Integrated phenotypic-genotypic approach to understand the influence of ultrasound on metabolic response of Lactobacillus sakei

PLoS ONE

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2018, Pages

  Ojha, K Shikha ^a   Burgess, Catherine M ^a   Duffy, Geraldine ^a   Kerry, Joseph P ^b   Tiwari, Brijesh K ^a  

^a TEAGASC FOOD RESEARCH CENTRE   (Ireland)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE CORK   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON; NITROGEN; PHOSPHORUS; SULFUR;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL CELL; BACTERIAL GENOME; BACTERIAL GROWTH; BACTERIAL METABOLISM; BACTERIUM CULTURE; CARBON SOURCE; CELL COUNT; CELL SURFACE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FREQUENCY; GENOTYPE; GROWTH RATE; LACTOBACILLUS SAKEI; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; NUTRIENT; PHENOTYPE; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; ULTRASOUND; BACTERIAL GENE; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

CARBON; GENES, BACTERIAL; GENOTYPE; LACTOBACILLUS SAKEI; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; NITROGEN; PHOSPHORUS; SULFUR; ULTRASONICS;

EID: 85041027311     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191053     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Karshafian R, Samac S, Bevan PD, Burns PN. Microbubble mediated sonoporation of cells in suspension: Clonogenic viability and influence of molecular size on uptake. Ultrasonics. 2010; 50(7):691–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2010.01.009 PMID: 20153497
2. Lentacker I, De Cock I, Deckers R, De Smedt S, Moonen C. Understanding ultrasound induced sonoporation: definitions and underlying mechanisms. Advanced drug delivery reviews. 2014; 72:49–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2013.11.008 PMID: 24270006
3. Yeo S-K, Liong M-T. Effects and applications of sub-lethal ultrasound, electroporation and UV radiations in bioprocessing. Annals of Microbiology. 2013; 63(3):813–24.
4. Yang F, Gu N, Chen D, Xi X, Zhang D, Li Y, et al. Experimental study on cell self-sealing during sonoporation. Journal of Controlled Release. 2008; 131(3):205–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2008.07.038 PMID: 18727944
5. Moncada M, Aryana KJ, Boeneke C. Effect of Mild Sonication Conditions on the Attributes of Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus LB-12. 2012.
6. Monsen T, Lövgren E, Widerström M, Wallinder L. In Vitro Effect of Ultrasound on Bacteria and Suggested Protocol for Sonication and Diagnosis of Prosthetic Infections. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2009; 47(8):2496–501. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02316-08 PMID: 19535525
7. Lanchun S, Bochu W, Liancai Z, Jie L, Yanhong Y, Chuanren D. The influence of low-intensity ultrasonic on some physiological characteristics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces. 2003; 30(1):61–6.
8. Lanchun S, Bochu W, Zhiming L, Chuanren D, Chuanyun D, Sakanishi A. The research into the influence of low-intensity ultrasonic on the growth of S. cerevisiaes. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces. 2003; 30(1):43–9.
9. Jomdecha C, Prateepasen A. Effects of pulse ultrasonic irradiation on the lag phase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae growth. Letters in applied microbiology. 2011; 52(1):62–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472765X.2010.02966.x PMID: 21143488
10. Nguyen TMP, Lee YK, Zhou W. Stimulating fermentative activities of bifidobacteria in milk by highinten-sity ultrasound. International Dairy Journal. 2009; 19(6–7):410–6.
11. Nguyen TMP, Lee YK, Zhou W. Effect of high intensity ultrasound on carbohydrate metabolism of bifidobacteria in milk fermentation. Food Chemistry. 2012; 130(4):866–74.
12. Yang S, Zhang H, Wang W. The ultrasonic effect on the mechanism of cholesterol oxidase production by Brevibacterium sp. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2010; 9(17):2574–8.
13. Castellano PH, Holzapfel WH, Vignolo GM. The control of Listeria innocua and Lactobacillus sakei in broth and meat slurry with the bacteriocinogenic strain Lactobacillus casei CRL705. Food Microbiology. 2004; 21(3):291–8.
14. McLeod A, Nyquist OL, Snipen L, Naterstad K, Axelsson L. Diversity of Lactobacillus sakei strains investigated by phenotypic and genotypic methods. Systematic and Applied Microbiology. 2008; 31 (5):393–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2008.06.002 PMID: 18678454
15. Tremaroli V, Bäckhed F. Functional interactions between the gut microbiota and host metabolism. Nature. 2012; 489(7415):242–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11552 PMID: 22972297
16. Holmes E, Li JV, Athanasiou T, Ashrafian H, Nicholson JK. Understanding the role of gut microbiome–host metabolic signal disruption in health and disease. Trends in microbiology. 2011; 19(7):349–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2011.05.006 PMID: 21684749
17. Greetham D. Phenotype microarray technology and its application in industrial biotechnology. Biotechnology letters. 2014; 36(6):1153–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-014-1481-x PMID: 24563312
18. Tiwari B, Muthukumarappan K, O’Donnell C, Cullen P. Effects of sonication on the kinetics of orange juice quality parameters. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2008; 56(7):2423–8. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf073503y PMID: 18321054
19. Galardini M, Mengoni A, Biondi EG, Semeraro R, Florio A, Bazzicalupo M, et al. DuctApe: A suite for the analysis and correlation of genomic and OmniLog™ Phenotype Microarray data. Genomics. 2014; 103(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2013.11.005 PMID: 24316132
20. Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic acids research. 2000; 28(1):27–30. PMID: 10592173
21. NCBI. Availabe onlie at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/1664?genome_assembly_id=256489 (Access date: 03 June 2017). 2017.
22. Nyquist OL, McLeod A, Brede DA, Snipen L, Aakra Å, Nes IF. Comparative genomics of Lactobacillus sakei with emphasis on strains from meat. Molecular Genetics and Genomics. 2011; 285(4):297–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-011-0608-1 PMID: 21369871
23. Chaillou S, Daty M, Baraige F, Dudez A-M, Anglade P, Jones R, et al. Intraspecies genomic diversity and natural population structure of the meat-borne lactic acid bacterium Lactobacillus sakei. Applied and environmental microbiology. 2009; 75(4):970–80. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01721-08 PMID: 19114527
24. Chaillou S, Lucquin I, Najjari A, Zagorec M, Champomier-Vergès M-C. Population genetics of Lactobacillus sakei reveals three lineages with distinct evolutionary histories. PLoS One. 2013; 8(9):e73253. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073253 PMID: 24069179
25. Koort J, Vandamme P, Schillinger U, Holzapfel W, Björkroth J. Lactobacillus curvatus subsp. melibiosus is a later synonym of Lactobacillus sakei subsp. carnosus. International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology. 2004; 54(5):1621–6.
26. Baranyi J, Roberts TA. A dynamic approach to predicting bacterial growth in food. International journal of food microbiology. 1994; 23(3–4):277–94. PMID: 7873331
27. Baranyi J, Roberts TA, Mcclure P. Some properties of a nonautonomous deterministic growth model describing the adjustment of the bacterial population to a new environment. Mathematical Medicine and Biology. 1993; 10(4):293–9.
28. Gao S, Hemar Y, Ashokkumar M, Paturel S, Lewis GD. Inactivation of bacteria and yeast using high-frequency ultrasound treatment. Water Research. 2014; 60:93–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.04.038 PMID: 24835956
29. Gera N, Doores S. Kinetics and mechanism of bacterial inactivation by ultrasound waves and sonopro-tective effect of milk components. Journal of food science. 2011; 76(2):M111–M9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.02007.x PMID: 21535773
30. Ojha KS, Kerry JP, Alvarez C, Walsh D, Tiwari BK. Effect of high intensity ultrasound on the fermentation profile of Lactobacillus sakei in a meat model system. Ultrasonics sonochemistry. 2016; 31:539–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.01.001 PMID: 26964981
31. Dalgaard P, Ross T, Kamperman L, Neumeyer K, McMeekin TA. Estimation of bacterial growth rates from turbidimetric and viable count data. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 1994; 23(3):391–404.
32. Leroy F, De Vuyst L. Growth of the bacteriocin-producingLactobacillus sakei strain CTC 494 in MRS broth is strongly reduced due to nutrient exhaustion: a nutrient depletion model for the growth of lactic acid bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2001; 67(10):4407–13. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.67.10.4407-4413.2001 PMID: 11571136
33. Aryani D, Zwietering M, den Besten H. The effect of different matrices on the growth kinetics and heat resistance of Listeria monocytogenes and Lactobacillus plantarum. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2016; 238:326–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.09.012 PMID: 27723494
34. Siragusa S, De Angelis M, Calasso M, Campanella D, Minervini F, Di Cagno R, et al. Fermentation and proteome profiles of Lactobacillus plantarum strains during growth under food-like conditions. Journal of proteomics. 2014; 96:366–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2013.11.003 PMID: 24231110
35. Mechmeche M, Kachouri F, Yaghlane HB, Ksontini H, Setti K, Hamdi M. Kinetic analysis and mathematical modeling of growth parameters of Lactobacillus plantarum in protein-rich isolates from tomato seed. Food Science and Technology International. 2017; 23(2):128–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1082013216665706 PMID: 27574029
36. Zwietering M, Jongenburger I, Rombouts F, Van’t Riet K. Modeling of the bacterial growth curve. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1990; 56(6):1875–81. PMID: 16348228
37. Sant’Ana AS, Franco BDGM, Schaffner DW. Modeling the growth rate and lag time of different strains of Salmonella enterica and Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat lettuce. Food Microbiology. 2012; 30(1):267–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2011.11.003 PMID: 22265311
38. Wijtzes T, Rombouts F, Kant-Muermans M, Van’t Riet K, Zwietering M. Development and validation of a combined temperature, water activity, pH model for bacterial growth rate of Lactobacillus curvatus. International journal of food microbiology. 2001; 63(1):57–64.
39. Tomás MSJ, Labanda EBd, de Ruiz Holgado AP, Nader-Macías ME. Estimation of vaginal probiotic lac-tobacilli growth parameters with the application of the Gompertz model. Canadian journal of microbiology. 2002; 48(1):82–92. PMID: 11888167
40. Sharma V, Mishra HN. Unstructured kinetic modeling of growth and lactic acid production by Lactobacillus plantarum NCDC 414 during fermentation of vegetable juices. LWT-Food Science and Technology. 2014; 59(2):1123–8.
41. Pla M-L, Oltra S, Esteban M-D, Andreu S, Palop A. Comparison of primary models to predict microbial growth by the plate count and absorbance methods. BioMed research international. 2015; 2015.
42. Mossel D, Van Netten P, editors. Harmful effects of selective media on stressed micro-organisms: nature and remedies. Society for Applied Bacteriology symposium series; 1984.
43. Flowers RS, Ordal ZJ. Current methods to detect stressed staphylococci. Journal of Food Protection. 1979; 42(4):362–7.
44. Roszak D, Colwell R. Survival strategies of bacteria in the natural environment. Microbiological reviews. 1987; 51(3):365. PMID: 3312987
45. Wordon BA, Mortimer B, McMaster LD. Comparative real-time analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell viability, injury and death induced by ultrasound (20 kHz) and heat for the application of hurdle technology. Food Research International. 2012; 47(2):134–9.
46. Radel S, McLoughlin AJ, Gherardini L, Doblhoff-Dier O, Benes E. Viability of yeast cells in well controlled propagating and standing ultrasonic plane waves. Ultrasonics. 2000; 38(1–8):633–7. PMID: 10829741
47. Shamila-Syuhada AK, Chuah L-O, Wan-Nadiah WA, Cheng LH, Alkarkhi AF, Effarizah ME, et al. Inactivation of microbiota and selected spoilage and pathogenic bacteria in milk by combinations of ultrasound, hydrogen peroxide, and active lactoperoxidase system. International Dairy Journal. 2016; 61:120–5.
48. Barba FJ, Koubaa M, do Prado-Silva L, Orlien V, de Souza Sant’Ana A. Mild processing applied to the inactivation of the main foodborne bacterial pathogens: A review. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2017.
49. Ojha KS, Mason TJ, O’Donnell CP, Kerry JP, Tiwari BK. Ultrasound technology for food fermentation applications. Ultrasonics sonochemistry. 2017; 34:410–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.06. 001 PMID: 27773263
50. Champomier-Vergès M-C, Chaillou S, Cornet M, Zagorec M. Lactobacillus sakei: recent developments and future prospects. Research in Microbiology. 2001; 152(10):839–48. PMID: 11766959
51. McLeod A, Zagorec M, Champomier-Vergès M-C, Naterstad K, Axelsson L. Primary metabolism in Lactobacillus sakei food isolates by proteomic analysis. BMC microbiology. 2010; 10(1):120.
52. Jensen H, Grimmer S, Naterstad K, Axelsson L. In vitro testing of commercial and potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria. International journal of food microbiology. 2012; 153(1):216–22.
53. Claesson MJ, Van Sinderen D, O’Toole PW. The genus Lactobacillus—a genomic basis for understanding its diversity. FEMS microbiology letters. 2007; 269(1):22–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.15746968.2006.00596.x PMID: 17343688
54. Chiaramonte F, Anglade P, Baraige F, Gratadoux J-J, Langella P, Champomier-Vergès M-C, et al. Analysis of Lactobacillus sakei mutants selected after adaptation to the gastrointestinal tracts of axenic mice. Applied and environmental microbiology. 2010; 76(9):2932–9. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM. 02451-09 PMID: 20208026
55. Chaillou S, Champomier-Vergès M-C, Cornet M, Crutz-Le Coq A-M, Dudez A-M, Martin V, et al. The complete genome sequence of the meat-borne lactic acid bacterium Lactobacillus sakei 23K. Nature biotechnology. 2005; 23(12):1527–33. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1160 PMID: 16273110
56. Mocali S, Chiellini C, Fabiani A, Decuzzi S, de Pascale D, Parrilli E, et al. Ecology of cold environments: new insights of bacterial metabolic adaptation through an integrated genomic-phenomic approach. Scientific Reports. 2017; 7.