Debating Unconventional Energy: Social, Political, and Economic Implications

Annual Review of Environment and Resources

Volumn 42, Issue , 2017, Pages 241-266

  Neville, Kate J ^a   Baka, Jennifer ^b   Gamper Rabindran, Shanti ^c   Bakker, Karen ^d   Andreasson, Stefan ^e   Vengosh, Avner ^f   Lin, Alvin ^g   Singh, Jewellord Nem ^h   Weinthal, Erika ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^e QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

^f DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL   (United States)

^h FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Energy markets; Governance; Hydraulic fracturing; Mobilization; Regulation; Unconventional energy

Indexed keywords

CARBON; COAL DEPOSITS; ECONOMICS; HYDRAULIC FRACTURING; NATURAL GAS WELL DRILLING; OILS AND FATS; SHALE OIL;

ENERGY MARKETS; GOVERNANCE; MOBILIZATION; REGULATION; UNCONVENTIONAL ENERGY;

FOSSIL FUELS;

EID: 85031713692     PISSN: 15435938     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-environ-102016-061102     Document Type: Review

References (151)

1. Jackson RB, Vengosh A, Carey JW, Davies RJ, Darrah TH, et al. 2014. The environmental costs and benefits of fracking. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 39:327-62
2. US Environ. Protect. Agency (EPA). 2016. Hydraulic fracturing for oil and gas: impacts from the hydraulic fracturing water cycle on drinking water resources in the United States. Rep. EPA-600-R-16-236Fa, Washington, DC: EPA Off. Res. Dev. https://www. epa. gov/hfstudy
3. Lave R, Lutz B. 2014. Hydraulic fracturing: A critical physical geography review. Geogr. Compass 8(10):739-54
4. Hays J, Shonkoff SBC. 2016. Toward an understanding of the environmental and public health impacts of unconventional natural gas development: A categorical assessment of the peer-reviewed scientific literature, 2009-2015. PlosOne 11(4):e0154164. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1371/journal. pone. 0154164
5. Small MJ, Stern PC, Bomberg E, Christopherson SM, Goldstein BD, et al. 2014. Risks and risk governance in unconventional shale gas development. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48:8289-97
6. Jacquet JB. 2014. Review of risks to communities from shale energy development. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48(15):8321-33
7. Clarke CE, Evensen DTN, Jacquet J, Stedman RC. 2012. Emerging risk communication challenges associated with shale gas development. Eur. J. Risk Regul. 3:424-30
8. Vengosh A, Jackson RB, Warner N, Darrah TH, Kondash A. 2014. A critical review of the risks to water resources from unconventional shale gas development and hydraulic fracturing in the United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48(15):8334-48
9. Wheeler D, MacGregor M, Atherton F, Christmas K, Dalton S, et al. 2015. Hydraulic fracturing-integrating public participationwith an independent review of the risks and benefits. Energy Policy 85:299-308
10. Council of Canadian Academies. 2014. Environmental Impacts of Shale Gas Extraction in Canada. The Expert Panel on Harnessing Science and Technology to Understand the Environmental Impacts of Shale Gas Extraction. Ottawa: Counc. Can. Acad. http://www. scienceadvice. ca/uploads/eng/assessments and publications and news releases/shale gas/shalegas-fullreporten. pdf
11. Academy of Science of South Africa. 2016. South Africa's technical readiness to support the shale gas industry. Rep., Acad. Sci. S. Afr., Pretoria, S. Afr. http://research. Assaf. org. za/handle/20. 500. 11911/14
12. Willow AJ, Zak R, Vilaplana D, Sheeley D. 2014. The contested landscape of unconventional energy development: A report from Ohio's shale gas country. J. Environ. Stud. Sci. 4:56-64
13. Davis C, Hoffer K. 2012. Federalizing energy Agenda change and the politics of fracking. Policy Sci. 45:221-41
14. Gamper-Rabindran S. 2017. Conclusion: How and why countries decide on shale and how they can make better decisions. In The Shale Dilemma: A Global Perspective on Fracking and Shale Development, ed. S Gamper-Rabindran. Pittsburgh: Univ. Pittsburgh Press
15. Sovacool BK. 2014. Cornucopia or curse Reviewing the costs and benefits of shale gas hydraulic fracturing (fracking). Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 37:249-64
16. Goldthau A. 2016. Conceptualizing the above ground factors in shale gas: Toward a research agenda on regulatory governance. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 20:73-81
17. Evensen D, Jacquet JB, Clarke CE, Stedman RC. 2014. What's the 'fracking' problem One word can't say it all. Extr. Ind. Soc. 1:130-36
18. Weinthal E, Vengosh A, Neville KJ. 2017. The nexus of energy and water quality. In Oxford Handbook on Water Politics and Policy, ed. K Conca, E Weinthal. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press. In press. http://www. oxfordhandbooks. com/view/10. 1093/oxfordhb/9780199335084. 001. 0001/oxfordhb-9780199335084-e-26
19. US Energy Information Administration (EIA). 2017. Annual Energy Outlook 2017: With Projections to 2050. Washington, DC: EIA. https://www. eia. gov/outlooks/aeo/pdf/0383(2017). pdf
20. Radetzki M. 2010. Peak Oil and other threatening peaks-Chimeras without substance. Energy Policy 38:6566-69
21. Kilian L. 2016. The impact of the shale oil revolution on U. S. oil and gasoline prices. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 10(2):185-205
22. Aguilera RF. 2014. Production costs of global conventional and unconventional petroleum. Energy Policy 64:134-40
23. Hughes JD. 2014. Drilling deeper: A reality check on US government forecasts for a lasting tight oil and shale gas boom. Rep., Post Carbon Inst. http://www. postcarbon. org/wp-content/uploads/2014/ 10/Drilling-Deeper-FULL. pdf
24. Braziel R. 2015. The dynamic energy landscape: natural gas in the US. Presented at US Assoc. Energy Econ. Conf., Pittsbg., PA, Oct. 26. http://www. usaee. org/usaee2015/submissions/presentations/ Rusty%20Braziel-RBN-USAEE-151026-rb. pdf
25. Kondash AJ, Albright E, Vengosh A. 2017. Quantity of flowback and produced waters from unconventional oil and gas exploration. Sci. Total Environ. 574:314-21
26. Kondash A, Vengosh A. 2015. Water footprint of hydraulic fracturing. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2:276-80
27. Lauer NE, Harkness JS, Vengosh A. 2016. Brine spills associated with unconventional oil development in North Dakota. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50(10):5389-97
28. Richardson T, Weszkalnys G. 2014. Resource materialities. Anthropol. Q. 87(1):5-30
29. Huber M. 2015. Theorizing energy geographies. Geogr. Compass 9(6):327-38
30. Florini A, Sovacool BK. 2011. Bridging the gaps in global energy governance. Glob. Gov. 17:57-74
31. Balsiger J, VanDeveer SD. 2012. Navigating regional environmental governance. Glob. Environ. Polit. 12(3):1-17
32. Short D, Elliot J, Norder K, Lloyd-Davies E, Morley J. 2015. Extreme energy, "fracking" and human rights: A new field for human rights impact assessments Int. J. Hum. Rights 19(6):697-736
33. Kaldor M, Karl TL, Said Y, eds. 2007. Oil Wars. London: Pluto Press
34. Ross ML. 2015. What have we learned about the resource curse Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 18:239-59
35. Godzimirski JM. 2016. Can the Polish shale gas dog still bark Politics and policy of unconventional hydrocarbons in Poland. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 20:158-67
36. Adamus W, Florkowski WJ. 2016. The evolution of shale gas development and energy security in Poland: presenting a hierarchical choice of priorities. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 20:168-78
37. McGowan F. 2014. Regulating innovation: European responses to shale gas development. Environ. Polit. 23(1):41-58
38. Feng B. 2015. China backpedals on shale gas. Chem. Eng. News 93:22-23
39. Yu M, Weinthal E, Patiño-Echeverri D, Deshusses MA, Zou C, et al. 2016. Water availability for shale gas development in Sichuan Basin, China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50(6):2837-45
40. Lozano-Maya JR. 2016. Looking through the prism of shale gas development: Towards a holistic framework for analysis. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 20:63-72
41. Newell RG, Qian Y, Raimi D. 2016. Global energy outlook 2015. NBER Work. Pap. 22075. http://www. nber. org/papers/w22075
42. Knittel CR, Metaxoglou K, Trindade A. 2015. Natural gas prices and coal displacement: evidence from electricity markets. NBERWork. Pap. 21627. http://www. nber. org/papers/w21627. pdf
43. Hausman C, Kellogg R. 2015. Welfare and distributional implications of shale gas. Brookings Pap. Econ. Act. 2015:71-125
44. Baily MN, Bosworth BP. 2014. US manufacturing: understanding its past and its potential future. J. Econ. Perspect. 28(1):3-26
45. Newell RG, Raimi D. 2014. Implications of shale gas development for climate change. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48(15):8360-68
46. Mason CF, Muehlenbachs LA, Olmstead SM. 2015. The economics of shale gas development. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 7:269-89
47. Kelsey TW, Partridge MD, White NE. 2016. Unconventional gas and oil development in the United States: Economic experience and policy issues. Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy 38(2):191-214
48. Bradshaw M, Dutton J, Bridge G. 2015. The geopolitical economy of a globalizing gas market. In Global Energy: Issues, Potentials and Policy Implications, ed. P Ekins, MBradshaw, J Watson. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
49. Broderick J, Anderson K. 2012. Has US shale gas reduced CO2 emissions Examining recent changes in emissions from the US power sector and traded fossil fuels. Rep. Tyndall. Cent. Clim. Change Res., Univ. Manch., http://www. Tyndall. Ac. uk/sites/default/files/publications/broderick-and-anderson- 2012-impact-of-shale-gas-on-us-energy-and-emissions. pdf
50. Medlock III KB. 2011. Impact of shale gas development on global gas markets. Nat. Gas Electr. 27(9):22-28
51. Borenstein S, Kellogg R. 2014. The incidence of an oil glut: Who benefits from cheap crude oil in the Midwest Energy J. 35(Jan):15-33
52. Badel A, McGillicuddy J. 2015. Oil prices and inflation expectations: Is there a link Reg. Econ. (Fed. Reserve Bank St. Louis) July 12-13. https://www. stlouisfed. org//media/Publications/ Regional%20Economist/2015/July/Oil. pdf
53. Baffes J, Kose MA, Ohnsorge F, Stocker M. 2015. The great plunge in oil prices: causes, consequences, and policy responses. SSRNWork. Pap. 2624398. http://dx. doi. org/10. 2139/ssrn. 2624398
54. Baumeister C, Kilian L. 2016. Understanding the decline in the price of oil since June 2014. CESifo Work. Pap. 5755. http://econpapers. repec. org/paper/cesceswps/-5f5755. htm
55. Selley RC, van der Spuy D. 2016. The oil and gas basins of Africa. Episodes: J. Int. Geosci. 39:429-45
56. Layachi A. 2013. The changing geopolitics of natural gas: The case of Algeria. Work Pap., Belfer Cent., Harv. Univ., Cambridge, MA/Baker Inst., Rice Univ., Houston, TX. http://www. bakerinstitute. org/ media/files/Research/5b21ebcc/CES-pub-GeoGasAlgeria-110113. pdf
57. Boersma T, Vandendriessche M, Leber A. 2015. Shale gas in Algeria: no quick fix. Policy Brief 15-01, Brookings Inst., Washington, DC. https://www. brookings. edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/ no-quick-fix-final-2. pdf
58. Rafey W, Sovacool BK. 2011. Competing discourses of energy development: The implications of the Medupi coal-fired power plant in South Africa. Glob. Environ. Change 21(3):1141-51
59. Baker L, Newell P, Phillips J. 2014. The political economy of energy transitions: The case of South Africa. New Polit. Econ. 19(6):791-818
60. Bazilian M, Hobbs BF, Blyth W, MacGill I, Howells M. 2011. Interactions between energy security and climate change: A focus on developing countries. Energy Policy 39(6):3750-56
61. Di Muzio T. 2012. Capitalizing a future unsustainable: finance, energy and the fate of market civilization. Rev. Int. Polit. Econ. 19:363-88
62. Mazur A. 2016. How did the fracking controversy emerge in the period 2010-2012 Public Underst. Sci. 25(2):207-22
63. Burnham A, Han J, Clark CE, Wang M, Dunn JB, Palou-Rivera I. 2012. Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of shale gas, natural gas, coal, and petroleum. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46:619-27
64. Poole A, Hudgins A. 2014. "I care more about this place, because I fought for it": Exploring the political ecology of fracking in an ethnographic field school. J. Environ. Stud. Sci. 4:37-46
65. Neville KJ, Weinthal E. 2016. Mitigating mistrust Participation and expertise in hydraulic fracturing governance. Rev. Policy Res. 33(6):578-602
66. Venturini T, Ricci D, MauriM, Kimbell L, Meunier A. 2015. Designing controversies and their publics. DesignIssues: 31(3):74-87
67. Zink V, Eaton E. 2016. Fault Lines: Life and Landscape in Saskatchewan's Oil Economy. Winnipeg: Univ. Manitoba Press
68. Nikiforuk A. 2015. Slick Water: Fracking and One Insider's Stand Against the World'sMost Powerful Industry. Vancouver, BC, Can. /Berkeley, CA, USA: Greystone Books
69. Rodrguez SMS, ed. 2015. Global Resistance to Fracking: Communities Rise Up to Fight Climate Crisis and Democratic Deficit. Madrid, Sp. : Libros en Acción
70. Hutton D. 2012. Lessons learned from the Lock the Gate movement. Soc. Altern. 31(1):15-19
71. Moore ML, von der Porten S, Castleden H. 2017. Consultation is not consent: hydraulic fracturing and water governance on Indigenous lands in Canada. WIREs Water 4(1):e1180. http://wires. wiley. com/WileyCDA/WiresArticle/wisId-WAT21180. html
72. Kinniburgh C. 2015. From Zuccotti Park to Z urawlów: The global revolt against fracking. Dissent 63(3):42-52
73. Harkness JS, DarrahTH, Warner NR, WhyteCJ, MooreMT, et al. 2017. The geochemistry of naturally occurring methane and saline groundwater in an area of unconventional shale gas development. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 208:302-34
74. Hudgins A, Poole A. 2014. Framing fracking: private property, common resources, and regimes of governance. J. Polit. Ecol. 21:303-15
75. Bassey N. 2012. Leaving the oil in the soil-communities connecting to resist oil extraction and climate change. Dev. Dialogue III (Clim., Dev. Equity):332-39
76. Savino L. 2016. Landscapes of contrast: The neo-extractivist state and indigenous peoples in "postneoliberal" Argentina. Extr. Ind. Soc. 3:404-15
77. Bomberg E. 2015. Shale we drill Discourse dynamics in UK fracking debates. J. Environ. Pol. Plann. 19(1):72-88
78. Cotton M, Rattle I, Van Alstine J. 2014. Shale gas policy in the United Kingdom: An argumentative discourse analysis. Energy Policy 73:427-38
79. Wright M. 2013. Making it personal: how anti-fracking organizations frame their messages. Columbia U. J. Polit. Soc. 24:105-23
80. Andrews E, McCarthy J. 2014. Scale, shale, and the state: political ecologies and legal geographies of shale gas development in Pennsylvania. J. Environ. Stud. Sci. 4:7-16
81. Hilson C. 2014. Framing fracking: Which frames are heard in English planning and environmental policy and practice J. Environ. Law 27:177-202
82. Ladd AE. 2014. Environmental disputes and opportunity-threat impacts surrounding natural gas fracking in Louisiana. Soc. Curr. 1(3):293-311
83. Graham JD, Rupp JA, Schenk O. 2015. Unconventional gas development in the USA: exploring the risk perception issues. Risk Anal. 35(10):1770-88
84. Hopke JE. 2015. Hashtagging politics: Transnational anti-fracking movement Twitter practices. Soc. Media Soc. 1(2):1-12
85. Cook J. 2012. Political action through environmental shareholder resolution filing: Applicability to Canadian Oil Sands J. Sust. Finance Invest. 2(1):26-43
86. Vasi IB, Walker ET, Johnson JS, Tand HF. 2015. "No fracking way!" Documentary film, discursive opportunity, and local opposition against hydraulic fracturing in the United States, 2010 to 2013. Am. Sociol. Rev. 80(5):934-59
87. Theodori GL, Luloff AE, Willits FK, Burnett DB. 2014. Hydraulic fracturing and the management, disposal, and reuse of frac flowback waters: views from the public in theMarcellus Shale. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2:66-74
88. McAdam D, Boudet HS. 2012. Putting Social Movements in Their Place: Explaining Opposition to Energy Projects in the United States, 2000-2005. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
89. McCarthy J. 2005. Scale, sovereignty, and strategy in environmental governance. Antipode 37(4):731-53
90. Neville KJ, Weinthal E. 2016. Scaling up site disputes: strategies to redefine "local" in the fight against fracking. Environ. Polit. 25(4):569-92
91. Pearson TW. 2016. Frac sand mining and the disruption of place, landscape, and community in Wisconsin. Hum. Organ. 75(1):47-58
92. De RijkeK. 2013. Coal seam gas and social impact assessment: An anthropological contribution to current debates and practices. J. Econ. Soc. Policy 15(3):3
93. Ladd AE. 2013. Stakeholder perceptions of socioenvironmental impacts from unconventional natural gas development and hydraulic fracturing in the Haynesville Shale. J. Rural Soc. Sci. 28(2):56-89
94. Kinchy A, Parks S, Jalbert K. 2015. Fractured knowledge: mapping the gaps in public and private water monitoring efforts in areas affected by shale gas development. Environ. Plann. C 34(5):879-99
95. Costello RA. 2014. Reviving Rylands: how the doctrine could be used to claim compensation for environmental damages caused by fracking. Rev. Eur. Comp. Int. Environ. Law 23(1):134-43
96. Jaspal R, Nerlich B, Lemancyzk S. 2014. Fracking in the Polish press: geopolitics and national identity. Energy Policy 74:253-61
97. Eaton E, Kinchy A. 2016. Quiet voices in the fracking debate: Ambivalence, nonmobilization, and individual action in two extractive communities (Saskatchewan and Pennsylvania). Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 20:22-30
98. Gullion JS. 2015. Fracking the Neighborhood: Reluctant Activists and Natural Gas Drilling. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
99. JacksonW, Monk H. 2014. Police violence at anti-fracking protests: pacifying disruptive subjects. Crim. Justice Matters 98(1):12-13
100. Jones P, Hillier D, Comfort D. 2015. The contested future of fracking for shale gas in the UK: risk, reputation and regulation. World Rev. Entrep. Manag. Sustain. Dev. 11(4):377-90
101. Hudgins A. 2013. Fracking's future in a coal mining past: subjectivity undermined. C&AFE (Cult. Agric. Food Environ.-J. Cult. Agric.) 35(1):54-59
102. Boudet H, Bugden D, Zanocco C, Maibach E. 2016. The effect of industry activities on public support for "fracking. " Environ. Polit. 25(4):593-612
103. Christopherson S. 2015. Risks beyond the well pad: The economic footprint of shale gas development in the US. In The Human and Environmental Impact of Fracking: How Fracturing Shale for Gas Affects Us and Our World, ed. ML Finkel, pp. 115-130. Santa Barbara, CA/Denver, CO/Oxford, UK: Praeger
104. Mooney L. 2015. Promoting the rule of law in the intersection of business, human rights, and sustainability. Georgetown J. Int. Law 46:1135-50
105. Raimi D, Newell RG. 2016. Local government revenue from oil and gas production. Res. Pap., Duke Univ. Energy Init., Durham, NC. http://dukespace. lib. duke. edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/10161/ 12390/Local%20government%20revenue%20from%20oil%20and%20gas%20production% 20FINAL. pdfsequence=1
106. Trigger D, Keenan J, de Rijke K, RifkinW. 2014. Aboriginal engagement and agreement-making with a rapidly developing resource industry: coal seam gas development in Australia. Extr. Ind. Soc. 1:176-88
107. Boyer D. 2011. Energopolitics and the anthropology of energy. Anthropol. News 52(5):5-7
108. Cartwright E. 2013. Eco-risk and the case of fracking. In Cultures of Energy: Power, Practices, Technologies, ed. S Strauss, S Rupp, T Love, pp. 201-12. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press
109. Finewood MH, Stroup LJ. 2012. Fracking and the neoliberalization of the hydro-social cycle in Pennsylvania's Marcellus Shale. J. Contemp. Water Res. Educ. 147:72-79
110. Vesalon L, Crettan R. 2015. "We are not the Wild West": Anti-fracking protests in Romania. Environ. Polit. 24(2):288-307
111. Willow AJ, Wylie S. 2014. Politics, ecology, and the new anthropology of energy: exploring the emerging frontiers of hydraulic fracking. J. Polit. Ecol. 21:222-36
112. Barry A. 2013. Material Politics: Disputes Along the Pipeline. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell
113. Krupnick A, Wang ZM, Wang YS. 2014. Environmental risks of shale gas development in China. Energy Policy 75:117-25
114. Cotton M. 2015. Stakeholder perspectives on shale gas fracking: A Q-Method study of environmental discourses. Environ. Plann. A 47(9):1944-62
115. Hanschel D, Centner T. 2016. Delineating property rights in unconventional hydrocarbon resources: concepts from the United States and Germany. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 20:149-57
116. Rabe BG, Hampton RL. 2016. Trusting in the future: The re-emergence of state trust funds in the shale era. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 20:117-27
117. Merrill TW. 2013. Four questions about fracking. Case West. Reserv. Law Rev. 63(4):971-94
118. Boudet H, Clarke C, Bugden D, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C, Leiserowitz A. 2014. "Fracking" controversy and communication: using national survey data to understand public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing. Energy Policy 65:57-67
119. Davis C, Fisk JM. 2014. Energy abundance or environmental worries Analyzing public support for fracking in the United States. Rev. Policy Res. 31(1):1-16
120. Stedman RC, Jacquet JB, Filteau MR, Willits FK, Brasier KJ, McLaughlin DK. 2012. Marcellus Shale gas development and new boomtown research: views of New York and Pennsylvania residents. Environ. Pract. 14(4):382-93
121. Clarke CE, Bugden D, Hart PS, Stedman RC, Jacquet JB, et al. 2016. How geographic distance and political ideology interact to influence public perception of unconventional oil/natural gas development. Energy Policy 97:301-9
122. Theodori GL. 2012. Public perception of the natural gas industry: data from the Barnett Shale. Energy Source B 7(3):275-81
123. Brasier KJ, McLaughlin DK, Rhubart D, Stedman RC, Filteau MR, Jacquet J. 2013. Risk perceptions of natural gas development in the Marcellus Shale. Environ. Pract. 15(2):108-22
124. Choma BL, Hanoch Y, Currie S. 2016. Attitudes toward hydraulic fracturing: The opposing forces of political conservatism and basic knowledge about fracking. Glob. Environ. Change 38:108-17
125. Warner B, Shapiro J. 2013. Fractured, fragmented federalism: A study in fracking regulatory policy. Publius J. Federalism 43(3):474-96
126. Spence DB. 2013. Federalism, regulatory lags, and the political economy of energy production. U. Penn. Law Rev. 161(2):431-508
127. Wiseman HJ. 2014. The capacity of states to govern shale gas development risks. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48(15):8376-87
128. Leiter AC. 2015. Fracking, federalism, and private governance. Harv. Environ. Law 39:107-56
129. Merrill TW, Schizer DM. 2013. The shale oil and gas revolution, hydraulic fracturing, and water contamination: A regulatory strategy. Minn. Law Rev. 98(1):145-264
130. Burger M. 2013. Response: fracking and federalism choice. U. Penn. Law Rev. Online. 161:150-63. https://www. pennlawreview. com/online/161-U-Pa-L-Rev-Online-150. pdf
131. Carter AV, Eaton EM. 2016. Subnational responses to fracking in Canada: explaining Saskatchewan's "Wild West" regulatory approach. Rev. Policy Res. 33(4):393-419
132. Shaw K, Hill SD, Boyd AD, Monk L, Reid J, Einsiedel EF. 2015. Conflicted or constructive Exploring community responses to new energy developments in Canada. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 8:41-51
133. Garvie KH, Shaw K. 2016. Shale gas development and community response: perspectives from Treaty 8 Territory, British Columbia. Local Environ. 21(8):1009-28
134. FlemingRC, ReinsL. 2016. Shale gas extraction, precaution and prevention: A conversation on regulatory responses. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 20:131-41
135. Elsner M, Schreglmann K, Calmano W, Bergmann A, Vieth-Hillebrand A, et al. 2015. Comment on the German draft legislation on hydraulic fracturing: The need for an accurate state of knowledge and for independent scientific research. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49(11):6367-69
136. Copley C, Eckert V. 2016. Germany Imposes Limits on Fracking. Berlin/Frankfurt, Ger. : Reuters
137. Johnson C, Boersma T. 2013. Energy (in)security in Poland the case of shale gas. Energy Policy 53:389-99
138. Green CA, Styles P, Baptie BJ. 2012. Preese Hall Shale Gas Fracturing Review & Recommendations for Induced Seismic Mitigation. London: Dep. Energy Clim. Change. https://www. gov. uk/ government/publications/preese-hall-shale-gas-fracturing-review-and-recommendations-forinduced-seismic-mitigation
139. Pi G, Dong X, Dong C, Guo J, Maet Z. 2015. The status, obstacles and policy recommendations of shale gas development in China. Sustainability 7(3):2353-72
140. Lin A. 2017. Replacing coal with shale gas: Could reducingChina's regional air pollution lead to more local pollution in rural China In The Shale Dilemma: A Global Perspective on Fracking and Shale Development, ed. S Gamper-Rabindran. Pittsburgh: Univ. Pittsburgh Press
141. Konschnik KE, Boling MK. 2014. Shale gas development: A smart regulation framework. Environ Sci. Technol. 48(15):8404-16
142. Craig RK. 2013. Hydraulic fracturing (fracking), federalism, and the water-energy nexus. Idaho Law Rev. 49(2):241-64.
143. Wiseman HJ. 2013. Risk and response in fracturing policy. Univ. Colorado Law Rev. 84(3):729-818
144. Rabe BG, Hampton RL. 2015. Taxing fracking: The politics of state severance taxes in the shale era. Rev. Policy Res. 32(4):389-412
145. Wiseman HJ. 2013. The private role in public fracturing disclosure and regulation. Harv. Bus. Law Rev. (Online) 3:49-66. http://www. hblr. org/2013/02/the-private-role-in-public-fracturing-disclosureand-regulation/
146. Dundon LA, Abkowitz M, Camp J. 2015. The real value of FracFocus as a regulatory tool: A national survey of state regulators. Energy Policy 87:496-504
147. KonschnikK, HoldenM, Shasteen A. 2013. Legal Fractures in ChemicalDisclosure Laws: Why the Voluntary Chemical Disclosure Registry Fracfocus Fails as a Regulatory Compliance Tool. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Law Sch.
148. Haufler V. 2010. Disclosure as governance: The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative and resource management in the developing world. Glob. Environ. Polit. 10(3):53-73
149. Fisk JM. 2013. The right to know State politics of fracking disclosure. Rev. Policy Res. 30(4):345-65
150. Curran G. 2017. Social licence, corporate social responsibility and coal seam gas: Framing the new political dynamics of contestation. Energy Policy 101:427-35
151. Manno JP, Hirsch P, Feldpausch-Parker AM. 2014. Introduction by the Onondaga Nation and activist neighbors of an indigenous perspective on issues surrounding hydrofracking in the Marcellus Shale. J. Environ. Stud. Sci. 4:47-55