Use of molecular markers for estimating breeding parameters: A case study in a Pinus pinaster Ait. progeny trial

Tree Genetics and Genomes

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 609-616

  Gaspar, Maria João ^a   de Lucas, Ana I ^b,h   Alía, Ricardo ^c,h   Paiva, Jorge Almiro Pinto ^d,e   Hidalgo, Elena ^b,h   Louzada, José ^f   Almeida, Helena ^g   González Martínez, Santiago C ^c,h  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRÁS OS MONTES AND ALTO DOURO   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VALLADOLID   (Spain)

^c Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria   (Spain)

^d INSTITUTO DE TECNOLOGIA QUÍMICA E BIOLÓGICA   (Portugal)

^e INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGAÇÃO CIENTÍFICA TROPICAL   (Portugal)

^f UNIVERSITY OF TRÁS OS MONTES AND ALTO DOURO   (Portugal)

^g INSTITUTO SUPERIOR DE AGRONOMIA   (Portugal)

^h UNIVERSITY OF SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Coefficient of coancestry; Microsatellite markers; Pinus pinaster

Indexed keywords

PINUS PINASTER;

EID: 70349805116     PISSN: 16142942     EISSN: 16142950     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11295-009-0213-1     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Adams WT, Hipkins VD, Burczyk J, Randall WK (1997) Pollen contamination trends in a maturing Douglas-fir seed orchard. Can J For Res 27:131-134
2. Aguiar A (1993) Análise da variação do crescimento em altura de descendências maternais de pinheiro bravo. Silva Lusitana 1:267-274
3. Aguiar A, Alemeida MH, Borralho N (2003) Genetic control of growth, wood density and stem characteristics of Pinus pinaster in Portugal. Silva Lusitana 11:131-139
4. Askew GR, El-Kassaby YA (1994) Estimation of relationship coefficients among progeny derived from wind pollinated orchard seeds. Theor Appl Genet 88:267-272
5. Austerlitz F, Smouse PE (2001) Two-generation analysis of pollen flow across a landscape. II. Relation between Phi(ft), pollen dispersal and interfemale distance. Genetics 157:851-857
6. Blouin M (2003) DNA-based methods for pedigree reconstruction and kinship analysis in natural populations. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18:503-511
7. Borralho NMG (1994) Heterogeneous selfing rates and dominance effects in estimating heritabilities from open-pollinated progeny. Can J For Res 24:1079-1082
8. Chagné D, Chaumeil P, Ramboer A, Collada C, Guevara A, Cervera MT, Vendramin GG, Garcia V, Frigerio JMM, Echt C, Richardson T, Plomion C (2004) Cross-species transferability and mapping of genomic and cDNA SSRs in pines. Theor Appl Genet 109:1204-1214
9. de-Lucas AI, Robledo-Amuncio JJ, Hidalgo E, González-Martínez SC (2008) Matting system and pollen gene flow in mediterraneam maritime pine. Heredity 100:390-399
10. Doyle J, Doyle J (1990) Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12:13-15
11. Durel CE, Bertin P, Kremer A (1996) Relationship between inbreeding depression and inbreeding coefficient in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster). Theor Appl Genet 92:347-356
12. El-Kassaby YA, Ritland K (1986) The relation of outcrossing and contamination to reproductive phenology and supplemental mass pollination in a Douglas-fir seed orchard. Silvae Genet 35:240-244
13. El-Kassaby YA, Fashler AMK, Sziklai O (1984) Reproductive phenology and its impact on genetically improved seed production in a Douglas-fir seed orchard. Silvae Genet 33:120-125
14. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman Scientific & Technical edn, New York
15. Fernandes L, Rocheta M, Cordeiro J, Pereira S, Gerber S, Oliveira M, Ribeiro MM (2008) Genetic variation, mating patterns and gene flow in a Pinus pinaster Aiton clonal seed orchard. Ann For Sci 65:706
16. Gaspar MJ, Louzada JLPC, Silva ME, Aguiar A, Almeida MH (2008) Age trends in genetic parameters of wood density components in 46 half-sibling families of Pinus pinaster Ait. Can J For Res 38:1470-1477
17. Gerber S, Mariette S, Streiff R, Bodenes C, Kremer A (2000) Comparison of microsatellites and amplified fragment length polymorphism markers for parentage analysis. Mol Ecol 9:1037-1048
18. Gilmour A, Gogel B, Cullis B, Welham S, Thompson R (1998) ASREML users manual. VSN International, New south Wales Agriculture, Orange
19. González-Martínez SC, Gerber S, Cervera MT, Martínez-Zapater JM, Gil L, Alía R (2002) Seed gene flow and fine-scale structure in a Mediterranean pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) using nuclear microsatellite markers. Theor Appl Genet 104:1290-1297
20. González-Martínez SC, Gerber S, Cervera MT, Martínez-Zapater JM, Alía R, Gil L (2003) Selfing and sibship structure in a two-cohort stand of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) using nuclear SSR markers. Ann For Sci 60:115-121
21. Goto S, Miyahara F, Ide Y (2002) Identification of the male parents of half-sib progeny from Japanese black pine (Pinus thunbergii Parl.) clonal seed orchard using RAPD markers. Breeding Science 52:71-77
22. Hansen OK, Kjaer ED (2006) Paternity analysis with microsatellites in a Danish Abies nordmanniana clonal seed orchard reveals dysfunctions. Can J For Res 36:1054-1058
23. Hardy OJ (2003) Estimation of pairwise relatedness between individuals and characterization of isolation-by-distance processes using dominant genetic markers. Mol Ecol 12:1577-1588
24. Hardy OJ, Vekemans X (2002) SPAGEDi: a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Mol Ecol Notes 2:618-620
25. Hardy OJ, González-Martínez SC, Colas B, Fréville H, Mignot A, Olivieri I (2004) Fine-scale genetic structure and gene dispersal in Centaurea corymbosa (Asteraceae) II. Correlated paternity within and among sibships. Genetics 168:1601-1614
26. Kaya N, Isik K, Adams WT (2006) Mating system and pollen contamination in a Pinus brutia seed orchard. New Forests 31:409-416
27. Kumar S, Richardson TE (2005) Inferring relatedness and heritability using molecular markers in radiata pine. Molecular Breeding 15:55-64
28. Kumar S, Gerber S, Richardson TE, Gea L (2007) Testing for unequal paternal contributions using nuclear and chloroplast SSR markers in polycross families of radiata pine. Tree Genetics & Genomes 3:207-214
29. Ledig FT (1998) Genetic variation in Pinus. In: Richardson DM (ed) Ecology and Biogeography of Pinus. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 251-279
30. Linhart YB (2000) Variation in woody plants; molecular markers, evolutionary processes and conservation biology. In: Jain SM, Minocha SC (eds) Molecular biology of woody plants. Kluwer academic, Dordrecht, pp 341-373
31. Loiselle BA, Sork VL, Nason J, Graham C (1995) Spatial genetic-structure of a tropical understory shrub, Psychotria officinalis (Rubiaceae). Am J Bot 82:1420-1425
32. Lynch M, Walsh B (1997) Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer Associates, Massachusetts
33. Lynch M, Ritland K (1999) Estimation of pairwise relatedness with molecular markers. Genetics 152:1753-1766
34. Moriguchi Y, Tani N, Itoo S, Kanehira F, Tanaka K, Yomogida H, Taira H, Tsumura Y (2005) Gene flow and mating system in five Cryptomeria japonica D. Don seed orchards as revealed by analysis of microsatellite markers. Tree Genetics & Genomes 1:174-183
35. Moriguchi Y, Tsuchiya S, Iwata H, Itoo S, Tani N, Taira H, Tsumura Y (2007) Factors influencing male reproductive success in a Cryptomeria japonica seed orchard revealed by microsatellite marker analysis. Silvae Genet 56:207-214
36. Perry D, Hopkins E (1967) Importation of breeding material of Pinus pinaster Ait. from Portugal. For Dep W A Bulletin 75
37. Plomion C, LeProvost G, Pot D, Vendramin G, Gerber S, Decroocq S, Brach J, Raffin A, Pastuszka P (2001) Pollen contamination in a maritime pine polycross seed orchard and certification of improved seeds using chloroplast microsatellites. Can J For Res 31:1816-1825
38. Ritland K (2002) Extensions of models for the estimation of mating systems using n independent loci. Heredity 88:221-228
39. Robledo-Arnuncio JJ, Smouse PE, Gil L, Alia R (2004) Pollen movement under alternative silvicultural practices in native populations of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in central Spain. Forest Ecol Manag 197:245-255
40. Slavov GT, Howe GT, Adams WT (2005) Pollen contamination and mating patterns in a Douglas-fir seed orchard as measured by simple sequence repeat markers. Can J For Res 35:1592-1603
41. Smouse PE, Dyer RJ, Westfall RD, Sork VL (2001) Two-generation analysis of pollen flow across a landscape. I. Male gamete heterogeneity among females. Evolution 55:260-271
42. Squillace AE (1974) Average genetic correlations among offspring from open-pollinated forest trees. Silvae Genet 23:149-156
43. Varela C (1989) Comportamento reprodutivo de Pinus pinaster Ait. num pomar clonal de sementes. Universidade Técnica de Lisboa, Lisbon, p 107
44. Wasieliwska M, LKlemm M, Burczyk J (2005) Genetic diversity and mating system of Scots pine plus trees. Dendrobiology 53:57-62
45. Wright JW (1976) Introduction to forest genetics. Academic, New York
46. Zobel BJ, Talbert J (1984) Applied forest tree Improvement. Wiley, New York