High-resolution TADs reveal DNA sequences underlying genome organization in flies

Nature Communications

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2018, Pages

  Ramírez, Fidel ^a   Bhardwaj, Vivek ^a,b   Arrigoni, Laura ^a   Lam, Kin Chung ^a   Grüning, Björn A ^b   Villaveces, José ^c   Habermann, Bianca ^c   Akhtar, Asifa ^a   Manke, Thomas ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF IMMUNOBIOLOGY AND EPIGENETICS   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF BIOCHEMISTRY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA BINDING PROTEIN; INSECT PROTEIN; MOTIF 1 BINDING PROTEIN; PROTEIN BEAF 32; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR CTCF; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; BEAF-32 PROTEIN, DROSOPHILA; CTCF PROTEIN, DROSOPHILA; DROSOPHILA PROTEIN; EYE PROTEIN; M1BP PROTEIN, DROSOPHILA; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR;

BIOINFORMATICS; DATABASE; DNA; FLY; GENETIC STRUCTURE; GENOME; PROTEIN; RESOLUTION; SOFTWARE;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CHROMATIN; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA SEQUENCE; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; GENE STRUCTURE; GENOME ANALYSIS; INSECT GENOME; NONHUMAN; PROMOTER REGION; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN MOTIF; SOFTWARE; TOPOLOGICALLY ASSOCIATING DOMAIN; ANIMAL; CHEMISTRY; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; CHROMOSOMAL MAPPING; CONFORMATION; EVOLUTION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC DATABASE; GENETICS; HUMAN; INSECT CHROMOSOME; METABOLISM; MOUSE; NUCLEOTIDE MOTIF; PROCEDURES; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; MAMMALIA;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CCCTC-BINDING FACTOR; CHROMATIN; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; CHROMOSOMES, INSECT; DATABASES, GENETIC; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; DROSOPHILA PROTEINS; EYE PROTEINS; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOME, INSECT; HUMANS; MICE; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; NUCLEOTIDE MOTIFS; SOFTWARE; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS;

EID: 85040779212     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-02525-w     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Dixon, J. R., Gorkin, D. U. & Ren, B. Chromatin domains: the unit of chromosome organization. Mol. Cell 62, 668-680 (2016).
2. Dixon, J. R. et al. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 485, 376-380 (2012).
3. Sexton, T. et al. Three-dimensional folding and functional organization principles of the Drosophila genome. Cell 148, 458-472 (2012).
4. Hou, C., Li, L., Qin, Z. S. & Corces, V. G. Gene density, transcription, and insulators contribute to the partition of the Drosophila genome into physical domains. Mol. Cell 48, 471-484 (2012).
5. Rao, S. S. P. et al. A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell 159, 1665-1680 (2014).
6. Sanborn, A. L. et al. Chromatin extrusion explains key features of loop and domain formation in wild-type and engineered genomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E6456-E6465 (2015).
7. Nichols, M. H. & Corces, V. G. A CTCF code for 3D genome architecture. Cell 162, 703-705 (2015).
8. Lupiáñez, D. G. et al. Disruptions of topological chromatin domains cause pathogenic rewiring of gene-enhancer interactions. Cell 161, 1012-1025 (2015).
9. Nora, E. P. et al. Targeted degradation of CTCF decouples local insulation of chromosome domains from genomic compartmentalization. Cell 169, 930-944. e22 (2017).
10. Van Bortle, K. et al. Insulator function and topological domain border strength scale with architectural protein occupancy. Genome Biol. 15, R82 (2014).
11. Zolotarev, N. et al. Architectural proteins Pita, Zw5, and ZIPIC contain homodimerization domain and support specific long-range interactions in Drosophila. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 7228-7241 (2016).
12. Ong, C.-T. & Corces, V. G. CTCF: an architectural protein bridging genome topology and function. Nat. Rev. Genet. 15, 234-246 (2014).
13. Maksimenko, O. et al. Two new insulator proteins, Pita and ZIPIC, target CP190 to chromatin. Genome Res. 25, 89-99 (2015).
14. Cuartero, S., Fresán, U., Reina, O., Planet, E. & Espinàs, M. L. Ibf1 and Ibf2 are novel CP190-interacting proteins required for insulator function. EMBO. J. 33, 1-11 (2014).
15. Li, L. et al. Widespread rearrangement of 3D chromatin organization underlies polycomb-mediated stress-induced silencing. Mol. Cell 58, 216-231 (2015).
16. Cubeñas-Potts, C. et al. Different enhancer classes in Drosophila bind distinct architectural proteins and mediate unique chromatin interactions and 3D architecture. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, 1714-1730 (2017).
17. Li, J. & Gilmour, D. S. Distinct mechanisms of transcriptional pausing orchestrated by GAGA factor and M1BP, a novel transcription factor. EMBO J. 32, 1829-1841 (2013).
18. Hug, C. B., Grimaldi, A. G., Kruse, K. & Vaquerizas, J. M. Chromatin architecture emerges during zygotic genome activation independent of transcription. Cell 169, 216-228. e19 (2017).
19. Mourad, R., Li, L. & Cuvier, O. Uncovering direct and indirect molecular determinants of chromatin loops using a computational integrative approach. PLoS Comput. Biol. 13, e1005538 (2017).
20. Ma, W., Noble, W. S. & Bailey, T. L. Motif-based analysis of large nucleotide data sets using MEME-ChIP. Nat. Protoc. 9, 1428-1450 (2014).
21. McLeay, R. C. & Bailey, T. L. Motif Enrichment Analysis: a unified framework and an evaluation on ChIP data. BMC Bioinform. 11, 165 (2010).
22. Thomas-Chollier, M. et al. Transcription factor binding predictions using TRAP for the analysis of ChIP-seq data and regulatory SNPs. Nat. Protoc. 6, 1860-1869 (2011).
23. Ohler, U., Liao, G.-C., Niemann, H. & Rubin, G. M. Computational analysis of core promoters in the Drosophila genome. Genome Biol. 3, RESEARCH0087 (2002).
24. Gurudatta, B. V., Yang, J., Van Bortle, K., Donlin-Asp, P. G. & Corces, V. G. Dynamic changes in the genomic localization of DNA replication-related element binding factor during the cell cycle. Cell Cycle 12, 1605-1615 (2013).
25. Jain, D., Baldi, S., Zabel, A., Straub, T. & Becker, P. B. Active promoters give rise to false positive 'Phantom Peaks' in ChIP-seq experiments. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, 6959-6968 (2015).
26. Landt, S. G. et al. ChIP-seq guidelines and practices of the ENCODE and modENCODE consortia. Genome Res. 22, 1813-1831 (2012).
27. Bailey, T. L. & Elkan, C. Fitting a mixture model by expectation maximization to discover motifs in biopolymers. Proc. Int. Conf. Intell. Syst. Mol. Biol. 2, 28-36 (1994).
28. Celniker, S. E. et al. Unlocking the secrets of the genome. Nature 459, 927-930 (2009).
29. Filion, G. J. et al. Systematic protein location mapping reveals five principal chromatin types in Drosophila cells. Cell 143, 212-224 (2010).
30. Belozerov, V. E., Majumder, P., Shen, P. & Cai, H. N. A novel boundary element may facilitate independent gene regulation in the Antennapedia complex of Drosophila. EMBO J. 22, 3113-3121 (2003).
31. Schweinsberg, S. et al. The enhancer-blocking activity of the Fab-7 boundary from the Drosophila bithorax complex requires GAGA-factor-binding sites. Genetics 168, 1371-1384 (2004).
32. Kalhor, R., Tjong, H., Jayathilaka, N., Alber, F. & Chen, L. Genome architectures revealed by tethered chromosome conformation capture and population-based modeling. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 90-98 (2011).
33. Goecks, J., Nekrutenko, A. & Taylor, J. Galaxy: a comprehensive approach for supporting accessible, reproducible, and transparent computational research in the life sciences. Genome Biol. 11, R86 (2010).
34. Ulianov, S. V. et al. Active chromatin and transcription play a key role in chromosome partitioning into topologically associating domains. Genome Res. 26, 70-84 (2016).
35. Lam, K. C. et al. The NSL complex regulates housekeeping genes in Drosophila. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002736 (2012).
36. Feller, C. et al. The MOF-containing NSL complex associates globally with housekeeping genes, but activates only a defined subset. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 1509-1522 (2012).
37. Van Bortle, K. et al. Drosophila CTCF tandemly aligns with other insulator proteins at the borders of H3K27me3 domains. Genome Res. 22, 2176-2187 (2012).
38. Liang, J. et al. Chromatin immunoprecipitation indirect peaks highlight longrange interactions of insulator proteins and Pol II pausing. Mol. Cell 5, 1-10 (2014).
39. Wood, A. M. et al. Regulation of chromatin organization and inducible gene expression by a Drosophila insulator. Mol. Cell 44, 29-38 (2011).
40. Pascual-Garcia, P. et al. Metazoan nuclear pores provide a scaffold for poised genes and mediate induced enhancer-promoter Contacts. Mol. Cell 66, 63-76. e6 (2017).
41. Emberly, E. et al. BEAF regulates cell-cycle genes through the controlled deposition of H3K9 methylation marks into its conserved dual-core binding sites. PLoS Biol. 6, 2896-2910 (2008).
42. Tue, N. T. et al. DREF plays multiple roles during Drosophila development. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1860, 705-712 (2017).
43. Schwartz, Y. B. et al. Nature and function of insulator protein binding sites in the Drosophila genome. Genome Res. 22, 2188-2198 (2012).
44. Narendra, V. et al. CTCF establishes discrete functional chromatin domains at the Hox clusters during differentiation. Science 347, 1017-1021 (2015).
45. Guo, Y. et al. CRISPR inversion of CTCF sites alters genome topology and enhancer/promoter function. Cell 162, 900-910 (2015).
46. Cuddapah, S. et al. Global analysis of the insulator binding protein CTCF in chromatin barrier regions reveals demarcation of active and repressive domains. Genome Res. 19, 24-32 (2009).
47. Iwasaki, O. et al. Interaction between TBP and condensin drives the organization and faithful segregation of mitotic chromosomes. Mol. Cell 59, 755-767 (2015).
48. Strick, T. R., Kawaguchi, T. & Hirano, T. Real-time detection of single-molecule DNA compaction by condensin I. Curr. Biol. 14, 874-880 (2004).
49. Alipour, E. & Marko, J. F. Self-organization of domain structures by DNAloop-extruding enzymes. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 11202-11212 (2012).
50. Fudenberg, G. et al. Formation of chromosomal domains by loop extrusion. Cell Rep. 15, 2038-2049 (2016).
51. Rowley, M. J. et al. Evolutionarily conserved principles predict 3D chromatin organization. Mol. Cell 67, 837-852. e7 (2017).
52. Imakaev, M. et al. Iterative correction of Hi-C data reveals hallmarks of chromosome organization. Nat. Methods 9, 999-1003 (2012).
53. Ramírez, F. et al. High-affinity sites form an interaction network to facilitate spreading of the MSL complex across the X chromosome in Drosophila. Mol. Cell 60, 146-162 (2015).
54. Shin, H. et al. TopDom: an efficient and deterministic method for identifying topological domains in genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, e70 (2016).
55. Quinlan, A. R. & Hall, I. M. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26, 841-842 (2010).
56. Ramírez, F. et al. deepTools2: a next generation web server for deep-sequencing data analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W160-W165 (2016).
57. Graveley, B. R. et al. The developmental transcriptome of Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 471, 473-479 (2011).
58. Pertea, M., Kim, D., Pertea, G. M., Leek, J. T. & Salzberg, S. L. Transcript-level expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with HISAT, StringTie and Ballgown. Nat. Protoc. 11, 1650-1667 (2016).
59. Liao, Y., Smyth, G. K. & Shi, W. FeatureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 30, 923-930 (2014).
60. Bailey, T. L. DREME: motif discovery in transcription factor ChIP-seq data. Bioinformatics 27, 1653-1659 (2011).
61. Feng, J., Liu, T., Qin, B., Zhang, Y. & Liu, X. S. Identifying ChIP-seq enrichment using MACS. Nat. Protoc. 7, 1728-1740 (2012).
62. Karolchik, D. et al. The UCSC table browser data retrieval tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, D493-D496 (2004).
63. Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357-359 (2012).
64. Grant, C. E., Bailey, T. L. & Noble, W. S. FIMO: scanning for occurrences of a given motif. Bioinformatics 27, 1017-1018 (2011).
65. Kuhn, M. Building Predictive Models in R Using the caret Package. J. Stat. Softw. Artic. 28, 1-26 (2008).
66. Friedman, J., Hastie, T. & Tibshirani, R. Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. J. Stat. Softw. 33, 1-22 (2010).
67. Friedman, J. H. Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Ann. Stat. 29, 1189-1232 (2001).
68. Arrigoni, L. et al. Standardizing chromatin research: a simple and universal method for ChIP-seq. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, e67 (2016).
69. Zabidi, M. A. et al. Enhancer-core-promoter specificity separates developmental and housekeeping gene regulation. Nature 518, 556-559 (2015).
70. Lex, A., Gehlenborg, N., Strobelt, H., Vuillemot, R. & Pfister, H. UpSet: visualization of intersecting sets. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 20, 1983-1992 (2014).
71. Gaszner, M., Vazquez, J. & Schedl, P. The Zw5 protein, a component of the scs chromatin domain boundary, is able to block enhancer-promoter interaction. Genes Dev. 13, 2098-2107 (1999).