. Online document at: www.teachingvisuallyimpaired.com accommodations-modifications.html (accessed 7 September 2017).
435. Woods, K. (2012). The role and perspectives of practitioner educational psy -chologists. In L. Peer & G. Reid (Eds.) Special educational needs: A guide for inclusive practice (pp. 255-272). London: Sage.
436. Woolfolk, A. (2015). Educational psychology (13th edn). New York: Pearson.
437. Wren, A. (2017). Understanding the role of the Teaching Assistant: Comparing the views of pupils with SEN and TAs within mainstream primary schools. Support for Learning, 32, 1: 4-19.
438. Wright, A.M. & Meyer, K.R. (2017). Exploring the relationship between students needing accommodations and instructor self-efficacy in complying with accom -modations. Higher Learning Research Communications, 7, 1: 65-83.
439. Wycislik-Wilson, M. (2017). The best free text to speech software. Online document at Techradar website: www.techradar.com/news/the-best-free-text-to-speechsoftware (accessed 6 September 2017).
440. Zappaterra, T. (2016). Dyslexia in the university. Guidelines for inclusion and teaching of the University of Florence. Education Sciences & Society: Open Access Journal. Online document at: http://ojs.francoangeli.it/_ojs/index.php/ess/article/view/3498 (accessed 14 October 2017).
441. Ziegler, A. & Stoeger, H. (2017). Systemic gifted education: A theoretical introduction. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61, 3: 183-193.
442. Zou, D. (2017). Vocabulary acquisition through cloze exercises, sentence-writing and composition-writing: Extending the evaluation component of the involve -ment load hypothesis. Language Teaching Research, 21, 1: 54-75.