Efficacy of peer Support arrangements to increase peer interaction and AAC use

American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

Volumn 122, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 25-48

  Biggs, Elizabeth E ^a   Carter, Erik W ^a   Gustafson, Jenny ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC); Collaborative planning; Inclusive education; Intellectual disability; Peer interaction

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; COMMUNICATION DISORDERS; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY; MALE; PEER GROUP; PROCEDURES;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; COMMUNICATION DISORDERS; EDUCATION, SPECIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; PEER GROUP;

EID: 85018644984     PISSN: 19447515     EISSN: 19447558     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1352/1944-7558-122.1.25     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Brock, M. E., Biggs, E., Carter, E. W., Cattey, G., & Raley, K. (2016). Implementation and generalization of peer support arrangements for students with significant disabilities in inclusive classrooms. The Journal of Special Education, 49, 221-232. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1177/0022466915594368
2. Carter, E. W., Asmus, J., Moss, C. K., Amirault, K. A., Biggs, E. E., Bolt, D.,⋯ Wier, K. (2016). Randomized evaluation of peer supports arrangements to support the inclusion of high school students with severe disabilities. Exceptional Children, 82, 209-233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0014402915598780
3. Carter, E. W., Cushing, L. S., & Kennedy, C. H. (2009). Peer support strategies: Improving all students' social lives and learning. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
4. Carter, E. W., Moss, C. K., Hoffman, A., Chung, Y. C., & Sisco, L. (2011). Efficacy and social validity of peer support arrangements for adolescents with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 78, 107-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001440291107800107
5. Carter, E. W., Sisco, L. G., Brown, L., Brickham, D., & Al-Khabbaz, Z. A. (2008). Peer interactions and academic engagement of youth with developmental disabilities in inclusive middle and high school classrooms. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 113, 479-494. http://dx.doi.org/10.1352/2008.113:479-494
6. Chung, Y., Carter, E. W., & Sisco, L. G. (2012). Social interaction of students with severe disabilities who use augmentative and alternative communication in inclusive classrooms. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 117, 349-367. http://dx. doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-117.5.349
7. Gast, D. L., Lloyd, B. P., & Ledford, J. R. (2014). Multiple baseline and multiple probe designs. In D. L. Gast & J. R. Ledford (Eds.), Single subject research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (pp. 251-296). New York, NY: Routledge.
8. Giangreco, M. F. (2010). One-to-one paraprofessionals for students with disabilities in inclusive classrooms: Is conventional wisdom wrong? Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 48, 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-48.1.1
9. Hunt, P., Soto, G., Maier, J., Muller, E., & Goetz, L. (2002). Collaborative teaming to support students with augmentative and alternative communication needs in general education classrooms. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 20-35. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1080/aac.18.1.20.35
10. Kent-Walsh, J., & Light, J. (2003). General education teachers' experiences with inclusion of students who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 211-222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0743461031000112043
11. Kent-Walsh, J., & McNaughton, D. (2005). Communication partner instruction in AAC: Present practices and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21, 195-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07434610400006646
12. McLeskey, J., Waldron, N. L., Spooner, F., & Algozzine, B. (2014). Handbook of effective inclusive schools: Research and practice. New York, NY: Routledge
13. Mirenda, P. (2014). Revisiting the mosaic of supports required for including people with severe intellectual or developmental disabilities in their communities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30, 19-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2013.875590
14. Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., Davis, J. L., & Sauber, S. B. (2011). Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42, 284-299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2010.08.006
15. U. S. Department of Education. (2014). 2012 IDEA part B child count educational environments. Washington, DC: Author.