Examining the role of big data and predictive analytics on collaborative performance in context to sustainable consumption and production behaviour

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volumn 196, Issue , 2018, Pages 1508-1521

  Dubey, Rameshwar ^a   Gunasekaran, Angappa ^b   Childe, Stephen J ^c   Luo, Zongwei ^d   Wamba, Samuel Fosso ^e   Roubaud, David ^a   Foropon, Cyril ^a  

^a MONTPELLIER BUSINESS SCHOOL   (France)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

^d SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^e TOULOUSE BUSINESS SCHOOL   (France)

Author keywords

Collaboration; Inter organizational fit; Resource complementarity; Sustainable consumption; Sustainable operations; Sustainable production

Indexed keywords

INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH; PLANNING; PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS; SUPPLY CHAINS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

COLLABORATION; INTER-ORGANIZATIONAL; RESOURCE COMPLEMENTARITY; SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION; SUSTAINABLE OPERATIONS; SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION;

BIG DATA;

EID: 85048757480     PISSN: 09596526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.097     Document Type: Article

References (115)

1. Ageron, B., Gunasekaran, A., Spalanzani, A., Sustainable supply management: an empirical study. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 140:1 (2012), 168–182.
2. Agarwal, R., Dhar, V., Big data, data science, and analytics: the opportunity and challenge for IS research. Inf. Syst. Res. 25:3 (2014), 443–448.
3. Ahuja, G., Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: a longitudinal study. Adm. Sci. Q. 45:3 (2000), 425–455.
4. Akter, S., Fosso Wamba, S., Dewan, S., Why PLS-SEM is suitable for complex modelling? An empirical illustration in big data analytics quality. Prod. Plann. Contr. 28:11–12 (2017), 1011–1021.
5. Arend, R.J., Bromiley, P., Assessing the dynamic capabilities view: spare change, everyone?. Strat. Organ. 7:1 (2009), 75–90.
6. Armstrong, J.S., Overton, T.S., Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J. Market. Res. 14:3 (1977), 396–402.
7. Berg, A., Not roadmaps but toolboxes: analysing pioneering national programmes for sustainable consumption and production. J. Consum. Pol. 34:1 (2011), 9–23.
8. Bocken, N.M., Short, S.W., Rana, P., Evans, S., A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. J. Clean. Prod. 65 (2014), 42–56.
9. Bowen, F.E., Cousins, P.D., Lamming, R.C., Farukt, A.C., The role of supply management capabilities in green supply. Prod. Oper. Manag. 10:2 (2001), 174–189.
10. Brandon-Jones, E., Squire, B., Autry, C.W., Petersen, K.J., A contingent resource-based perspective of supply chain resilience and robustness. J. Supply Chain Manag. 50:3 (2014), 55–73.
11. Brown, J.R., Lusch, R.F., Nicholson, C.Y., Power and relationship commitment: their impact on marketing channel member performance. J. Retailing 71:4 (1995), 363–392.
12. Cao, M., Zhang, Q., Supply chain collaboration: impact on collaborative advantage and firm performance. J. Oper. Manag. 29:3 (2011), 163–180.
13. Cannon, J.P., Doney, P.M., Mullen, M.R., Petersen, K.J., Building long-term orientation in buyer–supplier relationships: the moderating role of culture. J. Oper. Manag. 28:6 (2010), 506–521.
14. Chavez, R., Yu, W., Jacobs, M.A., Feng, M., Data-driven supply chains, manufacturing capability and customer satisfaction. Prod. Plann. Contr. 28:11–12 (2017), 906–918.
15. Chen, H., Chiang, R.H., Storey, V.C., Business intelligence and analytics: from big data to big impact. MIS Q. 36:4 (2012), 1165–1188.
16. Cheung, M.S., Myers, M.B., Mentzer, J.T., Does relationship learning lead to relationship value? A cross-national supply chain investigation. J. Oper. Manag. 28:6 (2010), 472–487.
17. Chin, W.W., Commentary: issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Q., 22(1), 1998 Vii–Xvi.
18. Childe, S.J., Case studies in the management of operations. Prod. Plann. Contr., 28(1), 2017, 1.
19. Cohen, J., Statistical Power Analyses for the Social Sciences. 1988, Lawrence Erlbauni Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
20. Das, T.K., Teng, B.S., Between trust and control: developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23:3 (1998), 491–512.
21. Davidson, R., MacKinnon, J.G., Estimation and Inference in Econometrics. 1993, Oxford University Press, New York.
22. Donaldson, L., The Contingency Theory of Organizations. 2001, Sage.
23. Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Education and training for successful career in big data and business analytics. Ind. Commerc. Train. 47:4 (2015), 174–181.
24. Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S.J., Fosso Wamba, S., Papadopoulos, T., The impact of big data on world-class sustainable manufacturing. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 84:1–4 (2016), 631–645.
25. Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S.J., Papadopoulos, T., Fosso Wamba, S., Song, M., Towards a theory of sustainable consumption and production: constructs and measurement. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 106 (2016), 78–89.
26. Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S.J., Papadopoulos, T., Luo, Z., Fosso Wamba, S., Roubaud, D., Can big data and predictive analytics improve social and environmental sustainability?. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 2017.
27. Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S.J., Papadopoulos, T., Hazen, B.T., Roubaud, D., Examining top management commitment to TQM diffusion using institutional and upper echelon theories. Int. J. Prod. Res. 56:8 (2018), 2988–3006.
28. Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S.J., Big data analytics capability in supply chain agility: the moderating effect of organizational flexibility. Manag. Decis., 2018 (in press) https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-01-2018-0119.
29. Dutta, D., Bose, I., Managing a big data project: the case of Ramco cements limited. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 165 (2015), 293–306.
30. Dyer, J.H., Singh, H., The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23:4 (1998), 660–679.
31. Dyer, J.H., Collaborative Advantage: Winning through Extended Enterprise Supplier Networks. 2000, Oxford University Press.
32. Eisenhardt, K.M., Building theories from case study research. Acad. Manag. Rev. 14:4 (1989), 532–550.
33. Eisenhardt, K.M., Martin, J.A., Dynamic capabilities: what are they?. Strat. Manag. J. 21:10/11 (2000), 1105–1121.
34. Fawcett, S.E., Magnan, G.M., Ten guiding principles for high-impact SCM. Bus. Horiz. 47:5 (2004), 67–74.
35. Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F., Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: algebra and statistics. J. Market. Res. 18:1 (1981), 39–50.
36. Fosso Wamba, S., Akter, S., Edwards, A., Chopin, G., Gnanzou, D., How ‘big data’ can make big impact: findings from a systematic review and a longitudinal case study. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 165 (2015), 234–246.
37. Fosso Wamba, S., Ngai, E.W., Riggins, F., Akter, S., Guest editorial. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 37:1 (2017), 2–9.
38. Galbraith, J.R., Organization design: an information processing view. Interfaces 4:3 (1974), 28–36.
39. Galbraith, J.R., Organizational design challenges resulting from big data. J. Org. Design 3:1 (2014), 2–13.
40. Gölzer, P., Fritzsche, A., Data-driven operations management: organisational implications of the digital transformation in industrial practice. Prod. Plann. Contr. 28:16 (2017), 1332–1343.
41. Gopal, P.R.C., Thakkar, J., Sustainable supply chain practices: an empirical investigation on Indian automobile industry. Prod. Plann. Contr. 27:1 (2016), 49–64.
42. Guide, V.D.R., Ketokivi, M., Notes from the editors: redefining some methodological criteria for the journal. J. Oper. Manag., 37, 2015 v–viii.
43. Gulati, R., Puranam, P., Tushman, M., Meta-organization design: rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts. Strat. Manag. J. 33:6 (2012), 571–586.
44. Gunasekaran, A., Papadopoulos, T., Dubey, R., Wamba, S.F., Childe, S.J., Hazen, B., Akter, S., Big data and predictive analytics for supply chain and organizational performance. J. Bus. Res. 70 (2017), 308–317.
45. Gupta, M., George, J.F., Toward the development of a big data analytics capability. Inf. Manag. 53:8 (2016), 1049–1064.
46. Hair, J.F., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M., PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet. J. Market. Theor. Pract. 19:2 (2011), 139–152.
47. Hair, J.F., Sarstedt, M., Pieper, T.M., Ringle, C.M., The use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in strategic management research: a review of past practices and recommendations for future applications. Long. Range Plan. 45:5 (2012), 320–340.
48. Hair, J.F. Jr., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C., Sarstedt, M., A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-sem). 2016, Sage Publications, Los Angeles.
49. Hampton, S.E., Strasser, C.A., Tewksbury, J.J., Gram, W.K., Budden, A.E., Batcheller, A.L., et al. Big data and the future of ecology. Front. Ecol. Environ. 11:3 (2013), 156–162.
50. Hart, P.J., Saunders, C.S., Emerging electronic partnerships: antecedents and dimensions of EDI use from the supplier's perspective. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 14:4 (1998), 87–111.
51. Harrison, J.S., Hitt, M.A., Hoskisson, R.E., Ireland, R.D., Resource complementarity in business combinations: extending the logic to organizational alliances. J. Manag. 27:6 (2001), 679–690.
52. Henseler, J., Ringle, C., Sinkovics, R., The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Adv. Int. Market. 20 (2009), 277–319.
53. Henseler, J., Dijkstra, T.K., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M., Diamantopoulos, A., Straub, D.W., Calantone, R.J., Common beliefs and reality about PLS: comments on rönkkö and evermann (2013). Organ. Res. Meth. 17:2 (2014), 182–209.
54. Holcomb, T.R., Hitt, M.A., Toward a model of strategic outsourcing. J. Oper. Manag. 25:2 (2007), 464–481.
55. Holweg, M., Disney, S., Holmström, J., Småros, J., Supply chain collaboration: making sense of the strategy continuum. Eur. Manag. J. 23:2 (2005), 170–181.
56. Huang, C.L., Vause, J., Ma, H.W., Yu, C.P., Using material/substance flow analysis to support sustainable development assessment: a literature review and outlook. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 68 (2012), 104–116.
57. Jonkutė G., Staniškis, J.K., Realising sustainable consumption and production in companies: the SUstainable and RESponsible COMpany (SURESCOM) model. J. Clean. Prod. 138 (2016), 170–180.
58. Keeso, A., Big data and environmental sustainability: a conversation starter. Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment. Working Paper Series, (14-04), 2014.
59. Ketokivi, M.A., Schroeder, R.G., Strategic, structural contingency and institutional explanations in the adoption of innovative manufacturing practices. J. Oper. Manag. 22:1 (2004), 63–89.
60. Khan, M., Hussain, M., Saber, H.M., Information sharing in a sustainable supply chain. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 181 (2016), 208–214.
61. Kock, N., WarpPLS 5.0 User Manual. 2015, ScriptWarp Systems., Laredo, TX.
62. Krishnan, R., Martin, X., Noorderhaven, N.G., When does trust matter to alliance performance?. Acad. Manag. J. 49:5 (2006), 894–917.
63. Lambe, C.J., Spekman, R.E., Hunt, S.D., Alliance competence, resources, and alliance success: conceptualization, measurement, and initial test. J. Acad. Market. Sci. 30:2 (2002), 141–158.
64. Lin, P.C., Huang, Y.H., The influence factors on choice behaviour regarding green products based on the theory of consumption values. J. Clean. Prod. 22:1 (2012), 11–18.
65. Lindell, M.K., Whitney, D.J., Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. J. Appl. Psychol. 86:1 (2001), 114–121.
66. Liu, P., Yi, S.P., Pricing policies of green supply chain considering targeted advertising and product green degree in the big data environment. J. Clean. Prod. 164 (2017), 1614–1622.
67. Luo, Z., Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S.J., Papadopoulos, T., Hazen, B., Roubaud, D., Sustainable production framework for cement manufacturing firms: a behavioural perspective. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 78 (2017), 495–502.
68. Luthra, S., Mangla, S.K., Xu, L., Diabat, A., Using AHP to evaluate barriers in adopting sustainable consumption and production initiatives in a supply chain. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 181 (2016), 342–349.
69. Mangla, S.K., Govindan, K., Luthra, S., Prioritizing the barriers to achieve sustainable consumption and production trends in supply chains using fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process. J. Clean. Prod. 151 (2017), 509–525.
70. Marginson, D., McAulay, L., Roush, M., Van Zijl, T., Performance measures and short-termism: an exploratory study. Account. Bus. Res. 40:4 (2010), 353–370.
71. McLachlin, R., Larson, P.D., Building humanitarian supply chain relationships: lessons from leading practitioners. J. Humanit. Logist. Supply Chain Manag. 1:1 (2011), 32–49.
72. Menor, L.J., Roth, A.V., New service development competence in retail banking: construct development and measurement validation. J. Oper. Manag. 25:4 (2007), 825–846.
73. Minelli, M., Chambers, M., Dhiraj, A., Big Data, Big Analytics: Emerging Business Intelligence and Analytic Trends for Today's Businesses. 2012, John Wiley & Sons.
74. Mitsuhashi, H., Greve, H.R., A matching theory of alliance formation and organizational success: complementarity and compatibility. Acad. Manag. J. 52:5 (2009), 975–995.
75. Moldan, B., Janoušková S., Hák, T., How to understand and measure environmental sustainability: indicators and targets. Ecol. Indicat. 17 (2012), 4–13.
76. Morgan, R.M., Hunt, S.D., The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. J. Market. 58:3 (1994), 20–38.
77. Moshtari, M., Inter-organizational fit, relationship management capability, and collaborative performance within a humanitarian setting. Prod. Oper. Manag. 25:9 (2016), 1542–1557.
78. Nazzal, D., Batarseh, O., Patzner, J., Martin, D.R., Product servicing for lifespan extension and sustainable consumption: an optimization approach. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 142:1 (2013), 105–114.
79. Naspetti, S., Mandolesi, S., Buysse, J., Latvala, T., Nicholas, P., Padel, S., Zanoli, R., Determinants of the acceptance of sustainable production strategies among dairy farmers: development and testing of a modified technology acceptance model. Sustainability, 9(10), 2017, 1805.
80. Norwegian Ministry of the Environment, Oslo Roundtable on Sustainable Production and Consumption. 1994.
81. Papadopoulos, T., Gunasekaran, A., Dubey, R., Fosso Wamba, S., Big data and analytics in operations and supply chain management: managerial aspects and practical challenges. Prod. Plann. Contr. 28:11–12 (2017), 873–876.
82. Peng, D.X., Lai, F., Using partial least squares in operations management research: a practical guideline and summary of past research. J. Oper. Manag. 30:6 (2012), 467–480.
83. Podsakoff, P.M., Organ, D.W., Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. J. Manag. 12:4 (1986), 531–544.
84. Podsakoff, N.P., Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 88:5 (2003), 879–903.
85. Rosenthal, R., Rosnow, R.L., Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis. 1991, McGraw-Hill Humanities Social.
86. Roy, V., Singh, S., Mapping the business focus in sustainable production and consumption literature: review and research framework. J. Clean. Prod. 150 (2017), 224–236.
87. Sarkar, M.B., Echambadi, R., Cavusgil, S.T., Aulakh, P.S., The influence of complementarity, compatibility, and relationship capital on alliance performance. J. Acad. Market. Sci. 29:4 (2001), 358–373.
88. Schoenherr, T., Speier-Pero, C., Data science, predictive analytics, and big data in supply chain management: current state and future potential. J. Bus. Logist. 36:1 (2015), 120–132.
89. Seele, P., Predictive Sustainability Control: a review assessing the potential to transfer big data driven ‘predictive policing’ to corporate sustainability management. J. Clean. Prod. 153 (2017), 673–686.
90. Seles, B.M.R.P., de Sousa Jabbour, A.B.L., Jabbour, C.J.C., de Camargo Fiorini, P., Yusoff, Y.M., Thomé A.M.T., Business opportunities and challenges as the two sides of the climate change: corporate responses and potential implications for big data management towards a low carbon society. J. Clean. Prod. 189 (2018), 763–774.
91. Shukla, M., Tiwari, M.K., Big-data analytics framework for incorporating smallholders in sustainable palm oil production. Prod. Plann. Contr. 28:16 (2017), 1365–1377.
92. Simatupang, T.M., Sridharan, R., The collaborative supply chain. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 13:1 (2002), 15–30.
93. Sivarajah, U., Kamal, M.M., Irani, Z., Weerakkody, V., Critical analysis of Big Data challenges and analytical methods. J. Bus. Res. 70 (2017), 263–286.
94. Steensma, H.K., Acquiring technological competencies through inter-organizational collaboration: an organizational learning perspective. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. 12:4 (1996), 267–286.
95. Song, M., Wang, S., Participation in global value chain and green technology progress: evidence from big data of Chinese enterprises. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Control Ser. 24:2 (2017), 1648–1661.
96. Song, M., Cen, L., Zheng, Z., Fisher, R., Liang, X., Wang, Y., Huisingh, D., How would big data support societal development and environmental sustainability? Insights and practices. J. Clean. Prod. 142 (2017), 489–500.
97. Song, M., Du, Q., Zhu, Q., A theoretical method of environmental performance evaluation in the context of big data. Prod. Plann. Contr. 28:11–12 (2017), 976–984.
98. Song, M., Peng, J., Wang, J., Dong, L., Better resource management: an improved resource and environmental efficiency evaluation approach that considers undesirable outputs. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 128 (2018), 197–205.
99. Srinivasan, R., Swink, M., An investigation of visibility and flexibility as complements to supply chain analytics: an organizational information processing theory perspective. Prod. Oper. Manag., 2017 (in press) https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12746.
100. Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A., Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strat. Manag. J. 18:7 (1997), 509–533.
101. Tukker, A., Cohen, M.J., Hubacek, K., Mont, O., Sustainable consumption and production. J. Ind. Ecol. 14:1 (2010), 1–3.
102. UNEP (United Nations) (2010) https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/945ABC_ENGLISH.pdf (date of access 15th March, 2015).
103. UNEP (United Nations), The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2017., 2017 https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/files/report/2017/TheSustainableDevelopmentGoalsReport2017.pdf (date of access 4th May 2018).
104. Vachon, S., Klassen, R.D., Environmental management and manufacturing performance: the role of collaboration in the supply chain. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 111:2 (2008), 299–315.
105. Vinkhuyzen, O.M., Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S.I., The role of moral leadership for sustainable production and consumption. J. Clean. Prod. 63 (2014), 102–113.
106. Voss, C., Tsikriktsis, N., Frohlich, M., Case research in operations management. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 22:2 (2002), 195–219.
107. Wagner, S.M., Kemmerling, R., Handling nonresponse in logistics research. J. Bus. Logist. 31:2 (2010), 357–381.
108. Waller, M.A., Fawcett, S.E., Data science, predictive analytics, and big data: a revolution that will transform supply chain design and management. J. Bus. Logist. 34:2 (2013), 77–84.
109. Wang, Q., Kayande, U., Jap, S., The seeds of dissolution: discrepancy and incoherence in buyer–supplier exchange. Market. Sci. 29:6 (2010), 1109–1124.
110. Wang, Z., Zhang, B., Yin, J., Zhang, Y., Determinants and policy implications for household electricity-saving behaviour: evidence from Beijing, China. Energy Pol. 39:6 (2011), 3550–3557.
111. Wu, K.J., Liao, C.J., Tseng, M.L., Lim, M.K., Hu, J., Tan, K., Toward sustainability: using big data to explore the decisive attributes of supply chain risks and uncertainties. J. Clean. Prod. 142 (2017), 663–676.
112. Wu, Z., Pagell, M., Balancing priorities: decision-making in sustainable supply chain management. J. Oper. Manag. 29:6 (2011), 577–590.
113. Zhao, R., Liu, Y., Zhang, N., Huang, T., An optimization model for green supply chain management by using a big data analytic approach. J. Clean. Prod. 142 (2017), 1085–1097.
114. Zhang, Y., Ren, S., Liu, Y., Si, S., A big data analytics architecture for cleaner manufacturing and maintenance processes of complex products. J. Clean. Prod. 142 (2017), 626–641.
115. Zhu, S., Song, J., Hazen, B.T., Lee, K., Cegielski, C., How supply chain analytics enables operational supply chain transparency: an organizational information processing theory perspective. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 48:1 (2018), 47–68.