Erratum: Effects of distributed practice on the acquisition of second language English syntax (Applied Psycholinguistics (2010) 31 (635-650) DOI: 10.1017/S0142716410000172);Effects of distributed practice on the acquisition of second language English syntax

Applied Psycholinguistics

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 635-650

  Bird, Steve ^a  

^a UNITED ARAB EMIRATES UNIVERSITY   (United Arab Emirates)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957232877     PISSN: 01427164     EISSN: 14691817     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0142716410000470     Document Type: Erratum

References (33)

1. Bahrick, H. P., Bahrick, L. E., Bahrick, A. S.,&Bahrick, P. E. (1993).Maintenance of foreign language vocabulary and the spacing effect. Psychological Science, 4, 316-321.
2. Bahrick, H. P., & Phelps, E. (1987). Retention of Spanish vocabulary over 8 years. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 344-349.
3. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2000). Tense and aspect in second language acquisition: Form, meaning, and use. Oxford: Blackwell.
4. Bloom, K. C., & Shuell, T. J. (1981). Effects of massed and distributed practice on the learning and retention of second-language vocabulary. Journal of Educational Research, 74, 245-248.
5. Cepeda, N. J., Mozer,M. C., Coburn, N., Rohrer, D.,Wixted, J. T.,&Pashler, H. (in press). Optimizing distributed practice: Theoretical analysis and practical implications. Experimental Psychology.
6. Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 354-380. (Pubitemid 43848888)
7. Cepeda, N. J., Vul, E., Rohrer, D., Wixted, J. T., & Pashler, H. (2008). Spacing effects in learning: A temporal ridgeline of optimal retention. Psychological Science, 11, 1095-1102.
8. Challis, B. H. (1993). Spacing effects on cued-memory tests depend on level of processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 389-396.
9. Collins, L., Halter, R. H., Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (1999). Time and the distribution of time in L2 instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 33, 655-668.
10. Dempster, F. N. (1987). Effects of variable encoding and spaced presentations on vocabulary learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 162-170.
11. Dempster, F. N. (1988). The spacing effect: A case study in the failure to apply the results of psychological research. American Psychologist, 43, 627-634.
12. Dempster, F. N. (1996). Distributing and managing the conditions of encoding practice. In E. L. Bjork & R. A. Bjork (Eds.) Memory (pp. 318-339). New York: Academic Press.
13. Donovan, J. J., & Radosevich, D. J. (1999). A meta-analytic review of the distribution of practice effect: Now you see it, now you don?t. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 795-805.
14. Freed, B. F., Segalowitz, N., & Dewey, D. P. (2004). Context of learning and second language fluency in French: Comparing regular classroom, study abroad, and intensive domestic immersion programs. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 275-301.
15. Glenberg, A. M. (1979). Component-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition. Memory & Cognition, 7, 95-112.
16. Glenberg, A. M., & Lehmann, T. S. (1980). Spacing repetitions over 1 week. Memory & Cognition, 8, 528-538.
17. Greene, R. L. (1989). Spacing effects in memory: Evidence for a two-process account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 371-377.
18. Greene, R. L. (1990). Spacing effects on implicit memory tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 1004-1011.
19. Greene, R. L. (1992). Human memory: Paradigms and paradoxes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Hintzman, D. L. (1976). Repetition and memory. In G. Bower (Ed.) The psychology of learning and memory (pp. 47-91). New York: Academic Press.
21. Landauer, T. K., & Bjork, R. A. (1978). Optimum rehearsal patterns and name learning. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.) Practical aspects of memory (pp. 625-632). London: Academic Press.
22. Lapkin, S., Hart, D., & Harley, B. (1998). Case study of compact core French models: Attitudes and achievement. In S. Lapkin (Ed.) French second language education in Canada: Empirical studies (pp. 3-31). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
23. Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (1994). An innovative program for primary ESL students in Quebec. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 563-579.
24. Netten, J., & Germain, C. (2004). Theoretical and research foundations of intensive French. Canadian Modern Language Review, 60, 275-294. (Pubitemid 41411417)
25. Peters, M. (2000). Le bain linguistique: Une innovation pour le programme de Français de base. Apprentissage et Socialisation, 20, 71-86.
26. Reder, L. M., & Anderson, J. R. (1982). Effects of spacing and embellishment on memory for the main points of a text. Memory & Cognition, 10, 97-102.
27. Reynolds, J. H., & Glaser, R. (1964). Effects of repetition and spaced review upon retention of a complex learning task. Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, 297-308.
28. Rohrer, D., & Pashler, H. (2007). Increasing retention without increasing study time. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 183-186.
29. Rohrer, D., & Taylor, K. (2006). The effects of overlearning and distributed practice on the retention of mathematics knowledge. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 1209-1224. (Pubitemid 46023670)
30. Seabrook, R., Brown,G.D. A.,&Solity, J. E. (2005).Distributed andmassed practice: From laboratory to classroom. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 107-122. (Pubitemid 40124128)
31. Serrano, R., & Munoz, C. (2007). Same hours, different time distribution: Any difference in EFL? System, 35, 305-321.
32. Spada, N. (1997). Form-focussed instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research. Language Teaching, 30, 73-87.
33. Spada, N., & Lightbown, P. M. (1989). Intensive ESL programmes in Quebec primary schools. TESL Canada Journal, 7, 11-32.