Pollen contamination and mating patterns in a Douglas-fir seed orchard as measured by simple sequence repeat markers

Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 35, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 1592-1603

  Slavov, Gancho T ^a   Howe, Glenn T ^a   Adams, W Thomas ^a  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMARKERS; CLONING; CONTAMINATION; CROPS; GENETIC ENGINEERING;

FLORAL PHENOLOGY; POLLEN CONTAMINATION; SIMPLE SEQUENCE REPEAT (SSR); SSR MARKERS;

SEED;

FOREST MANAGEMENT; GENETIC MARKER; GENETICS; ORCHARD; POLLEN;

CLONES; FARM CROPS; GENETIC ENGINEERING; POLLUTION; SEEDS;

PSEUDOTSUGA; PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII;

EID: 27744447969     PISSN: 00455067     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/x05-082     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Adams, W.T. 1992. Gene dispersal within forest tree populations. New For. 6: 217-240.
2. Adams, W.T., and Birkes, D.S. 1991. Estimating mating patterns in forest tree populations. In Biochemical markers in the population genetics of forest trees. Edited by S. Fineschi, M.E. Malvolti, F. Cannata, and H.H. Hattemer. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, Netherlands. pp. 157-172.
3. Adams, W.T., and Burczyk, J. 2000. Magnitude and implications of gene flow in gene conservation reserves. In Forest conservation genetics: principles and practice. Edited by A. Young, D. Boshier, and T. Boyle. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Australia. pp. 215-224.
4. Adams, W.T., Neale D.B., and Loopstra, C.A. 1988. Verifying controlled crosses in conifer tree-improvement programs. Silvae Genet. 37: 147-152.
5. Adams, W.T., Hipkins, V.D., Burczyk, J., and Randall, W.K. 1997. Pollen contamination trends in a maturing Douglas-fir seed orchard. Can. J. For. Res. 27: 131-134.
6. Belkhir, K., Borsa, P., Chikhi, L., Raufaste, N., and Bonhomme, F. 2004. GENETIX 4.05, logiciel sous Windows TM pour la génétique des populations. Laboratoire Génome, Populations, Interactions, CNRS UMR 5000, Université de Montpellier II, Montpellier, France. Available from http://www.univ-montp2.fr/%7Egenetix/genetix/genetix.htm [accessed 13 April 2005].
7. Brondani, R.P.V., Brondani, C., Tarchini, R., and Grattapaglia, D. 1998. Development, characterization and mapping of microsatellite markers in Eucalyptus grandis and E. urophylla. Theor. Appl. Genet. 97: 816-827.
8. Burczyk, J., and Prat, D. 1997. Male reproductive success in Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco: the effects of spatial structure and flowering characteristics. Heredity, 79: 638-647.
9. Burczyk, J., Adams, W.T., and Shimizu, J.Y. 1996. Mating patterns and pollen dispersal in a natural knobcone pine (Pinus attenuata Lemmon.) stand. Heredity, 77: 251-260.
10. Campbell, R.K., and Sorensen, F.C. 1973. Cold-acclimation in seedling Douglas-fir related to phenology and provenance. Ecology, 54: 1148-1151.
11. Chaix, G., Gerber, S., Razafimaharo, V., Vigneron, P., Verhaegen, D., and Hamon, S. 2003. Gene flow estimation with microsatellites in a Malagasy seed orchard of Eucalyptus grandis. Theor. Appl. Genet. 107: 705-712.
12. DiFazio, S.P. 2002. Measuring and modeling gene flow from hybrid poplar plantations: implications for transgenic risk assessment. Ph.D. dissertation, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Ore.
13. Dow, B.D., and Ashley, M.V. 1998. High levels of gene flow in Bur oak revealed by paternity analysis using microsatellites. J. Hered. 89: 62-70.
14. El-Kassaby, Y.A., and Askew, G.R. 1991. The relation between reproductive phenology and output in determining the gametic pool profile in a Douglas-fir seed orchard. For. Sci. 37: 827-835.
15. El-Kassaby, Y.A., and Ritland, K. 1986. The relation of outcrossing and contamination to reproductive phenology and supplemental mass pollination in a Douglas-fir seed. Silvae Genet. 35: 240-244.
16. Elsik, C.G., Minihan, V.T., Hall, S.E., Scarpa, A.M., and Williams C.G. 2000. Low-copy microsatellite markers for Pinus taeda L. Genome, 43: 550-555.
17. Erickson, V.J., and Adams, W.T. 1989. Mating success in a coastal Douglas-fir seed orchard as affected by distance and floral phenology. Can. J. For. Res. 19: 1248-1255.
18. Ewen, K.R., Bahlo, M., Treloar, S., Levinson, D., Mowry, B., Barlow, J., and Foote, S. 2000. Identification and analysis of error types in high-throughput genotyping. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 67: 727-736.
19. Friedman, S.T., and Adams, W.T. 1982. Genetic efficiency in loblolly pine seed orchards. In Proceedings of the 16th Southern Forest Tree Improvement Conference, 27-28 May 1981, Blacksburg, Va. Edited by F.E. Bridgwater, P.P. Feret, and R.L. McElwee. Virginia Polytechnical Institute, Blacksburg, Va. pp. 213-220.
20. Friedman, S.T., and Adams, W.T. 1985. Estimation of gene flow into two seed orchards of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 69: 609-615.
21. Gerber, S., Mariette, S., Streiff, R., Bodénès, C., and Kremer, A. 2000. Comparison of microsatellites and amplified fragment length polymorphism markers for parentage analysis. Mol. Ecol. 9: 1037-1048.
22. Greenwood, M., and Rucker, T. 1985. Estimating pollen contamination in loblolly pine seed orchards by pollen trapping. In Proceedings of the 18th Southern Forest Tree Improvement Conference, 21-23 May 1985, Long Beach, Miss. Edited by R.C. Schmidtling and M.M. Griggs. University of Southern Mississippi, Long Beach, Miss. pp. 179-186.
23. Hamrick, J.L., and Godt, M.J. 1989. Allozyme diversity in plants species. In Plant population, genetics, breeding, and genetic resources. Edited by A.H.D. Brown, M.T. Clegg, A.L. Kahler, and B.S. Weir. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass. pp. 43-63.
24. Jones, A.G., and Ardren, W.R. 2003. Methods of parentage analysis in natural populations. Mol. Ecol. 12: 2511-2523.
25. Kylmänen, P. 1980. Preliminary results concerning usability of North Finland x South Finland hybrid seed born in young Scots pine seed orchards. Folia For. 423. [Summary in English.]
26. Li, P., and Adams, W.T. 1993. Genetic control of bud phenology in pole-size trees and seedlings of coastal Douglas-fir. Can. J. For. Res. 23: 1043-1051.
27. Marshall, T.C., Slate, J., Kruuk, L.E., and Pemberton, J.M. 1998. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol. Ecol. 7: 639-655.
28. Nikkanen, T. 1982. Survival and height growth of North Finland x South Finland hybrid progenies of Scots pine in intermediate areas. Folia For. 527. [Summary in English.]
29. Pakkanen, A., Nikkanen, T., and Pulkkinen, P. 2000. Annual variation in pollen contamination and outcrossing in a Picea abies seed orchard. Scand. J. For. Res. 15: 399-404.
30. Slate, J., Marshall, T., and Pemberton, J. 2000. A retrospective assessment of the accuracy of the paternity inference program CERVUS. Mol. Ecol. 9: 801-808.
31. Slavov, G.T., Howe, G.T., Yakovlev, I., Edwards, K.J., Krutovskii, K.V., Tuskan, G.A., Carlson, J.E., Strauss, S.H., and Adams, W.T. 2004. Highly variable SSR markers in Douglas-fir: Mendelian inheritance and map locations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 108: 873-880.
32. Slavov, G.T., Howe, G.T., Birkes, D.S., Gyaourova, A.V., and Adams, W.T. 2005. Estimating pollen flow using SSR markers and paternity exclusion: Accounting for mistyping. Mol. Ecol. In press. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005. 02620.x
33. Smith, D.B., and Adams, W.T. 1983. Measuring pollen contamination in clonal seed orchards with the aid of genetic markers. In Proceedings of the 17th Southern Forest Tree Improvement Conference, 6-9 June 1983, Athens, Ga. Edited by B.C. Bongarten and H.O. Yates. pp. 271-279.
34. Sorensen, F.C. 1999. Relationship between self-fertility, allocation of growth, and inbreeding depression in three coniferous species. Evolution, 53: 417-425.
35. Squillace, A.E., and Long, E.M. 1981. Proportion of pollen from non-orchard sources. In Pollen management handbook. Edited by E.C. Franklin. U.S. Dep. Agric. Agric. Handb. 587. pp. 15-19.
36. Stoehr, M.U., and Newton, C.R. 2002. Evaluation of mating dynamics in a lodgepole pine seed orchard using chloroplast DNA markers. Can. J. For. Res. 32: 469-476.
37. Stoehr, M.U., Webber, J.E., and Painter, R.A. 1994. Pollen contamination effects on progeny from an off-site Douglas-fir seed orchard. Can. J. For. Res. 24: 2113-2117.
38. Stoehr, M.U., Orvar, B., Vo, T., Gawley, J., Webber, J., and Newton, C. 1998. Application of a chloroplast DNA marker in seed orchard management evaluations of Douglas-fir. Can. J. For. Res. 28: 187-195.
39. Wackerly, D.D., Mendenhall, W., and Scheaffer, R.L. 2002. Mathematical statistics with applications. 6th ed. Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove, Calif.
40. Webber, J.E. 1995. Pollen management for intensive seed orchard production. Tree Physiol. 15: 507-514
41. Webber, J.E., and Painter, R.A. 1996. Douglas-fir pollen management manual. 2nd ed. B.C. Min. For. For. Res. Work. Pap. 02/1996.
42. Wheeler, N., and Jech, K. 1986. Pollen contamination in a mature Douglas-fir seed orchard. In Proceedings from the IUFRO Conference on Breeding Theory, Progeny Testing, and Seed Orchards, 13-17 October 1986, Williamsburg, Va. Edited by R.J. Weir. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, N.C. pp. 13-17.
43. Xie, C.-Y., and Yanchuk, A.D. 2003. Breeding values of parental trees, genetic worth of seed orchard seedlots, and yields of improved stocks in British Columbia. West. J. Appl. For. 18: 88-100.