Undergraduate institutions that foster women and minority scientists

Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 77-91

  Stage, Frances K ^a   Hubbard, Steven ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70450219518     PISSN: 10728325     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v15.i1.50     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Bandura, A. (1999). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
2. Bensimon, E. (2005). Closing the achievement gap in higher education: An organizational perspective. New Directions for Higher Education, 131, 99-111.
3. Berryman, S. (1983). Who will do science? New York: The Rockefeller Foundation.
4. Blackburn, R. T, & Lawrence, J. H. (1995). Faculty at work: Motivation, expectation, satisfaction. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
5. Brown, O. G. (1994). Debunking the myth: Stories of African-American university students. Bloomington, IN: PHI Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
6. Clewell, B. C., & Campbell, P. B. (2002). Taking stock: Where we've been, where we are, where we're going. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 8(3), 20.
7. Contreras, F. E., Malcom, L., & Bensimon, E. M. (2008). Hispanic-serving institutions: Closeted identity and the production of equitable outcomes for Latino/a students. In M. Gasman, B. Baez, & C. Turner (Eds.), Minority serving institutions: New interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 71-90). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
8. Drew, D. (1996). Aptitude revisited: Rethinking math and science education for America's next century. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
9. Gilbert, J., & Calvert, S. (2003). Challenging accepted wisdom: Looking at the gender and science education question through a different lens. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 861-878.
10. Gilmartin, S. K., Li, E., & Aschbacher, P. (2006). The relationship between interest in physical science/engineering, science class experiences, and family contexts: Variations by gender and race/ethnicity among secondary students. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 12(2-3), 179-207.
11. Glazer-Raymo, J. (2005). Professionalizing graduate education: The master's degree in the marketplace. ASHE Higher Education Report, 31(4).
12. Glazer-Raymo, J. (2008). Unfinished agendas: New and continuing gender challenges in higher education. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
13. Hanson, S. L. (1996). Lost talent: Women in the sciences. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
14. Hubbard, S. (2005). Identifying factors that infl uence student-centered teaching in the undergraduate classroom: A structural modeling analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York University.
15. Hubbard, S., & Stage, F. K. (2009). Conditions, practices and attitudes of faculty at Hispanic serving institutions. The Journal of Higher Education, 80(3), 270-289.
16. Kimball, J., Cole, B., Hobson, M., Watson, K., & Stanley, C. (2008). A study of women engineering students and time to completion of first-year required courses at Texas A&M University. Journal of Women and Minorities Science and Engineering, 14(1), 67-81.
17. Kinzie, J. (2007). Women's paths in science: A critical feminist analysis. In F. Stage (Ed.), Using quantitative data to answer critical questions. New directions for institutional research (pp. 81-93). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18. Lane, M. J. (1990). Women and minorities in science and engineering. Washington DC: National Science Foundation.
19. MacLachlan, A. J. (2006). Developing graduate students of color for the professoriate in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Research & Occasional Paper Series: UC Berkeley: Center for Studies in Higher Education 6.06.
20. Marquis Who's Who (2005.) Who's Who in America. New Providence, NJ: Author.
21. National Science Foundation. (2002). Selected data on science and engineering doctorate awards: 1995. Arlington, VA: Author.
22. National Science Foundation. (2003). Gender differences in the careers of academic scientists and engineers: A literature review. Arlington, VA: Author.
23. National Science Foundation. (2005). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2003. Arlington, VA: Author.
24. National Science Foundation. (2006). Integrated Science and Engineering Resource Data System (WebCASPAR). Retrieved on July 15, 2006, from http://webcaspar. nsf.gov/.
25. Newbill, P., & Cennamo, K. (2008). Improving women's and girls' attitudes toward science with instructional strategies. Journal of Women and Minorities Science and Engineering, 14(1), 49-65.
26. Oakes, J. (1990). Lost talent: The underrepresentation of women, minorities and disabled persons in science. Santa Monica: Rand.
27. Ortiz, A., & Boyer, P. (2003). Student assessment in tribal colleges. In M. C. Brown & J. E. Lane (Eds.), Studying diverse institutions: Contexts, challenges, and considerations (pp. 41-49). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
28. Princeton Review. (2005). The Princeton Review's complete book of colleges (2006 ed.). New York: Random House, Inc.
29. Rosser, S. V. (1995). Teaching the majority: Breaking the gender barrier in science, mathematics, and engineering, Athene Series. New York: Teachers College Press.
30. Rosser, S. V., & Lane, E.O. (2002). Key barriers for academic institutions seeking to retain female scientists and engineers: Family-unfriendly policies, low numbers, stereotypes, and harassment. Journal of Women and Minorities Science and Engineering, 8, 161-189.
31. Sax, L. (2001). Undergraduate science majors: gender differences in who goes to graduate school. Review of Higher Education, 24(2), 153-172.
32. Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder CO: Westview Press.
33. Sonnert, G. (1995). Who succeeds in science? The gender dimension. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
34. Stage, F. K. (1997). Reframing research, informing policy: Another view of women in the mathematics/science pipeline. In C. Marshall (Ed.), Feminist critical policy analysis II: A prospective from post-secondary education. Washington, DC: The Falmer Press.
35. Stage, F. K., & Hubbard, S. (2005, November). Developing scientists of color: Baccalaureate origins of recent math and science doctorates. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Philadelphia, PA.
36. Stage, F. K., & Hubbard, S. M. (2008a). Conditions, practices, and attitudes of faculty at minority serving institutions. In M. B. Gasman, B. Baez & Turner, C. (Eds.), Minority serving institutions: New interdisciplinary perspectives. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
37. Stage, F. K., & Hubbard, S. (2008b). Developing women scientists: Baccalaureate origins of recent math and science Ph.D.s. In J. Glazer-Raymo (Ed.), Unfinished agendas: Women, gender, and the new challenges in higher education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
38. Stage, F. K., & Kinzie, J. (in press). Reform in undergraduate science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: The classroom context. Journal of General Education.
39. Stage, F. K., & Maple, S. (1996). Incompatible coals: Narratives of graduate women in the mathematics pipeline. American Educational Research Journal, 33(1), 23-51. (Pubitemid 126321558)
40. Stage F. K., Muller, P., Kinzie, J. & Simmons, A. (1998). Creating learning centered classrooms: What does learning theory have to say? ASHE Higher Education Report, 26(4).
41. Teranishi, R. T. (2007). Race, ethnicity, and higher education policy. In F. K. Stage (Ed.), Answering critical questions with quantitative data. New directions for institutional research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
42. Tidball, M. E. (1980). Women's colleges and women achievers revisited. Signs, 5, 504-517.
43. Tidball, M. E., Smith, D. G., Tidball, C. S., & Wolf-Wendel, L. E. (1999). Taking women seriously: Lessons and legacies for educating the majority. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press.
44. Thurgood, L., Golladay, M., & Hill, S. (2006). U.S. doctorates in the 20th century. Washington DC: National Science Foundation.
45. Trautvetter, L. C., McKenna, A. F., & Saddler, T. (2009, April). Making progress: Using organizational context to study recruitment and retention of female and underrepresented faculty members in engineering. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Conference, San Diego, CA.
46. Wentling, R. M., & Camacho, C. (2008). Women engineers: Factors and obstacles related to the pursuit of a degree in engineering. Journal of Women and Minorities Science and Engineering, 14(1), 83-118.
47. Wolf-Wendel, L. E. (1998). Models of excellence: The baccalaureate origins of successful European American women, African American women and Latinas. Journal of Higher Education, 69(2), 144-172.
48. Wolf-Wendel, L. E. (2000). Women friendly campuses: What five institutions are doing right. Review Higher Education, 23(3), 319-345.
49. Wolf-Wendel, L. E., Baker, B., & Morphew, C. (2000). Dollars & $ense: Institutional resources and the baccalaureate origins of women doctorates. Journal of Higher Education, 71(2), 165-186.
50. Wyer, M. (2003). Intending to stay: Images of scientists, attitudes toward women, and gender as infl uences on persistence among science and engineering majors. Journal of Women and Minorities Science and Engineering, 9(1), 1-16.