Microsatellite versus AFLP analyses of pre-management introgression levels in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) and shortleaf pine (P. echinata Mill.)

Tree Genetics and Genomes

Volumn 6, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 853-862

  Stewart, John F ^a   Liu, Yanyan ^a   Tauer, Charles G ^a   Nelson, C D ^b  

^a OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Genetic diversity; Hybridization; Introgression; Molecular markers

Indexed keywords

PINUS ECHINATA; PINUS TAEDA;

EID: 78649972838     PISSN: 16142942     EISSN: 16142950     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11295-010-0296-8     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Abbot JE (1974) Introgressive hybridization between shortleaf and loblolly pine in southeast Oklahoma. Oklahoma State University master's thesis, 31pp.
2. Al-Rahab'ah MA, Williams CG (2002) Population dynamics of Pinus taeda L. based on nuclear microsatellites. Forest Ecol Manag 163: 263-271.
3. Bohrerova Z, Bohrer G, Cho KD, Bolch MA, Linden KG (2009) Determining the viability response of pine pollen to atmospheric conditions during long-distance dispersal. Ecol Appl 19: 656-667.
4. Chagne D, Chaumeil P, Ramboer A, Collada C, Guevara A, Cervera MT, Vendramin GG, Garcia V, Frigerio JM, Echt C, Richardson T, Plomion C (2004) Cross-species transferability and mapping of genomic and cDNA SSRs in pines. Theor Appl Genet 109: 1204-1214.
5. Chen JW, Tauer CG, Bai G, Huang Y, Payton ME, Holley AG (2004) Bidirectional introgression between Pinus taeda and Pinus echinata: evidence from morphological and molecular data. Can J For Res 34: 2508-2516.
6. Cotton MH, Hicks RR Jr, Flake RH (1975) Morphological variability among loblolly and shortleaf pines of east Texas with reference to natural hybridization. Castanea 40: 309-319.
7. Dorman KW, Barber JC (1956) Time of flowering and seed ripening in southern pines. USDA Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Station Paper 72.
8. Doyle JJ, Doyle J (1988) Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12: 13-15.
9. Edwards MA, Hamrick JL (1995) Genetic variation in shortleaf pine, Pinus echinata Mill. (Pinaceae). Forest Gen 2: 21-28.
10. Edwards-Burke MA, Hamrick JL, Price RA (1997) Frequency and direction of hybridization in sympatric populations of Pinus taeda (Mill) and P. echinata (Pinaceae). Am J Bot 84: 879-886.
11. Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2003) Inference of population structure: extensions to linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164: 1567-1587.
12. Hare RC, Switzer GL (1969) Introgression with shortleaf pine may explain rust resistance in western loblolly pine. USDA Forest Service, Research Note SO-88. Southern Forest Experiment Station, New Orleans, p 2.
13. Hedrick PW (1999) Perspective: highly variable loci and their interpretation in evolution and conservation. Evolution 53: 313-318.
14. Hicks RR Jr (1973) Evaluation of morphological characters for use in identifying loblolly pine, shortleaf pine, and loblolly x shortleaf hybrids. Castanea 38: 182-189.
15. Huneycutt M, Askew G (1989) Electrophoretic identification of loblolly pine-shortleaf pine hybrids. Silvae Genet 38: 3-4.
16. Little EL (1971) Atlas of United States trees, volume 1. Conifers and important hardwoods. USDA Forest Service Miscellaneous publication no. 1146. Washington, D. C. 200 Maps.
17. Mergen F, Stairs GR, Snyder EB (1965) Natural and controlled loblolly x shortleaf pine hybrids in Mississippi. Forest Sci 11: 306-314.
18. Nelson CD, Josserand S, Echt CS, Koppelman J (2007) Loblolly pine SSR markers for shortleaf pine genetics. In: Kabrick JM, Dey DC, Gwaze D (eds) Shortleaf pine restoration and ecology in the Ozarks: proceedings of a symposium; November 7-9, 2006; Springfield, MO. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-P-15. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, pp 95-98.
19. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6: 288-295.
20. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945-959.
21. Raja RG, Tauer CG, Wittwer RF, Huang YH (1997) Isoenzyme variation and genetic structure in natural populations of shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata). Can J For Res 27: 740-749.
22. Schmidtling RC (2007) Genetic variation in the southern pines: evolution, migration, and adaptation following the Pleistocene. In: Kabrick JM, Dey DC, Gwaze D (eds) Shortleaf pine restoration and ecology in the Ozarks: proceedings of a symposium; 2006 November 7-9; Springfield, MO. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-P-15. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, pp 28-32.
23. Schmidtling RC, Carroll E, LaFarge T (1999) Allozyme diversity of selected and natural loblolly pine populations. Silvae Genet 48: 35-45.
24. Schreiner EJ (1937) Improvement of forest trees. 1937 Yearbook of Agriculture. USDA, Washington, pp 1242-1279.
25. Williams CG, LaDeau SL, Oren R, Katal GG (2006) Modeling dispersal distances: implications for transgenic Pinus taeda. Ecol Appl 16: 117-124.
26. Xu S, Tauer CG, Nelson CD (2008a) Natural hybridization within seed sources of shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata Mill.) and loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Tree Genet Genomes 4: 849-858.
27. Xu S, Tauer CG, Nelson CD (2008b) Genetic diversity within and among populations of shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata Mill.) and loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Tree Genetics and Genomes 4: 859-868.
28. Zobel BJ (1953) Are there natural loblolly-shortleaf pine hybrids? J Forest 51: 494-495.