Spaced Repetition Promotes Efficient and Effective Learning: Policy Implications for Instruction

Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 12-19

  Kang, Sean H K ^a  

^a DARTMOUTH COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

education; learning; research based instructional strategies; spaced distributed practice; testing

Indexed keywords

EID: 85030859663     PISSN: 23727322     EISSN: 23727330     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/2372732215624708     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Anderson L. S., Healy A. F., Kole J. A., Bourne L. E., (2013). The clicker technique: Cultivating efficient teaching and successful learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 222-234
2. Arnold K. M., McDermott K. B., (2013). Free recall enhances subsequent learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 507-513
3. Bahrick H. P., (1979). Maintenance of knowledge: Questions about memory we forgot to ask. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 296-308
4. Balota D. A., Duchek J. M., Logan J. M., (2007). Is expanded retrieval practice a superior form of spaced retrieval? A critical review of the extant literature. In Nairne J. S., (Ed.), The foundations of remembering: Essays in honor of Henry L. Roediger III (pp. 83-105). New York, NY: Psychological Press
5. Barrett M., (1990). The case for more school days. The Atlantic Monthly, 266(5), 78-106. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/past/politics/educatio/barr2f.htm
6. Benjamin A. S., Pashler H., (2015). The value of standardized testing: A perspective from cognitive psychology. Policy Insights From the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2, 13-23
7. Bird S., (2010). Effects of distributed practice on the acquisition of second language English syntax. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 635-650
8. Birnbaum M. S., Kornell N., Bjork E. L., Bjork R. A., (2013). Why interleaving enhances inductive learning: The roles of discrimination and retrieval. Memory & Cognition, 41, 392-402
9. Butler A. C., (2010). Repeated testing produces superior transfer of learning relative to repeated studying. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1118-1133
10. Butler A. C., Marsh E. J., Slavinsky J. P., Baraniuk R. G., (2014). Integrating cognitive science and technology improves learning in a STEM classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 26, 331-340
11. Carpenter S. K., (2012). Testing enhances the transfer of learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 279-283
12. Carpenter S. K., Cepeda N. J., Rohrer D., Kang S. H. K., Pashler H., (2012). Using spacing to enhance diverse forms of learning: Review of recent research and implications for instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 24, 369-378
13. Carpenter S. K., Pashler H., Cepeda N. J., (2009). Using tests to enhance 8th grade students’ retention of U.S. history facts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 760-771
14. Carpenter S. K., Pashler H., Wixted J. T., Vul E., (2008). The effects of tests on learning and forgetting. Memory & Cognition, 36, 438-448
15. Carvalho P. F., Goldstone R. L., (2014). Putting category learning in order: Category structure and temporal arrangement affect the benefit of interleaved over blocked study. Memory & Cognition, 42, 481-495
16. Cepeda N. J., Coburn N., Rohrer D., Wixted J. T., Mozer M. C., Pashler H., (2009). Optimizing distributed practice: Theoretical analysis and practical implications. Experimental Psychology, 56, 236-246
17. Cepeda N. J., Pashler H., Vul E., Wixted J. T., Rohrer D., (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 354-380
18. Cepeda N. J., Vul E., Rohrer D., Wixted J. T., Pashler H., (2008). Spacing effects in learning a temporal ridgeline of optimal retention. Psychological Science, 19, 1095-1102
19. Dempster F. N., (1988). The spacing effect: A case study in the failure to apply the results of psychological research. American Psychologist, 43, 627-634
20. Dunlosky J., Rawson K. A., Marsh E. J., Nathan M. J., Willingham D. T., (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14, 4-58
21. Ebbinghaus H., (1913). Memory (Ruger H. A., Bussenius C. E., Trans.). New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University. (Original work published 1885)
22. Finn B., Tauber S. K., (2015). When confidence is not a signal of knowing: How students’ experiences and beliefs about processing fluency can lead to miscalibrated confidence. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 567-586
23. Glenberg A. M., (1979). Component-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition. Memory & Cognition, 7, 95-112
24. Gluckman M., Vlach H. A., Sandhofer C. M., (2014). Spacing simultaneously promotes multiple forms of learning in children’s science curriculum. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 266-273
25. Gordon K., (1925). Class results with spaced and unspaced memorizing. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 8, 337-343
26. Greene J. A., (2015). Serious challenges require serious scholarship: Integrating implementation science into the scholarly discourse. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 40, 112-120
27. Hartwig M. K., Dunlosky J., (2012). Study strategies of college students: Are self-testing and scheduling related to achievement? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 126-134
28. James W., (1899). Talks to teachers on psychology: And to students on some of life’s ideals. New York: Henry Holt
29. Jensen B., Hunter A., Sonnemann J., Burns T., (2012). Catching up: Learning from the best school systems in East Asia. Grattan Institute. Retrieved from http://grattan.edu.au/report/catching-up-learning-from-the-best-school-systems-in-east-asia/
30. Kalyuga S., (2007). Expertise reversal effect and its implications for learner-tailored instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 509-539
31. Kang S. H. K., (in press). The benefits of interleaved practice for learning. In Horvath J. C., Lodge J., Hattie J. A. C., (Eds.), From the laboratory to the classroom: Translating the learning sciences for teachers. New York: Routledge
32. Kang S. H. K., Lindsey R. V., Mozer M. C., Pashler H., (2014). Retrieval practice over the long term: Should spacing be expanding or equal-interval? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 1544-1550
33. Kang S. H. K., McDaniel M. A., Pashler H., (2011). Effects of testing on learning of functions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 998-1005
34. Kang S. H. K., McDermott K. B., Roediger H. L., (2007). Test format and corrective feedback modify the effect of testing on long-term retention. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 528-558
35. Kang S. H. K., Pashler H., (2012). Learning painting styles: Spacing is advantageous when it promotes discriminative contrast. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 97-103
36. Kapler I. V., Weston T., Wiseheart M., (2015). Spacing in a simulated undergraduate classroom: Long-term benefits for factual and higher-level learning. Learning and Instruction, 36, 38-45
37. Karpicke J. D., Grimaldi P. J., (2012). Retrieval-based learning: A perspective for enhancing meaningful learning. Educational Psychology Review, 24, 401-418
38. Kornell N., (2009). Optimising learning using flashcards: Spacing is more effective than cramming. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 1297-1317
39. Kornell N., Bjork R. A., (2008). Learning concepts and categories: Is spacing the “enemy of induction”? Psychological Science, 19, 585-592
40. Kornell N., Castel A. D., Eich T. S., Bjork R. A., (2010). Spacing as the friend of both memory and induction in young and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 25, 498-503
41. Landauer T. K., Bjork R. A., (1978). Optimum rehearsal patterns and name learning. In Gruneberg M. M., Morris P. E., Sykes R. N., (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory (pp. 625-632). London, England: Academic Press
42. Lindsey R. V., Shroyer J. D., Pashler H., Mozer M. C., (2014). Improving students’ long-term knowledge retention through personalized review. Psychological Science, 25, 639-647
43. Lortie D. C., (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
44. Magliero A., (1983). Pupil dilations following pairs of identical and related to-be-remembered words. Memory & Cognition, 11, 609-615
45. Mayer R. E., (1977). The sequencing of instruction and the concept of assimilation-to-schema. Instructional Science, 6, 369-388
46. Mayer R. E., (2002). Rote versus meaningful learning. Theory Into Practice, 41, 226-232
47. Metcalfe J., Xu J., (in press). People mind wander more during massed than spaced inductive learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. Advanced online publication. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000216
48. Morehead K., Rhodes M. G., DeLozier S., (2016). Instructor and student knowledge of study strategies. Memory, 24, 257-271
49. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2014). Education at a glance 2014. Paris, France: Author. Retrieved from doi:10.1787/eag-2014-en
50. Pearson. (2012). The learning curve: Lessons in country performance in education. Retrieved from http://thelearningcurve.pearson.com/reports/the-learning-curve-report-2012
51. Rawson K. A., Kintsch W., (2005). Rereading effects depend on time of test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 70-80
52. Rea C. P., Modigliani V., (1985). The effect of expanded versus massed practice on the retention of multiplication facts and spelling lists. Human Learning: Journal of Practical Research & Applications, 4, 11-18
53. Rickard T. C., Lau J. S. H., Pashler H., (2008). Spacing and the transition from calculation to retrieval. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 656-661
54. Roediger H. L., Butler A. C., (2011). The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 20-27
55. Rohrer D., (2009). The effects of spacing and mixing practice problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40, 4-17
56. Rohrer D., (2012). Interleaving helps students distinguish among similar concepts. Educational Psychology Review, 24, 355-367
57. Rohrer D., Dedrick R. F., Burgess K., (2014). The benefit of interleaved mathematics practice is not limited to superficially similar kinds of problems. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 1323-1330
58. Rohrer D., Dedrick R. F., Stershic S., (2015). Interleaved practice improves mathematics learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 900-908
59. Rohrer D., Taylor K., (2006). The effects of overlearning and distributed practice on the retention of mathematics knowledge. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 1209-1224
60. Rohrer D., Taylor K., (2007). The shuffling of mathematics practice problems improves learning. Instructional Science, 35, 481-498
61. Siegler R. S., (1988). Strategy choice procedures and the development of multiplication skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 258-275
62. Sobel H. S., Cepeda N. J., Kapler I. V., (2011). Spacing effects in real-world classroom vocabulary learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 763-767
63. Soderstrom N. C., Bjork R. A., (2014). Testing facilitates the regulation of subsequent study time. Journal of Memory and Language, 73, 99-115
64. Storm B. C., Bjork R. A., Storm J. C., (2010). Optimizing retrieval as a learning event: When and why expanding retrieval practice enhances long-term retention. Memory & Cognition, 38, 244-253
65. Susser J. A., McCabe J., (2013). From the lab to the dorm room: Metacognitive awareness and use of spaced study. Instructional Science, 41, 345-363
66. Taylor K., Rohrer D., (2010). The effects of interleaving practice. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 837-848
67. Toppino T. C., Gerbier E., (2014). About practice: Repetition, spacing, and abstraction. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 60, 113-189
68. Vlach H. A., Sandhofer C. M., (2012). Distributing learning over time: The spacing effect in children’s acquisition and generalization of science concepts. Child Development, 83, 1137-1144
69. Wahlheim C. N., Maddox G. B., Jacoby L. L., (2014). The role of reminding in the effects of spaced repetitions on cued recall: Sufficient but not necessary. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 94-105