Influence of scanning strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanning systems;Einfluss von scanstrategien auf die genauigkeit von digitalen intraoralen scansystemen

International Journal of Computerized Dentistry

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 11-21

  Ender, Andreas ^a   Mehl, Albert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Accuracy; CAD CAM; Digital impression; Full arch dental impression

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DENTAL PROCEDURE; EQUIPMENT; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MAXILLA; METHODOLOGY; OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH ARCH;

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL ARCH; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MODELS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAXILLA; OPTICAL DEVICES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84879182149     PISSN: 14634201     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 2008;204:505-511
2. Delong R, Heinzen M, Hodges JS, Ko CC, Douglas WH. Accuracy of a system for creating 3D computer models of dental arches. J Dent Res 2003;82:438-442
3. Christensen GJ. Impressions are changing: deciding on conventional, digital or digital plus in-office milling. J Am Dent Assoc 2009;140:1301-1304
4. Del Corso M, Abà G, Vazquez L, Dargaud J, Dohan Ehrenfest DM. Optical three-dimensional scanning acquisition of the position of osseointegrated implants: an in vitro study to determine method accuracy and operational feasibility. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009;11:214-221
5. Fasbinder DJ. Clinical performance of chairside CAD/CAM restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137:22S-31S
6. Fasbinder DJ. Digital dentistry: innovation for restorative treatment. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2010;31 Spec No 4:2-11; quiz 12
7. Fickl S, Schneider D, Zuhr O, Hinze M, Ender A, Jung RE et al. Dimensional changes of the ridge contour after socket preservation and buccal overbuilding: an animal study. J Clin Periodontol 2009;36:442-448
8. Dalstra M, Melsen B. From alginate impressions to digital virtual models: accuracy and reproducibility. J Orthod 2009;36:36-41; discussion 14
9. Luthardt RG, Loos R, Quaas S. Accuracy of intraoral data acquisition in comparison to the conventional impression. Int J Comput Dent 2005;8:283-294
10. Mehl A, Ender A, Mörmann W, Attin T. Accuracy testing of a new intraoral 3D camera. Int J Comput Dent 2009;12: 11-28
11. Ziegler M. Digital impression taking with reproducibly high precision. Int J Comput Dent 2009;12:159-163
12. van der Meer WJ, Andriessen FS, Wismeijer D, Ren Y. Application of intra-oral dental scanners in the digital workflow of implantology. PLoS ONE 2012;7:e43312
13. Ender A, Mehl A. Accuracy of full arch dental impressions, a new highly accurate method of measuring trueness and precision. J Prosthet Dent 2013;109:121-128
14. Akbar JH, Petrie CS, Walker MP, Williams K, Eick JD. Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs. J Prosthodont 2006;15:155-163
15. Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D, Klein C, Cerny B, Brodesser J. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent 2010;38:553-559
16. Ender A, Mehl A. Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions-an in-vitro study. Int J Comput Dent 2011;14:11-21