Uncovering direct and indirect molecular determinants of chromatin loops using a computational integrative approach

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2017, Pages

  Mourad, Raphaël ^a   Li, Lang ^b   Cuvier, Olivier ^a  

^a Université Paul Sabatier   (France)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHROMOSOMES; DECISION TREES; PROTEINS;

CELL TYPES; CIS-REGULATORY ELEMENTS; CONSENSUS MOTIF; DNA REPLICATIONS; DNA-BINDING PROTEIN; DROSOPHILLA; LONG RANGE CONTACTS; MOLECULAR DETERMINANTS; PROTEIN MOTIFS; TIMING PROGRAMS;

DNA;

COHESIN; DNA BINDING PROTEIN; EARLY GROWTH RESPONSE FACTOR 1; RNA POLYMERASE II; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR EBF1; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR MEF2C; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; CHROMATIN; DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CHROMATIN; CIS ISOMER; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; DNA BINDING MOTIF; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; GENOME; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; VALIDATION STUDY; BINDING SITE; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; DROSOPHILA; METABOLISM; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ANIMALS; BINDING SITES; CHROMATIN; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DNA; DROSOPHILA; HUMANS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 85020062466     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005538     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Halverson JD, Smrek J, Kremer K, Grosberg AY, From a melt of rings to chromosome territories: the role of topological constraints in genome folding. Reports on Progress in Physics. 2014;77(2):022601. doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/77/2/022601 24472896
2. Dixon JR, Selvaraj S, Yue F, Kim A, Li Y, Shen Y, et al. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature. 2012;485(7398):376–380. doi: 10.1038/nature11082 22495300
3. Sexton T, Yaffe E, Kenigsberg E, Bantignies F, Leblanc B, Hoichman M, et al. Three-dimensional folding and functional organization principles of the Drosophila genome. Cell. 2012;148(3):458–472. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.010 22265598
4. Jin F, Li Y, Dixon JR, Selvaraj S, Ye Z, Lee AY, et al. A high-resolution map of the three-dimensional chromatin interactome in human cells. Nature. 2013;503(7475):290–294. doi: 10.1038/nature12644 24141950
5. Lieberman-Aiden E, van Berkum NL, Williams L, Imakaev M, Ragoczy T, Telling A, et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science. 2009;326(5950):289–293. doi: 10.1126/science.1181369 19815776
6. Pope BD, Ryba T, Dileep V, Yue F, Wu W, Denas O, et al. Topologically associating domains are stable units of replication-timing regulation. Nature. 2014;515(7527):402–405. doi: 10.1038/nature13986 25409831
7. Cubenas-Potts C, Corces VG, Architectural proteins, transcription, and the three-dimensional organization of the genome. FEBS Letters. 2015;589(20PartA):2923–2930. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2015.05.025 26008126
8. Phillips-Cremins JE, Sauria MEG, Sanyal A, Gerasimova TI, Lajoie BR, Bell JSK, et al. Architectural protein subclasses shape 3D organization of genomes during lineage commitment. Cell. 2013;153(6):1281–1295. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.053 23706625
9. Van Bortle K, Nichols MH, Li L, Ong CT, Takenaka N, Qin ZS, et al. Insulator function and topological domain border strength scale with architectural protein occupancy. Genome Biology. 2014;15(5):R82+. doi: 10.1186/gb-2014-15-5-r82 24981874
10. Rao SSP, Huntley MH, Durand NC, Stamenova EK, Bochkov ID, Robinson JT, et al. A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell. 2015;159(7):1665–1680. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.021
11. Zuin J, Dixon JR, van der Reijden MIJA, Ye Z, Kolovos P, Brouwer RWW, et al. Cohesin and CTCF differentially affect chromatin architecture and gene expression in human cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2014;111(3):996–1001. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317788111
12. Mourad R, Cuvier O, Computational identification of genomic features that influence 3D chromatin domain formation. PLoS Computational Biology. 2016;12(5):e1004908. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004908 27203237
13. Mourad R, Cuvier O, Predicting the spatial organization of chromosomes using epigenetic data. Genome Biology. 2015;16(1):1–3. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0752-8 26319942
14. Dekker J, Marti-Renom MA, Mirny LA, Exploring the three-dimensional organization of genomes: interpreting chromatin interaction data. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2013;14(6):390–403. doi: 10.1038/nrg3454 23657480
15. Hu M, Deng K, Selvaraj S, Qin Z, Ren B, Liu JS, HiCNorm: removing biases in Hi-C data via Poisson regression. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(23):3131–3133. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts570 23023982
16. Imakaev M, Fudenberg G, McCord RP, Naumova N, Goloborodko A, Lajoie BR, et al. Iterative correction of Hi-C data reveals hallmarks of chromosome organization. Nature Methods. 2012;9(10):999–1003. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2148 22941365
17. Sanborn AL, Rao SSP, Huang SC, Durand NC, Huntley MH, Jewett AI, et al. Chromatin extrusion explains key features of loop and domain formation in wild-type and engineered genomes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2015;112(47):E6456–E6465. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1518552112 26499245
18. Ghavi-Helm Y, Klein FA, Pakozdi T, Ciglar L, Noordermeer D, Huber W, et al. Enhancer loops appear stable during development and are associated with paused polymerase. Nature. 2014;512(7512):96–100. 25043061
19. Liang J, Lacroix L, Gamot A, Cuddapah S, Queille S, Lhoumaud P, et al. Chromatin immunoprecipitation indirect peaks highlight functional long-range interactions among insulator proteins and RNAII pausing. Molecular Cell. 2014;53(4):672–681. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.12.029 24486021
20. Phillips-Cremins JE, Corces VG, Chromatin insulators: Linking genome organization to cellular function. Molecular Cell. 2013;50(4):461–474. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.04.018 23706817
21. Li L, Lyu X, Hou C, Takenaka N, Nguyen HQ, Ong CT, et al. Widespread rearrangement of 3D chromatin organization underlies Polycomb-mediated stress-induced silencing. Molecular Cell. 2015;(15):S1097–2765. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.02.023 25818644
22. Vogelmann J, Le Gall A, Dejardin S, Allemand F, Gamot A, Labesse G, et al. Chromatin insulator factors involved in long-range DNA interactions and their role in the folding of the Drosophila genome. PLoS Genetics. 2014;10(8):e1004544. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004544 25165871
23. Georgieva M, Cattoni DI, Fiche JB, Mutin T, Chamousset D, Nollmann M, Nanometer resolved single-molecule colocalization of nuclear factors by two-color super resolution microscopy imaging. Methods. 2016;105:44–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.03.029. 27045944
24. Li J, Gilmour DS, Distinct mechanisms of transcriptional pausing orchestrated by GAGA factor and M1BP, a novel transcription factor. The EMBO Journal. 2013;32(13):1829–1841. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2013.111 23708796
25. Kellner WA, Van Bortle K, Li L, Ramos E, Takenaka N, Corces VG, Distinct isoforms of the Drosophila Brd4 homologue are present at enhancers, promoters and insulator sites. Nucleic Acids Research. 2013;41(20):9274–9283. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt722 23945939
26. Wong KC, Li Y, Peng C, Identification of coupling DNA motif pairs on long-range chromatin interactions in human K562 cells. Bioinformatics. 2015;
27. Pancaldi V, Carrillo-de Santa-Pau E, Javierre BM, Juan D, Fraser P, Spivakov M, et al. Integrating epigenomic data and 3D genomic structure with a new measure of chromatin assortativity. Genome Biology. 2016;17(1):1–19. doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-1003-3 27391817
28. He B, Chen C, Teng L, Tan K, Global view of enhancer-promoter interactome in human cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2014;111(21):201320308–E2199. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1320308111 24821768
29. Lupiáñez DG, Kraft K, Heinrich V, Krawitz P, Brancati F, Klopocki E, et al. Disruptions of topological chromatin domains cause pathogenic rewiring of gene-enhancer interactions. Cell. 2015;161(5):1012–1025. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.004 25959774
30. Tang Z, Luo OJ, Li X, Zheng M, Zhu JJ, Szalaj P, et al. CTCF-mediated human 3D genome architecture reveals chromatin topology for transcription. Cell. 2016;163(7):1611–1627. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.024
31. Van Bortle K, Ramos E, Takenaka N, Yang J, Wahi JE, Corces VG, Drosophila CTCF tandemly aligns with other insulator proteins at the borders of H3K27me3 domains. Genome Research. 2012;22(11):2176–2187. doi: 10.1101/gr.136788.111 22722341
32. Gibcus J, Dekker J, The hierarchy of the 3D genome. Molecular Cell. 2013;49(5):773–782. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2013.02.011. 23473598
33. Filippova D, Patro R, Duggal G, Kingsford C, Identification of alternative topological domains in chromatin. Algorithms for Molecular Biology. 2014;9(1):1–11. doi: 10.1186/1748-7188-9-14 24868242
34. Vietri Rudan M, Barrington C, Henderson S, Ernst C, Odom D, Tanay A, et al. Comparative Hi-C reveals that CTCF underlies evolution of chromosomal domain architecture. Cell Reports. 2015;10(8):1297–1309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.02.004. 25732821
35. Gómez-Marín C, Tena JJ, Acemel RD, López-Mayorga M, Naranjo S, de la Calle-Mustienes E, et al. Evolutionary comparison reveals that diverging CTCF sites are signatures of ancestral topological associating domains borders. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2015;112(24):7542–7547. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1505463112 26034287
36. Zabidi MA, Arnold CD, Schernhuber K, Pagani M, Rath M, Frank O, et al. Enhancer-core-promoter specificity separates developmental and housekeeping gene regulation. Nature. 2014;518(7540):556–559. doi: 10.1038/nature13994 25517091
37. Buxa MK, Slotman JA, van Royen ME, Paul MW, Houtsmuller AB, Renkawitz R, Insulator speckles associated with long-distance chromatin contacts. Biology Open. 2016;5(9):1266–1274. doi: 10.1242/bio.019455 27464669
38. Hart CM, Cuvier O, Laemmli UK, Evidence for an antagonistic relationship between the boundary element-associated factor BEAF and the transcription factor DREF. Chromosoma. 1999;108(6):375–383. doi: 10.1007/s004120050389 10591997
39. Jiang N, Emberly E, Cuvier O, Hart CM, Genome-wide mapping of Boundary Element-Associated Factor (BEAF) binding sites in Drosophila melanogaster links BEAF to transcription. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 2009;29(13):3556–3568. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01748-08 19380483
40. Negre N, Brown CD, Shah PK, Kheradpour P, Morrison CA, Henikoff JG, et al. A comprehensive map of insulator elements for the Drosophila genome. PLoS Genetics. 2010;6(1):e1000814+. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000814 20084099
41. Bailey SD, Zhang X, Desai K, Aid M, Corradin O, Cowper-Sal Lari R, et al. ZNF143 provides sequence specificity to secure chromatin interactions at gene promoters. Nature Communications. 2015;2:6186. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7186 25645053
42. Wani AH, Boettiger AN, Schorderet P, Ergun A, Munger C, Sadreyev RI, et al. Chromatin topology is coupled to Polycomb group protein subnuclear organization. Nature Communications. 2015;7:10291. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10291
43. Wang F, Marshall CB, Ikura M, Transcriptional/epigenetic regulator CBP/p300 in tumorigenesis: structural and functional versatility in target recognition. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 2013;70(21):3989–4008. doi: 10.1007/s00018-012-1254-4 23307074
44. Jost D, Carrivain P, Cavalli G, Vaillant C, Modeling epigenome folding: formation and dynamics of topologically associated chromatin domains. Nucleic Acids Research. 2014;42(15):9553–9561. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku698 25092923
45. Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. Journal of Statistical Software. 2010;33(1):1–22. doi: 10.18637/jss.v033.i01 20808728
46. Wang W, Org T, Montel-Hagen A, Pioli PD, Duan D, Israely E, et al. MEF2C protects bone marrow B-lymphoid progenitors during stress haematopoiesis. Nature Communications. 2016;7:12376+. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12376 27507714
47. Laoukili J, Kooistra MR, Brás A, Kauw J, Kerkhoven RM, Morrison A, et al. FoxM1 is required for execution of the mitotic programme and chromosome stability. Nature Cell Biology. 2005;7(2):126–136. doi: 10.1038/ncb1217 15654331
48. John LB, Ward AC, The Ikaros gene family: Transcriptional regulators of hematopoiesis and immunity. Molecular Immunology. 2011;48(9–10):1272–1278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molimm.2011.03.006. 21477865
49. DeSandro AM, Nagarajan UM, Boss JM, Associations and interactions between Bare lymphocyte syndrome factors. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 2000;20(17):6587–6599. doi: 10.1128/MCB.20.17.6587-6599.2000 10938133
50. Moqtaderi Z, Wang J, Raha D, White RJ, Snyder M, Weng Z, et al. Genomic binding profiles of functionally distinct RNA polymerase III transcription complexes in human cells. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology. 2010;17(5):635–640. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1794 20418883
51. Doyle B, Fudenberg G, Imakaev M, Mirny LA, Chromatin loops as allosteric modulators of enhancer-promoter interactions. PLoS Computational Biology. 2014;10(10):e1003867+. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003867 25340767
52. Neuwald AF, Aravind L, Spouge JL, Koonin EV, AAA+: A class of chaperone-like ATPases associated with the assembly, operation, and disassembly of protein complexes. Genome Research. 1999;9(1):27–43. 9927482
53. Marsman J, Horsfield JA, Long distance relationships: Enhancer-promoter communication and dynamic gene transcription. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)—Gene Regulatory Mechanisms. 2012;1819(11–12):1217–1227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2012.10.008. 23124110
54. Cao R, Wang L, Wang H, Xia L, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, et al. Role of histone H3 lysine 27 methylation in polycomb-group silencing. Science. 2002;298(5595):1039–1043. doi: 10.1126/science.1076997 12351676
55. Djekidel MN, Liang Z, Wang Q, Hu Z, Li G, Chen Y, et al. 3CPET: finding co-factor complexes from ChIA-PET data using a hierarchical Dirichlet process. Genome Biology. 2015;16(1):288+. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0851-6 26694485
56. Schwarzer W, Abdennur N, Goloborodko A, Pekowska A, Fudenberg G, Loe-Mie Y, et al. Two independent modes of chromosome organization are revealed by cohesin removal. bioRxiv. 2016;
57. Hnisz D, Weintraub AS, Day DS, Valton AL, Bak RO, Li CH, et al. Activation of proto-oncogenes by disruption of chromosome neighborhoods. Science. 2016; doi: 10.1126/science.aad9024 26940867
58. Facchinei F, Scutari G, Sagratella S, Parallel selective algorithms for nonconvex big data optimization. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing. 2015;63(7):1874–1889. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2015.2399858
59. Bien J, Taylor J, Tibshirani R, A Lasso for Hierarchical Interactions. Annals of Statistics. 2012;.
60. Wood AM, Van Bortle K, Ramos E, Takenaka N, Rohrbaugh M, Jones BC, et al. Regulation of chromatin organization and inducible gene expression by a Drosophila insulator. Molecular Cell. 2011;44(1):29–38. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.07.035 21981916
61. The ENCODE ConsortiumAn integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature. 2012;489(7414):57–74. doi: 10.1038/nature11247 22955616
62. Andersson R, Gebhard C, Miguel-Escalada I, Hoof I, Bornholdt J, Boyd M, et al. An atlas of active enhancers across human cell types and tissues. Nature. 2014;507(7493):455–461. doi: 10.1038/nature12787 24670763