Efficient human-robot collaboration: When should a robot take initiative?

International Journal of Robotics Research

Volumn 36, Issue 5-7, 2017, Pages 563-579

  Baraglia, Jimmy ^a   Cakmak, Maya ^b   Nagai, Yukie ^a   Rao, Rajesh PN ^b   Asada, Minoru ^a  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian network; Human robot interaction; initiative assistive robotics; social robotics

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; ROBOTICS;

ASSISTIVE ROBOTICS; DYNAMIC BAYESIAN NETWORKS; ENVIRONMENTAL STATE; HUMAN-ROBOT COLLABORATION; QUALITY OF INTERACTION; RESEARCH QUESTIONS; SOCIAL ROBOTICS; TRIGGER MECHANISM;

HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION;

EID: 85035813650     PISSN: 02783649     EISSN: 17413176     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0278364916688253     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Alexandrova S, Cakmak M, Hsiao K, et al. (2014) Robot programming by demonstration with interactive action visualizations. In: Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems. Berkeley, CA.
2. Argyle M, Cook M, (1976) Gaze and Mutual Gaze. American Psychological Association. Cambridge University Press.
3. Awais M, Henrich D, (2012) Proactive premature intention estimation for intuitive human-robot collaboration. In: 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 4098–4103. Vilamoura-Algarve, Portugal: IEEE.
4. Baraglia J, Cakmak M, Nagai Y, Rao R, Asada M, (2016) Initiative in robot assistance during collaborative task execution. In: 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pp. 67–74. Christchurch, New Zealand: IEEE.
5. Baraglia J, Nagai Y, Asada M, (2014) Prediction error minimization for emergence of altruistic behavior. In: The 2014 4th International Conference on Development and Learning and on Epigenetic Robotics, pp. 281–286. Genoa, Italy: IEEE.
6. Baraglia J, Nagai Y, Asada M, (2015) State prediction for development of helping behavior in robots. In: The 2015 Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, Proceeding of the Workshop on Cognition: A Bridge Between Robotics and Interaction. pp. 11. Portland, USA.
7. Cakmak M, Chao C, Thomaz A, (2010) Designing interactions for robot active learners. IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development 2(2): 108–118.
8. Carifio J, Perla RJ, (2007) Ten common misunderstandings, misconceptions, persistent myths and urban legends about Likert scales and Likert response formats and their antidotes. Journal of Social Sciences 3(3): 106–116.
9. Chao C, Thomaz A, (2013) Controlling social dynamics with a parametrized model of floor regulation. Journal of Human Robot Interaction 2(1): 4–29.
10. Chao C, Thomaz AL, (2010) Turn taking for human-robot interaction. In: AAAI fall symposium: Dialog with robots, The 2010 AAAI Fall Symposium, USA. Arlington, USA: AAAI press.
11. St Clair A, Mataric M, (2015) How robot verbal feedback can improve team performance in human-robot task collaborations. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pp. 213–220. Portland, USA: ACM.
12. Cuntoor NP, Collins R, Hoogs AJ, (2012) Human-robot teamwork using activity recognition and human instruction. In: 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp.459–465. Vilamoura-Algarve, Portugal: IEEE.
13. Degris T, Sigaud O, (2010) Factored Markov decision processes. In: Markov Decision Processes in Artificial Intelligence. pp.99–126. Elsevier, Open access.
14. Dragan AD, Bauman S, Forlizzi J, Srinivasa SS, (2015) Effects of robot motion on human-robot collaboration. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp.51–58. Portland, USA: ACM.
15. Emery NJ, (2000) The eyes have it: The neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 24(6): 581–604.
16. Fong T, Thorpe C, Baur C, (2003) Multi-robot remote driving with collaborative control. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 50(4): 699–704. IEEE.
17. Gombolay MC, Gutierrez RA, Sturla GF, et al. (2014) Decision-making authority, team efficiency and human worker satisfaction in mixed human-robot teams. Robots: Science and Systems (RSS).
18. Groten R, Feth D, Peer A, Buss M, (2010).Shared decision making in a collaborative task with reciprocal haptic feedback-an efficiency-analysis. In: Robotics and Automation (ICRA), IEEE International Conference on 2010, pp. 1834–1839. Anchorage, USA: IEEE.
19. Hawkins KP, Bansal S, Vo NN, Bobick AF, (2014) Anticipating human actions for collaboration in the presence of task and sensor uncertainty. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp.2215–2222). Hong Kong, China: IEEE.
20. Hayes B, Scassellati B, (2015) Effective robot teammate behaviors for supporting sequential manipulation tasks. In: Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), IEEE/RSJ International Conference on 2015, pp. 6374–6380. Tokyo, Japan: IEEE.
21. Hoffman G, (2013) Evaluating fluency in human-robot collaboration. In: HRI workshop on human robot collaboration.
22. Hoffman G, Breazeal C, (2007, March). Effects of anticipatory action on human-robot teamwork efficiency, fluency, and perception of team. In: Proceedings of the 2007 2nd ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction, pp.1–8. Washington DC, USA: ACM.
23. Hoffman G, Breazeal C, (2010) Effects of anticipatory perceptual simulation on practiced human-robot tasks. Autonomous Robots 28(4): 403–423.
24. Huang CM, Mutlu B, (2014) Learning-based modeling of multimodal behaviors for humanlike robots. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction, pp.57–64. Bielefeld, Germany: ACM.
25. Huang CM, Andrist S, Sauppé A, et al. (2015a) Using gaze patterns to predict task intent in collaboration. Frontiers in Psychology 6: 1049.
26. Huang CM, Cakmak M, Mutlu B, (2015b) Adaptive coordination strategies for human-robot handovers. In: 2015 Robotics: Science and systems (RSS). Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
27. Jarrassé N, Paik J, Pasqui V, Morel G, (2008) How can human motion prediction increase transparency? In:Robotics and Automation, ICRA 2008. IEEE International Conference on 2008, pp.2134–2139. Pasadena, USA: IEEE.
28. Kwon WY, Suh IH, (2013) Proactive planning using a hybrid temporal influence diagram for human assistive robots. In: Robotics and Automation (ICRA), IEEE International Conference on 2013, pp.1785–1791. Karlsruhe, Germany: IEEE.
29. Li H, Cabibihan JJ, Tan YK, (2011) Towards an effective design of social robots. International Journal of Social Robotics 3(4): 333–335.
30. Mainprice J, Berenson D, (2013) Human-robot collaborative manipulation planning using early prediction of human motion. In: 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp.299–306. Tokyo, Japan: IEEE.
31. Mainprice J, Sisbot EA, Jaillet L, Cortés J, Alami R, Siméon T, (2011) Planning human-aware motions using a sampling-based costmap planner. In: Robotics and Automation (ICRA), IEEE International Conference on 2011, pp.5012–5017. Shanghai, China: IEEE.
32. Meltzoff AN, (2007) ‘Like me’: A foundation for social cognition. Developmental Science 10(1): 126–134.
33. Moon A, Troniak DM, Gleeson B, et al. (2014). Meet me where i’m gazing: how shared attention gaze affects human-robot handover timing. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction, pp.334–341. Bielefeld, Germany: ACM.
34. Mutlu B, Shiwa T, Kanda T, Ishiguro H, Hagita N, (2009) Footing in human-robot conversations: how robots might shape participant roles using gaze cues. In: Proceedings of the 2009 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction, pp.61–68. San Diego, USA: ACM.
35. Mutlu B, Terrell A, Huang CM, (2013) Coordination mechanisms in human-robot collaboration. In: Proceedings of the 2013 Workshop on Collaborative Manipulation, 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. Tokyo, Japan: ACM.
36. Myowa-Yamakoshi M, Scola C, Hirata S, (2012) Humans and chimpanzees attend differently to goal-directed actions. Nature Communications 3: 693.
37. Najmaei N, Kermani MR, (2010) Prediction-based reactive control strategy for human-robot interactions. In: 2010 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), pp.3434–3439. Anchorage, USA: IEEE.
38. Nikolaidis S, Ramakrishnan R, Gu K, Shah J, (2015) Efficient model learning from joint-action demonstrations for human-robot collaborative tasks. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp.189–196. Portland, USA: ACM.
39. Nikolaidis S, Shah J, (2013) Human-robot cross-training: Computational formulation, modeling and evaluation of a human team training strategy. In: Proceedings of the 2013 8th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction, pp.33–40. Tokyo, Japan: IEEE Press.
40. Pérez-D’Arpino C, Shah JA, (2015) Fast target prediction of human reaching motion for cooperative human-robot manipulation tasks using time series classification. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp.6175–6182. Seattle, USA: IEEE.
41. Shah J, Wiken J, Williams B, Breazeal C, (2011) Improved human-robot team performance using chaski, a human-inspired plan execution system. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Human-robot interaction, pp.29–36. Lausanne, Switzerland: ACM.
42. Sisbot EA, Clodic A, Alami R, Ransan M, (2008) Supervision and motion planning for a mobile manipulator interacting with humans. In: Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on 2008, pp.327–334. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IEEE.
43. Tomasello M, Carpenter M, Call J, et al. (2005) Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and brain sciences 28(05): 675–691.