Viability of yeast cells in well controlled propagating and standing ultrasonic plane waves

Ultrasonics

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 633-637

  Radel, S ^a   McLoughlin, A J ^a   Gherardini, L ^b   Doblhoff Dier, O ^b   Benes, E ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND LIFE SCIENCES   (Austria)

^c VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC FIELDS; AGGLOMERATION; ANECHOIC CHAMBERS; MORPHOLOGY; PRESSURE EFFECTS; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; ULTRASONIC EFFECTS; ULTRASONIC TRANSMISSION; YEAST;

SONICATION; ULTRASONIC STANDING WAVE FIELDS;

PLANT CELL CULTURE;

ARTICLE; CELL SURVIVAL; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; ULTRASOUND; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

CELL SURVIVAL; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; ULTRASONICS;

EID: 0034154870     PISSN: 0041624X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0041-624X(99)00211-5     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. D'Amore T. Improving yeast fermentation performance. J. Inst. Brew. 98:1992;375.
2. McLoughlin A.J. Controlled release of immobilized cells as a strategy to regulate ecological competence of inocula. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotech. 51:1994;2.
3. T.R. Mhatzo, A.J. McLoughlin, E. Benes, Immobilisation in carrageenan polymer as a strategy to enhance the ecological competence of brewers' yeast inocula, Proc. BRG Int. Workshop VII, Maryland, USA, 1998.
4. Gröschl M., Burger W., Handl B., Doblhoff-Dier O., Gaida T., Schmatz C. Ultrasonic separation of suspended particles. Part III. Application in biotechnology. Acustica. 84:1998;815.
5. Gröschl M. Ultrasonic separation of suspended particles. Part I. Fundamentals. Acustica. 84:1998;432.
6. Hawkes J.J., Limaye M.S., Coakley W.T. Filtration of bacteria and yeast by ultrasound-enhanced sedimentation. J. Appl. Micro. 82:1997;39.
7. Bierau H., Perani A., Al-Rubeai M., Emery A.N. A comparison of intensive cell culture bioreactors operating with Hybridomas modified for inhibited apoptotic response. J. Biotech. 62:1998;195.
8. Zhang J., Collins A., Chen M., Knyazev I., Gentz R. High-density perfusion culture of insect cells with a biosep ultrasonic filter. Biotech. Bioeng. 59:1998;351.
9. Barnes R.A., Jenkins P., Coakley W.T. Preliminary clinical evaluation of meningococcal disease and bacterial meningitis by ultrasonic enhancement. Arch. Disease Child. 78:1998;58.
10. Doblhoff O., Gaida T.H., Katinger H., Burger W., Gröschl M., Benes E. A novel ultrasonic resonance field device for the retention of animal cells. Biotechnol. Prog. 10:1994;428.
11. Kobori H., Sato M., Tameike A., Hamada K., Shimada S., Osumi M. Ultrastructural effects of pressure stress to the nucleus in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a study by immunoelectron microscopy using frozen thin sections. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 132:1995;235.
12. Sato M., Kobori H., Shimada S., Osumi M. Pressure-stress effects on the ultrastructure of cells of the dimorphic yeast Candida tropicalis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 131:1995;11.
13. Thacker J. An approach to the mechanism of killing cells in suspension by ultrasound. Biochem. Biophys. Acta. 304:1973;240.