Performance of microsatellites for parentage assignment following mass controlled pollination in a clonal seed orchard of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.)

Tree Genetics and Genomes

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1631-1643

  Grattapaglia, Dario ^a,b   do Amaral Diener, Polyanna Shelliny ^b,d   dos Santos, Gleison Augusto ^c,e  

^a EMBRAPA RECURSOS GENÉTICOS E BIOTECNOLOGIA   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DE BRASÍLIA   (Brazil)

^c Fazenda Monte Alegre ^*  (Brazil)

^d Hereditas Tecn Em Analise DNA Ltda   (Brazil)

^e CMPC Celulose Riograndense   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Breeding; Mass controlled pollination; Microsatellites; Parentage; Pinus taeda

Indexed keywords

PINUS TAEDA;

EID: 85027940239     PISSN: 16142942     EISSN: 16142950     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11295-014-0784-3     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. ABRAF (2013) ABRAF Statistical Annual Report 2013 Base year 2012. In: http://www.abraflor.org.br/estatisticas/ABRAF13/ABRAF13_EN.pdf (ed). Brazilian Association of Forest Plantation Producers, Brasília
2. Adams WT, Neale DB, Loopstra CA (1988) Verifying controlled crosses in conifer tree-improvement programs. Silvae Genet 37:147–152
3. Al-Rabab’ah MA, Williams CG (2002) Population dynamics of Pinus taeda L. based on nuclear microsatellites. For Ecol Manag 163:263–271
4. Al-Rabah’ah MA, Williams CG (2004) An ancient bottleneck in the lost pines of central Texas. Mol Ecol 13:1075–1084
5. Blush TD, Bramlett DL, El-Kassaby YA (1993) Reproductive phenology of seed orchards. In: Bramlett DL, Askew GR, Blush TD, Bridgwater FE, Jett JB (eds) Advances in pollen management USDA handbook 698. USDA Forest Service, Washington, pp 15–23
6. Bramlett DL (1997) Genetic gain from mass controlled pollination and topworking. J For 95:15–19
7. Bridgwater FE, Blush TD, Wheeler NC (1993) Supplemental mass pollination. In: Bramlett DL, Askew GR, Blush TD, Bridgwater FE, Jett JB (eds) Advances in pollen management USDA for Serv. Agric. Handbook, vol 698., pp 69–77
8. Bridgwater FE, Bramlett DL, Byram TD, Lowe WJ (1998) Controlled mass pollination in loblolly pine to increase genetic gains. For Chron 74:185–189
9. Brondani RPV, Grattapaglia D (2001) Cost-effective method to synthesize a fluorescent internal DNA standard for automated fragment sizing. Biotechniques 31:793–795, 798, 800
10. Brownstein MJ, Carpten JD, Smith JR (1996) Modulation of non-templated nucleotide addition by tag DNA polymerase: primer modifications that facilitate genotyping. Biotechniques 20:1004–1006, 1008−1010
11. Daniels JD (1978) Efficacy of supplemental mass-pollination in a Douglas-Fir seed orchard. Silvae Genet 27:52–58
12. DeWoody J, Nason JD, Hipkins VD (2006) Mitigating scoring errors in microsatellite data from wild populations. Mol Ecol Notes 6:951–957
13. Doerksen TK, Herbinger CM (2010) Impact of reconstructed pedigrees on progeny-test breeding values in red spruce. Tree Genet Genomes 6:591–600
14. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1987) Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12:13–15
15. Echt CS, MayMarquardt P (1997) Survey of microsatellite DNA in pine. Genome 40:9–17
16. Echt CS, Saha S, Deemer DL, Nelson CD (2011a) Microsatellite DNA in genomic survey sequences and UniGenes of loblolly pine. Tree Genet Genomes 7:773–780
17. Echt CS, Saha S, Krutovsky KV, Wimalanathan K, Erpelding JE, Liang C, Nelson CD (2011b) An annotated genetic map of loblolly pine based on microsatellite and cDNA markers. BMC Genetics 12:17, doi:10.1186/1471-2156-12-17
18. El-Kassaby YA, Lstiburek M (2009) Breeding without breeding. Genet Res 91:111–120
19. El-Kassaby YA, Reynolds S (1990) Reproductive phenology, parental balance, and supplemental mass pollination in a Sitka-spruce seed-orchard. For Ecol Manag 31:45–54
20. El-Kassaby YA, Ritland K (1986) The relation of outcrossing and contamination to reproductive phenology and supplemental mass pollination in a Douglas-Fir seed orchard. Silvae Genet 35:240–244
21. El-Kassaby YA, Barnes S, Cook C, Macleod DA (1993a) Supplemental mass pollination success rate in a mature Douglas-Fir seed orchard. Can J For Res-Rev Can De Recherche Forestiere 23:1096–1099
22. El-Kassaby YA, Meagher MD, Davidson R (1993b) Temporal variation in the outcrossing rate in a natural stand of western white-pine. Silvae Genet 42:131–135
23. El-Kassaby YA, Funda T, Lai BSK (2010) Female reproductive success variation in a Pseudotsuga menziesii seed orchard as revealed by pedigree reconstruction from a bulk seed collection. J Hered 101:164–168
24. El-Kassaby YA, Cappa EP, Liewlaksaneeyanawin C, Klapste J, Lstiburek M (2011) Breeding without breeding: is a complete pedigree necessary for efficient breeding? Plos One 6(10):e25737
25. Elsik CG, Williams CG (2001) Low-copy microsatellite recovery from a conifer genome. Theor Appl Genet 103:1189–1195
26. Elsik CG, Minihan VT, Hall SE, Scarpa AM, Williams CG (2000) Low-copy microsatellite markers for Pinus taeda L. Genome 43:550–555
27. Eriksson U, Jansson G, Yazdani R, Wilhelmsson L (1995) Effects of supplemental mass pollination (SMP) in a young and a mature seed orchard of Pinus sylvestris. Tree Physiol 15:519–526
28. Faria DA, Mamani EMC, Pappas GJ, Grattapaglia D (2011) Genotyping systems for eucalyptus based on tetra-, penta-, and hexanucleotide repeat EST microsatellites and their use for individual fingerprinting and assignment tests. Tree Genet Genomes 7:63–77
29. Fernandes L, Rocheta M, Cordeiro J, Pereira S, Gerber S, Oliveira MM, Ribeiro MM (2008) Genetic variation, mating patterns and gene flow in a Pinus pinaster Aiton clonal seed orchard. Ann For Sci. doi:10.1051/forest:2008049
30. Gaspar MJ, De-Lucas A, Alia R, Paiva JAP, Hidalgo E, Louzada J, Almeida H, Gonzalez-Martinez SC (2009) Use of molecular markers for estimating breeding parameters: a case study in a Pinus pinaster Ait. progeny trial. Tree Genet Genomes 5:609–616
31. Joly RJ, Adams WT (1983) Allozyme analysis of pitch X loblolly-pine hybrids produced by supplemental mass-pollination. For Sci 29:423–432
32. Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC (2007) Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol Ecol 16:1099–1106
33. Kumar S, Gerber S, Richardson TE, Gea L (2007) Testing for unequal paternal contributions using nuclear and chloroplast SSR markers in polycross families of radiata pine. Tree Genet Genomes 3:207–214
34. Lai BS, Funda T, Liewlaksaneeyanawin C, Klapste J, Van Niejenhuis A, Cook C, Stoehr MU, Woods J, El-Kassaby YA (2010) Pollination dynamics in a Douglas-Fir seed orchard as revealed by pedigree reconstruction. Annals of Forest Science 67(8):808
35. Lambeth C, Lee BC, O’Malley D, Wheeler N (2001) Polymix breeding with parental analysis of progeny: an alternative to full-sib breeding and testing. Theor Appl Genet 103:930–943
36. Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LEB, Pemberton JM (1998) Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol Ecol 7:639–655
37. Matschiner M, Salzburger W (2009) TANDEM: integrating automated allele binning into genetics and genomics workflows. Bioinformatics 25:1982–1983
38. Moriguchi Y, Taira H, Tani N, Tsumura Y (2004) Variation of paternal contribution in a seed orchard of Cryptomeria japonica determined using microsatellite markers. Can J For Res-Rev Can De Recherche Forestiere 34:1683–1690
39. Neale DB, Kremer A (2011) Forest tree genomics: growing resources and applications. Nat Rev Genet 12:111–122
40. Neale DB, Wegrzyn JL, Stevens KA, Zimin AV, Puiu D, Crepeau MW, Cardeno C, Koriabine M, Holtz-Morris AE, Liechty JD, Martinez-Garcia PJ, Vasquez-Gross HA, Lin BY, Zieve JJ, Dougherty WM, Fuentes-Soriano S, Wu LS, Gilbert D, Marcais G, Roberts M, Holt C, Yandell M, Davis JM, Smith KE, Dean JF, Lorenz WW, Whetten RW, Sederoff R, Wheeler N, McGuire PE, Main D, Loopstra CA, Mockaitis K, Dejong PJ, Yorke JA, Salzberg SL, Langley CH (2014) Decoding the massive genome of loblolly pine using haploid DNA and novel assembly strategies. Genome Biol 15:R59
41. Nel A, van Staden J (2003) Micro-fibre pollination bags and high viability Pinus patula pollen enhance cone survival and seed set during controlled pollination. S Afr J Bot 69:469–475
42. Plomion C, LeProvost G, Pot D, Vendramin G, Gerber S, Decroocq S, Brach J, Raffin A, Pastuszka P (2001) Pollen contamination in a maritime pine polycross seed orchard and certification of improved seeds using chloroplast microsatellites. Can J For Res-Rev Can De Recherche Forestiere 31:1816–1825
43. Pompanon F, Bonin A, Bellemain E, Taberlet P (2005) Genotyping errors: causes, consequences and solutions. Nat Rev Genet 6:847–859
44. Shimizu JY (2005) Cultivo do Pinus. Embrapa Florestas Sistemas de Produção-5-ISSN 1678–8281, Curitiba
45. Slavov GT, Howe GT, Adams WT (2005a) Pollen contamination and mating patterns in a Douglas-fir seed orchard as measured by simple sequence repeat markers. Can J For Res-Rev Can De Recherche Forestiere 35:1592–1603
46. Slavov GT, Howe GT, Gyaourova AV, Birkes DS, Adams WT (2005b) Estimating pollen flow using SSR markers and paternity exclusion: accounting for mistyping. Mol Ecol 14:3109–3121
47. Stewart JF, Liu YY, Tauer CG, Nelson CD (2010) Microsatellite versus AFLP analyses of pre-management introgression levels in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) and shortleaf pine (P. echinata Mill.). Tree Genet Genomes 6:853–862
48. Stoehr MU, Orvar BL, Vo TM, Gawley JR, Webber JE, Newton CH (1998) Application of a chloroplast DNA marker in seed orchard management evaluations of Douglas-fir. Can J For Res-Rev Can De Recherche Forestiere 28:187–195
49. Stoehr M, Mehl H, Nicholson G, Pieper G, Newton C (2006) Evaluating supplemental mass pollination efficacy in a lodgepole pine orchard in British Columbia using chloroplast DNA markers. New For 31:83–90
50. Summers K, Amos W (1997) Behavioral, ecological, and molecular genetic analyses of reproductive strategies in the Amazonian dart-poison frog, Dendrobates ventrimaculatus. Behav Ecol 8:260–267
51. Torimaru T, Wang XR, Fries A, Andersson B, Lindgren D (2009) Evaluation of pollen contamination in an advanced Scots pine seed orchard. Silvae Genet 58:262–269
52. Vandeputte M, Mauger S, Dupont-Nivet M (2006) An evaluation of allowing for mismatches as a way to manage genotyping errors in parentage assignment by exclusion. Mol Ecol Notes 6:265–267
53. Wang JL (2010) Effects of genotyping errors on parentage exclusion analysis. Mol Ecol 19:5061–5078
54. Wang XR, Torimaru T, Lindgren D, Fries A (2010) Marker-based parentage analysis facilitates low input ‘breeding without breeding’ strategies for forest trees. Tree Genet Genomes 6:227–235
55. Webber JE (1995) Pollen management for intensive seed orchard production. Tree Physiol 15:507–514
56. Williams CG, Elsik CG, Barnes RD (2000) Microsatellite analysis of Pinus taeda L. in Zimbabwe. Heredity 84:261–268
57. Yamamura K, Hino A (2007) Estimation of the proportion of defective units by using group testing under the existence of a threshold of detection. Commun Stat-Simul Comput 36:949–957
58. Yazdani R, Hadders G, Szmidt AE (1986) Supplemental mass pollination in a seed orchard of Pinus sylvestris L. investigated by isozyme analyses. Scand J For Res 1:309–315
59. Zhou Y, Bui T, Auckland LD, Williams CG (2002) Undermethylated DNA as a source of microsatellites from a conifer genome. Genome 45:91–99
60. Zimin A, Stevens KA, Crepeau MW, Holtz-Morris A, Koriabine M, Marcais G, Puiu D, Roberts M, Wegrzyn JL, de Jong PJ, Neale DB, Salzberg SL, Yorke JA, Langley CH (2014) Sequencing and assembly of the 22-gb loblolly pine genome. Genetics 196:875–890