Understanding Instructional Quality Through a Relational Lens

ZDM - Mathematics Education

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 2018, Pages 367-379

  Berlin, Rebekah ^a   Cohen, Julie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

And general versus content specific pedagogy; Classroom observation; Mathematics instruction

Indexed keywords

EID: 85048053502     PISSN: 18639690     EISSN: 18639704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11858-018-0940-6     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Acock, A. (2013). Discovering structural equation modeling using stata. College Station, Texas: Stata Press.
2. Allen, J. P., Hauser, S. T., Bell, K. L., & O’Connor, T. G. (1994). Longitudinal assessment of autonomy and relatedness in adolescent-family interactions as predictors of adolescent ego development and self-esteem. Child Development, 65(1), 179–194.
3. Allen, J., Marsh, P., McFarland, C., McElhaney, K., Land, D., & Jodi, K. (2002). Attachment and autonomy as predictors of the development of social skills and delinquency during midadolescence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70(1), 56–66.
4. Allen, J. P., Pianta, R. C., Gregory, A., Mikami, A. Y., & Lun, J. (2011). An interaction-based approach to enhancing secondary school instruction and student achievement. Science, 333(6045), 1034–1037.
5. Allen, J., Gregory, A., Mikami, A., Lun, J., Hamre, B., & Pianta, R. (2013). Observations of effective teacher-student interactions in secondary school classrooms: Predicting student achievement with the classroom assessment scoring system-secondary. School Psychology Review, 42(1), 76.
6. Bell, C. A., Gitomer, D. H., McCaffrey, D. F., Hamre, B. K., Pianta, R. C., & Qi, Y. (2012). An argument approach to observation protocol validity. Educational Assessment, 17(2–3), 62–87.
7. Blazar, D., Braslow, D., Charalambous, C. Y., & Hill, H. C. (2017). Attending to general and mathematics-specific dimensions of teaching: Exploring factors across two observation instruments. Educational Assessment, 22(2), 71–94.
8. Bowman, B., & Stott, F. (1994). Understanding development in a cultural context: The challenge for teachers. In B. L. Mallory & R. S. New (Eds.), Diversity and developmentally appropriate practices: Challenges for early childhood education (pp. 19–34). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
9. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn:. In Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
10. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (1998). The ecology of developmental processes. In Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (pp. 993–1028). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
11. Brophy, J. (1981). Teacher praise: A functional analysis. Review of Educational Research, 51(1), 5–32.
12. Brophy, J. E., & Evertson, C. M. (1976). Learning from teaching: A developmental perspective. Allyn and Bacon.
13. Bruner, J. S. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14. Butler, R. (1987). Task-involving and ego-involving properties of evaluation: Effects of different feedback conditions on motivational perceptions, interest, and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(4), 474.
15. Charalambous, C. Y., & Litke, E. (2018). Studying instructional quality by using a content-specific lens: The case of the mathematical quality of instruction framework. ZDM Mathematics Education. 10.1007/s11858-018-0913-9.
16. Charalambous, C. Y., Praetorius, A.-K. (2018). Studying mathematics instruction through different lenses: setting the ground for understanding instructional quality more comprehensively. ZDM Mathematics Education. 10.1007/s11858-018-0914-8.
17. Danielson Group. (2017). The framework. https://www.danielsongroup.org/framework. Accessed 1 May 2017.
18. Davidson, J. E., & Sternberg, R. J. (2003). The psychology of problem solving. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Downer, J. T., López, M. L., Grimm, K. J., Hamagami, A., Pianta, R. C., & Howes, C. (2012). Observations of teacher–child interactions in classrooms serving Latinos and dual language learners: Applicability of the Classroom Assessment Scoring System in diverse settings. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27(1), 21–32.
20. Eccles, J. S. (2004). Schools, academic motivation, and stage-environment fit. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 125–153). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
21. English, L. D., & Kirshner, D. (Eds.). (2015). Handbook of international research in mathematics education. New York: Routledge.
22. Ford, D. H., & Lerner, R. M. (1992). Developmental systems theory: An integrative approach. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.
23. Good, T. L., & Grouws, D. A. (1977). Teaching effects: A process-product study in fourth-grade mathematics classrooms. Journal of Teacher Education, 28(3), 49–54.
24. Hafen, C. A., Hamre, B. K., Allen, J. P., Bell, C. A., Gitomer, D. H., & Pianta, R. C. (2015). Teaching through interactions in secondary school classrooms: Revisiting the factor structure and practical application of the Classroom Assessment Scoring System–Secondary. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 35(5–6), 651–680.
25. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
26. Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2005). Can instructional and emotional support in the first-grade classroom make a difference for children at risk of school failure? Child Development, 76(5), 949–967.
27. Hamre, B. K., Pianta, R. C., Mashburn, A. J., & Downer, J. T. (2007). Building a science of classrooms: Application of the CLASS framework in over 4,000 US early childhood and elementary classrooms. Research paper, Foundation for Childhood Development. https://www.fcd-us.org/building-a-science-of-classrooms-application-of-the-class-framework-in-over-4000-u-s-early-childhood-and-elementary-classrooms/. Accessed 20 Apr 2017.
28. Hamre, B. K., Pianta, R. C., Downer, J. T., DeCoster, J., Mashburn, A. J., Jones, S. M., … & Brackett, M. A. (2013). Teaching through interactions: Testing a developmental framework of teacher effectiveness in over 4,000 classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 113(4), 461–487.
29. Hamre, B., Hatfield, B., Pianta, R., & Jamil, F. (2014). Evidence for general and domain-specific elements of teacher–child interactions: Associations with preschool children’s development. Child Development, 85(3), 1257–1274.
30. Hill, H., & Grossman, P. (2013). Learning from teacher observations: Challenges and opportunities posed by new teacher evaluation systems. Harvard Educational Review, 83(2), 371–384.
31. Hill, H. C., Charalambous, C. Y., & Kraft, M. A. (2012). When rater reliability is not enough: Teacher observation systems and a case for the generalizability study. Educational Researcher, 41(2), 56–64.
32. Hoy, A. W., & Weinstein, C. S. (2006). Student and teacher perspectives on classroom management. In C. Everston & C. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice and contemporary issues (pp. 181–222). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33. Hu, B. Y., Fan, X., Gu, C., & Yang, N. (2016). Applicability of the classroom assessment scoring system in Chinese preschools based on psychometric evidence. Early Education and Development, 27(5), 714–734.
34. Kane, T. J., & Staiger, D. O. (2012). Gathering feedback for teaching: Combining high-quality observations with student surveys and achievement gains. Research paper, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED540960.pdf.
35. Kounin, J. S. (1970). Discipline and group management in classrooms. Oxford: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
36. Lee, C. D. (2007). Culture, literacy, and learning. New York: Teachers College Press.
37. Levin, J. R., & Pressley, M. (1981). Improving children’s prose comprehension: Selected strategies that seem to succeed. In C. M. Santa & B. L. Hayes (Eds.), Children’s prose comprehension: Research and practice (pp. 44–71). Newark: International Reading Association.
38. Leyva, D., Weiland, C., Barata, M., Yoshikawa, H., Snow, C., Treviño, E., & Rolla, A. (2015). Teacher–child interactions in Chile and their associations with prekindergarten outcomes. Child Development, 86(3), 781–799.
39. Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
40. Mashburn, A. J., Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., Downer, J. T., Barbarin, O. A., Bryant, D., Burchinal, M., Early, D., & Howes, C. (2008). Measures of classroom quality in prekindergarten and children’s development of academic, language, and social skills. Child Development, 79(3), 732–749.
41. McCaffrey, D. F., Yuan, K., Savitsky, T. D., Lockwood, J. R., & Edelen, M. O. (2015). Uncovering multivariate structure in classroom observations in the presence of rater errors. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 34(2), 34–46.
42. McClellan, C., Donoghue, J., & Park, Y. S. (2013). Commonality and uniqueness in teaching practice observation. Research paper, Clowder Consulting. http://www.clowderconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Commonality-and-Uniqueness-in-Teaching-Practice-Observation_paper.pdf. Accessed 25 Apr 2017.
43. National Research Council. (2003). Engaging schools: Fostering high school students’ motivation to learn. Washington: National Academies Press.
44. Pakarinen, E., Lerkkanen, M. K., Poikkeus, A. M., Kiuru, N., Siekkinen, M., Rasku-Puttonen, H., & Nurmi, J. E. (2010). A validation of the classroom assessment scoring system in finnish kindergartens. Early Education and Development, 21(1), 95–124.
45. Pianta, R. C., & Hamre, B. K. (2009). Conceptualization, measurement, and improvement of classroom processes: Standardized observation can leverage capacity. Educational Researcher, 38(2), 109–119.
46. Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., & Mintz, S. (2012). Classroom Assessment Scoring System Upper Elementary Manual. Charlottesville, VA: Teachstone.
47. Raver, C. C. (2004). Placing emotional self-regulation in sociocultural and socioeconomic contexts. Child Development, 75(2), 346–353.
48. Rosenshine, B. (1995). Advances in research on instruction. The Journal of Educational Research, 88(5), 262–268.
49. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.
50. Sandilos, L., Rimm-Kaufman, S., & Cohen, J. (2017). Warmth and demand: The relation between students’ perceptions of the classroom environment and achievement growth. Child Development, 88(4), 1321–1337.
51. Skinner, E. A., Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Connell, J. P., Eccles, J. S., & Wellborn, J. G. (1998). Individual differences and the development of perceived control. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, i-231.
52. Slavin, R. E., Hurley, E. A., & Chamberlain, A. (2003). Cooperative learning and achievement: Theory and research. In W. M. Reynolds & G. E. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (pp. 177–198). Hoboken: Wiley.
53. Taylor, B. M., Pearson, P. D., Peterson, D. S., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2003). Reading growth in high-poverty classrooms: The influence of teacher practices that encourage cognitive engagement in literacy learning. The Elementary School Journal, 104(1), 3–28.
54. Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the Development of Children, 23(3), 34–41.
56. Walkowiak, T. A., Berry, R. Q., Meyer, J. P., Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., & Ottmar, E. R. (2014). Introducing an observational measure of standards-based mathematics teaching practices: Evidence of validity and score reliability. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85(1), 109–128.
57. Walkowiak, T. A., Berry, R. Q., Pinter, H. H., & Jacobson, E. D. (2018). Utilizing the M-Scan to measure standards based mathematics teaching practices: affordances and limitations. ZDM Mathematics Education. 10.1007/s11858-018-0931-7.
58. Yair, G. (2000). Educational battlefields in America: The tug-of-war over students’ engagement with instruction. Sociology of Education, 73(4), 247–269.