Quiet voices in the fracking debate: Ambivalence, nonmobilization, and individual action in two extractive communities (Saskatchewan and Pennsylvania)

Energy Research and Social Science

Volumn 20, Issue , 2016, Pages 22-30

  Eaton, Emily ^a   Kinchy, Abby ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGINA   (Canada)

^b RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Ambivalence; Collective action; Individualism; Pennsylvania; Powerlessness; Saskatchewan; Shale oil and gas

Indexed keywords

EID: 84973912730     PISSN: 22146296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2016.05.005     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. [1] Anderson, Brooklynn J., Theodori, Gene L., Local leaders’ perceptions of energy development in the Barnett Shale. South. Rural Sociol. 24:1 (2009), 113–129.
2. [2] Bell, Shannon Elizabeth, ‘There Ain't No Bond in Town Like There Used to Be’: the destruction of social capital in the West Virginia coalfields. Sociol. Forum 24:3 (2009), 631–657.
3. [3] Bell, Shannon Elizabeth, York, Richard, Community economic identity: the coal industry and ideology construction in West Virginia. Rural Sociol. 75:1 (2010), 111–143.
4. [4] Benford, Robert D., Snow, David A., Framing processes and social movements: an overview and assessment. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 26 (2000), 611–639.
5. [5] Boudet, Hilary, Clarke, Christopher, Bugden, Dylan, Maibach, Edward, Roser-Renouf, Connie, Leiserowitz, Anthony, ‘Fracking’ controversy and communication: using national survey data to understand public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing. Energy Policy 65 (2014), 57–67 Elsevier.
6. [6] Boyd, Amanda D., Connections between community and emerging technology: support for enhanced oil recovery in the Weyburn, Saskatchewan area. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 32 (2015), 81–89 Elsevier Ltd.
7. [7] Brasier, Kathryn J., Mclaughlin, Diane K., Rhubart, Danielle, Stedman, Richard C., Filteau, Matthew R., Jacquet, Jeffrey, Risk perceptions of natural gas development in the Marcellus Shale. Environ. Pract. 15:June (2013), 108–122.
8. [8] Brasier, Kathryn J., Filteau, Matthew R., McLaughlin, Diane K., Jacquet, Jeffrey, Stedman, Richard C., Kelsey, Timothy W., Goetz, Stephan J., Residents’ perceptions of community and environmental impacts from development of natural gas in the Marcellus Shale: a comparison of Pennsylvania and New York cases. J. Rural Soc. Sci. 26:1 (2011), 32–61.
9. [9] Brown, Erica, Hartman, Kristine, Borick, Christopher, Rabe, Barry G., Ivacko, Thomas, Public opinion on fracking: perspectives from Michigan and Pennsylvania. The Center for Local, State, and Urban Policy, 2013, University of Michigan.
10. [10] Angela Carter, Emily Eaton, Subnational responses to fracking in Canada: explaining Saskatchewan's ‘Wild West’ regulatory approach. Rev. Policy Res., forthcoming.
11. [11] Colborn, Theo, Kwiatkowski, Carol, Schultz, Kim, Bachran, Mary, Natural gas operations from a public health perspective. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess.: Int. J. 17:5 (2011), 1039–1056.
12. [12] Davis, Charles, The politics of fracking: regulating natural gas drilling practices in Colorado and Texas. Rev. Policy Res., 29(2), 2012.
13. [13] Davis, Charles, Fisk, Jonathan M., Energy abundance or environmental worries? Analyzing public support for fracking in the United States. Rev. Policy Res. 31:1 (2014), 1–16.
14. [14] Evensen, Darrick T., Clarke, Christopher E., Stedman, Richard C., A New York or Pennsylvania state of mind: social representations in newspaper coverage of gas development in the Marcellus Shale. J. Environ. Stud. Sci. 2014:4 (2014), 65–77.
15. [15] Finewood, Michael H., Stroup, Laura J., Fracking and the neoliberalization of the hydro-social cycle in Pennsylvania's Marcellus Shale. J. Contemp. Water Res. Educ. 147:1 (2012), 72–79.
16. [16] Freudenburg, William R., Gramling, Robert, Oil in Troubled Waters: Perceptions, Politics, and the Battle Over Offshore Drilling. 1994, SUNY Press.
17. [17] Gaventa, John, Power and Powerlessness: Quiescence and Rebellion in an Appalachian Valley. 1980, University of Illinois Press.
18. [18] Hanley, Paul, Unconventional Fossil Fuels Waylay Sustainable Energy Options. 2010, The StarPhoenix October 26.
19. [19] Hudgins, Anastasia, Fracking's future in a coal mining past: subjectivity undermined. Cult. Agric. Food Environ. 35:1 (2013), 54–59.
20. [20] Hudgins, Anastasia, Poole, Amanda, Framing fracking: private property, common resources, and regimes of governance. J. Polit. Ecol. 21 (2014), 222–348.
21. [21] Jacquet, Jeffrey B., Landowner attitudes toward natural gas and wind farm development in northern Pennsylvania. Energy Policy 50 (2012), 677–788 Elsevier.
22. [22] Kinniburgh, Colin, From Zuccotti Park to Żurawlów: the global revolt against fracking. Dissent, 2015, 42–53 Summer.
23. [23] Kriesky, J., Goldstein, B.D., Zell, K., Beach, S., Differing opinions about natural gas drilling in two adjacent counties with different levels of drilling activity. Energy Policy 58 (2013), 228–236 Elsevier.
24. [24] Lachapelle, Erick, Montpetit, Eric, Public opinion on hydraulic fracturing in the province of Quebec: a comparison with Michigan and Pennsylvania. Issues Energy Environ. Policy, 2014 October (17).
25. [25] Lave, Rebecca, Lutz, Brian, Hydraulic fracturing: a critical physical geography review. Geogr. Compass 8:10 (2014), 739–754.
26. [26] Ladd, Anthony E., Environmental disputes and opportunity—threat impacts surrounding natural gas fracking in Louisiana. Soc. Curr. 1:3 (2014), 293–311.
27. [27] Leo, Geoff, Sour Gas from Oil Wells a Deadly Problem in Southeast Saskatchewan. 2015, CBC News, Saskatchewan April 21 http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatchewan/sour-gas-from-oil-wells-a-deadly-problem-in-southeast-saskatchewan-1.3042939.
28. [28] Stephanie Malin, “There's No Real Choice but to Sign : Neoliberalization and Normalization of Hydraulic Fracturing on Pennsylvania Farmland,” (2014) 17–27.
29. [29] Mazur, Allan, How did the fracking controversy emerge in the period 2010–2012?. Public Underst. Sci., 2014, 1–16.
30. [30] McAdam, Doug, Schaffer Boudet, Hilary, Putting Social Movements in Their Place: Explaining Opposition to Energy Projects in the United States, 2000–2005. 2012, Cambridge University Press.
31. [31] McAdam, Doug, Schaffer Boudet, Hilary, Davis, Jennifer, Orr, Ryan J., Scott, W. Richard, Levitt, Raymond E., ‘Site fights’: explaining opposition to pipeline projects in the developing world. Sociol. Forum 25:3 (2010), 401–427.
32. [32] Mercer, Alexandra, de Rijke, Kim, Dressler, Wolfram, Silences in the boom: coal seam gas, neoliberalizing discourse, and the future of regional Australia. J. Polit. Ecol. 21 (2014), 279–302.
33. [33] Messer, Chris M., Adams, Alison E., Shriver, Thomas E., Corporate frame failure and the erosion of elite legitimacy. Sociol. Q. 53:3 (2012), 475–499.
34. [34] National Energy Board, Tight Oil Developments in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin (2011).
35. [35] Pearson, Thomas W., Frac sand mining in Wisconsin: understanding emerging conflicts and community organizing. Cult. Agric. Food Environ. 35:1 (2013), 30–40.
36. [36] Perry, Simona L., Using ethnography to monitor the community health implications of onshore unconventional oil and gas developments: examples from Pennsylvania's Marcellus Shale. New Solut. 23:1 (2013), 33–53.
37. [37] Perry, Simona L, Development, land use, and collective trauma: the Marcellus Shale gas boom in rural Pennsylvania. Cult. Agric; Food Environ. 34:1 (2012), 81–92.
38. [38] Pribanic, Joshua B., Melissa Troutman, Public Herald 30-Month Report Finds DEP Fracking Complaint Investigations Are ‘Cooked’ & Shredded., 2015, Public Herald September 15 http://publicherald.org/public-herald-30-month-report-finds-dep-fracking-complaint-investigations-are-cooked/.
39. [39] Rabe, Barry G., Borick, Christopher., Conventional politics for unconventional drilling? Lessons from Pennsylvania's early move into fracking policy development. Rev. Policy Res. 30:3 (2013), 321–340.
40. [40] Rozell, Daniel J., Reaven, Sheldon J., Water pollution risk associated with natural gas extraction from the Marcellus Shale. Risk Anal. 32:8 (2012), 1382–1393.
41. [41] Schafft, Kai A., Borlu, Yetkin, Glenna, Leland, The relationship between Marcellus Shale gas development in Pennsylvania and local perceptions of risk and opportunity. Rural Sociol. 78:2 (2013), 143–166.
42. [42] Scott, James C., Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. 1987, Yale University Press.
43. [43] Scott, James C., The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia. 1977, Yale University Press.
44. [44] Shriver, Thomas E., Adams, Alison E., Cable, Sherry, Discursive obstruction and elite opposition to environmental activism in the Czech Republic. Soc. Forces 91:3 (2013), 873–893.
45. [45] Shriver, Thomas E., Adams, Alison E., Messer, Chris M., Power, quiescence, and pollution: the suppression of environmental grievances. Soc. Curr. 1:3 (2014), 275–292.
46. [46] Simonelli, Jeanne, Home rule and natural gas development in New York: civil fracking rights. J. Polit. Ecol. 21 (2014), 258–278.
47. [47] Smith, Michael F., Ferguson, Denise P., ‘Fracking democracy’: issue management and locus of policy decision-making in the Marcellus Shale gas drilling debate. Public Relat. Rev. 39:4 (2013), 377–386 (Elsevier Inc.).
48. [48] Steinzor, Nadia, Subra, Wilma, Sumi, Lisa, Investigating links between shale gas development and health impacts through a community survey project in Pennsylvania. New Solut.: J. Environ. Occup. Health Policy 1 (2013), 55–83.
49. [49] Theodori, Gene L., Paradoxical perceptions of problems associated with unconventional natural gas development. South. Rural Sociol. 24:3 (2009), 97–117.
50. [50] U.S. Energy Information Administration. “Shale Gas Production.” (2015). https://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_prod_shalegas_s1_a.htm.
51. [51] Vasi, Ion Bogdan, Walker, Edward T., Johnson, John S., Fen Fen, H., ‘No Fracking Way!’ documentary film, discursive opportunity, and local opposition against hydraulic fracturing in the United States, 2010–2013. Am. Sociol. Rev. 80:5 (2015), 934–959.
52. [52] Vesalon, Lucian, Creţan, Remus, ‘We Are Not the Wild West’: anti-fracking protests in Romania. Environ. Politics 24:2 (2015), 288–307.
53. [53] Warner, Barbara, Shapiro, Jennifer, Fractured, fragmented federalism: a study in fracking regulatory policy. Publius: J. Federalism, 2013.
54. [54] Wilber, Tom, Under the Surface: Fracking, Fortunes, and the Fate of the Marcellus Shale (Google eBook). 2012, Cornell University Press http://books.google.com/books?id=Xk_fpsoCLlQC&pgis=1.
55. [55] Willow, Anna J., The new politics of environmental degradation: un/expected landscapes of disempowerment and vulnerability. J. Polit. Ecol. 21 (2014), 237–257.
56. [56] Willow, Anna J., Zak, Rebecca, Vilaplana, Danielle, Sheeley, David, The contested landscape of unconventional energy development: a report from Ohio's shale gas country. J. Environ. Stud. Sci. 4:1 (2014), 56–64.
57. [57] Wiseman, Hannah J., Risk and response in fracturing policy. Univ. Colo. Law Rev., 84(729), 2013.
58. [58] Wiseman, Hannah Jacobs, Untested waters: the rise of hydraulic fracturing in oil and gas production and the need to revisit regulation. Fordham Environ. Law Rev., 20(115), 2009.
59. [59] Wright, Marita, Making it personal: how anti-fracking organizations frame their messages. Columbia Univ. J. Politics Soc., 2013, 107–125.
60. [60] Wright, Rachel A., Schaffer Boudet, Hilary, To act or not to act: context, capability, and community response to environmental risk. Am. J. Sociol., 118(3), 2013, 7.