Structural and spatial chromatin features at developmental gene loci in human pluripotent stem cells

Nature Communications

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Ikeda, Hiroki ^a   Sone, Masamitsu ^a,b   Yamanaka, Shinya ^a,c   Yamamoto, Takuya ^a,b,d  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c GLADSTONE INSTITUTE OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE   (United States)

^d JAPAN AGENCY FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HISTONE H3; HISTONE H3K4ME3; POLYCOMB GROUP PROTEIN; POLYCOMB REPRESSIVE COMPLEX 2; TRITHORAX GROUP; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; HISTONE; PRC1 PROTEIN, HUMAN;

CELLS AND CELL COMPONENTS; DIFFERENTIATION; GENE EXPRESSION; PIGMENT; PROTEIN;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL INTERACTION; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; CHROMATIN STRUCTURE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVELOPMENTAL GENE; ENHANCER REGION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE LOCUS; HISTONE MODIFICATION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR REPROGRAMMING; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; PROMOTER REGION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION SITE; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION; CHEMISTRY; CHROMATIN; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; HISTONE CODE; METABOLISM; METHYLATION;

CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CHROMATIN; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; GENES, DEVELOPMENTAL; GENETIC LOCI; HISTONE CODE; HISTONES; HUMANS; METHYLATION; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS;

EID: 85034668683     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-01679-x     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Bernstein, B. E. et al. A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell 125, 315-326 (2006).
2. Ku, M. et al. Genomewide analysis of PRC1 and PRC2 occupancy identifies two classes of bivalent domains. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000242 (2008).
3. Pan, G. et al. Whole-genome analysis of histone H3 lysine 4 and lysine 27 methylation in human embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 1, 299-312 (2007).
4. Zhao, X. D. et al. Whole-genome mapping of histone H3 Lys4 and 27 trimethylations reveals distinct genomic compartments in human embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 1, 286-298 (2007).
5. Azuara, V. et al. Chromatin signatures of pluripotent cell lines. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 532-538 (2006).
6. Dou, Y. et al. Physical association and coordinate function of the H3 K4 methyltransferase MLL1 and the H4 K16 acetyltransferase MOF. Cell 121, 873-885 (2005).
7. Kuzmichev, A., Nishioka, K., Erdjument-Bromage, H., Tempst, P. &Reinberg, D. Histone methyltransferase activity associated with a human multiprotein complex containing the Enhancer of Zeste protein. Genes Dev. 16, 2893-2905 (2002).
8. Wysocka, J. et al. WDR5 associates with histone H3 methylated at K4 and is essential for H3 K4 methylation and vertebrate development. Cell 121, 859-872 (2005).
9. Brookes, E. et al. Polycomb associates genome-wide with a specific RNA polymerase II variant, and regulates metabolic genes in ESCs. Cell Stem Cell 10, 157-170 (2012).
10. Min, I. M. et al. Regulating RNA polymerase pausing and transcription elongation in embryonic stem cells. Genes Dev. 25, 742-754 (2011).
11. Stock, J. K. et al. Ring1-mediated ubiquitination of H2A restrains poised RNA polymerase II at bivalent genes in mouse ES cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 9, 1428-1435 (2007).
12. Polo Jose, M. et al. A molecular roadmap of reprogramming somatic cells into iPS Cells. Cell 151, 1617-1632 (2012).
13. Morin-Kensicki, E. M., Faust, C., LaMantia, C. &Magnuson, T. Cell and tissue requirements for the gene eed during mouse gastrulation and organogenesis. Genesis 31, 142-146 (2001).
14. Pasini, D., Bracken, A. P., Jensen, M. R., Lazzerini Denchi, E. &Helin, K. Suz12 is essential for mouse development and for EZH2 histone methyltransferase activity. EMBO J. 23, 4061-4071 (2004).
15. O'Carroll, D. et al. The polycomb-group gene Ezh2 is required for early mouse development. Mol. Cell Biol. 21, 4330-4336 (2001).
16. Jost, K. L. et al. 3D-image analysis platform monitoring relocation of pluripotency genes during reprogramming. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, e113 (2011).
17. Apostolou, E. et al. Genome-wide chromatin interactions of the Nanog locus in pluripotency, differentiation, and reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell 12, 699-712 (2013).
18. de Wit, E. &de Laat, W. A decade of 3C technologies: insights into nuclear organization. Genes Dev. 26, 11-24 (2012).
19. Gheldof, N., Leleu, M., Noordermeer, D., Rougemont, J. &Reymond, A. Detecting long-range chromatin interactions using the chromosome conformation capture sequencing (4C-seq) method. Methods Mol. Biol. 786, 211-225 (2012).
20. Simonis, M. et al. Nuclear organization of active and inactive chromatin domains uncovered by chromosome conformation capture-on-chip (4C). Nat. Genet. 38, 1348-1354 (2006).
21. Zhao, Z. et al. Circular chromosome conformation capture (4C) uncovers extensive networks of epigenetically regulated intra-and interchromosomal interactions. Nat. Genet. 38, 1341-1347 (2006).
22. Lieberman-Aiden, E. et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 326, 289-293 (2009).
23. Devon, R. S., Porteous, D. J. &Brookes, A. J. Splinkerettes-improved vectorettes for greater efficiency in PCR walking. Nucleic Acids Res. 23, 1644-1645 (1995).
24. Huang, P. Y. H. et al. Protocol: sonication-based circular chromosome conformation capture with next-generation sequencing analysis for the detection of chromatin interactions. Protoc. Exch., doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/ protex.2010.1207 (2010).
25. Stadhouders, R. et al. Multiplexed chromosome conformation capture sequencing for rapid genome-scale high-resolution detection of long-range chromatin interactions. Nat. Protoc. 8, 509-524 (2013).
26. Wei, Z. et al. Klf4 organizes long-range chromosomal interactions with the oct4 locus in reprogramming and pluripotency. Cell Stem Cell 13, 36-47 (2013).
27. Ernst, J. &Kellis, M. ChromHMM: automating chromatin-state discovery and characterization. Nat. Methods 9, 215-216 (2012).
28. Ernst, J. et al. Mapping and analysis of chromatin state dynamics in nine human cell types. Nature 473, 43-49 (2011).
29. ENCODE Project Consortium. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 489, 57-74 (2012).
30. Mikkelsen, T. S. et al. Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells. Nature 448, 553-560 (2007).
31. Voigt, P., Tee, W. W. &Reinberg, D. A double take on bivalent promoters. Genes Dev. 27, 1318-1338 (2013).
32. Drukker, M. et al. Isolation of primitive endoderm, mesoderm, vascular endothelial and trophoblast progenitors from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 531-542 (2012).
33. Albini, S. et al. Epigenetic reprogramming of human embryonic stem cells into skeletal muscle cells and generation of contractile myospheres. Cell Rep. 3, 661-670 (2013).
34. Yu, P., Pan, G., Yu, J. &Thomson, J. A. FGF2 sustains NANOG and switches the outcome of BMP4-induced human embryonic stem cell differentiation. Cell Stem Cell 8, 326-334 (2011).
35. Vodyanik, M. A. et al. A mesoderm-derived precursor for mesenchymal stem and endothelial cells. Cell Stem Cell 7, 718-729 (2010).
36. de Wit, E., Braunschweig, U., Greil, F., Bussemaker, H. J. &van Steensel, B. Global chromatin domain organization of the Drosophila genome. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000045 (2008).
37. Splinter, E., de Wit, E., van de Werken, H. J., Klous, P. &de Laat, W. Determining long-range chromatin interactions for selected genomic sites using 4C-seq technology: from fixation to computation. Methods 58, 221-230 (2012).
38. Peric-Hupkes, D. et al. Molecular maps of the reorganization of genomenuclear lamina interactions during differentiation. Mol. Cell 38, 603-613 (2010).
39. Finlan, L. E. et al. Recruitment to the nuclear periphery can alter expression of genes in human cells. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000039 (2008).
40. Meuleman, W. et al. Constitutive nuclear lamina-genome interactions are highly conserved and associated with A/T-rich sequence. Genome Res. 23, 270-280 (2013).
41. Guelen, L. et al. Domain organization of human chromosomes revealed by mapping of nuclear lamina interactions. Nature 453, 948-951 (2008).
42. Reddy, K. L., Zullo, J. M., Bertolino, E. &Singh, H. Transcriptional repression mediated by repositioning of genes to the nuclear lamina. Nature 452, 243-247 (2008).
43. Luo, L. et al. The nuclear periphery of embryonic stem cells is a transcriptionally permissive and repressive compartment. J. Cell Sci. 122, 3729-3737 (2009).
44. Fanucchi, S., Shibayama, Y., Burd, S., Weinberg, M. S. &Mhlanga, M. M. Chromosomal contact permits transcription between coregulated genes. Cell 155, 606-620 (2013).
45. Iborra, F. J., Pombo, A., Jackson, D. A. &Cook, P. R. Active RNA polymerases are localized within discrete transcription "factories' in human nuclei. J. Cell Sci. 109, 1427-1436 (1996).
46. Jackson, D. A., Hassan, A. B., Errington, R. J. &Cook, P. R. Visualization of focal sites of transcription within human nuclei. EMBO J. 12, 1059-1065 (1993).
47. Guenther, M. G., Levine, S. S., Boyer, L. A., Jaenisch, R. &Young, R. A. A chromatin landmark and transcription initiation at most promoters in human cells. Cell 130, 77-88 (2007).
48. Xie, W. et al. Epigenomic analysis of multilineage differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Cell 153, 1134-1148 (2013).
49. Nagano, T. et al. Comparison of Hi-C results using in-solution versus innucleus ligation. Genome Biol. 16, 175 (2015).
50. Schwartzman, O. et al. UMI-4C for quantitative and targeted chromosomal contact profiling. Nat. Methods 13, 685-691 (2016).
51. Fu, Y. et al. MacroH2A1 associates with nuclear lamina and maintains chromatin architecture in mouse liver cells. Sci. Rep. 5, 17186 (2015).
52. Sadaie, M. et al. Redistribution of the Lamin B1 genomic binding profile affects rearrangement of heterochromatic domains and SAHF formation during senescence. Genes Dev. 27, 1800-1808 (2013).
53. Denholtz, M. et al. Long-range chromatin contacts in embryonic stem cells reveal a role for pluripotency factors and polycomb proteins in genome organization. Cell Stem Cell 13, 602-616 (2013).
54. Joshi, O. et al. Dynamic reorganization of extremely long-range promoterpromoter interactions between two states of pluripotency. Cell Stem Cell 17, 748-757 (2015).
55. Schoenfelder, S. et al. Polycomb repressive complex PRC1 spatially constrains the mouse embryonic stem cell genome. Nat. Genet. 47, 1179-1186 (2015).
56. Li, W. et al. Functional roles of enhancer RNAs for oestrogen-dependent transcriptional activation. Nature 498, 516-520 (2013).
57. Lai, F. et al. Activating RNAs associate with mediator to enhance chromatin architecture and transcription. Nature 494, 497-501 (2013).
58. Wang, K. C. et al. A long noncoding RNA maintains active chromatin to coordinate homeotic gene expression. Nature 472, 120-124 (2011).
59. Gomez, J. A. et al. The NeST long ncRNA controls microbial susceptibility and epigenetic activation of the interferon-gamma locus. Cell 152, 743-754 (2013).
60. Yang, Y. W. et al. Essential role of lncRNA binding for WDR5 maintenance of active chromatin and embryonic stem cell pluripotency. Elife 3, e02046 (2014).
61. Boyer, L. A. et al. Polycomb complexes repress developmental regulators in murine embryonic stem cells. Nature 441, 349-353 (2006).
62. Ang, Y. S. et al. Wdr5 mediates self-renewal and reprogramming via the embryonic stem cell core transcriptional network. Cell 145, 183-197 (2011).
63. Liu, X. et al. Distinct features of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 chromatin domains in pre-implantation embryos. Nature 537, 558-562 (2016).
64. Nishizawa, M. et al. Epigenetic variation between human induced pluripotent stem cell lines is an indicator of differentiation capacity. Cell Stem Cell 19, 341-354 (2016).
65. Okita, K. et al. A more efficient method to generate integration-free human iPS cells. Nat. Methods 8, 409-412 (2011).
66. Woltjen, K. et al. piggyBac transposition reprograms fibroblasts to induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 458, 766-770 (2009).
67. Yoshida, Y., Takahashi, K., Okita, K., Ichisaka, T. &Yamanaka, S. Hypoxia enhances the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 5, 237-241 (2009).
68. Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J. 17, 10-12 (2011).
69. Li, H. &Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754-1760 (2009).
70. Daley, T. &Smith, A. D. Predicting the molecular complexity of sequencing libraries. Nat. Methods 10, 325-327 (2013).