Microsatellite analysis of Pinus taeda L. in Zimbabwe

Heredity

Volumn 84, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 261-268

  Williams, Claire G ^a   Elsik, Christine G ^a   Barnes, Richard D ^b  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Conifers; Phylogeny; Population dynamics

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; DIALLEL ANALYSIS; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC MARKER; INTROGRESSION; MICROSATELLITE DNA; POPULATION GENETICS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES; ZIMBABWE;

ALLELES; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GYMNOSPERMS; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PHYLOGENY; PINUS TAEDA; VARIATION (GENETICS); ZIMBABWE;

CONIFEROPHYTA; EMBRYOPHYTA; PINUS TAEDA;

EID: 0034085015     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.00666.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. n microsatellite markers. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 52, 922-927.
2. CAVALLI-SFORZA, L. L. AND EDWARDS, A. W. F. 1967. Phylogenetic analysis models and estimation procedures. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 19, 233-257.
3. CAVALLI-SFORZA, L. L., MENOZZI, P. AND PIAZZA, A. 1994. The History and Geography of Human Genes. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
4. CHAKRABORTY, R., KIMMEL, D. N., STIVERS, D. N., DEKA, R. AND DAVISON, L. J. 1997. Relative mutation rates at di-, tri-and tetranucleotide microsatellite loci. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 94, 1041-1046.
5. DOYLE, J. J. AND DOYLE, J. L. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull., 19, 11-15.
6. ECHT, C. S., MAY-MARQUARDT, P., HSEIH, M. AND ZAHORCHAK, R. 1996. Characterization of microsatellite markers in eastern white pine. Genome, 39, 1102-1108.
7. ELSIK, C. G., MINIHAN, V. T., HALL, S. E., SCARPA, A. M. AND WILLIAMS, C. G. in press. Low-copy microsatellite markers for Pinus taeda, L. Genome, in press.
8. ESTROUP, A., GARNERY, L., SOLIGNAC, M. AND CORNUET, J. 1995. Microsatellite variation in honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) populations: hierarchical genetic structure and test of the infinite allele and stepwise mutation models. Genetics, 140, 679-695.
9. FELSENSTRIN, J. 1982. How can we infer geography and history from gene frequencies? J. Theor. Biol., 96, 9-20.
10. FLORENCE, L. Z. AND ZINK, G. 1979. Geographic patterns of allozyme variation in loblolly pine. In: Proceedings of the Southern Forest Tree Improvement Conference, Starkville MS, pp. 33-42.
11. GOLDSTEIN, D. B. AND POLLOCK, D. D. 1997. Launching microsatellites: a review of mutation processes and methods of phylogenetic inference. J. Hered., 88, 335-342.
12. GRIMALDI, M. AND CROUAU-ROY, B. 1997. Microsatellite allelic homoplasy due to variable flanking sequences. J. Mol. Evol., 44, 336-340.
13. HOFFMAN, S. M. G. AND BROWN, W. M. 1995. The molecular mechanism underlying the 'rare allele phenomenon' in a subspecific hybrid zone of the California field mouse, Peromyscus californicus. J. Mol. Evol., 41, 1165-1169.
14. KIMURA, M. AND CROW, J. F. 1964. The number of alleles that can be maintained in a finite population. Genetics, 49, 725-738.
15. KUMAR, S., TAMURA, K. AND NEI, M. 1993. MEGA: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis, version 1.0. Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.
16. LEVINSON, G. AND GUTTMAN, G. A. 1987. Slipped strand mispairing: a major mechanism for DNA sequence evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol., 4, 203-221.
17. MULLIN, L. J., BARNES, R. D. AND PREVOST, M. J. 1978. A Review of the Southern Pines in Rhodesia. Rhodesian For. Res. Bull. no. 7., Salisbury, Rhodesia.
18. OHTA, T. AND KIMURA, M. 1973. The model of mutation appropriate to estimate the number of electrophoretically detectable alleles in a genetic population. Genet. Res., 22, 201-204.
19. RAYMOND, M. AND ROUSSET, F. 1995. GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J. Hered., 86, 248-249.
20. ROUSSET, R. 1996. Equilibrium values for measures of population subdivision for stepwise mutation processes. Genetics, 142, 1357-1362.
21. ROUSSET, F. AND RAYMOND, M. 1995. Testing heterozygote excess and deficiency. Genetics, 140, 1413-1419.
22. SAITOU, N. AND NEI, M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol., 4, 406-425.
23. SAS. 1991. SAS System for Statistical Graphics. SAS Institute, Cary NC.
24. SWOFFORD, D. L. AND SELANDER, R. B. 1989. BIOSYS-1: a Fortran program for comprehensive analysis for electrophoretic data in population genetics and systematics. J. Hered., 72, 281-283.
25. TAKEZAKI, N. AND NEI, M. 1996. Genetic distances and reconstruction of phylogenetic trees from microsatellite DNA. Genetics, 144, 389-399.
26. VALDES, A. M., SLATKIN, M. AND FREIMER, F. B. 1993. Allele frequencies at microsatellite loci: the stepwise mutation model revisited. Genetics, 133, 737-749.
27. WEIR, B. S. 1990. Genetic Data Analysis. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
28. WILLIAMS, C. G., HAMRICK, J. L. AND LEWIS, P. O. 1995. Multiple-population versus hierarchical conifer breeding programs: a comparison of genetic diversity levels. Theor. Appl. Genet., 90, 584-594.