Pollination dynamics in a Douglas-fir seed orchard as revealed by pedigree reconstruction

Annals of Forest Science

Volumn 67, Issue 8, 2010, Pages

  Lai, Ben Sk ^a   Funda, Tomas ^a,b   Liewlaksaneeyanawin, Cherdsak ^a   Klápå Tě, Jaroslav ^a,b   Van Niejenhuis, Annette ^c   Cook, Cathy ^c   U Stoehr, Michael ^d   Woods, Jack ^e   A El Kassaby, Yousry ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b CZECH UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES PRAGUE   (Czech Republic)

^c Western Forest Products Inc   (Canada)

^d RESEARCH BRANCH   (Canada)

^e SelectSeed Company Limited   (Canada)

Author keywords

DNA fingerprinting; Mating dynamics; Pedigree reconstruction; Pseudotsuga menziesii; Seed orchard

Indexed keywords

CENSUS; CLONE; DNA FINGERPRINTING; EFFECTIVE POPULATION SIZE; EMBRYO; EVERGREEN FOREST; GAMETE; GENETIC MARKER; MASTING; ORCHARD; POLLEN; POLLINATION; RECONSTRUCTION; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS;

PSEUDOTSUGA; PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII;

EID: 78951489391     PISSN: 12864560     EISSN: 1297966X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1051/forest/2010044     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Adams W.T., Neale D.B., and Lopstra C.A., 1988. Verifying controlled crosses in conifer tree-improvement programs. Silvae Genet. 37: 147-152.
2. Adams W.T., Hipkins V.D., Burczyk J., and Randall W.K., 1997. Pollen contamination trends in a maturing Douglas-fir seed orchard. Can. J. For. Res. 27: 131-134. (Pubitemid 27164949)
3. Allen G.S. and Owens J.N., 1972. The Life History of Douglas-fir, Ottawa, Canada, Can. For. Serv. 139 p.
4. Anonymous, 1976. Twentieth annual report on cooperative tree improvement and hardwood research program, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, USA.
5. Askew G.R., 1992. Potential genetic improvement due to supplemental mass pollination management in conifer seed orchards. For. Ecol. Manage. 47: 135-147.
6. Bell G.D. and Fletcher A.M., 1978. Computer organised orchard layouts (COOL) based on the permutated neighbourhood design concept, Silvae Genet. 27: 223-225.
7. Bridgwater F.E., Bramlett D.L., and Matthews F.R., 1987. Supplemental mass pollination is feasible on an operational scale. In: Proc. 19th South. For. Tree Improv. Conf., College Sta, TX, pp. 216-222.
8. Cockerham C., 1967. Group inbreeding and coancestry. Genetics 56: 89-104.
9. Daniels J.D., 1978. Efficacy of supplemental mass pollination in a Douglas-fir seed orchard. Silvae Genet. 27: 52-58.
10. Denti D., Schoen D.J., 1988. Self-fertilization rates in white spruce: effect of pollen and seed production. J. Hered. 79: 284-288.
11. Doyle J.J. and Doyle J.L., 1990. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12: 13-15.
12. Edwards D.G.W. and El-Kassaby Y.A., 1995. Douglas-fir genotypic response to seed stratification. Seed Sci Tech. 23: 771-778.
13. El-Kassaby Y.A., 1992. Domestication and genetic diversity-should we be concerned? For. Chron. 68: 687-700.
14. El-Kassaby Y.A. and Askew G.R., 1998. Seed orchards and their genetics. In: Mandal A.K., Gibson G.L. (Ed.), Forest genetics and tree breeding, CBS Publishers and Distributors, Daryaganj, New Delhi, India, pp. 103-111.
15. El-Kassaby Y.A. and Davidson R., 1990. Impact of crop management practices on the seed crop genetic quality in a Douglas-fir seed orchard. Silvae Genet. 39: 230-237.
16. El-Kassaby Y.A. and Davidson R. 1991. Impact of pollination environment manipulation on the apparent outcrossing rate in a Douglas-fir seed orchard. Heredity 66: 55-59.
17. El-Kassaby Y.A. and Ritland K., 1986. The relation of outcrossing and contamination to reproductive phenology and supplemental mass pollination in a Douglas-fir seed orchard. Silvae Genet. 35: 240-244.
18. El-Kassaby Y.A., Parkinson J., and Devitt W.J.B., 1986. The effect of crown segment on the mating system in a Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) seed orchard. Silvae Genet. 35: 149-155.
19. El-Kassaby Y.A., Ritland K., Fashler A.M.K., and Devitt W.J.B., 1988. The role of reproductive phenology upon the mating structure of a Douglas-fir seed orchard. Silvae Genet. 37: 76-82.
20. El-Kassaby Y.A., Edwards D.G.W., and Cook C., 1990. Impact of crop management practices on seed yield in a Douglas-fir seed orchard. Silvae Genet. 39: 226-230.
21. El-Kassaby Y.A., Barnes S., Cook C., and MacLeod D.A., 1993. Supplemental mass pollination success rate in a mature Douglas-fir seed orchard. Can. J. For. Res. 23: 1069-1099.
22. El-Kassaby Y.A., Stoehr M.U., Reid D., Walsh C.G., and Lee T.E., 2007. Clonal-row versus random seed orchard designs: interior spruce mating system evaluation. Can. J. For. Res. 37: 690-696. (Pubitemid 47262304)
23. Erickson V.J. and Adams W.T., 1990. Mating system variation among individual ramets in a Douglas-fir seed orchard. Can. J. For. Res. 20: 1672-1675.
24. Eriksson G., Jonsson A., and Lindgren D., 1973. Flowering in a clonal trial of Picea abies Karst. Stud. For. Suec. 110: 3-45.
25. Fashler A.M.K. and DevittW.J.B., 1980. A practical solution to Douglasfir seed orchard pollen contamination. For. Chron. 56: 237-240.
26. Fashler A.M.K. and El-Kassaby Y.A., 1987. The effect of water spray cooling treatment on reproductive phenology in a Douglas-fir seed orchard. Silvae Genet. 36: 245-249.
27. Fast W., Dancik B.P., and Bower R.C., 1986. Mating system and pollen contamination in a Douglas-fir clone bank. Can. J. For. Res. 16: 1314-1319.
28. Franklin E.C., 1974. Pollination in slash pine: first come, first served. In: Proceedings of a Colloquium, Seed yield from southern pine seed orchards In: Kraus J. (Ed.), Georgia Forestry Center, Macon, GA, pp. 15-20.
29. Funda T., Chen C., Liewlaksaneeyanawin C., Kenawy A., and El-Kassaby Y.A., 2008. Pedigree and mating system analyses in a western larch (Larix occidentalis Nutt.) experimental population. Ann. For. Sci. 65: 705.
30. Griffin A.R., 1982. Clonal variation in radiata pine seed orchards. I. Some flowering, cone and seed production traits. Aust. For. Res. 12: 295-302.
31. Hansen O.K. and Kjaer E.D., 2006. Paternity analysis with microsatellites in a Danish Abies nordmanniana clonal seed orchard reveals dysfunctions. Can. J. For. Res. 36: 1054-1058. (Pubitemid 44076373)
32. Kalinowski S.T., Taper M.L., and Marshall T.C., 2007. Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol. Ecol. 16: 1099-1106.
33. Krutovskii K.V., Vollmer S.S., Sorensen F.C., Adams W.T., and Strauss S.H., 1997. Effects of megagametophyte removal on DNA yield and early seedling growth in coastal Douglas-fir. Can. J. For. Res. 27: 964-968. (Pubitemid 27389561)
34. Lindgren D. and Mullin T.J., 1998. Relatedness and status number in seed orchard crops. Can. J. For. Res. 28: 276-283.
35. Moriguchi Y., Taira H., Tani N., and Tsumura Y., 2004. Variation of paternal contribution in a seed orchard of Cryptomeria japonica determined using microsatellite markers. Can. J. For. Res. 34: 1683-1690. (Pubitemid 39501116)
36. Moriguchi Y., Tani N., Itoo S., Kanehira F., Tanaka K., Yomogida H., Taira H., and Tsumura Y., 2005. Gene flow and mating system in five Cryptomeria japonica D. Don seed orchards as revealed by analysis of microsatellite markers. Tree Genet. Genomes. 1: 174-183.
37. Nakamura R.R. and Wheeler N.C., 1992. Pollen competition and paternal success in Douglas-fir. Evolution 46: 846-851.
38. Namkoong G., Kang H.C., and Brouard J.S., 1988. Tree breeding: principles and strategies, Monographs on theoretical and applied genetics. II, Springer-Verlag, New York, USA.
39. Orr-Ewing A.L., 1954. Inbreeding experiments with the Douglas-fir. For. Chron. 30: 7-21.
40. Orr-Ewing A.L., 1965. Inbreeding and single-crossing in Douglas-fir. For. Sci. 11: 279-290.
41. Owens J.N. and Simpson S.J., 1982. Further observations on the pollination mechanism and seed production of Douglas-fir. Can. J. For. Res. 12: 431-434. (Pubitemid 13283746)
42. Owens J.N., Simpson S.J., and Molder M., 1981. The pollination mechanism and the optimal time of pollination in Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii). Can. J. For. Res. 11: 36-50.
43. Ritland K. and El-Kassaby Y.A., 1985. The nature of inbreeding in a seed orchard of Douglas-fir as shown by an efficient multilocus model. Theor. Appl. Genet. 71: 375-384.
44. Shaw D.V. and Allard R.W., 1982. Estimation of outcrossing rates in Douglas-fir using isozyme markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 62: 113-120.
45. Silen R.R. and Keane G., 1969. Cooling a Douglas-fir seed orchard to avoid pollen contamination, USDA For. Serv. Res. Note PNW-101.
46. Slavov G.T., Howe G.T., and Adams W.T., 2005. Pollen contamination and mating patterns in a Douglas-fir seed orchard as measured by simple sequence repeat markers. Can. J. For. Res. 35: 1592-1603. (Pubitemid 41626781)
47. Slavov G.T., Howe G.T., Yakovlev I., Edwards K.J., Krutovskii K.V., Tuskan G.A., Carlson J.E., Strauss S.H., and Adams W.T., 2004. Highly variable SSR markers in Douglas-fir: Mendelian inheritance and map locations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 108: 873-880. (Pubitemid 38463850)
48. Sorensen F.C., 1971. Estimate of self-fertility in coastal Douglas-fir from inbreeding studies. Silvae Genet. 20: 115-120.
49. Sorensen F.C., 1982. The roles of polyembryony and embryo viability in the genetic system of conifers. Evolution 36: 725-733.
50. Stoehr M.U. and Newton C.H., 2002. Evaluation of mating dynamics in a lodgepole pine seed orchard using chloroplast DNA markers. Can. J. For. Res. 32: 469-476. (Pubitemid 34294266)
51. Stoehr M.U., Orvar B.L., Vo T.M., Gawley J.R.,Webber J.E., and Newton C.H., 1998. Application of a chloroplast DNAmarker in seed orchard management evaluations of Douglas-fir. Can. J. For. Res. 28: 187-195.
52. Stoehr M.U.,Webber J.E., and Woods J.H., 2004. Protocol for rating seed orchard seedlots in British Columbia: quantifying genetic gain and diversity. Forestry 77: 297-303.
53. Stoehr M.U., Mehl H., Nicholson G., Pieper G., and Newton C.H., 2006. Evaluating supplemental mass pollination efficacy in a lodgepole pine orchard in British Columbia using chloroplast DNA markers. New For. 31: 83-90. (Pubitemid 41813275)
54. Wakeley P.C., Wells O.O., and Campbell T.E., 1966. Mass production of shortleaf × slash pine hybrids by pollinating unbagged female flowers. In: Joint Proceedings of the Second Genetics Workshop of the Society of American Foresters and the Seventh Lake States Forest Tree Improvement Conference, USDA Forest Service, St. Paul, USA, Res. Pap. NC-6, pp. 78-79.
55. Webber J.E. and Painter R.A., 1996. Douglas-fir pollen management manual. Second edition, Res. Program WP 02/96. B.C. Ministry of Forests, Victoria, Canada.
56. Woods J.H., 2005. Methods for estimating gamete contributions to orchard seed crops and vegetative lots in British Columbia. B.C. Ministry of Forests and Range, Research Branch, Victoria, B.C. Tech Rep 25.
57. Woods J.H. and Heaman J.C., 1989. Effect of different inbreeding levels on filled seed production in Douglas-fir. Can. J. For. Res. 19: 54-59.
58. Wright S., 1931. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16: 97-159.
59. Yazdani R., Hadders G., and Szmidt A., 1986. Supplemental mass pollination in a seed orchard of Pinus sylvestris L. investigated by isozyme analyses. Scand. J. For. Res. 1: 309-315.