Shale gas extraction, precaution and prevention: A conversation on regulatory responses

Energy Research and Social Science

Volumn 20, Issue , 2016, Pages 131-141

  Fleming, Ruven C ^a   Reins, Leonie ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Precaution; Prevention; Risk management; Shale gas

Indexed keywords

EID: 84990925779     PISSN: 22146296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2016.05.013     Document Type: Article

References (241)

1. [1] Laurie, Graeme, Harmon, Shawn H.E., Arzuaga, Fabiana, Foresighting futures: law, new technologies, and the challenges of regulating for uncertainty. Law Innov. Technol. 4:1 (2012), 1–33 at 10.
2. [2] Laurie, Graeme, Harmon, Shawn H.E., Arzuaga, Fabiana, Foresighting futures: law, new technologies, and the challenges of regulating for uncertainty. Law Innov. Technol. 4:1 (2012), 12f–14f.
3. [3] de Sadeleer, Nicolas, Environmental Principles: From Political Slogans to Legal Rules. 2002, Oxford University Press 74/75 and 222 (hereinafter: De Sadeleer).
4. [3] Epiney, Astrid, Scheyli, Martin, Strukturprinzipien des Umweltvölkerrechts. 1998, Nomos Verlag, Baden-Baden 91 and 109/110 (hereinafter: Epiney/Scheyli).
5. [3] Freestone, David, International Fisheries Law since Rio: The Continued Rise of the Precautionary Principle. Boyle, Alan, Freestone, David, (eds.) International Law and Sustainable Development: Past Achievements and Future Challenges, 1999, Oxford University Press, Oxford 139 (hereinafter: Freestone 1999).
6. [4] Art. 3 (a) Council Directive (EC) 96/61 of 24 September 1996 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control [1996] OJ L 257/26.
7. [4] Dixon, Martin, Mc Corquodale, Robert, Williams, Sarah, Cases and Materials on International Law. 5th edition, 2011, Oxford University Press, Oxford 455.
8. [5] De Sadeleer 72/73.
9. [6] Trouwborst, Arie, Prevention, precaution, logic and law. Erasmus Law Rev., 2, 2009, 110.
10. [7] De Sadeleer 79/80.
11. [8] Klinke, Andreas, Renn, Ortwin, Precautionary principle and discursive strategies: classifying and managing risks. J. Risk Res., 4, 2001, 159.
12. [9] Corbeau, Anne-Sophie, The introduction of unconventional gas in Europe: opportunities and challenges. Roggenkamp, Martha, Woolley, Olivia, (eds.) European Energy Law Report IX, 2012, Intersentia Publishing Ltd., Cambridge 195/196 (hereinafter: Corbeau).
13. [9] Yergin, Daniel, The Quest-Energy Security and the Remaking of the Modern World. 2011, Penguin Ltd., London 329 (hereinafter: Yergin).
14. [10] Philippe & Partners Law Firm, Final Report on Unconventional Gas in Europe., 2011 5 available at http://ec.europa.eu/energy/studies/doc/2012_unconventional_gas_in_europe.pdf (accessed 12.03.12) (hereinafter: Philippe & Partners).
15. [11] See for instance Philippe & Partners 11–14.
16. [12] Corbeau 202/203.
17. [13] Corbeau 195 and 203.
18. [13] Yergin 329.
19. [14] Petroleum Geoscience—From Sedimentary Environments to Rock Physics. 2010, Springer Verlag, Berlin 464 (hereinafter: Bjorlykke).
20. [15] Curtis, John B., Fractured shale-gas systems. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull., 86(11), 2002 1921 and 1923.
21. [16] Frantz, Joseph H., Jochen, Valerie, Shale Gas—When Your Gas Reservoir is Unconventional so is Our Solution. 2005, White Paper Schlumberger Ltd. at 4 and 6 http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2010/ph240/alnoaimi2/docs/shale_gas_solution_05of299.pdf (accessed 20.03.12) (hereinafter: Schlumberger).
22. [17] Ground Water Protection Council and ALL Consulting, Modern Shale Gas Development in the United States: A Primer. 2009 14 available at: http://www.eogresources.com/responsibility/doeModernShaleGasDevelopment.pdf (accessed 28.04.12) (hereinafter: Modern Shale Gas Development).
23. [18] Pearson, Ivan L.G., et al. Unconventional Gas: Potential Energy Market Impacts in the European Union., 2012, Joint Research Centre of the European Commission 59 available at: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/jrc/downloads/jrc_report_2012_09_unconventional_gas.pdf (accessed 20.05.14) (hereinafter: Pearson et al.).
24. [18] Andruleit, Harald, et al. Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe (BGR) ‘Abschätzung des Erdgaspotenzials aus dichten Tongesteinen (Schiefergas) in Deutschland’. 2012, Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe, Hannover 35 (hereinafter: Andruleit et al. BGR Abschätzung).
25. [19] Details on hydraulic fracturing may be found at: Veatch Part 1, 677.
26. [20] Andruleit et al. BGR Abschätzung 35.
27. [21] Bjorlykke, 464.
28. [22] Sachverständigenrat für Umweltfragen (SRU) Martin Faulstich et al., Fracking zur Schiefergasgewinnung Ein Beitrag zur energie- und umweltpolitischen Bewertung Stellungnahme. Available at: http://www.umweltrat.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/04_Stellungnahmen/2012_2016/2013_05_AS_18_Fracking.pdf?__blob=publicationFile (accessed 2.07.13) 6 (hereinafter: SRU Faulstich).
29. [23] Veatch, Ralph W. Jr., Overview of current hydraulic fracturing design and treatment technology—part 1. J. Petrol. Technol., 1983, 677 (hereinafter: Veatch Part 1).
30. [24] SRU Faulstich 7.
31. [25] SRU Faulstich 7/8.
32. [26] SRU Faulstich 8.
33. [27] Dietrich, Lars, Elgeti, Till, Rechtliche Implikationen der Aufsuchung und Förderung von unkonventionellem Erdgas. Erdöl Erdgas Kohle, 127(7–8), 2011 311.
34. [27] Pearson et al. 56/57.
35. [28] UK Onshore Oil and Gas, Onshore Extraction Development. Available at: http://www.ukoog.org.uk/onshore-extraction/stages-of-development (accessed 18.03.16).
36. [29] Article 15 and 21 of the Rio Declaration; even though the status of the precautionary principle in international law is still disputed.
37. [30] Trouwborst, Arie, Prevention, precaution logic and law. Erasmus Law Rev., 2, 2009, 112.
38. [31] Freestone, David, The Precautionary Principle. Churchill, Robin Rolf, Freestone, David, (eds.) International Law and Global Climate Change, 1991, Kluwer Law International, London/Dordrecht 21.
39. [31] Cameron, James, Abouchar, Juli, The Status of the Precautionary Principle in International Law. Freestone, David, Hey, Ellen, (eds.) The Precautionary Principle and International Law—the Challenge of Implementation, 1996, Kluwer Law International, The Hague 29/31.
40. [31] De Sadeleer 93.
41. [31] Scott, Joan, Vos, Ellen, The Juridification of Uncertainty: Observations on the Ambivalence of the Precautionary Principle within the EU and the WTO. Joerges, Christian, Dehousse, Renaud, (eds.) Good Governance in Europe's Integrated Market, 2002, Oxford University Press 253.
42. [31] Sands, Philippe, Principles of International Environmental Law. 2nd edition, 2003, Cambridge University Press 267.
43. [31] Morris, Julian, Rethinking Risk and the Precautionary Principle. 2000, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford 1 (hereinafter: Morris).
44. [32] Richardson, Benjamin J., Wood, Stepan, Environmental Law for Sustainability: A Reader. 2006, Hart Publishing, Portland 361.
45. [33] European Commission, Communication on the Precautionary Principle. 2000, Communication) COM 1 (hereinafter: communication on precaution).
46. [34] Appel, Ivo, Europas Sorge um die Vorsorge. Zur Mitteilung der Europäischen Kommission über die Anwendbarkeit des Vorsorgeprinzips. Neue Z. Verwalt., 4, 2001 NVwZ 395/396.
47. [35] Due to its endorsement by the ECJ in Case T-70/99 Alpharma Inc. v Council of the European Union [2002] ECR II-03495, paragraphs 162 and 144 (hereinafter: Alpharma).
48. [36] Communication on precaution para 3 page 9.
49. [37] Hohmann, Harald, Precautionary Legal Duties and Principles of Modem International Environmental Law. 1994, Kluwer Law International, The Hague 334 (hereinafter: Hohmann).
50. [37] Communication on precaution 4, 13 and 16.
51. [38] Communication on precaution paragraphs 6.1.
52. [39] See also:Lierman, S., Veuchelen, L., The optimisation approach of ALARA in nuclear practice: an early application of the precautionary principle? Scientific uncertainty versus legal uncertainty and its role in tort law. Eur. Environ. Law Rev. 15:4 (2006), 98–107 at 99.
53. [40] Kingdom of Belgium v Kingdom of the Netherlands, Iron Rhine (“IJZEREN RIJN”) Railway arbitration tribunal award of 24 May 2005, available at: http://www.pca-cpa.org/showpage.asp?pag_id=1155 (accessed 21.06.12) para. 59 and 222.
54. [41] Trouwborst, A., Prevention, precaution, logic and law: the relationship between the precautionary principle and the preventative principle in international law and associated questions. Erasmus Law Rev. 2:2 (2009), 105–127 See for a discussion of the relationship of the principles in international law:.
55. [42] See alsoKraemer, L., The Genesis of EC Environmental Principles. Macrory, R., (eds.) Principles of European Environmental Law, 2004, European Commission Law Publishing, 29–47 at 38.
56. [42] For a detailed discussion tode Sadeleer, N., Environmental Principles: From Political Slogans to Legal Rules. 2005, Oxford University Press, Oxford at 61–90.
57. [43] US v Canada, 3 RIAA (1941) 1907.
58. [44] See also on the distinction between precaution and prevention Kraemer, note 25 above, at 39. See alsoVan Calster, G., Risk regulation, EU law and emerging technologies: smother or smooth?. NanoEthics 2:1 (2008), 61–71 at 66.
59. [45] De Sadeleer, note 25 above, at 80f.
60. [46] See above under the precautionary principle.
61. [47] Trouwborst, Arie, Evolution and Status of the Precautionary Principle in International Law. 2002, Kluwer Law International, The Hague 51 (hereinafter: Trouwborst 2002).
62. [47] Bogdansky, Daniel, et al. The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law. 2008, Oxford University Press, Oxford 381/382 (hereinafter: Bogdansky et al.).
63. [47] de Chazournes, Laurence Boisson, The Precautionary Principle. Precaution from Rio to Johannesburg: Proceedings of a Geneva Environment Network Roundtable, 2002, International Environment House, Geneva 10.
64. [47] Marr, Simon, The Precautionary Principle in the Law of the Sea: Modern Decision Making in International Law. 2003, Kluwer Law International, The Hague 5 (hereinafter: Marr).
65. [48] Joined Cases C-175/98 and C-177/98 Lirussi and Bizzaro [1999] ECR I-6881 para 51–53.
66. [49] De Sadeleer 61 and 86–89.
67. [50] Especially the ECJ contributed to that confusion by using the terms interchangeably, see for instance: Case C-418 and 419/97 ARCO Chemie [2000] ECR I-4475 at para 39.
68. [50] Case C-318/98 Italy v Fornasar and others [2000] ECR I-4485 at para 37.
69. [50] At least an attempt to distinguish both can be seen in Joined Cases C-175/98 and C-177/98 Lirussi and Bizzaro [1999] ECR I-6881 para 51–53.
70. [51] For examples see:Trouwborst, Arie, Precautionary Rights and Duties of States’ 94. 2006, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden (hereinafter: Trouwborst 2006).
71. [52] BVerwGE 69, 37 (43).
72. [52] Trouwborst 2002, 37–39.
73. [52] Trouwborst 2006, 94.
74. [52] Freestone 1999, 139.
75. [52] Barton, Charmian, Status of the Precautionary Principle in Australia: its emergence in legislation and as a common law doctrine. Harvard Environ. Law Rev., 22(2), 1998, 535.
76. [52] Trouwborst, Arie, Prevention, precaution, logic and law. Erasmus Law Rev., 2, 2009 119 (hereinafter: Trouwborst 2009).
77. [53] European Court of Justice Case C-180/96 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v Commission of the European Communities [1998] ECR I-2265, para. 105.
78. [53] Case T-70/99 Alpharma Inc. v Council of the European Union [2002] ECR II-03495, para. 152.
79. [53] Case C-236/01 Monsanto Agricoltura Italia Spa and Others v Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri and Others [2003] ECR I-08105, para. 106.
80. [53] Case C-192/01 Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Denmark [2003] ECR I-09693, para. 49.
81. [53] Case C-24/00 Commission of the European Communities v French Republic [2004] ECR I-01277, para. 56. German courts ruled in similar vein: German Federal Administrative Court (Bundesverwaltungsgericht): BVerwGE 69, 43.
82. [53] BVerwG NVwZ 1986, 208, para. 37 and German Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht): BVerfG, NJW 2002, 1638 (1639). Furthermore, the idea is invoked by Communication 1 and 10.
83. [53] Cameron/Abouchar 45.
84. [53] Cameron, James, Wade-Gery, Will, Abouchar, Juli, Precautionary Principle and Future Generations. Agius, Emmanuel, (eds.) Future Generations and International Law, 1998, Earthscan Ltd., London 99.
85. [53] Epiney/Scheyli 109/110.
86. [54] Dzidzornu, David, Four principles in marine environment protection: a comparative analysis. Ocean Dev. Int. Law, 29, 1998, 100.
87. [54] Trouwborst, Arie, Prevention, precaution, logic and law. Erasmus Law Rev., 2, 2009, 117.
88. [55] Cooney, Rosie, The Precautionary Principle in Biodiversity Conservation and Natural Resource Management. 2004, International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), Gland (Switzerland) and Cambridge 8.
89. [55] Atapattu, Sumudu A., Emerging Principles of International Environmental Law. 2006, Transnational Publishers, Ardsley 206.
90. [55] Maurmann, Dorothee, Rechtsgrundsätze im Völkerrecht am Beispiel des Vorsorgeprinzips. 2008, Nomos Verlag, Baden-Baden 151.
91. [55] Epiney/Scheyli 91.
92. [56] De Sadeleer 74/75 and 222.
93. [57] De Sadeleer 75 and 158.
94. [58] Richardson, Benjamin J., Wood, Stepan, Environmental Law for Sustainability: A Reader. 2006, Hart Publishing, Portland 362.
95. [59] De Sadeleer 75 and 158.
96. [60] Fisher, Elizabeth, Risk and environmental law: a beginner's guide. Richardson, Benjamin J., Wood, Stepan, (eds.) Environmental Law for Sustainability: A Reader, 2006, Hart Publishing, Portland 114.
97. [61] Weiss, Charles, Expressing scientific uncertainty. Law Probab. Risk, 2, 2003, 25.
98. [61] Tai, Stephanie, Uncertainty about uncertainty: the impact of judicial decisions on assessing scientific uncertainty. Univ. Pa. J. Constitutional Law, 11, 2009, 680.
99. [62] Tai, Stephanie, Uncertainty about uncertainty: the impact of judicial decisions on assessing scientific uncertainty. Univ. Pa. J. Constitutional Law, 11, 2009 676 and 680.
100. [62] Walker, Vern R., The myth of science as a ‘Neutral Arbiter’ triggering precaution. Boston Coll. Int. Comp. Law Rev., 26, 2006, 214.
101. [63] Tai, Stephanie, Uncertainty about uncertainty: the impact of judicial decisions on assessing scientific uncertainty. Univ. Pa. J. Const. Law, 11, 2009, 680.
102. [64] Wagner, Wendy E., The science charade in toxic risk regulation. Columbia Law Rev., 95, 1995, 1639.
103. [65] Krimsky, Sheldon, The funding effect in science and its implications for the judiciary. J. Law Policy, 2005 52 and 59.
104. [66] Trouwborst 2006, 145.
105. [67] Trouwborst 2006, 146.
106. [68] For a description of the argument see: Trouwborst 2006, 146.
107. [69] Carpenter, Richard A., Limitations in measuring ecological sustainability. Trzyna, Thaddeus, (eds.) A Sustainable World: Defining and Measuring Sustainable Development, 1995, Earthscan Publications Ltd., London 183.
108. [69] Fisher, Elizabeth, Risk and environmental law: a beginner's guide. Richardson, Benjamin J., Wood, Stepan, (eds.) Environmental Law for Sustainability: A Reader, 2006, Hart Publishing, Portland 114.
109. [69] Tai, Stephanie, Uncertainty about uncertainty: the impact of judicial decisions on assessing scientific uncertainty. Univ. Pa. J. Constitutional Law 11 (2009), 677–679.
110. [69] Klinke, Andreas, Renn, Ortwin, Precautionary principle and discursive strategies: classifying and managing risks. Journal of Risk Research, 4, 2001 163 et seq.
111. [69] Wynne, Brian, Uncertainty and environmental learning. Global Environm. Change, 2, 1992 114.
112. [69] Weiss, Charles, Expressing scientific uncertainty. Law Probab. Risk, 2, 2003 30/31.
113. [69] Wayne R. LaFave, ‘Street Encounters’ and the Constitution: Terry, Sibron, Peters and Beyond (1968/1969) 67 Michigan Law Review 40 and 87.
114. [69] Jones, Judith, Regulatory design for scientific uncertainty. J. Environ. Law, 19, 2007 353 et sqq and 365.
115. [70] Walker, Vern R., The myth of science as a ‘Neutral Arbiter’ triggering precaution. Boston Coll. Int. Comp. Law Rev., 26, 2006 197 (hereinafter: Walker 2006).
116. [71] Walker, Vern R., The myth of science as a ‘Neutral Arbiter’ triggering precaution. Boston Coll. Int. Comp. Law Rev., 26, 2006 204.
117. [72] Walker, Vern R., The myth of science as a ‘neutral arbiter’ triggering precaution. Boston Coll. Int. Comp. Law Rev., 26, 2006 197.
118. [72] Walker, Vern R., The siren songs of science. Conneticut Law Rev., 23, 1991 567 (hereinafter: Walker 1991).
119. [73] Walker 2006, 205.
120. [73] Walker 1991, 574–579.
121. [74] Walker 2006, 206.
122. [75] Carmines, Edward G., Zeller, Richard A., Reliability and Validity Assessment. 1979, Sage, London, 11–13.
123. [75] Ghiselli, Edwin Ernest, et al. Measurement Theory for the Behavioural Science. 1980, W. H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco 184/191.
124. [76] Walker 1991, 588.
125. [77] Walker 1991, 589.
126. [78] Walker 2006, 208.
127. [79] Walker 1991, 598.
128. [80] Walker 2006, 210.
129. [81] Walker 2006, 211.
130. [82] Walker 1991, 609.
131. [83] Trouwborst 2006, 94.
132. [84] Commission Recommendation of 22 January 2014 on minimum principles for the exploration and production of hydrocarbons (such as shale gas) using high-volume hydraulic fracturing, OJ L 39, 8.2.2014, pp. 72–78 (‘the Recommendation’).
133. [85] Commission Communication on the exploration and production of hydrocarbons (such as shale gas) using high volume hydraulic fracturing in the EU, Brussels, 17.3.2014, COM (2014) 23 (‘the Communication’).
134. [86] Commission Staff Working Document Impact Assessment accompanying the Commission Communication, Brussels, 22.1.2014, SWD (2014) 21 (‘the Commission Staff Working Document’).
135. [87] Recital 12 Preamble to the Recommendation.
136. [88] European Commission Communication at 3 and only slightly different at 5.
137. [89] European Commission Communication at 3 and only slightly different at 8.
138. [90] Commission Staff Working Document, at 41f, emphasis added.
139. [91] Trouwborst, Aire, Prevention, precaution, logic and law. Erasmus Law Rev., 2, 2009 105 and 107 (hereinafter Trouwborst 2009).
140. [92] UK Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, A comparative table of the current EC and EU Treaties as amended by the Treaty of Lisbon. Available at: http://www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/cm73/7311/7311.pdf (accessed 09.03.13).
141. [93] Other examples include art. 3 (2) of both 1994 Agreement on the Protection of the Meuse and the 1994 Agreement on the Protection of the Scheldt.
142. [93] S. 2.4 para 2/3 of the Pan-European Biological and Landscape Diversity Strategy of 25 October 1995 (Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg 1998).
143. [93] Art. 1(2) of the Protocol on Cooperation in the Area of Water and Nature Protection in the Ems River Mouth to the 1960 Treaty between the Netherlands and Germany on cooperation in the Ems River Mouth.
144. [93] Para. 8 of the Trilateral Wadden Sea Plan of 22 October 1997.
145. [93] Art. 4 of the Convention on the Protection of the Rhine.
146. [93] Art. 5 of 1999 Protocol on Water and Health to the 1992 Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes.
147. [94] Trouwborst, Aire, Prevention, precaution logic and law. Erasmus Law Rev., 2, 2009, 126.
148. [95] French National Assembly ‘Information report on the implementation of the conclusions of the information report (No. 2719) 8 July 2010 on the evaluation of the implementation of Article 5 of the Charter of the environment on the application the precautionary principle’ (17/11/2011 RAPPORT D'INFORMATION déposé en application de l'article 146-3, alinéa 8, du Règlement par le comité d’évaluation et de contrôle des politiques publiques sur la mise en œuvre des conclusions du rapport d'information (n° 2719) du 8 juillet 2010 sur l’évaluation de la mise en œuvre de l'article 5 de la Charte de l'environnement relatif à l'application du principe de précaution) paragraph 1) a) available at: http://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/13/pdf/rap-info/i3970.pdf (accessed 12.06.12) (hereinafter: France Report on PP).
149. [95] French National Assembly ‘PROHIBITION OF HYDRAULIC FRACTURE Solemn Vote Official Journal of the French Republic Regular Session 2010-2011 175th meeting Minutes integral 1st meeting of Wednesday, May 11, 2011’ (INTERDICTION DE LA FRACTURATION HYDRAULIQUE Vote solennel JOURNAL OFFICIEL DE LA RÉPUBLIQUE FRANÇAISE SESSION ORDINAIRE DE 2010-2011 175e séance Compte rendu integral 1re séance du mercredi 11 mai 2011) 2974 available at: http://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/13/pdf/cri/2010-2011/20110175.pdf (accessed 07.05.14) (hereinafter: French National Assembly Minutes 11th May 2011).
150. [96] According to: French National Assembly ‘Thirteenth legislature Ordinary Session 2010–2011 Report First meeting of Tuesday, June 21, 2011 ELECTRONIC SUMMARY’ (XIIIe législature Session ordinaire de 2010–2011 Compte rendu intégral Première séance du mardi 21 juin 2011 SOMMAIRE ÉLECTRONIQUE) 4381 available at: http://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/13/pdf/cri/2010-2011/20110216.pdf (accessed 02.05.14) (hereinafter: French National Assembly Minutes 21st June 2011).
151. [97] French National Assembly Minutes 21st June 2011, 4381.
152. [98] French moratorium.
153. [99] Article 1 French moratorium.
154. [100] French National Assembly Minutes 21st June 2011, 4392.
155. [101] French Senate `Meeting of 30 June 2011 (Verbatim Report of Debates)` (Séance du 30 juin 2011 (compte rendu intégral des débats)) available at: http://www.senat.fr/seances/s201106/s20110630/s20110630.pdf (accessed 02.05.14) (hereinafter: French Senate 30th June 2011).
156. [102] See: France Report on PP, paragraph I) A) 1) b).
157. [102] French National Assembly Minutes 21st June 2011 4390.
158. [102] French National Assembly ‘PROHIBITION OF HYDRAULIC FRACTURE Discussion of a bill Official Journal of the French Republic Regular Session 2010–2011 174rd meeting Minutes integral 2nd meeting of Tuesday, May 10, 2011’ (INTERDICTION DE LA FRACTURATION HYDRAULIQUE Discussion d'une proposition de loi JOURNAL OFFICIEL DE LA RÉPUBLIQUE FRANÇAISE SESSION ORDINAIRE DE 2010–2011 174e séance Compte rendu integral 2e séance du mardi 10 mai 2011) available at: http://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/13/pdf/cri/2010-2011/20110174.pdf (accessed 07.05.14) 2919, 2923 (hereinafter: French National Assembly Minutes 10th May 2011 part 2).
159. [102] French Senate ‘Prohibition of exploration and mining hydrocarbons by hydraulic fracturing. - Discussion Text of the Commission OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE FRENCH REPUBLIC REGULAR SESSION 2010–2011 FULL REPORT Meeting on Wednesday, June 1, 2011’ (112th sitting day of the session)’ (Interdiction de l'exploration et de l'exploitation des mines d'hydrocarbures par fracturation hydraulique. – Discussion en procédure accélérée de trois propositions de loi dans le texte de la commission SÉNAT JOURNAL OFFICIEL DE LA RÉPUBLIQUE FRANÇAISE SESSION ORDINAIRE DE 2010–2011 COMPTE RENDU INTÉGRAL Séance du mercredi 1er juin 2011 (112e jour de séance de la session)) 4472 available at: http://www.senat.fr/seances/s201106/s20110601/s20110601.pdf (accessed 18.08.14) (hereinafter: French Senate Minutes 1st June 2011).
160. [103] According to: report on PP, para. 1) a).
161. [104] Report on PP, para. I) A) 1) b).
162. [105] See: France Report on PP, paragraph I) A) 1) b).
163. [105] French National Assembly Minutes 21st June 2011 4390.
164. [105] French National Assembly Minutes 10th May 2011 part 2 2919, 2923.
165. [105] French Senate Minutes 1st June 2011 4472.
166. [106] See article 1 of law no. 2011-835.
167. [107] Article 1 of the French moratorium now reads: “En application de la Charte de l'environnement de 2004 et du principe d'action préventive et de correction prévu à l'article L. 110-1 du code de l'environnement”. For the debate see: French Senate Minutes 1st June 2011 4460.
168. [108] SRU Faulstich 44/45.
169. [109] For example: BBC ‘Fracking tests near Blackpool ‘likely cause’ of tremors’. Available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-lancashire-15550458 (accessed 04.03.16).
170. [110] Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ‘Health Consultation- Chesapeake ATGAS 2H Well Site Leroy Hill Road, Leroy, Leroy Township, Bradford County, PA November 4 2011’ (2011) Conclusion 1 at page iii, available at: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/hac/pha/ChesapeakeATGASWellSite/ChesapeakeATGASWellSiteHC110411Final.pdf (accessed 14.03.13).
171. [110] Osborn, Stephen G., et al. Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 108(20), 2011, 8172.
172. [110] US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Draft Investigation of Ground Water Contamination near Pavillion, Wyoming., 2011 at 37–39 and xiii, available at: http://www.epa.gov/region8/superfund/wy/pavillion/EPA_ReportOnPavillion_Dec-8-2011.pdf (accessed 04.03.13).
173. [110] For a general acknowledgement of the potential threat, see:Esser, Bradley K., et al. Recommendations on Model Criteria for Groundwater Sampling, Testing, and Monitoring of Oil and Gas Development in California. Final Report, California State Water Resources Control Board, LLNL‐TR‐669645., 2015 8, 10 available at: http://sites.nicholas.duke.edu/avnervengosh/publications/llnl_recommendations_report/ (accessed 17.03.16).
174. [111] Boyer, Elizabeth W., et al. The Impact of Marcellus Gas Drilling on Rural Drinking Water Supplies., 2012, Centre for Rural Pennsylvania, Harrisburg Available at: http://www.rural.palegislature.us/documents/reports/Marcellus_and_drinking_water_2012.pdf (accessed 05.07.13) 4.
175. [111] Energy Institute of the University of Texas ‘Fact-Based Regulation for Environmental Protection in Shale Gas Development’ (2012) ‘Environmental Impacts of Shale gas development’ part 2 ‘Summary of findings’ 30/31 available at: http://barnettprogress.com/media/ei_shale_gas_regulation120215.pdf (accessed 14.06.12) (hereinafter: University of Texas).
176. [112] The study commenced in 1999 and monitored several wells in the US over a time period of 5 years, see: EPA ‘Hydraulic Fracturing Background Information’ http://water.epa.gov/type/groundwater/uic/class2/hydraulicfracturing/wells_hydrowhat.cfm (accessed 28.03.13).
177. [113] EPA, Evaluation of Impacts to Underground Sources of Drinking Water by Hydraulic Fracturing of Coalbed Methane Reservoirs Study. 2004 Available at: http://water.epa.gov/type/groundwater/uic/class2/hydraulicfracturing/wells_coalbedmethanestudy.cfm (accessed 28.03.13) (hereinafter: EPA CBM).
178. [114] Executive Summary of the study available at: http://www.epa.gov/ogwdw/uic/pdfs/cbmstudy_attach_uic_exec_summ.pdf (accessed 28.03.13) ES-1 and ES-16. Although the study was concerned with the hydraulic fracturing of CBM and not with hydraulic fracturing in shale plays, the findings are transferable, since the study focussed on hydraulic fracturing as a technique and its effects on the groundwater. The hydraulic fracturing technique is equally deployed for gas flow stimulation in CBM-reservoirs and in shale plays, since both have very low permeability, see Knut Bjorlykke ‘Petroleum Geoscience – From sedimentary Environments to Rock Physics’ (Springer Verlag, Berlin 2010) 464.
179. [115] Michael Gunzelmann, Mohamed El Hamdaoui, Grundwassermonitoring im Bereich der Bohrungen Damme 2/3 der Exxon Mobil. Available at: http://damme.de/templates/images/news/1272_1.pdf (accessed 05.07.13) 13.
180. [115] Rosenwinkel 10, 22/23.
181. [116] Rosenwinkel, 1–3 and 32.
182. [117] Kuhn, Maximilian, Umbach, Frank, Strategic Perspectives of Unconventional Gas: A Game Changer with Implications for the EU. 2011 European Centre for Energy and Resource Security (EUCERS) Strategy Paper No. 1 http://www.eucers.eu/2011/05/06/eucers-strategy-paper-no1/ (accessed 24.04.12) 22 (hereinafter: EUCERS).
183. [117] UK report I, 44.
184. [118] EUCERS 22.
185. [119] EUCERS 22.
186. [119] UK report I, 44.
187. [120] C. Ewen et al., Hydrofracking Risk Assessment-Executive Summary. Available at: http://dialog-erdgasundfrac.de/sites/dialog-erdgasundfrac.de/files/Ex_HydrofrackingRiskAssessment_120611.pdf (accessed 15.06.12) 47.
188. [120] EUCERS 22.
189. [121] Karl-Heinz Rosenwinkel et al., Gutachten zur Abwasserentsorgung und Stoffstrombilanz ISAH 2012. Available at: http://dialog-erdgasundfrac.de/sites/dialog-erdgasundfrac.de/files/Gutachten%20zur%20Abwasserentsorgung%20und%20Stoffstrombilanz%20ISAH%20Mai%202012.pdf (accessed 25.06.12) (hereinafter: Rosenwinkel).
190. [122] Rosenwinkel 64.
191. [123] Broderick, John, Anderson, Kevin, Has US Shale Gas Reduced CO2 Emissions? Examining Recent Changes in Emissions from the US Power Sector and Traded Fossil Fuels. 2012, Tyndall Centre at the University of Manchester, Manchester Available at: http://www.tyndall.manchester.ac.uk/public/Broderick_Anderson_2012_Impact_of_Shale_Gas_on_US_Energy_Emissions.pdf (accessed 20.03.13) 13–15 and 21–24 (hereinafter: Broderick/Anderson).
192. [124] Howarth, Robert W., Santoro, Renee, Ingraffea, Anthony, Methane and the greenhouse-gas footprint of natural gas from shale formations. Climatic Change, 106(4), 2011 684/685.
193. [124] Broderick/Anderson 13–15 and 21–24.
194. [124] Howarth/Santoro/Ingraffea 684/685.
195. [124] S. Pacala, R. Socolow, Stabilization Wedges: Solving the Climate Problem for the Next 50 Years with Current Technologies. Available at: http://www.princeton.edu/mae/people/faculty/socolow/Science-2004-SW-1100103-PAPER-AND-SOM.pdf (accessed 26.02.14) 17/18 and 25/26 of Supporting On-Line Material (hereinafter: Pacala/Socolow).
196. [124] Brandt, A.R., et al. Methane leaks from North American natural gas systems. Science, 343(6172), 2014, 733.
197. [124] Daniel Forster, Jonathan Perks, Climate Impact of potential shale gas production in the EU study of 30 July 2012 (European Commission 2012). Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/eccp/docs/120815_final_report_en.pdf (accessed 29.10.12) 67 and v.
198. [125] Energy and Climate Change Committee of the House of Commons ‘Shale Gas’ Fifth Report of Session 2010–2012, vol. I (Crown 2011) 55 (hereinafter: UK report I).
199. [125] Energy and Climate Change Committee ‘Shale Gas’ Fifth Report of Session of the House of Commons 2010–12, vol. II (Crown 2011) (hereinafter: UK report II).
200. [126] The committee heard its last evidence by April 2011, see: UK report I, Ev. 109 and went to print at 10 May 2011, see UK report I, 1.
201. [127] BBC, Fracking tests near Blackpool ‘likely cause’ of tremors. Available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-lancashire-15550458 (accessed 04.04.14).
202. [128] ‘Induced seismicity’ refers to seismic events which are triggered by the injection of fluid into shale plays, see Cuadrilla report 52. A technically precise definition can be found at: Cuadrilla report, 36.
203. [129] UK report I, Ev 94.
204. [130] Edward Davey, Written Ministerial Statement by Edward Davey: Exploration for shale gas. 13 December 2012. Available at: http://www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/news/wms_shale/wms_shale.aspx (accessed 17.12.12) (hereinafter: Written Statement Davey).
205. [130] The Royal Society and the Royal Academy of Engineering, Shale gas extraction in the UK: a review of hydraulic fracturing (London, 2012). Available at: https://royalsociety.org/policy/projects/shale-gas-extraction/report/ (accessed 11.04.14) (hereinafter: Royal Society).
206. [130] Christopher A. Green et al., Preese Hall Shale Gas Fracturing Review and Recommendations for Induced Seismic Mitigation Report on behalf of the UK Department of Energy and Climate Change. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/15745/5075-preese-hall-shale-gas-fracturing-review.pdf (accessed 11.04.14) (hereinafter: Green et al.).
207. [130] Government response to Royal Academy of Engineering and Royal Society report on “Shale Gas Extraction in the UK: a review of hydraulic fracturing” (10th December 2012). Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/49541/7269-government-response-sg-report-.pdf (accessed 11.04.14) (hereinafter: Government response).
208. [131] Green et al., ii/iii and 13/14.
209. [131] Royal Society 4–7.
210. [132] Davies, Richard, et al. Induced seismicity and hydraulic fracturing for the recovery of hydrocarbons. Marine and Petroleum Geology 45 (2013), 171–185.
211. [132] Ellsworth, William L., Injection-induced earthquakes. Science, 341(6142), 2013.
212. [133] Holland, Austin A., Earthquakes triggered by hydraulic fracturing in South-Central Oklahoma. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 103:3 (2013), 1784–1792.
213. [134] For the suspected detrimental health effects see: Neela Banerjee Los Angeles Times ‘Mining sand for fracking causes friction in Wisconsin’. Available at: http://articles.latimes.com/2012/nov/19/nation/la-na-wisconsin-sand-20121119-1 (accessed 25.03.13).
214. [135] Andrew Revkin, The New York Times ‘Damning Review of Gas Study Prompts a Shakeup at the University of Texas’. Available at: http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/12/06/damning-review-of-gas-study-prompts-a-shakeup-at-the-university-of-texas/ (accessed 16.03.13).
215. [136] Carmines, Edward G., Zeller, Richard A., Reliability and Validity Assessment. 1979, Sage, London 12/13.
216. [136] Ghiselli, Edwin Ernest, et al. Measurement Theory for the Behavioural Science. 1980, W. H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco 266.
217. [137] Walker 2006, 207. However, every measurement process is to some extent unreliable so that the level of “acceptable imprecision” has to be determined.
218. [138] Walker 1991, 585.
219. [139] Osborn, Stephen G., et al. Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 108(20), 2011, 8172.
220. [140] Walker 1991, 588.
221. [141] Walker 1991, 594.
222. [142] Energy Institute of the University of Texas, Fact-Based Regulation for Environmental Protection in Shale Gas Development (2012) in part 4 ‘Environmental Impacts of Shale gas development’ at page 68 available at: http://barnettprogress.com/media/ei_shale_gas_regulation120215.pdf (accessed 14.06.12) (hereinafter: Energy Institute Texas). This study, however, has later been discredited, see: http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/12/06/damning-review-of-gas-study-prompts-a-shakeup-at-the-university-of-texas/?_r=0, as has been discussed above. The study is cited here merely for illustrative purposes.
223. [143] Walker 2006, 210.
224. [144] Walker 2006, 209.
225. [145] Walker 1991, 599.
226. [146] Walker 1991, 598.
227. [147] Stoneley, Robert, An Introduction to Petroleum Exploration for Non-Geologists. 1995, Oxford University Press, Oxford 43/44 and 113.
228. [147] De Waal, J.A., The effective subsidence capacity concept: how to assure that subsidence in the Wadden Sea remains within defined limits?. Neth. J. Geosci. 3:91 (2012), 385–399.
229. [148] See for instance:Darrah, Thomas A., et al. Noble gases identify the mechanisms of fugitive methane contamination in drinking-water wells overlying the Marcellus and Barnett Shales. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 111(39), 2014 14077/14078.
230. [149] US Environmental Protection Agency, EPA's Study of Hydraulic Fracturing and Its Potential Impact on Drinking Water Resources. Available at: http://epa.gov/hfstudy/ (accessed 02.0313).
231. [150] Mint Press News, EPA Pushes Back Fracking Impact Study To 2016. Available at: http://www.mintpressnews.com/epa-pushes-back-fracking-impact-study-to-2016/163927/ (accessed 25.02.15).
232. [151] Also raised in Reins Minimum Principles above.
233. [152] European Commission, Commission Communication on the precautionary principle, Brussels, 02.02.2000 COM (2000) 1.
234. [153] Van Calster, Bowman, D'Silva, Trust me, I'm a Regulator’: the (In)adequacy of EU Legislative Instruments for Three Nanotechnologies Categories, 213.
235. [154] Reins Minimum Principles 26.
236. [155] John Cherry, “Hydraulic Fracturing: Science and Propaganda”, Munk School of Global Affairs, U of T, May 29, 2014, available at http://powi.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/POWI-29May-Cherry-Presentation.pdf.
237. [156] Ballesteros, M., Pelsy, F., Reins, L., Regulatory Provisions Governing Key Aspects of Unconventional Gas Extraction in Selected Member States. 2013, Milieu Ltd., Brussels 78 pp.
238. [157] Analysis and presentation of the results of the public consultation “Unconventional fossil fuels (e.g. shale gas) in Europe” Final report, European Commission DG Environment, 03.10.2013, available at http://ec.europa.eu/environment/integration/energy/pdf/Shale%20gas%20consultation_report.pdf (accessed 22.10.14).
239. [158] Suggested in the Commission Communication on the exploration and production of hydrocarbons (such as shale gas) using high volume hydraulic fracturing in the EU, Brussels, 22.1.2014, COM (2014) 23, p. 1. The network was effectively launched on 8th July 2014. For more information refer to https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/uh-network (accessed 22.10.14).
240. [159] See Article 16(1), which invites “Member States having chosen to explore or exploit hydrocarbons using high-volume hydraulic fracturing are invited to give effect to the minimum principles set out in this Recommendation by 28 July 2014 and to annually inform the Commission about the measures they put in place in response to this Recommendation, and for the first time, by December 2014”.
241. [160] Best Available Techniques for Management of Tailings and Waste-Rock in Mining Activities, January 2009. Available at http://eippcb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/reference/BREF/mmr_adopted_0109.pdf (accessed 12.06.16) under revision until 2017.