Breeding without breeding

Genetics Research

Volumn 91, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 111-120

  El kassaby, Yousry A ^a   Lstibůrek, Milan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b CZECH UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES PRAGUE   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA MARKER;

ARTICLE; DOUGLAS FIR; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENOTYPE; NONHUMAN; PEDIGREE; PHENOTYPE; PLANT BREEDING; PLANT GENETICS; PROGENY; QUANTITATIVE GENETICS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ALGORITHMS; BREEDING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENOTYPE; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; PLANTS; PSEUDOTSUGA; SELECTION (GENETICS); TREES;

PSEUDOTSUGA; PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII;

EID: 70349243804     PISSN: 00166723     EISSN: 14695073     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S001667230900007X     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Adams, W. T., Neale, D. B. & Loopstra, C. A. (1988). Verifying controlled crosses in conifer tree-improvement programs. Silvae Genetica 37, 147-152.
2. Andersson, E. W., Spanos, K. A., Mullin, T. J. & Lindgren, D. (1998). Phenotypic selection compared to restricted combined index selection for many generations. Silva Fennica 32, 111-120.
3. Anonymous (2002). The MOSEK.NET API Manual, Version 4.0 (Revision 60) Denmark: Mosek. 341 pp.
4. Botstein, D., White, R. L., Skolnick, M. & Davis, R. W. (1980). Construction of a Genetic Linkage Map in Man Using Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphisms. The American Journal of Human Genetics 32 314-331.
5. Cappa, E. P. & Cantet, R. J. C. (2007). Bayesian estimation of surface to account for spatial trend using penalized splines in an individual-tree mixed model. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 37, 2677-2688.
6. Cotterill, P. P. (1986). Breeding strategy: Don't underestimate simplicity. In Proceedings of the Joint IUFRO Meeting, Working Parties on Breeding Theory, Progeny Testing and Seed Orchards (Williamsburg, VA), pp. 8-23.
7. Devey, M. E., Bell, J. C., Uren, T. L. & Moran, G. F. (2002). A set of microsatellite markers for fingerprinting and breeding applications in Pinus radiata. Genome 45, 984-989.
8. Doerksen, T. K. & Herbinger, C. M. (2008). Male reproductive success and pedigree error in red spruce open-pollinated and polycross mating systems. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 38, 1742-1749.
9. Dutkowski, G. W., Costa-Silva, J., Gilmour, A. R. & Lopez, G. A. (2002). Spatial analysis methods for forest genetic trials. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 32, 2201-2214.
10. El-Kassaby, Y. A. & Askew, G. R. (2004). A method for calculating expected genetic diversity of vegetatively propagated populations produced from commonly used mating designs. In Plantation Forest Biotechnology for the 21st Century (eds C. Walter & M. Carson), pp. 129-146. Trivandrum, India: Research Signpost.
11. El-Kassaby, Y. A. & Davidson, R. (1990). Impact of crop management practices on the seed crop genetic quality in a Douglas-fir seed orchard. Silvae Genetica 39, 230-237.
12. El-Kassaby, Y. A. & Lindgren, D. (2007). Increasing the efficiency of breeding without breeding through phenotypic preselection in open pollinated progenies. In 29th Southern Forest Tree Improvement Conference and the Western Forest Genetics Association, Galveston, TX pp. 15-19.
13. El-Kassaby, Y. A., Fashler, A. M. K. & Crown, M. (1989a). Variation in fruitfulness in a Douglas-fir seed orchard and its effect on crop management decisions. Silvae Genetica 38, 113-121.
14. El-Kassaby, Y. A., Rudin, D. & Yazdani, R. (1989b). Levels of outcrossing and contamination in two Scots pine seed orchards. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 4, 41-49.
15. El-Kassaby, Y. A., Barnes, S., Cook, C. & MacLeod, D. A. (1993). Supplemental-mass-pollination success rate in a mature Douglas-fir seed orchard. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 23, 1069-1099.
16. El-Kassaby, Y. A., Lstibůrek, M., Liewlaksaneeyanawin, C., Slavov, G. T. & Howe, G. T. (2006). Low Input Breeding and Genetic Conservation of Forest Tree Species. Antalya, Turkey: IUFRO. http://www.akdeniz.edu.tr/english/iufro/2007.pdf
17. Eriksson, G., Namkoong, G. & Roberds, J. H. (1993). Dynamic gene conservation for uncertain futures. Forest Ecology and Management 62, 15-37.
18. Falconer, D. S. & Mackay, T. F. C. (1996). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 4th edn. New York: Longman.
19. Friedman, S. T. & Adams, W. T. (1985). Estimation of gene flow into seed orchards of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 69, 609-615.
20. Funda, T., Chen, C., Liewlaksaneeyanawin, C., Kenawy, A. & El-Kassaby, Y. A. (2008). Pedigree and mating system analyses in a western larch (Larix occidentalis Nutt.) experimental population. Annals of Forest Science 65, 705.
21. Gerber, S., Mariette, S., Streiff, R., Bodénès, C. & Kremer, A. (2000). Comparison of microsatellites and amplified fragment length polymorphism markers for parentage analysis. Molecular Ecology 9, 1037-1048.
22. Gilmour, A. R., Gogel, B. J., Cullis, B. R. & Thompson, R. (2006). ASReml User Guide, Release 2.0. Hemel Hempstead, UK: VSN International.
23. Grattapaglia, D., Ribeiro, V. J. & Rezende, G. D. S. P. (2004). Retrospective selection of elite parent trees using paternity testing with microsatellite markers: An alternative short term breeding tactic for Eucalyptus. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 109, 192-199.
24. Griffing, B. (1956). Concept of general and specific combing ability in relation to diallel crossing system. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 9, 463-493.
25. Hazel, L. N. (1943). The genetic basis for constructing selection indexes. Genetics 28, 476-490.
26. Henderson, C. R. (1975). Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model. Biometrics 31, 423-447.
27. Henderson, C. R. (1984). Applications of Linear Models in Animal Breeding. Guelph, ON: University of Guelph.
28. Henderson, C. R. (1988). Theoretical basis and computational methods for a number of different animal models. Journal of Dairy Science 71 (Suppl. 2), 1-16.
29. Hill, W. G., Goddard, M. E. & Visscher, P. M. (2008). Data and theory point to mainly additive genetic variance for complex traits. PLoS Genetics 4, 1-10.
30. Jones, A. G. & Ardren, W. R. (2003). Methods of parentage analysis in natural populations. Molecular Ecology 12, 2511-2523.
31. Kalinowski, S. T., Taper, M. L. & Marshall, T. C. (2007). Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Molecular Ecology 16, 1099-1106.
32. Kennedy, B. W., Schaeffer, L. R. & Sorensen, D. A. (1988). Genetic properties of animal models. Journal of Dairy Science 71 (Suppl. 2), 17-26.
33. Kumar, S., Gerber, S., Richardson, T. & Gea, L. (2007). Testing for unequal paternal contributions using nuclear and chloroplast SSR markers in polycross families of radiata pine. Tree Genetics and Genomes 3, 207-214.
34. Lambeth, C., Lee, B. C., O'Malley, D. & Wheeler, N. (2001). Polymix breeding with parental analysis of progeny: An alternative to full-sib breeding and testing. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 103, 930-943.
35. Lindgren, D. & Matheson, A. C. (1986). Increasing the genetic quality of seed from seed orchards by using the better clones in higher proportions. Silvae Genetica 35, 173-177.
36. Lindgren, D., Gea, L. D. & Jefferson, P. A. (1996). Loss of genetic diversity monitored by status number. Silvae Genetica 45, 52-59.
37. Lindgren, D., Cui, J., Son, S. G. & Sonesson, J. (2004). Balancing seed yield and breeding value in clonal seed orchards. New Forests 28, 11-22.
38. Lstibůrek, M., Mullin, T. J. & El-Kassaby, Y. A. (2006). The impact of differential success of somatic embryogenesis on the outcome of clonal forestry programs. I. Initial comparison under multitrait selection. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36, 1376-1384.
39. Lynch, M. & Walsh, B. (1998). Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
40. McKeand, S., Mullin, T., Byram, T. & White, T. (2003). Deployment of genetically improved loblolly and slash pines in the South. Journal of Forestry 101, 32-37.
41. Namkoong, G. (1966). Inbreeding effects on estimation of genetic additive variance. Forest Science 12, 8-13.
42. Namkoong, G. (1979). Introduction to quantitative genetics in forestry. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Technical Bulletin No. 1588.
43. Namkoong, G., Kang, H. C. & Brouard, J. S. (1988). Tree Breeding: Principles and Strategies. New York: Springer-Verlag. Monograph, Theoretical and Applied Genetics 11.
44. Pompanon, F., Bonin, A., Bellemain, E. & Taberlet, P. (2005). Genotyping errors: Causes, consequences and solutions. Nature Reviews Genetics 6, 847-859.
45. Rönningen, K. & Van Vleck, L. D. (1985). General and Quantitative Genetics, pp. 187-225. New York: World Animal Science, Elsevier Science Publishing Company.
46. Roberds, J. H., Friedman, S. T. & El-Kassaby, Y. A. (1991). Effective number of pollen parents in clonal seed orchards. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 82, 313-320.
47. Savolainen, O., Karkkainen, K., Harju, A., Nikkanen, T. & Rusanen, M. (1993). Fertility variation in Pinus sylvestris: A test of sex allocation theory. American Journal of Botany 80, 1016-1020.
48. Smith, H. (1936). A discriminant function for plant selection. Annals of Eugenics 7, 240-250.
49. Vandeputte, S., Mauger, S. & Dupont-Nivet, M. (2006). An evaluation of allowing for mismatches as a way to manage genotyping errors in parentage assignment by exclusion. Molecular Ecology Notes 6 265-267.
50. Wakeley, P. C., Wells, O. O. & Campbell, T. E. (1966). Mass production of shortleafrslash pine hybrids by pollinating unbagged female flowers. In Proceedings of the 2nd Genetics Workshop of the Society of American Foresters and 7th Lake States for Tree Improvement Conference Research Paper NC-6. pp. 78-79.
51. Wang, J. L. (2004). Sibship reconstruction from genetic data with typing errors. Genetics 166, 1963-1979.
52. Wang, J. L. (2007). Parentage and sibship exclusions: Higher statistical power with more family members. Heredity 99, 205-217.
53. Wheeler, N., Payne, P., Hipkins, V., Saich, R., Kenny, S. & Tuskan, G. (2006). Polymix breeding with paternity analysis in Populus: A test for differential reproductive success (DRS) among pollen donors. Tree Genetics and Genomes 2, 1614-2950.
54. Yanchuk, A. D. (1996). General and specific combining ability from disconnected partial diallels of coastal Douglas-fir. Silvae Genetica 45, 37-45.
55. Yanchuk, A. D. (2001). A quantitative framework for breeding and conservation of forest tree genetic resources in British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 31, 566-576.
56. Ying, C. C. & Yanchuk, A. D. (2006). The development of British Columbia's tree seed transfer guidelines: Purpose, concept, methodology, and implementation. Forest Ecology and Management 227, 1-13.