Comparison of digital intraoral scanner reproducibility and image trueness considering repetitive experience

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 119, Issue 2, 2018, Pages 225-232

  Lim, Jung Hwa ^a   Park, Ji Man ^b   Kim, Minji ^a   Heo, Seong Joo ^b   Myung, Ji Yun ^a  

^a Ewha Womans University   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CAREER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL TRIAL; DENTAL ASSISTANT; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; MOUTH CAVITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SOFTWARE; STUDENT T TEST; TOOTH ARCH; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL ARCH; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 85021853392     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.05.002     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Andreiotelli, M., Kamposiora, P., Papavasiliou, G., Digital data management for CAD/CAM technology. An update of current systems. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 21 (2013), 9–15.
2. van Steenberghe, D., Glauser, R., Blomback, U., Andersson, M., Schutyser, F., Pettersson, A., et al. A computed tomographic scan-derived customized surgical template and fixed prosthesis for flapless surgery and immediate loading of implants in fully edentulous maxillae: a prospective multicenter study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 7:suppl 1 (2005), S111–S120.
3. Giménez, B., Özcan, M., Martínez-Rus, F., Pradíes, G., Accuracy of a digital impression system based on active triangulation technology with blue light for implants: effect of clinically relevant parameters. Implant Dent 24 (2015), 498–504.
4. Strub, J.R., Rekow, E.D., Witkowski, S., Computer-aided design and fabrication of dental restorations: current systems and future possibilities. J Am Dent Assoc 137 (2006), 1289–1296.
5. DeLong, R., Heinzen, M., Hodges, J.S., Ko, C.C., Douglas, W.H., Accuracy of a system for creating 3D computer models of dental arches. J Dent Res 82 (2003), 438–442.
6. Schoenbaum, T.R., Decoding CAD/CAM and digital impression units. Dent Today 29 (2010), 144–145.
7. Nedelcu, R.G., Persson, A.S., Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis. J Prosthet Dent 112 (2014), 1461–1471.
8. Kim, S.Y., Kim, M.J., Han, J.S., Yeo, I.S., Lim, Y.J., Kwon, H.B., Accuracy of dies captured by an intraoral digital impression system using parallel confocal imaging. Int J Prosthodont 26 (2013), 161–163.
9. Lee, J.J., Jeong, I.D., Park, J.Y., Jeon, J.H., Kim, J.H., Kim, W.C., Accuracy of single-abutment digital cast obtained using intraoral and cast scanners. J Prosthet Dent 117 (2017), 253–259.
10. Carbajal Mejía, J.B., Wakabayashi, K., Nakamura, T., Yatani, H., Influence of abutment tooth geometry on the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining dental impressions. J Prosthet Dent 118 (2017), 392–399.
11. Park, J.M., Comparative analysis on reproducibility among 5 intraoral scanners: sectional analysis according to restoration type and preparation outline form. J Adv Prosthodont 8 (2016), 354–362.
12. Seelbach, P., Brueckel, C., Wöstmann, B., Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow. Clin Oral Investig 17 (2013), 1759–1764.
13. Brawek, P.K., Wolfart, S., Endres, L., Kirsten, A., Reich, S., The clinical accuracy of single crowns exclusively fabricated by digitalworkflow–the comparison of two systems. Clin Oral Investig 17 (2013), 2119–2125.
14. Sakornwimon, N., Leevailoj, C., Clinical marginal fit of zirconia crowns and patients' preferences for impression techniques using intraoral digital scanner versus polyvinyl siloxane material. J Prosthet Dent 118 (2017), 386–391.
15. Ender, A., Mehl, A., Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions: an in-vitro study. Int J Comput Dent 14 (2011), 11–21.
16. van der Meer, W.J., Andriessen, F.S., Wismeijer, D., Ren, Y., Application of intra-oral dental scanners in the digital workflow of implantology. PLoS One, 7, 2012, e43312.
17. Flügge, T.V., Schlager, S., Nelson, K., Nahles, S., Metzger, M.C., Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 144 (2013), 471–478.
18. Ender, A., Mehl, A., Influence of scanning strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanning systems. Int J Comput Dent 16 (2013), 11–21.
19. Ender, A., Mehl, A., Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision. J Prosthet Dent 109 (2013), 121–128.
20. Patzelt, S.B., Emmanouilidi, A., Stampf, S., Strub, J.R., Att, W., Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners. Clin Oral Investig 18 (2014), 1687–1694.
21. Ender, A., Mehl, A., In-vitro evaluation of the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining full-arch dental impressions. Quintessence Int 46 (2015), 9–17.
22. Su, T.S., Sun, J., Comparison of repeatability between intraoral digital scanner and extraoral digital scanner: An in-vitro study. J Prosthodont Res 59 (2015), 236–242.
23. Anh, J.W., Park, J.M., Chun, Y.S., Kim, M., Kim, M., A comparison of the precision of three-dimensional images acquired by 2 digital intraoral scanners: effects of tooth irregularity and scanning direction. Korean J Orthod 46 (2016), 3–12.
24. Renne, W., Ludlow, M., Fryml, J., Schurch, Z., Mennito, A., Kessler, R., et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: An in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons. J Prosthet Dent 118 (2017), 36–42.
25. Ender, A., Attin, T., Mehl, A., In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods of obtaining complete-arch dental impressions. J Prosthet Dent 115 (2016), 313–320.
26. Ender, A., Zimmermann, M., Attin, T., Mehl, A., In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods for obtaining quadrant dental impressions. Clin Oral Investig 20 (2016), 1495–1504.
27. Atieh, M.A., Ritter, A.V., Ko, C.C., Duqum, I., Accuracy evaluation of intraoral optical impressions: A clinical study using a reference appliance. J Prosthet Dent 118 (2017), 400–405.
28. Birnbaum, N.S., Aaronson, H.B., Dental impressions using 3D digital scanners: virtual becomes reality. Compend Contin Educ Dent 29 (2008), 498–505.
29. Chambers, D., Learning curves: what do dental students learn from repeated practice of clinical procedures?. J Dent Educ 76 (2012), 291–302.
30. Sammon, J., Perry, A., Beaule, L., Kinkead, T., Clark, D., Hansen, M., Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: learning rate analysis as an objective measure of the acquisition of surgical skill. BJU Int 106 (2010), 855–860.
31. Feldman, L.S., Cao, J., Andalib, A., Fraser, S., Fried, G.M., A method to characterize the learning curve for performance of a fundamental laparoscopic simulator task: defining “learning plateau” and “learning rate.”. Surgery 146 (2009), 381–386.
32. Blavier, A., Gaudissart, Q., Cadiere, G.B., Nyssen, A.S., Comparison of learning curves and skill transfer between classical and robotic laparoscopy according to the viewing conditions: implications for training. Am J Surg 194 (2007), 115–121.
33. Yohannes, P., Rotariu, P., Pinto, P., Smith, A.D., Lee, B.R., Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic skills: is there a difference in the learning curve?. Urology 60 (2002), 39–45.
34. Prasad, S.M., Maniar, H.S., Soper, N.J., Damiano, R.J. Jr., Klingensmith, M.E., The effect of robotic assistance on learning curves for basic laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg 183 (2002), 702–707.
35. Gurusamy, K., Aggarwal, R., Palanivelu, L., Davidson, B.R., Systematic review of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of virtual reality training for laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 95 (2008), 1088–1097.
36. Spaun, G.O., Zheng, B., Martinec, D.V., Arnold, B.N., Swanstrom, L.L., A comparison of early learning curves for complex bimanual coordination with open, laparoscopic, and flexible endoscopic instrumentation. Surg Endosc 24 (2010), 2145–2155.
37. Kim, J., Park, J.M., Kim, M., Heo, S.J., Shin, I.H., Kim, M., Comparison of experience curves between two 3-dimensional intraoral scanners. J Prosthet Dent 116 (2016), 221–230.
38. Grünheid, T., McCarthy, S.D., Larson, B.E., Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 146 (2014), 673–682.
39. Yuzbasioglu, E., Kurt, H., Turunc, R., Bilir, H., Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients' perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes. BMC Oral Health, 14, 2014, 10.
40. Lee, S.J., Gallucci, G.O., Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res 24 (2013), 111–115.