Comparison of repeatability between intraoral digital scanner and extraoral digital scanner: An in-vitro study

Journal of Prosthodontic Research

Volumn 59, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 236-242

  Su, Ting shu ^a   Sun, Jian ^a  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (China)

Author keywords

Intraoral digital impression; Intraoral scanning; Precision; Repeatability

Indexed keywords

ABNORMALITIES; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DENTAL PROCEDURE; HUMAN; HYPODONTIA; IN VITRO STUDY; INCISOR; MAXILLA; REPRODUCIBILITY; SOFTWARE;

ANODONTIA; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MODELS; HUMANS; IN VITRO TECHNIQUES; INCISOR; MAXILLA; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84944175820     PISSN: 18831958     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpor.2015.06.002     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Mörmann W.H. The evolution of the CEREC system. J Am Dent Assoc 2006, 137(September (Suppl)):7S-13S.
2. Luthardt R., Weber A., Rudolph H., Schöne C., Quaas S., Walter M. Design and production of dental prosthetic restorations: basic research on dental CAD/CAM technology. Int J Comput Dent 2002, 5:165-176.
3. Rekow E.D. Dental CAD/CAM systems: a 20-year success story. J Am Dent Assoc 2006, 137(Suppl):5S-6S.
4. Logozzo S., Franceschini G., Kilpelä A., Caponi M., Governi L., Blois L. A comparative analysis of intraoral 3D digital scanners for restorative dentistry. Internet J Med Technol 2011, 5.
5. Stimmelmayr M., Güth J.F., Erdelt K., Edelhoff D., Beuer F. Digital evaluation of the reproducibility of implant scanbody fit-an in vitro study. Clin Oral Investig 2012, 16:851-856.
6. Huang C.C., Feng H.L. Analysis of the difference in the tissue surfaces between the old and new upper complete dentures. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2009, 44:232-235.
7. Sousa M.V., Vasconcelos E.C., Janson G., Garib D., Pinzan A. Accuracy and reproducibility of 3-dimensional digital model measurements. Am J Orthod Dentof Orthop 2012, 142:269-273.
8. Balakrishnama S., Wenzel K., Bergeron J., Ruest C., Reusch B., Kugel G. Dimensional repeatability from the LAVA COS 3D intra-oral scanning system. IADR/AADR/CADR 87th general session and exhibition 2009, 1-4.
9. Wostmann B., Dohle A., Rettberg S. Zur Frage der in vivo erreichbaren Abformgenauigkeit. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1994, 49:679-682.
10. da Costa J.B., Pelogia F., Hagedorn B., Ferracane J.L. Evaluation of different methods of optical impression making on the marginal gap of onlays created with CEREC 3D. Oper Dent 2010, 35:324-329.
11. Syrek A., Reich G., Ranftl D., Klein C., Cerny B., Brodesser J. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent 2010, 38:553-559.
12. Cardelli P., Scotti R., Monaco C. Clinical fitting of CAD/CAM zirconia single crowns generated from digital intraoral impressions based on active wavefront sampling. J Dent 2011, 2011.
13. DIN ISO 5725-1:1997-11. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results-Part 1: General principles and definitions (ISO 5725-1:1994).
14. Steinhauser-Andresen S., DetterbeckA.Funk C., Krumm M., Kasperl S., Holst A., et al. Pilot study on accuracy and dimensional stability of impression materials using industrial CT technology. J Orofac Orthop 2011, 72:111-124.
15. Mehl A., Ender A., Mormann W., Attin T. Accuracy testing of a new intraoral 3D camera. Int J Comput Dent 2009, 12:11-28.
16. Luthardt R.G., Loos R., Quaas S. Accuracy of intraoral data acquisition in comparison to the conventional impression. Int J Comput Dent 2005, 8:283-294.
17. Rohaly J (inventor). Three-channel camera systems with non-collinear apertures. United States Patent. 2006;7:372,642.
18. Pradíes G., Zarauz C., Valverde A., Ferreiroa A., Martínez-Rus F. Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions based on wavefront sampling technology. J Dent 2015, 43:201-208.
19. Brawek P.K., Wolfart S., Endres L., Kirsten A., Reich S. The clinical accuracy of single crowns exclusively fabricated by digital workflow-the comparison of two systems. Clin Oral Investig 2013, 17:2119-2125.
20. Güth J.-F., Keul C., Stimmelmayr M., Beuer F., Edelhoff D. Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing. Clin Oral Investig 2013, 17:1201-1208.
21. Ender A., Mehl A. Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions-an in-vitro study. Int J Comput Dent 2011, 14:11-21.
22. Almeida E., Silva J.S., Erdelt K., Edelhoff D., Araújo E., Stimmelmayr M., et al. Marginal and internal fit of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses based on digital and conventional impression techniques. Clin Oral Investig 2013, 29.