Corrigendum: The 4D nucleome project (Nature (2017) 549 (219-226) DOI: 10.1038/nature23884);The 4D nucleome project

Nature

Volumn 549, Issue 7671, 2017, Pages 219-226

  Dekker, Job ^a   Belmont, Andrew S ^b   Guttman, Mitchell ^c   Leshyk, Victor O ^d   Lis, John T ^e   Lomvardas, Stavros ^f   Mirny, Leonid A ^g   O'Shea, Clodagh C ^h   Park, Peter J ⁱ   Ren, Bing ^j   Ritland Politz, Joan C ^k   Shendure, Jay ^l   Zhong, Sheng ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^c California Institute of Technology   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^e Cornell University ^*  (United States)

^f Columbia University ^*  (United States)

^g Massachusetts Institute of Technology   (United States)

^h SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES   (United States)

ⁱ HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^k USA   (United States)

^l HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOPHYSICS; CELLS AND CELL COMPONENTS; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOME; GENOMICS; MODEL VALIDATION;

CELL NUCLEUS INCLUSION BODY; CELL POPULATION; CHROMATIN STRUCTURE; CRISPR-CAS9 SYSTEM; DNA SEQUENCE; GENE CONTROL; GENE FUNCTION; GENE MAPPING; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENOME ANALYSIS; HUMAN; IMAGING; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR LAMINA; NUCLEAR PORE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL LINE; CELL NUCLEUS; CHEMISTRY; CHROMATIN; CHROMOSOME; GENETICS; GENOME; GENOMICS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR IMAGING; MOLECULAR MODEL; MOTIVATION; MOUSE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SINGLE CELL ANALYSIS; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

ANIMALS; CELL LINE; CELL NUCLEUS; CHROMATIN; CHROMOSOMES; GENOME; GENOMICS; GOALS; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MICE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SINGLE-CELL ANALYSIS; SPATIO-TEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 85030772716     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature24667     Document Type: Erratum

References (101)

1. ENCODE Project Consortium. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 489, 57-74 (2012).
2. Roadmap Epigenomics Consortium et al. Integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes. Nature 518, 317-330 (2015).
3. Stunnenberg, H. G., International Human Epigenome Consortium & Hirst, M. The international human epigenome consortium: a blueprint for scientific collaboration and discovery. Cell 167, 1145-1149 (2016).
4. The FANTOM Consortium et al. The transcriptional landscape of the mammalian genome. Science 309, 1559-1563 (2005).
5. Tolhuis, B., Palstra, R. J., Splinter, E., Grosveld, F. & de Laat, W. Looping and interaction between hypersensitive sites in the active ?-globin locus. Mol. Cell 10, 1453-1465 (2002).
6. Tang, Z. et al. CTCF-mediated human 3D genome architecture reveals chromatin topology for transcription. Cell 163, 1611-1627 (2015).
7. Deng, W. et al. Reactivation of developmentally silenced globin genes by forced chromatin looping. Cell 158, 849-860 (2014).
8. Guelen, L. et al. Domain organization of human chromosomes revealed by mapping of nuclear lamina interactions. Nature 453, 948-951 (2008).
9. Pope, B. D. et al. Topologically associating domains are stable units of replication-timing regulation. Nature 515, 402-405 (2014).
10. Maurano, M. T. et al. Systematic localization of common disease-associated variation in regulatory DNA. Science 337, 1190-1195 (2012).
11. Roix, J. J., McQueen, P. G., Munson, P. J., Parada, L. A. & Misteli, T. Spatial proximity of translocation-prone gene loci in human lymphomas. Nat. Genet. 34, 287-291 (2003).
12. Zhang, Y. et al. Spatial organization of the mouse genome and its role in recurrent chromosomal translocations. Cell 148, 908-921 (2012).
13. Cremer, T. & Cremer, C. Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2, 292-301 (2001).
14. Bickmore, W. A. The spatial organization of the human genome. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 14, 67-84 (2013).
15. Dekker, J., Rippe, K., Dekker, M. & Kleckner, N. Capturing chromosome conformation. Science 295, 1306-1311 (2002).
16. Denker, A. & de Laat, W. The second decade of 3C technologies: detailed insights into nuclear organization. Genes Dev. 30, 1357-1382 (2016).
17. Lieberman-Aiden, E. et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 326, 289-293 (2009).
18. Rao, S. S. P. et al. A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell 159, 1665-1680 (2014).
19. Fudenberg, G. et al. Formation of chromosomal domains by loop extrusion. Cell Reports 15, 2038-2049 (2016).
20. Sanborn, A. L. et al. Chromatin extrusion explains key features of loop and domain formation in wild-type and engineered genomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E6456-E6465 (2015).
21. de Wit, E. et al. CTCF binding polarity determines chromatin looping. Mol. Cell 60, 676-684 (2015).
22. Vietri Rudan, M. et al. Comparative Hi-C reveals that CTCF underlies evolution of chromosomal domain architecture. Cell Reports 10, 1297-1309 (2015).
23. Dekker, J. & Mirny, L. The 3D genome as moderator of chromosomal communication. Cell 164, 1110-1121 (2016).
24. Engreitz, J. M., Ollikainen, N. & Guttman, M. Long non-coding RNAs: spatial amplifiers that control nuclear structure and gene expression. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 17, 756-770 (2016).
25. Hess, S. T., Girirajan, T. P. & Mason, M. D. Ultra-high resolution imaging by fluorescence photoactivation localization microscopy. Biophys. J. 91, 4258-4272 (2006).
26. Betzig, E. et al. Imaging intracellular fluorescent proteins at nanometer resolution. Science 313, 1642-1645 (2006).
27. Rust, M. J., Bates, M. & Zhuang, X. Sub-diffraction-limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM). Nat. Methods 3, 793-795 (2006).
28. Cisse, I. I. et al. Real-time dynamics of RNA polymerase II clustering in live human cells. Science 341, 664-667 (2013).
29. Ma, H. et al. Multiplexed labeling of genomic loci with dCas9 and engineered sgRNAs using CRISPRainbow. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 528-530 (2016).
30. Chen, B. et al. Dynamic imaging of genomic loci in living human cells by an optimized CRISPR/Cas system. Cell 155, 1479-1491 (2013).
31. Deng, W., Shi, X., Tjian, R., Lionnet, T. & Singer, R. H. CASFISH: CRISPR/Cas9-mediated in situ labeling of genomic loci in fixed cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 11870-11875 (2015).
32. Marti-Renom, M. A. & Mirny, L. A. Bridging the resolution gap in structural modeling of 3D genome organization. PLOS Comput. Biol. 7, e1002125 (2011).
33. Imakaev, M. V., Fudenberg, G. & Mirny, L. A. Modeling chromosomes: beyond pretty pictures. FEBS Lett. 589, 3031-3036 (2015).
34. Dixon, J. R. et al. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 485, 376-380 (2012).
35. Nora, E. P. et al. Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre. Nature 485, 381-385 (2012).
36. Nagano, T. et al. Single-cell Hi-C reveals cell-to-cell variability in chromosome structure. Nature 502, 59-64 (2013).
37. Beagrie, R. A. et al. Complex multi-enhancer contacts captured by genome architecture mapping. Nature 543, 519-524 (2017).
38. Ma, H. et al. Multicolor CRISPR labeling of chromosomal loci in human cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 3002-3007 (2015).
39. Martell, J. D. et al. Engineered ascorbate peroxidase as a genetically encoded reporter for electron microscopy. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 1143-1148 (2012).
40. Bulina, M. E. et al. A genetically encoded photosensitizer. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 95-99 (2006).
41. Le Gros, M. A. et al. Soft X-ray tomography reveals gradual chromatin compaction and reorganization during neurogenesis in vivo. Cell Reports 17, 2125-2136 (2016).
42. Smith, E. A. et al. Quantitatively imaging chromosomes by correlated cryo-fluorescence and soft X-ray tomographies. Biophys. J. 107, 1988-1996 (2014).
43. Ou, H. D. et al. ChromEMT: Visualizing 3D chromatin structure and compaction in interphase and mitotic cells. Science 357, eaag0025 (2017).
44. Dundr, M. Nuclear bodies: multifunctional companions of the genome. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 24, 415-422 (2012).
45. Mao, Y. S., Zhang, B. & Spector, D. L. Biogenesis and function of nuclear bodies. Trends Genet. 27, 295-306 (2011).
46. Németh, A. et al. Initial genomics of the human nucleolus. PLoS Genet. 6, e1000889 (2010).
47. van Koningsbruggen, S. et al. High-resolution whole-genome sequencing reveals that specific chromatin domains from most human chromosomes associate with nucleoli. Mol. Biol. Cell 21, 3735-3748 (2010).
48. Lee, S. Y. et al. APEX fingerprinting reveals the subcellular localization of proteins of interest. Cell Reports 15, 1837-1847 (2016).
49. McHugh, C. A. et al. The Xist lncRNA interacts directly with SHARP to silence transcription through HDAC3. Nature 521, 232-236 (2015).
50. Engreitz, J. M. et al. The Xist lncRNA exploits three-dimensional genome architecture to spread across the X chromosome. Science 341, 1237973 (2013).
51. Akhtar, W. et al. Chromatin position effects assayed by thousands of reporters integrated in parallel. Cell 154, 914-927 (2013).
52. Serra, F. et al. Restraint-based three-dimensional modeling of genomes and genomic domains. FEBS Lett. 589, 2987-2995 (2015).
53. Zhu, Y. et al. Comprehensive characterization of neutrophil genome topology. Genes Dev. 31, 141-153 (2017).
54. Naumova, N. et al. Organization of the mitotic chromosome. Science 342, 948-953 (2013).
55. Fudenberg, G. & Imakaev, M. FISH-ing for captured contacts: towards reconciling FISH and 3C. Nat. Methods 14, 673-678 (2017).
56. Lucas, J. S., Zhang, Y., Dudko, O. K. & Murre, C. 3D trajectories adopted by coding and regulatory DNA elements: first-passage times for genomic interactions. Cell 158, 339-352 (2014).
57. Jost, D., Carrivain, P., Cavalli, G. & Vaillant, C. Modeling epigenome folding: formation and dynamics of topologically associated chromatin domains. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 9553-9561 (2014).
58. Xiong, X., Chen, M., Lim, W. A., Zhao, D. & Qi, L. S. CRISPR/Cas9 for human genome engineering and disease research. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 17, 131-154 (2016).
59. Wang, H., La Russa, M. & Qi, L. S. CRISPR/Cas9 in genome editing and beyond. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 85, 227-264 (2016).
60. Poirier, M. G. & Marko, J. F. Micromechanical studies of mitotic chromosomes. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 55, 75-141 (2003).
61. Rodley, C. D., Bertels, F., Jones, B. & O'Sullivan, J. M. Global identification of yeast chromosome interactions using genome conformation capture. Fungal Genet. Biol. 46, 879-886 (2009).
62. Simonis, M. et al. Nuclear organization of active and inactive chromatin domains uncovered by chromosome conformation capture-on-chip (4C). Nat. Genet. 38, 1348-1354 (2006).
63. Dostie, J. et al. Chromosome conformation capture carbon copy (5C): a massively parallel solution for mapping interactions between genomic elements. Genome Res. 16, 1299-1309 (2006).
64. Ramani, V. et al. Massively multiplex single-cell Hi-C. Nat. Methods 14, 263-266 (2017).
65. Ma, W. et al. Fine-scale chromatin interaction maps reveal the cis-regulatory landscape of human lincRNA genes. Nat. Methods 12, 71-78 (2015).
66. Hsieh, T.-H. S. et al. Mapping nucleosome resolution chromosome folding in yeast by Micro-C. Cell 162, 108-119 (2015).
67. Hsieh, T.-H. S., Fudenberg, G., Goloborodko, A. & Rando, O. J. Micro-C XL: assaying chromosome conformation from the nucleosome to the entire genome. Nat. Methods 13, 1009-1011 (2016).
68. Dryden, N. H. et al. Unbiased analysis of potential targets of breast cancer susceptibility loci by Capture Hi-C. Genome Res. 24, 1854-1868 (2014).
69. Hughes, J. R. et al. Analysis of hundreds of cis-regulatory landscapes at high resolution in a single, high-throughput experiment. Nat. Genet. 46, 205-212 (2014).
70. Kalhor, R., Tjong, H., Jayathilaka, N., Alber, F. & Chen, L. Genome architectures revealed by tethered chromosome conformation capture and populationbased modeling. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 90-98 (2011).
71. Darrow, E. M. et al. Deletion of DXZ4 on the human inactive X chromosome alters higher-order genome architecture. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, E4504-E4512 (2016).
72. Fullwood, M. J. et al. An oestrogen-receptor-?-bound human chromatin interactome. Nature 462, 58-64 (2009).
73. van Steensel, B. & Henikoff, S. Identification of in vivo DNA targets of chromatin proteins using tethered dam methyltransferase. Nat. Biotechnol. 18, 424-428 (2000).
74. Hiratani, I. et al. Global reorganization of replication domains during embryonic stem cell differentiation. PLoS Biol. 6, e245 (2008).
75. Hansen, R. S. et al. Sequencing newly replicated DNA reveals widespread plasticity in human replication timing. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 139-144 (2010).
76. Chu, C. et al. Systematic discovery of Xist RNA binding proteins. Cell 161, 404-416 (2015).
77. Simon, M. D. et al. The genomic binding sites of a noncoding RNA. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 20497-20502 (2011).
78. Strongin, D. E., Groudine, M. & Politz, J. C. Nucleolar tethering mediates pairing between the IgH and Myc loci. Nucleus 5, 474-481 (2014).
79. Lubeck, E., Coskun, A. F., Zhiyentayev, T., Ahmad, M. & Cai, L. Single-cell in situ RNA profiling by sequential hybridization. Nat. Methods 11, 360-361 (2014).
80. Ma, H., Reyes-Gutierrez, P. & Pederson, T. Visualization of repetitive DNA sequences in human chromosomes with transcription activator-like effectors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 21048-21053 (2013).
81. Miyanari, Y., Ziegler-Birling, C. & Torres-Padilla, M. E. Live visualization of chromatin dynamics with fluorescent TALEs. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 1321-1324 (2013).
82. Shachar, S., Voss, T. C., Pegoraro, G., Sciascia, N. & Misteli, T. Identification of gene positioning factors using high-throughput imaging mapping. Cell 162, 911-923 (2015).
83. Ma, H. et al. CRISPR-Cas9 nuclear dynamics and target recognition in living cells. J. Cell Biol. 214, 529-537 (2016).
84. Takei, Y., Shah, S., Harvey, S., Qi, L. S. & Cai, L. Multiplexed dynamic imaging of genomic loci by combined CRISPR imaging and DNA sequential FISH. Biophys. J. 112, 1773-1776 (2017).
85. Hocine, S., Raymond, P., Zenklusen, D., Chao, J. A. & Singer, R. H. Singlemolecule analysis of gene expression using two-color RNA labeling in live yeast. Nat. Methods 10, 119-121 (2013).
86. Fukaya, T., Lim, B. & Levine, M. Enhancer control of transcriptional bursting. Cell 166, 358-368 (2016).
87. Robinett, C. C. et al. In vivo localization of DNA sequences and visualization of large-scale chromatin organization using lac operator/repressor recognition. J. Cell Biol. 135, 1685-1700 (1996).
88. Chen, H., Fujioka, M. & Gregor, T. Direct visualization of transcriptional activation by physical enhancer-promoter proximity. Preprint at http://www. biorxiv.org/content/early/2017/01/11/099523 (2017).
89. Phan, S. et al. 3D reconstruction of biological structures: automated procedures for alignment and reconstruction of multiple tilt series in electron tomography. Adv. Struct. Chem. Imaging 2, 8 (2017).
90. Soto, G. E. et al. Serial section electron tomography: a method for threedimensional reconstruction of large structures. NeuroImage 1, 230-243 (1994).
91. Adams, S. R. et al. Multicolor electron microscopy for simultaneous visualization of multiple molecular species. Cell Chem. Biol. 23, 1417-1427 (2016).
92. Szymborska, A. et al. Nuclear pore scaffold structure analyzed by superresolution microscopy and particle averaging. Science 341, 655-658 (2013).
93. Izeddin, I. et al. PSF shaping using adaptive optics for three-dimensional single-molecule super-resolution imaging and tracking. Opt. Express 20, 4957-4967 (2012).
94. Paszek, M. J. et al. Scanning angle interference microscopy reveals cell dynamics at the nanoscale. Nat. Methods 9, 825-827 (2012).
95. Chen, B. C. et al. Lattice light-sheet microscopy: imaging molecules to embryos at high spatiotemporal resolution. Science 346, 1257998 (2014).
96. Legant, W. R. et al. High-density three-dimensional localization microscopy across large volumes. Nat. Methods 13, 359-365 (2016).
97. Chen, J. et al. Single-molecule dynamics of enhanceosome assembly in embryonic stem cells. Cell 156, 1274-1285 (2014).
98. Izeddin, I. et al. Single-molecule tracking in live cells reveals distinct target-search strategies of transcription factors in the nucleus. eLife 3, e02230 (2014).
99. Hansen, A. S., Pustova, I., Cattoglio, C., Tjian, R. & Darzacq, X. CTCF and cohesin regulate chromatin loop stability with distinct dynamics. eLife 6, e25776 (2017).
100. Ghosh, R., Draper, W., Franklin, J. M., Shi, Q. & Liphardt, J. A fluorogenic nanobody array tag for prolonged single molecule imaging in live cells. Preprint at http://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2017/07/03/159004 (2017).
101. Grimm, J. B. et al. A general method to improve fluorophores for live-cell and single-molecule microscopy. Nat. Methods 12, 244-250 (2015).