Distinct features of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 chromatin domains in pre-implantation embryos

Nature

Volumn 537, Issue 7621, 2016, Pages 558-562

  Liu, Xiaoyu ^a,b,c   Wang, Chenfei ^a   Liu, Wenqiang ^a   Li, Jingyi ^a   Li, Chong ^a   Kou, Xiaochen ^a   Chen, Jiayu ^a   Zhao, Yanhong ^a   Gao, Haibo ^a,c   Wang, Hong ^a   Zhang, Yong ^a   Gao, Yawei ^a   Gao, Shaorong ^a,b,c  

^a TONGJI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b GRADUATE SCHOOL OF PEKING UNION MEDICAL COLLEGE   (China)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HISTONE H3; LYSINE; CHROMATIN; HISTONE;

CELLS AND CELL COMPONENTS; EMBRYO; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENOME; MAMMAL; PROTEIN; RODENT;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CHROMATIN; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYNAMICS; EMBRYO; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; EPIGENETICS; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION; GENE ACTIVATION; GENE REPRESSION; GENOME; HISTONE METHYLATION; INNER CELL MASS; MOUSE; NIDATION; NONHUMAN; PREIMPLANTATION EMBRYO; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROMOTER REGION; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION SITE; TROPHOBLAST; ANIMAL; BLASTOCYST; CHEMISTRY; GENETIC EPIGENESIS; GENETICS; MALE; METABOLISM; METHYLATION; ZYGOTE;

MAMMALIA;

ANIMALS; BLASTOCYST; CHROMATIN; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; EPIGENESIS, GENETIC; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION; GENOME; HISTONES; LYSINE; MALE; METHYLATION; MICE; PROMOTER REGIONS, GENETIC; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION SITE; ZYGOTE;

EID: 84989172058     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature19362     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Li, E. Chromatin modification and epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3, 662-673 (2002).
2. Bogliotti, Y. S. and Ross, P. J. Mechanisms of histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation remodeling during early mammalian development. Epigenetics 7, 976-981 (2012).
3. BrindAmour, J. et al. An ultra-low-input native ChIP-seq protocol for genome-wide profiling of rare cell populations. Nat. Commun. 6, 6033 (2015).
4. Schuettengruber, B., Chourrout, D., Vervoort, M., Leblanc, B. and Cavalli, G. Genome regulation by polycomb and trithorax proteins. Cell 128, 735-745 (2007).
5. Ringrose, L. and Paro, R. Epigenetic regulation of cellular memory by the Polycomb and Trithorax group proteins. Annu. Rev. Genet. 38, 413-443 (2004).
6. Erhardt, S. et al. Consequences of the depletion of zygotic and embryonic enhancer of zeste 2 during preimplantation mouse development. Development 130, 4235-4248 (2003).
7. van der Heijden, G. W. et al. Asymmetry in histone H3 variants and lysine methylation between paternal and maternal chromatin of the early mouse zygote. Mech. Dev. 122, 1008-1022 (2005).
8. Zhang, M., Wang, F., Kou, Z., Zhang, Y. and Gao, S. Defective chromatin structure in somatic cell cloned mouse embryos. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 24981-24987 (2009).
9. Wang, H. and Dey, S. K. Roadmap to embryo implantation: clues from mouse models. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7, 185-199 (2006).
10. Chang, G. et al. High-throughput sequencing reveals the disruption of methylation of imprinted gene in induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Res. 24, 293-306 (2014).
11. Soshnikova, N. and Duboule, D. Epigenetic temporal control of mouse Hox genes in vivo. Science 324, 1320-1323 (2009).
12. Ernst, J. and Kellis, M. ChromHMM: automating chromatin-state discovery and characterization. Nat. Methods 9, 215-216 (2012).
13. Plath, K. et al. Role of histone H3 lysine 27 methylation in X inactivation. Science 300, 131-135 (2003).
14. Mak, W. et al. Mitotically stable association of polycomb group proteins Eed and Enx1 with the inactive X chromosome in trophoblast stem cells. Curr. Biol. 12, 1016-1020 (2002).
15. Thomson, J. P. et al. CpG islands influence chromatin structure via the CpG-binding protein Cfp1. Nature 464, 1082-1086 (2010).
16. Mikkelsen, T. S. et al. Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells. Nature 448, 553-560 (2007).
17. Brandeis, M. et al. Sp1 elements protect a CpG island from de novo methylation. Nature 371, 435-438 (1994).
18. Hashimshony, T., Zhang, J., Keshet, I., Bustin, M. and Cedar, H. The role of DNA methylation in setting up chromatin structure during development. Nat. Genet. 34, 187-192 (2003).
19. Lande-Diner, L. et al. Role of DNA methylation in stable gene repression. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 12194-12200 (2007).
20. Wang, L. et al. Programming and inheritance of parental DNA methylomes in mammals. Cell 157, 1735-1735 (2014).
21. Benayoun, B. A. et al. H3K4me3 breadth is linked to cell identity and transcriptional consistency. Cell 158, 673-688 (2014).
22. Chen, K. et al. Broad H3K4me3 is associated with increased transcription elongation and enhancer activity at tumor-suppressor genes. Nat. Genet. 47, 1149-1157 (2015).
23. Greer, E. L. and Shi, Y. Histone methylation: a dynamic mark in health, disease and inheritance. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13, 343-357 (2012).
24. Huang, J. et al. Impairment of preimplantation porcine embryo development by histone demethylase KDM5B knockdown through disturbance of bivalent H3K4me3-H3K27me3 modifications. Biol. Reprod. 92, 72 (2015).
25. Azuara, V. et al. Chromatin signatures of pluripotent cell lines. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 532-538 (2006).
26. Bernstein, B. E. et al. A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell 125, 315-326 (2006).
27. Vastenhouw, N. L. et al. Chromatin signature of embryonic pluripotency is established during genome activation. Nature 464, 922-926 (2010).
28. Sachs, M. et al. Bivalent chromatin marks developmental regulatory genes in the mouse embryonic germline in vivo. Cell Reports 3, 1777-1784 (2013).
29. Paranjpe, S. S. and Veenstra, G. J. Establishing pluripotency in early development. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1849, 626-636 (2015).
30. Perez-Lluch, S. et al. Absence of canonical marks of active chromatin in developmentally regulated genes. Nat. Genet. 47, 1158-1167 (2015).
31. Kimura, Y. and Yanagimachi, R. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the mouse. Biol. Reprod. 52, 709-720 (1995).
32. Chatot, C. L., Ziomek, C. A., Bavister, B. D., Lewis, J. L. and Torres, I. An improved culture medium supports development of random-bred 1-cell mouse embryos in vitro. J. Reprod. Fertil. 86, 679-688 (1989).
33. Li, H. and Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows- Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754-1760 (2009).
34. Zhang, Y. et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP-seq (MACS). Genome Biol. 9, R137 (2008).
35. Trapnell, C., Pachter, L. and Salzberg, S. L. TopHat: discovering splice junctions with RNA-Seq. Bioinformatics 25, 1105-1111 (2009).
36. Trapnell, C. et al. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 511-515 (2010).
37. Xi, Y. and Li, W. BSMAP: whole genome bisulfite sequence MAPping program. BMC Bioinformatics 10, 232 (2009).
38. Sun, D. et al. MOABS: model based analysis of bisulfite sequencing data. Genome Biol. 15, R38 (2014).
39. Weber, M. et al. Distribution, silencing potential and evolutionary impact of promoter DNA methylation in the human genome. Nat. Genet. 39, 457-466 (2007).
40. Huang, W., Sherman, B. T. and Lempicki, R. A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protocols 4, 44-57 (2009).
41. Shen, Y. et al. A map of the cis-regulatory sequences in the mouse genome. Nature 488, 116-120 (2012).
42. Cabili, M. N. et al. Integrative annotation of human large intergenic noncoding RNAs reveals global properties and specific subclasses. Genes Dev. 25, 1915-1927 (2011).
43. Barrett, T. et al. NCBI GEO: archive for functional genomics data sets-update. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D991-D995 (2013).
44. Liu, W. et al. Identification of key factors conquering developmental arrest of somatic cell cloned embryos by combining embryo biopsy and single-cell sequencing. Cell Discovery 2, 16010 (2016).