Modeling epigenome folding: Formation and dynamics of topologically associated chromatin domains

Nucleic Acids Research

Volumn 42, Issue 15, 2014, Pages 9553-9561

  Jost, Daniel ^a   Carrivain, Pascal ^b   Cavalli, Giacomo ^b   Vaillant, Cédric ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

^b INSTITUTE OF HUMAN GENETICS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COPOLYMER; BIOPOLYMER; CHROMATIN; POLYCOMB GROUP PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CHROMATIN DOMAIN; CHROMATIN STRUCTURE; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONFORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DROSOPHILA; EPIGENETICS; EPIGENOME FOLDING; GENE CONTROL; GENE INTERACTION; GENE REARRANGEMENT; GENE STRUCTURE; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC MODEL; GENETIC STABILITY; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPIC VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; CHROMATIN; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; GENETIC EPIGENESIS; GENETICS; METABOLISM;

ANIMALS; BIOPOLYMERS; CHROMATIN; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; EPIGENESIS, GENETIC; MODELS, GENETIC; POLYCOMB-GROUP PROTEINS;

EID: 84924870007     PISSN: 03051048     EISSN: 13624962     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku698     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Filion, G.J., van Bemmel, J.G., Braunschweig, U., Talhout, W., Kind, J., Ward, L.D., Brugman, W., de Castro, I.J., Kerkhove, R.M., Bussemake, H.J. et al. (2010) Systematic protein location mapping reveals five principal chromatin types in drosophila cells. Cell, 143, 212-224.
2. Ernst, J., Kheradpour, P., Mikkelsen, T.S., Shoresh, N., Ward, L.D., Epstein, C.B., Zhang, X., Wang, L., Issner, R., Coyne, M. et al. (2011) Mapping and analysis of chromatin state dynamics in nine human cell types. Nature, 473, 43-49.
3. Roudier, F., Ahmed, I., Bérard, C., Sarazin, A., Mary-Huard, T., Cortijo, S., Bouyer, D., Caillieux, E., Duvernois-Berther, E., Al-Shikhley, L. et al. (2011) Integrative epigenomic mapping defines four main chromatin states in Arabidopsis. EMBO J., 30, 1928-1938.
4. Gerstein, M.B., Lu, Z.J., van Nostrand, E.L., Cheng, C., Arshinoff, B.I., Liu, T., Yip, K.Y., Robilotto, R., Rechtsteiner, A., Ikegami, K. et al. (2010) Integrative analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome by the modENCODE project. Science, 330, 1775-1787.
5. Kharchenko, P.V., Alekseyenko, A.A., Schwartz, Y.B., Minoda, A., Riddle, N.C., Ernst, J., Sabo, P.J., Larschan, E., Gorchakov, A.A., Gu, T. et al. (2011) Comprehensive analysis of the chromatin landscape in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature, 471, 480-485.
6. Dekker, J. (2007) GC- and AT-rich chromatin domains differ in conformation and histone modification status and are differentially modulated by rpd3p. Genome Biol., 8, R116.
7. van Steensel, B. (2011) Chromatin: constructing the big picture. EMBO J., 30, 1885-1895.
8. Ong, C.T. and Corces, V.G. (2011) Enhancer function: new insights into the regulation of tissue-specific gene expression. Nat. Rev. Genet., 12, 283-293.
9. Phillips-Cremins, J.E., Sauria, M.E.G., Sanyal, A., Gerasimova, T.I., Lajoie, B.R., Bell, J.S.K., Ong, C.T., Hookway, T.A., Guo, C., Sun, Y. et al. (2013) Architectural protein subclasses shape 3d organization of genomes during lineage commitment. Cell, 153, 1281-1295.
10. Sofueva, S., Yaffe, E., Chan, W.C., Georgopoulou, D., Rudan, M.V., Mira-Bontenbal, H., Pollard, S.M., Schroth, G.P., Tanay, A. and Hadjur, S. (2013) Cohesin-mediated interactions organize chromosomal domain architecture. EMBO J., 32, 3119-3129.
11. Sexton, T., Yaffe, E., Kenigsberg, E., Bantignies, F., Leblanc, B., Hoichman, M., Parrinello, H., Tanay, A. and Cavalli, G. (2012) Three-dimensional folding and functional organization principles of the Drosophila genome. Cell, 148, 458-472.
12. Hou, C., Li, L., Qin, Z.S. and Corces, V.G. (2012) Gene density, transcription, and insulators contribute to the partition of the Drosophila genome into physical domains. Mol. Cell, 48, 471-484.
13. Dixon, J.R., Selvaraj, S., Yue, F., Kim, A., Li, Y., Shen, Y., Hu, M., Liu, J.S. and Ren, B. (2012) Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature, 485, 376-380.
14. Nagano, T., Lubling, Y., Stevens, T.J., Schoenfelder, S., Yaffe, E., Dean, W., Laue, E.D., Tanay, A. and Fraser, P. (2013) Single-cell Hi-C reveals cell-to-cell variability in chromosome structure. Nature, 502, 59-64.
15. Ahmed, K., Dehghani, H., Rugg-Gunn, P., Fussner, E., Rossant, J. and Bazett-Jones, D.P. (2010) Global chromatin architecture reflects pluripotency and lineage commitment in the early mouse embryo. PLoS One 5, e10531.
16. Rapkin, L.M., Anchel, D.R.P., Li, R. and Bazett-Jones, D.P. (2012) A view of the chromatin landscape. Micron 43, 150-158.
17. Solovei, I., Wang, A.S., Thanisch, K., Schmidt, C.S., Krebs, S., Zwerger, M., Cohen, T.V., Devys, D., Foisner, R., Peichl, L. et al. (2013) Lbr and lamin A/C sequentially tether peripheral heterochromatin and inversely regulate differentiation. Cell 152, 584-598.
18. Chandra, T., Kirschner, K., Thuret, J-Y, Pope, B.D., Ryba, T., Newman, S., Ahmed, K., Samarajiwa, S.A., Salama, R., Carroll, T. et al. (2012) Independence of repressive histone marks and chromatin compaction during senescent heterochromatic layer formation. Mol. Cell 47, 203-214.
19. Rosa, A., Becker, N.B. and Everaers, R. (2010) Looping probabilities in model interphase chromosomes. Biophys. J. 98, 2410-2419.
20. Grosberg, A.Y. and Khokhlov, A.R. (1994) Statistical Physics of Macromolecules. AIP Press, Woodbury, NY.
21. Wong, H., Marie-Nelly, H., Herbert, S., Carrivain, P., Blanc, H., Koszul, R., Fabre, E. and Zimmer, C. (2012) A predictive computational model of the dynamic 3d interphase yeast nucleus. Curr. Biol. 22, 1881-1890.
22. Hajjoul, H., Mathon, J., Ranchon, H., Goiffon, I., Mozziconacci, J., Albert, B., Carrivain, P., Victor, J.M., Gadal, O., Bystricky, K. et al. (2013) High-throughput chromatin motion tracking in living yeast reveals the flexibility of the fiber throughout the genome. Genome Res. 23, 1829-1838.
23. Lieberman-Aiden, E., van Berkum, N.L., Williams, L., Imakaev, M., Ragoczy, T., Telling, A., Amit, I., Lajoie, B.R., Sabo, P.J., Dorschner, M.O. et al. (2009) Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 326, 289-293.
24. Rosa, A. and Everaers, R. (2008) Structure and dynamics of interphase chromosomes. PLoS Comput. Biol. 4, e1000153.
25. Halverson, J.D., Lee, W.B., Grest, G.S., Grosberg, A.Y. and Kremer, K. (2011) Molecular dynamics simulation study of non-concatenated ring polymers in a melt. I. Statistics. J. Chem. Phys. 134, 204904.
26. Rosa, A. and Everaers, R. (2014) Ring polymers in the melt state: the physics of crumpling. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 118302.
27. Barbieri, M., Chotalia, M., Fraser, J., Lavitas, L.M., Dostie, J., Pombo, A. and Nicodemi, M. (2012) Complexity of chromatin folding is captured by the strings and binders switch model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 16173-16178.
28. Bohn, M. and Heermann, D.W. (2010) Diffusion-driven looping provides a consistent framework for chromatin organization. PLoS One 5, e12218.
29. Jerabek, H. and Heermann, D.W. (2012) Expression-dependent folding of interphase chromatin. PLoS One 7, e37525.
30. Jerabek, H. and Heermann, D.W. (2014) How chromatin looping and nuclear envelope attachment affect genome organization in eukaryotic cell nuclei. Int. Rev. Cell. Mol. Biol. 307, 351-381.
31. Stefano, M.D., Rosa, A., Belcastro, V., di Bernardo, D. and Micheletti, C. (2013) Colocalization of coregulated genes: a steered molecular dynamics study of human chromosome 19. PLoS Comput. Biol. 9, e1003019.
32. Ganai, N., Sengupta, S. and Menon, G.I. (2014) Chromosome positioning from activity-based segregation. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 4145-4159.
33. Canzio, D., Liao, M., Naber, N., Pate, E., Larson, A., Wu, S., Marina, D.B., Garcia, J.F., Madhani, H.D., Cooke, R. et al. (2013) A conformational switch in hp1 releases auto-inhibition to drive heterochromatin assembly. Nature 496, 377-381.
34. Isono, K., Endo, T.A., Ku, M., Yamada, D., Suzuki, R., Sharif, J., Ishikura, T., Toyoda, T., Bernstein, B.E. and Koseki, H. (2013) Sam domain polymerization links subnuclear clustering of prc1 to gene silencing. Dev. Cell 26, 565-577.
35. Timoshenko, E., Kuznetsov, Y.A. and Dawson, K. (1998) Conformational transitions of heteropolymers in dilute solutions. Phys. Rev. E 57, 6801-6814.
36. Ramalho, T., Selig, M., Gerland, U. and Enßlin, T.A. (2013) Simulation of stochastic network dynamics via entropic matching. Phys. Rev. E 87, 022719.
37. Doi, M. and Edwards, S. (1988) The Theory of Polymer Dynamics. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
38. van Kampen, N. (2001) Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
39. Press, W., Teukolsky, S., Vetterling, W. and Flannery, B. (2007) Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
40. Frenkel, D. and Smit, B. (2002) Understanding Molecular Simulations: from Algorithm to Applications. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
41. Francis, N.J., Kingston, R.E. and Woodcock, C.L. (2004) Chromatin compaction by a polycomb group protein complex. Science 306, 1574-1577.
42. Lo, S.M., Follmer, N.E., Lengsfeld, B.M., Madamba, E.V., Seong, S., Grau, D.J. and Francis, N.J. (2012) A bridging model for persistence of a polycomb group protein complex through DNA replication in vitro. Mol. Cell 46, 784-796.
43. Whyte, W.A., Orlando, D.A., Hnisz, D., Abraham, B.J., Lin, C.Y., Kagey, M.H., Rahl, P.B., Lee, T.I. and Young, R.A. (2013) Master transcription factors and mediator establish superenhancers at key cell identity genes. Cell 153, 307-319.
44. Kagey, M.H., Newman, J.J., Bilodeau, S., Zhan, Y., Orlando, D.A., van Berkum, N.L., Ebmeier, C.C., Goossens, J., Rahl, P.B., Levine, S.S. et al. (2010) Mediator and cohesin connect gene expression and chromatin architecture. Nature 467, 430-435.
45. Timoshenko, E.G. and Kuznetsov, Y.A. (2002) Improved Gaussian self-consistent-method: Applications to homopolymers with different architectures in dilute solution. J. Chem. Phys. 117, 5404-5414.
46. Fraser, P. and Bickmore, W. (2007) Nuclear organization of the genome and the potential for gene regulation. Nature 447, 413-417.
47. Mora, T. and Bialek, W. (2011) Are biological systems poised at criticality? J. Stat. Phys. 144, 268-302.
48. Jost, D. (2014) Bifurcation in epigenetics: Implications in development, proliferation, and diseases. Phys. Rev. E 89, 010701.
49. Noordermeer, D., Leleu, M., Splinter, E., Rougemont, J., Laat, W.D. and Duboule, D. (2011) The dynamic architecture of hox gene clusters. Science 334, 222-225.
50. Naumova, N., Imakaev, M., Fudenberg, G., Zhan, Y., Lajoie, B.R., Mirny, L.A. and Dekker, J. (2013) Organization of the mitotic chromosome. Science 342, 948-953.
51. Meuleman, W., Peric-Hupkes, D., Kind, J., Beaudry, J.B., Pagie, L., Kellis, M., Reinders, M., Wessels, L. and van Steensel, B. (2012) Constitutive nuclear lamina-genome interactions are highly conserved and associated with A/T-rich sequence. Genome Res. 23, 270280.
52. Vaquerizas, J.M., Suyama, R., Kind, J., Miura, K., Luscombe, N.M. and Akhtar, A. (2010) Nuclear pore proteins nup153 and megator define transcriptionally active regions in the Drosophila genome. PLoS Genet. 6, e1000846.
53. Mukhopadhyay, S., Schedl, P., Studitsky, V.M. and Sengupta, A.M. (2011) Theoretical analysis of the role of chromatin interactions in long-range action of enhancers and insulators. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108, 19919-19924.
54. Meluzzi, D. and Arya, G. (2012) Recovering ensembles of chromatin conformations from contact probabilities. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 63-75.
55. Noordermeer, D. and Duboule, D. (2013) Chromatin architectures and hox gene collinearity. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 104, 113-148.
56. Hawkins, R.D., Hon, G.C., Lee, L.K., Ngo, Q., Lister, R., Pelizzola, M., Edsall, L.E., Kuan, S., Luu, Y., Klugman, S., Antosiewicz-Bourget, J. et al. (2010) Distinct epigenomic landscapes of pluripotent and lineage-committed human cells. Cell Stem Cell 6, 479-491.
57. Zhu, J., Adli, M., Zou, J.Y., Verstappen, G., Coyne, M., Zhang, X., Durham, T., Miri, M., Deshpande, V., Jager, P.L.D. et al. (2013) Genome-wide chromatin state transitions associated with developmental and environmental cues. Cell 152, 642-654.