Toward Inclusive Science Education: University Scientists' Views of Students, Instructional Practices, and the Nature of Science

Science Education

Volumn 86, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 42-78

  Bianchini, Julie A ^a   Whitney, David J ^b   Breton, Therese D ^a   Hilton Brown, Bryan A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036116585     PISSN: 00368326     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sce.1043     Document Type: Article

References (106)

1. Aikenhead, G. S., Fleming, R. W., & Ryan, A. G. (1987). High-school graduates' beliefs about science-technology-society. I. Methods and issues in monitoring student views. Science Education, 71(2), 145-161.
2. Aikenhead, G. S., & Jegede, O. J. (1999). Cross-cultural science education: A cognitive explanation of a cultural phenomenon. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(3), 269-288.
3. American Association for the Advancement of Science (1989). Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: Author.
4. American Association of University Women (1991). Shortchanging girls, shortchanging America: A call to action. Washington, DC: Author.
5. Arnold, K. D. (1995). Lives of promise: What becomes of high school valedictorians. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6. Association of American Colleges and Universities (1999a). Frequently asked questions about feminist science studies. Washington, DC: Author.
7. Association of American Colleges and Universities (1999b). Special focus on AAC&U's women and scientific literacy project. On Campus with Women, 29(1), 2-7.
8. Banks, J. A. (1995). The historical reconstruction of knowledge about race: Implications for transformative teaching. Educational Researcher, 24(2), 15-25.
9. Banks, J. A. (1999). An introduction to multicultural education (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
10. Barad, K. (1996). Meeting the universe halfway: Realism and social constructivism without contradiction. In L. H. Nelson & J. Nelson (Eds.), Feminism, science, and the philosophy of science (pp. 161-194). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.
11. Barton, A. C. (1998). Feminist science education. New York: Teachers College Press.
12. Bianchini, J. A., Hilton-Brown, B. A., & Breton, T. D. (2000). Professional development for university scientists around issues of inclusion: Investigating dissent within community. Manuscript submitted for publication.
13. Bloor, D. (1976). Knowledge and social imagery. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
14. Brainard, S. G. (1994). The freshman intervention program. Final report to the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. Seattle, WA: University of Washington.
15. Brickhouse, N. W., Lowery, P., & Schultz, K. (2000). What kind of a girl does science? The construction of school science identities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(5), 441-458.
16. Cobern, W. W., & Loving, C. C. (1998). Defining "science" in a multicultural world: Implications for science education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Diego, CA.
17. Costa, V. B. (1995). When science is "another world": Relationships between worlds of family, friends, school, and science. Science Education, 79, 313-333.
18. Cunningham, C. M., & Helms, J. V. (1998). Sociology of science as a means to a more authentic, inclusive science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(5), 483-500.
19. Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people's images of science. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
20. Eisenhart, M. (1994). Women scientists and the norm of gender neutrality at work. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 1, 193-207.
21. Eisenhart, M. A., & Finkel, E. (1998). Women's science: Learning and succeeding from the margins. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. Fordham, S. (1996). Blacked out: Dilemmas of race, identity, and success at Capital high. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23. Fraser, B, J. (1978). Development of a Test of Science-Related Attitudes. Science Education, 62(4), 509-515.
24. Gaskell, J., & Hildebrand, G. (1996). Teaching individuals in a gendered world. Reflect, 2(2), 36-42.
25. Ginorio, A. B. (1995). Warming the climate for women in academic science. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
26. Ginorio, A. B., et al. (1994, July). Patterns of persistence: Switching and attrition among science and engineering majors for women and men students at the University of Washington, 1985-1991. Final report to the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. Seattle, WA: University of Washington.
27. Ginzberg, R. (1989). Uncovering gynocentric science. In N. Tuana (Ed.), Feminism and science (pp. 69-84). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
28. Gould, S. J. (1996). The mismeasure of man (2nd ed.). New York: Norton.
29. Haggerty, S. M. (1995). Gender and teacher development: Issues of power and culture. International Journal of Science Education, 17, 1-15.
30. Haraway, D. J. (1989). Primate visions: Gender, race, and nature in the world of modern science. New York: Routledge.
31. Haraway, D. J., & Goodeve, T. N. (2000). How like a leaf. An interview with Donna J. Haraway. New York: Routledge.
32. Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women's lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
33. Harding, S. (1994). Is science multicultural? Configurations, 2, 301-330.
34. Harding, S. (1998). Is science multicultural? Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
35. Hart, R. (1999). On the problem of Chinese science. In M. Biagioli (Ed.), The science studies reader (pp. 189-201). New York: Routledge.
36. Hartsock, N. (1983). Money, sex, and power: Toward a feminist historical materialism. New York: Longman.
37. Hess, D. (1995). Science and technology in a multicultural world. New York: Columbia.
38. Jones, L. R., Mullis, I. V. S., Raizen, S. A., Weiss, I. R., & Weston, E. A. (1992). The 1990 science report card: NAEP's assessment of fourth, eighth, and twelfth graders. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education.
39. Kahle, J. B. (1996). Opportunities and obstacles: Science education in the schools. In C.-S. Davis, A. B. Ginorio, C. S. Hollenshead, B. B. Lazarus, P. M. Rayman, & Associates (Eds.), The equity equation (pp. 57-95). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
40. Kass-Simon, G., & Farnes, P. (Eds.). (1990). Women of science: Righting the record. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
41. Keller, E. F. (1977). The anomaly of a woman in physics. In S. Ruddick & P. Daniels (Eds.), Working it out (pp. 77-91). New York: Pantheon Books.
42. Keller, E. F. (1983). A feeling for the organism: The life and work of Barbara McClintock. New York: Freeman.
43. Keller, E. F. (1985). Reflections on gender and science. New Haven, RI: Yale University Press.
44. Kelly, G. J., Chen, C., & Crawford, T. (1998). Methodological considerations for studying science-in-the-making in educational settings. Research in Science Education, 28(1), 23-50.
45. Kohlstedt, S. G., & Longino, H. (1997). The women, gender, and science question: What do research on women in science and research on gender and science have to do with each other? Osiris, 12, 3-15.
46. Kreinberg, N., & Lewis, S. (1996). The politics and practice of equity: Experiences from both sides of the Pacific. In L. H. Parker, L. J. Rennie, & B. J. Fraser (Eds.), Gender, science, and mathematics: Shortening the shadow (pp. 177-202). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
47. Lapointe, A. E., Mead, N. A., & Phillips, G. W. (1989). A world of differences: An international assessment of mathematics and science. Princeton, NJ: Center for the Assessment of Educational Progress, Educational Testing Service.
48. Lewontin, R. C., Rose, S., & Kamin, L. J. (1993). IQ: the rank ordering of the world. In S. Harding (Ed.), The racial economy of science (pp. 142-160). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
49. Longino, H. (1989). Can there be a feminist science? In N. Tuana (Ed.), Feminism & science (pp. 45-57). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
50. Longino, H. (1990). Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
51. Longino, H. B., & Hammonds, E. (1990). Conflicts and tensions in the feminist study of gender and science. In M. Hirsch & E. F. Keller (Eds.), Conflicts in feminism (pp. 164-183). New York: Routledge.
52. Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P. W., Love, N., & Stiles, K. E. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
53. Malcom, S. M. (1993). Undergraduate and beyond: Letting nurture take its course. In D. C. Fort (Ed.), A hand up: Women mentoring women in science (pp. 181-193). Washington, DC: The Association for Women in Science.
54. Martin, E. (1999). Toward an anthropology of immunology: The body as nation state. In M. Biagioli (Ed.), The science studies reader (pp. 358-371). New York: Routledge.
55. Mayberry, M. (1998). Reproductive and resistant pedagogies: The comparative roles of collaborative learning and feminist pedagogy in science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(4), 443-459.
56. Mayberry, M. & Rose, E. C. (Eds.) (1999). Innovative feminist pedagogies in action: Meeting the challenge. New York: Routledge.
57. McCormick, T. (1994). Creating the non-sexist classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
58. McGinnis, J. R., & Pearsall, M. (1998). Teaching elementary science methods to women: A male professor's experience from two perspectives. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(8), 919-949.
59. McIntosh, P. (1984). The study of women: Processes of personal and curricular revision. The Forum for Liberal Education, 6(5), 2-4.
60. Merchant, C. (1980). The death of nature. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
61. Mies, M., & Shiva, V. (1993). Ecofeminism. London: Zed Books.
62. Muller, C. B., & Pavone, M. L. (1998). The women and science project at Dartmouth: One campus model for support and systemic change. In A. M. Pattatucci (Ed.), Women in science: Meeting career challenges (pp. 247-265). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
63. Narayan, U. (1989). The project of feminist epistemology: Perspectives from a Nonwestem feminist. In A. Jagger & S. Bordo (Eds.), Gender/body/knowledge: Feminist reconstructions of being and knowing (pp. 255-269). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
64. National Research Council (1996a). From analysis to action: Undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: Report of a convocation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
65. National Research Council (1996b). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
66. National Science Foundation (1996). Shaping the future: New expectations for undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. A report on its Review of Undergraduate Education by the Advisory Committee to the Directorate for Education and Human Resources, NSF Publication No. 96-139). Arlington, VA: Author.
67. National Science Foundation (1998). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 1998 [On-line]. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/nsf99338/start.htm.
68. Nieto, S. (1996). Affirming diversity: The sociopolitical context of multicultural education (2nd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
69. Nieto, S. (1999). The light in their eyes: Creating multicultural learning communities. New York: Teachers College Press.
70. Ogbu, J. U. (1994). Racial stratification and education in the United States: Why inequality persists. Teachers College Record, 96(2), 264-297.
71. Posner, G. J. (1995). Analyzing the curriculum (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
72. Reiss, M. J. (1993). Science education for a pluralist society. Buckingham: Open University Press.
73. Rennie, L. J., Parker, L. H., & Kahle, J. B. (1996). Informing teaching and research in science education through gender equity initiatives. In L. H. Parker, L. J. Rennie, & B. J. Fraser (Eds.), Gender, science, and mathematics: Shortening the shadow (pp. 203-222). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
74. Richmond, G., Howes, E., Kurth, L., & Hazelwood, C. (1998). Connections and critique: Feminist pedagogy and science teacher education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(8), 897-918.
75. Rodriguez, A. J. (1998). Strategies for counterresistance: Toward sociotransformative constructivism and learning to teach science for diversity and understanding. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 589-622.
76. Rosser, S. V. (1991). Female-friendly science: Applying women's studies methods and theories to attract students. New York: Teachers College Press.
77. Rosser, S. V. (1995). Teaching the majority: Breaking the gender barrier in science, mathematics and engineering. New York: Teachers College Press.
78. Rosser, S. V. (1997). Re-engineering female-friendly science. New York: Teachers College Press.
79. Rossiter, M. W. (1982). Women scientists in America: Struggles and strategies to 1940. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
80. Rossiter, M. W. (1995). Women scientists in America: Before affirmative action, 1940-1972. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
81. Rutherford, F. J. (1964). The role of inquiry in science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2, 80-84.
82. Sanders, J., Campbell, P. B., & Steinbrueck, K. (1997). One project, many strategies: Making preservice teacher education more equitable. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 3, 225-243.
83. Sands, A. (1993). Never meant to survive: A black woman's journey - an interview with Evelynn Hammonds. In S. Harding (Ed.), The racial economy of science (pp. 239-248). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
84. Schiebinger, L. (1997). Creating sustainable science. Osiris, 12, 201-216.
85. Schiebinger, L. (1999). Has feminism changed science? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
86. Schuster, M., & Van Dyne, S. (1985), Women's place in the academy: Transforming the liberal arts curriculum. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld.
87. Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
88. Southerland, S. A. (2000). Epistemic universalism and the shortcomings of curricular multicultural science education. Science & Education, 9(3), 298-307.
89. Southerland, S. A., & Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Preservice teachers' views of inclusive science teaching as shaped by images of teaching, learning, and knowledge. Science Education, 83(2), 131-150.
90. Spanier, B. (1995). Im/partial science: Gender ideology in molecular biology. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
91. Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
92. Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air. American Psychologist, 52(6), 613-629.
93. Stepan, N. L. (1996). Race and gender: The role of analogy in science. In E. F. Keller & H. E. Longino (Eds.), Feminism and science (pp. 121-136). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
94. Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
95. Tetreault, M. K. (1985). Stages of thinking about women: An experience-derived evaluation model. Journal of Higher Education, 5(4), 368-384.
96. The Biology and Gender Study Group (1989). The importance of feminist critique for contemporary cell biology. In N. Tuana (Ed.), Feminism and science (pp. 172-187). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
97. Tobias, S. (1990). They're not dumb, they're different. Tucson, AZ: Research Corporation.
98. Tobias, S. (1992). Revitalizing undergraduate science: Why some things work and most don't. Tucson, AZ: Research Corporation.
99. Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high energy physics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
100. Tuana, N. (1995). The values of science: Empiricism from a feminist perspective. Synthese, 104(3) 441-461.
101. Vetter, B. M. (1996). Myths and realities of women's progress in the sciences, mathematics, and engineering. In C. Davis, A. B. Ginorio, C. S. Hollenshead, B. B. Lazarus, P. M. Rayman, & Associates (Eds.), The equity equation: Fostering the advancement of women in the sciences, mathematics, and engineering (pp. 29-56). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
102. Weatherford, J. (1993). Early Andean experimental agriculture. In S. Harding (Ed.), The racial economy of science (pp. 64-77). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press
103. Weigand, D., Ginorio, A. B., & Brown, M. D. (1994). First steps in college science: A comparison of single-sex versus co-educational programs. Final report to the Women's Colleges Coalition. Northwest Center for Research on Women.
104. Wertheim, M. (1995). Pythagoras' trousers. New York: W. W. Norton.
105. Willis, S. (1996). Gender justice and the mathematics curriculum: Four perspectives. In L. H. Parker, L. J. Rennie, & B. J. Fraser (Eds.), Gender, science, and mathematics: Shortening the shadow (pp. 41-52). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
106. Woolgar, S. (Ed.) (1988). Knowledge and reflexivity: New frontiers in the sociology of knowledge. London: Sage