Influence of abutment tooth geometry on the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining dental impressions

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 118, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 392-399

  Carbajal Mejía, Jeison B ^a   Wakabayashi, Kazumichi ^a   Nakamura, Takashi ^a   Yatani, Hirofumi ^a  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; POLYVINYL DERIVATIVE; SILOXANE; VINYL POLYSILOXANE;

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL ABUTMENT; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DENTAL PROCEDURE; HUMAN; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH CROWN;

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; CROWNS; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MODELS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; POLYVINYLS; SILOXANES;

EID: 85013041839     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.10.021     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Mörmann, W.H., The evolution of the CEREC system. J Am Dent Assoc 137:suppl (2006), 7S–13S.
2. Alghazzawi, T.F., Advancements in CAD/CAM technology: options for practical implementation. J Prosthodont Res 30 (2016), 72–84.
3. Yuzbasioglu, E., Kurt, H., Turunc, R., Bilir, H., Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients' perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes. BMC Oral Health, 14, 2014, 10.
4. Burhardt, L., Livas, C., Kerdijk, W., Van der Meer, W.J., Ren, Y., Treatment comfort, time perception, and preference for conventional and digital impression techniques: a comparative study in young patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 150 (2016), 261–267.
5. Luthardt, R.G., Loos, R., Quaas, S., Accuracy of intraoral data acquisition in comparison to the conventional impression. Int J Comput Dent 8 (2005), 283–294.
6. Su, T.S., Sun, J., Comparison of repeatability between intraoral digital scanner and extraoral digital scanner: an in-vitro study. J Prosthodont Res 59 (2015), 236–242.
7. Mehl, A., Ender, A., Mörmann, W., Attin, T., Accuracy testing of a new intraoral 3D camera. Int J Comput Dent 12 (2009), 11–28.
8. Hack, G.D., Patzelt, S.B., Evaluation of the accuracy of six intraoral scanning devices: an in-vitro investigation. ADA Professional Product Review 10 (2015), 1–5.
9. Nedelcu, R.G., Persson, A.S., Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis. J Prosthet Dent 112 (2014), 1461–1471.
10. Joda, T., Brägger, U., Digital vs. conventional implant prosthetic workflows: a cost/time analysis. Clin. Oral Impl Res 26 (2015), 1430–1435.
11. Abdel-Azim, T., Rogers, K., Elathamna, E., Zandinejad, A., Metz, M., Morton, D., Comparison of the marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM technology by using conventional impressions and two intraoral digital scanners. J Prosthet Dent, 2015, 554–559.
12. Ender, A., Mehl, A., Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision. J Prosthet Dent 109 (2013), 121–128.
13. Ting-Shu, S., Jian, S., Intraoral digital impression technique: a review. J Prosthodont 24 (2015), 313–321.
14. Logozzo, S., Zanetti, E.M., Franceschini, G., Kilpelä, A., Mäkynen, A., Recent advances in dental optics-Part I: 3D intraoral scanners for restorative dentistry. Opt Lasers Eng 54 (2014), 203–221.
15. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 5725-1:1994 Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results? Part 1: General principles and definitions. 1994, ISO, Geneva Available at: www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:5725:-1:ed-1:v1:en Accessed October 19, 2016.
16. Vandeweghe, S., Vervack, V., Vanhove, C., Dierens, M., Jimbo, R., De Bruyn, H., Accuracy of optical dental digitizers: an in vitro study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 35 (2015), 115–121.
17. Christensen, G.J., Will digital impressions eliminate the current problems with conventional impressions?. J Am Dent Assoc 139 (2008), 761–763.
18. Tapie, L., Lebon, N., Mawussi, B., Fron-Chabouis, H., Duret, F., Attal, J.P., Understanding dental CAD/CAM for restorations – accuracy from a mechanical engineering viewpoint. Int J Comput Dent 18 (2015), 343–367.
19. Gimenez, B., Ozcan, M., Martinez-Rus, F., Pradies, G., Accuracy of a digital impression system based on parallel confocal laser technology for implants with consideration of operator experience and implant angulation and depth. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 29 (2014), 853–862.
20. Song, Y.L., Li, J., Yin, L., Huang, T., Gao, P., The feature-based posterior crown design in a dental CAD/CAM system. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 31 (2007), 1058–1065.
21. Lebon, N., Tapie, L., Duret, F., Attal, J.P., Understanding dental CAD/CAM for restorations – dental milling machines from a mechanical engineering viewpoint. Part A: chairside milling machines. Int J Comput Dent 19 (2016), 45–62.
22. Christensen, G.J., Marginal fit of gold inlay castings. J Prosthet Dent 16 (1966), 297–305.
23. Björn, A.L., Björn, H., Grkovic, B., Marginal fit of restorations and its relation to periodontal bone level. II. Crowns. Odontol Rev 21 (1970), 337–346.
24. Mitchell, C.A., Pintado, M.R., Douglas, W.H., Nondestructive, in vitro quantification of crown margins. J Prosthet Dent 85 (2001), 575–584.
25. Kohorst, P., Brinkmann, H., Li, J., Borchers, L., Stiesch, M., Marginal accuracy of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses fabricated using different computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing systems. Eur J Oral Sci 117 (2009), 319–325.
26. McLean, J.W., von Fraunhofer, J.A., The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 131 (1971), 107–111.
27. Parsell, D.E., Anderson, B.C., Livingston, H.M., Rudd, J.I., Tankersley, J.D., Effect of camera angulation on adaptation of CAD/CAM restorations. J Esthet Dent 12 (2000), 78–84.
28. Chan, D.C., Chung, A.K., Haines, J., Yau, E.H., Kuo, C.C., The accuracy of optical scanning: influence of convergence and die preparation. Oper Dent 36 (2011), 486–491.
29. Jeon, J.H., Choi, B.Y., Kim, C.M., Kim, J.H., Kim, H.Y., Kim, W.C., Three-dimensional evaluation of the repeatability of scanned conventional impressions of prepared teeth generated with white- and blue-light scanners. J Prosthet Dent 114 (2015), 549–553.
30. The glossary of prosthodontic terms. J Prosthet Dent 94 (2005), 10–92.
31. Jørgensen, K.D., The relationship between retention and convergence angle in cemented veneer crowns. Acta Odontol Scand 13 (1955), 35–40.
32. Tiu, J., Al-Amleh, B., Waddell, J.N., Duncan, W.J., Clinical tooth preparations and associated measuring methods: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 113 (2015), 175–184.
33. Marghalani, T.Y., Frequency of undercuts and favorable path of insertion in abutments prepared for fixed dental prostheses by preclinical dental students. J Prosthet Dent 116 (2016), 564–569.
34. Rosenstiel, S.F., Land, M.F., Fujimoto, J., Contemporary fixed prosthodontics. 5th ed., 2016, Mosby, St. Louis, p. 184–208.
35. Cho, S.H., Schaefer, O., Thompson, G.A., Guentsch, A., Comparison of accuracy and reproducibility of casts made by digital and conventional methods. J Prosthet Dent 113 (2015), 310–315.
36. Schaefer, O., Schmidt, M., Goebel, R., Kuepper, H., Qualitative and quantitative three-dimensional accuracy of a single tooth captured by elastomeric impression materials: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 108 (2012), 165–172.