Advancing inclusive science and systemic change: The convergence of national aims and institutional goals in implementing and assessing biomedical science training

BMC Proceedings

Volumn 11, Issue , 2017, Pages

  Hurtado, Sylvia ^a   White Lewis, Damani ^a   Norris, Keith ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CULTURAL FACTOR; CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT; DIVERISTY PROGRAM CONSORTIUM; ETHNICITY; EVALUATION STUDY; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; GOAL ATTAINMENT; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; INSTITUTIONAL CARE; INTEGRATED HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; INTERSECTORAL COLLABORATION; LEARNING; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL SCHOOL; MEDICAL STUDENT; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCIENTIST;

EID: 85037642015     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17536561     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12919-017-0086-5     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Bush V. Science, the endless frontier: a report to the president by the director of the Office of Scientific research and development. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office; 1945.
2. NIH Chronology of Events. https://www.nih.gov/about-nih/what-we-do/nih-almanac/chronology-events. Accessed 27 June 2017.
3. st century: social, political, and economic challenges. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University; 2011. p. 113-38.
4. National Institutes of Health. Draft report of the advisory committee to the director working group on diversity in the biomedical research workforce. Bethesda: The National Institutes of Health; 2012. https://acd.od.nih.gov/documents/reports/DiversityBiomedicalResearchWorkforceReport.pdf. Accessed 27 June 2017.
5. National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. Arlington: Special Report NSF 17-310; 2017. www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/. Accessed 27 June 2017.
6. Colby SL, Ortman JM. Projections of size and composition: 2014-2060. Current Population Reports, P25-1143. Washington, DC: United States Census Bureau; 2015.
7. Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy. Rising above the gathering storm: energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2007.
8. National Academy of Sciences. Expanding underrepresented minority participation: America's science and technology talent at the crossroads. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011.
9. President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST). Engage to excel: producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: The White House; 2012.
10. Brewer CA, Smith D. Vision and change in undergraduate biology education: a call to action. Washington, DC: AAAS; 2011.
11. Association of American Universities. Five-year initiative for improving undergraduate STEM education: discussion draft. Washington, DC: AAU; 2011.
12. The National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM). Barriers and opportunities for 2-year and 4-year STEM degrees: systemic change to support students' diverse pathways. Washington, DC: National Academies of Press; 2017.
13. Bowman NA. College diversity experiences and cognitive development: a meta-analysis. Rev of Educational Research. 2010;80:4-33.
14. Gurin P, Dey EL, Hurtado S, Gurin G. Diversity and higher education: theory and impact on educational outcomes. Harvard Educational Rev. 2002;72:330-66.
15. Hurtado S, Alvarez, CL, Guillermo-Wann C, Cuellar, M, Arellano L. A model for diverse learning environments: The scholarship on creating and assessing conditions for student success. In: Smart JC, Paulsen MB, editors. Higher education: Handbook of theory and research. 2012. p. 41-122.
16. Page SE. The difference: how the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2007.
17. Phillips KW. How diversity makes us smarter. Sci Am. 2014;311:43-7.
18. Kochan T, Bezrukova K, Ely R, Jackson S, Joshi A, Jehn K, Leonard J, Levine D, Thomas D. The effects of diversity on business performance: report of the diversity research network. Hum Resour Manag. 2003;42:3-21.
19. European Commission. The costs and benefits of diversity. Kent: Centre for Strategy and Evaluation Services; 2003.
20. Freeman RB, Huang W. Collaborating with people like me: ethnic co-authorship within the US. Cambridge: The National Bureau of Economic Research; 2014.
21. Dovidio JF, Fiske ST. Under the radar: how unexamined biases in decision-making processes in clinical interactions can contribute to health care disparities. Am J Public Health. 2012;102:945-52.
22. Shapiro JR, Williams AM. The role of stereotype threats in undermining girls' and women's performance and interest in STEM fields. Sex Roles. 2012;66:175.
23. Schrodt P, Cawyer CS, Sanders R. An examination of academic mentoring and new faculty members' satisfaction with socialization and tenure and promotion processes. Commun Educ. 2003;52:17-29.
24. Editorial Board. Diversity challenge. Nature. 2014;513:279.
25. Hayden EC. Racial bias continues to haunt NIH grants. Nature. 2015;527:286-7.
26. Reardon S. NIH to probe racial disparity in grant awards. Nature. 2014;512:243.
27. Ginther DK, Shaffer WT, Schnell J, Masimore B, Liu F, Hakk LL, Kington R. Race, ethnicity, and NIH research awards. Science. 2011;333:1015-9.
28. National Institutes of Health Data Book - Research and Training Grants: Competing Applications by Mechanism and Selected Activity Codes. https://report.nih.gov/NIHDatabook/Charts/Default.aspx?showm=Y&chartId=200&catId=2. Accessed 14 July 2017.
29. Tabak LA, Collins FS. Weaving a richer tapestry in biomedical science. Science. 2011;333:940-1.
30. National Science Foundation website for Statistics on Minorities in Science and Engineering. http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/showpub.cfm?TopID=2&SubID=27. Accessed 27 June 2017.
31. Building Infrastructure Leading to Diversity (BUILD) RFA. https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-RM-13-016.html. Accessed 27 June 2017.
32. Valantine HA, Lund PK, Gammie AE. From the NIH: a systems approach to increasing the diversity of the biomedical research workforce. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016;15:1-6.
33. NIH Common Fund. https://commonfund.nih.gov/. Accessed 27 June 2017.
34. National Research Mentoring Network (NRMN) RFA. https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-RM-13-017.html. Accessed 27 June 2017.
35. Coordination and Evaluation Center (CEC) RFA. https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-RM-13-015.html. Accessed 27 June 2017.
36. Enhancing the Diversity of the NIH-Funded Workforce, Working Group - Consortium Members. https://commonfund.nih.gov/diversity/members. Accessed 18 Sept 2017.
37. ACD Working Group on Diversity - Mission and Charge. https://acd.od.nih.gov/working-groups/wgd.html. Accessed 18 Sept 2017.
38. Building Infrastructure Leading to Diversity (BUILD) Participating Institutions. https://www.nigms.nih.gov/training/dpc/Pages/partinst-BUILD.aspx. Accessed 27 June 2017.
39. Sorkness Ca, Pfund C, Ofili EO, Okuyemi KS, Vishwanatha JK. A new approach to mentoring for research careers: the National Research Mentoring Network. BMC Proc. 2017;11(Suppl 12). [S14 this supplement].
40. Jones HP, McGee R, Weber-Main AM, Buchwald DS, Manson SM, Vishwanatha JK, Okuyemi KS. Enhancing research careers: an example of a US national diversity-focused, grant-writing training and coaching experiment. BMC Proc. 2017;11(Suppl 12). [S15 this supplement].
41. McCreath HE, Norris KC, Calderón NE, Purnell DL, Maccalla NMG, Seeman TE. Evaluating efforts to diversify the biomedical workforce: the role and function of the Coordination and Evaluation Center of the Diversity Program Consortium. BMC Proc. 2017;11(Suppl 12). [S2 this supplement].
42. Schulz PW, Hernandez PR, Woodcock A, Estrada M, Chance RC, Aguilar M, Serpe FT. Patching the pipeline: reducing educational disparities in the sciences through minority training programs. Educ Eval and Pol Analysis. 2011;33:95-114.
43. Chang M, Sharkness J, Hurtado S, Newman C. What matters in college for retaining aspiring scientists and engineers from underrepresented racial groups. J Res Sci Teach. 2014;51:555-80.
44. National Institute of General Medical Sciences - Training, Workforce Development, & Diversity. https://www.nigms.nih.gov/Training/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed 27 June 2017.
45. Hall AK, Miklos A, Oh A, Gailliard SD. Educational Outcomes from the Maximizing Access to Research Careers Undergraduate Student Training in Academic Research (MARC U-STAR) Program. https://www.nigms.nih.gov/News/reports/Documents/MARC-paper031416.pdf. Accessed 28 June 2017.
46. Faupel-Badger J, Miklos A. Institutional Research and Academic Career Development Awards (IRACDA) (K12) Outcomes Assessment. https://www.nigms.nih.gov/News/reports/Documents/IRACDA-outcomes-report.pdf. Accessed 28 June 2017.
47. National Research Council. Assessment of NIH minority research and training programs: phase 3. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2005.
48. National Science Board Science and Engineering Indicators 2014. https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind14/. Accessed 27 June 2017.
49. Higher Education Research Institute. Degrees of Success: Bachelor's Degree Completion Rates Among Initial STEM Majors. Los Angeles: HERI Report Brief; 2010. https://heri.ucla.edu/nih/downloads/2010-Degrees-of-Success.pdf. Accessed 28 June 2017.
50. Estrada M. Ingredients for improving the culture of STEM degree attainment with co-curricular supports for underrepresented minority students. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2014.
51. National Research Council. Discipline-based education research: understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2012.
52. Understanding Interventions Article Database. https://uiai.uccs.edu/article-database.php. Accessed 7 Nov 2017.
53. Chang MJ, Eagan MK, Lin MH, Hurtado S. Considering the impact of racial stigmas and science identity: persistence among biomedical and behavioral science aspirants. J High Educ. 2011;82:564-96.
54. Harackiewicz JM, Canning EA, Tibbetts Y, Giffen CJ, Blair SS, Rouse DI, Hyde JS. Closing the social class achievement gap for first-generation students in undergraduate biology. J Educ Psychol. 2014;106:375-89.
55. Chemers MM, Zurgriggen EL, Syed M, Goza BK, Bearman S. The role of efficacy and identity in science career commitment among underrepresented minority students. J Soc Issues. 2011;67:469-91.
56. Graham MJ, Frederick J, Byars-Winston A, Hunter A-B. Handelsman, J: increasing persistence of college students in STEM. Science. 2013;341:1455-6.
57. Palmer RT, Maramba DC, Gasman M. Fostering success of ethnic minorities in STEM: the role of minority serving institutions. New York: Routledge; 2013.
58. Stage FK, Hubbard SM. Undergraduate institutions that foster women and minority scientists. J Women Minorities Sci Eng. 2009;15:77-91.
59. Hurtado S, Cabrera NL, Lin MH, Arellano L, Espinosa L. Diversifying science: underrepresented student experiences in structured research programs. Res High Educ. 2009;50:189-214.
60. Bensimon EM, Hao L, Bustillos LT. Measuring the state of equity in public higher education. In: Gandara P, Orfield G, Horn C, editors. Expanding opportunity in higher education leveraging promise. Albany: State University of New York Press; 2006.
61. Hurtado S, Sork VL. Enhancing student success and building inclusive classrooms at UCLA: Report to the Executive Vice Chancellor and Provost. https://evc.ucla.edu/reports. Accessed 28 June 2017.
62. Turner CSV, Myers SL. Faculty of color in academe: bittersweet success. Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon; 2000.
63. Bianchini JA, Whitney DJ, Breton TD, Hilton-Brown BA. Toward inclusive science education: university scientists views of students, instructional practices, and the nature of science. Sci Educ. 2000;86:42-78.
64. Hrabowki FA, Henderson PH. How undergraduate programs can boost minority success in medical school. Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC); 2017. https://news.aamc.org/diversity/article/how-undergraduate-programs-boost-minority-success/. Accessed 27 June 2017.
65. Bonous-Hammarth M. Pathways to success: affirming opportunities for science, mathematics, and engineering majors. J Neg Educ. 2000;69:2-111.
66. Tibbetts Y, Harackiewicz JM, Canning EA, Boston JS, Priniski SJ, Hyde JS. Affirming independence: exploring mechanisms underlying a values affirmation intervention for first-generation students. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016;110:635-59.
67. Hurtado S, Han JC, Sáenz VB, Espinosa L, Cabrera N, Cerna O. Predicting transition and adjustment to college: biomedical and behavioral science aspirants' and minority students' first year of college. Res High Educ. 2007;48:841-87.
68. Strayhorn TL. College students' sense of belonging: a key to educational success for all students. New York and London: Routledge; 2012.
69. Sue DW, Bucceri J, Lin AI, Nadal KL, Torino GC. Racial microaggressions and the Asian American experience. Cult Divers Ethn Minor Psychol. 2007;13:72-81.
70. Saetermoe CL, Chavira G, Khachikian C, Boyns D, Cabello B. Critical race theory as a bridge in science training: The California State University, Northridge BUILD PODER program. BMC Proceedings. 2017;11(Suppl 12). [S4 this supplement].
71. Steele CM. A threat in the air. How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. Am Psychol. 1997;52:613-29.
72. Tuitt F. Afterword: realizing a more inclusive pedagogy. In: Howell A, Tuitt F, editors. Race and higher education: rethinking pedagogy in diverse classrooms. Cambridge: Harvard Educ Rev; 2003. p. 243-68.
73. Johnson J, Bozeman B. Perspective: adopting an asset bundles model to support and advance minority students' careers in academic medicine and the scientific pipeline. Acad Med. 2012;87:1488-95.
74. Carlone HB, Johnson A. Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: science identity as an analytic lens. J Res Sci Teach. 2007;44:1187-218.
75. Wieman C. Improving how universities teach science: lessons from the science education initiative. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 2017.