Accuracy of single-abutment digital cast obtained using intraoral and cast scanners

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 117, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 253-259

  Lee, Jae Jun ^a   Jeong, II Do ^a   Park, Jin Young ^a   Jeon, Jin Hun ^b   Kim, Ji Hwan ^a   Kim, Woong Chul ^a  

^a Korea University   (South Korea)

^b Kyungdong University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL ARTICLE; IN VITRO STUDY; KRUSKAL WALLIS TEST; MAXILLA; MODEL; TOOTH; VIDEORECORDING; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL ABUTMENT; DENTAL CASTING; DENTAL IMPRESSION; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL CASTING TECHNIQUE; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; IN VITRO TECHNIQUES;

EID: 84994479792     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.07.021     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. 1 Miyazaki, T., Hotta, Y., Kunii, J., Kuriyama, S., Tamaki, Y., A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J 28 (2009), 44–56.
2. 2 Luthardt, R.G., Sandkuhl, O., Herold, V., Walter, M.H., Accuracy of mechanical digitizing with a CAD/CAM system for fixed restorations. Int J Prosthodont 14 (2001), 146–151.
3. 3 Güth, J.F., Keul, C., Stimmelmayr, M., Beuer, F., Edelhoff, D., Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing. Clin Oral Investig 17 (2013), 1201–1208.
4. 4 Persson, A., Andersson, M., Oden, A., Sandborgh-Englund, G., A three-dimensional evaluation of a laser scanner and a touch-probe scanner. J Prosthet Dent 95 (2006), 194–200.
5. 5 González de Villaumbrosia, P., Martínez-Rus, F., García-Orejas, A., Salido, M.P., Pradíes, G., In vitro comparison of the accuracy (trueness and precision) of six extraoral dental scanners with different scanning technologies. J Prosthet Dent 116 (2016), 543–550.
6. 6 May, K.B., Russell, M.M., Razzoog, M.E., Lang, B.R., Precision of fit: the Procera AllCeram crown. J Prosthet Dent 80 (1998), 394–404.
7. 7 Jeon, J.H., Lee, K.T., Kim, H.Y., Kim, J.H., Kim, W.C., White light scanner-based repeatability of 3-dimensional digitizing of silicon rubber abutment teeth impressions. J Adv Prosthodont 5 (2013), 452–456.
8. 8 Jeon, J.H., Choi, B.Y., Kim, C.M., Kim, J.H., Kim, H.Y., Kim, W.C., Three-dimensional evaluation of the repeatability of scanned conventional impressions of prepared teeth generated with white-and blue-light scanners. J Prosthet Dent 114 (2015), 549–553.
9. 9 Christensen, G.J., The challenge to conventional impressions. J Am Dental Assoc 139 (2008), 347–349.
10. 10 Christensen, G.J., Will digital impressions eliminate the current problems with conventional impressions?. J Am Dent Assoc 139 (2008), 761–763.
11. 11 Al-Bakri, I., Hussey, D., Al-Omari, W., The dimensional accuracy of four impression techniques with the use of addition silicone impression materials. J Clin Dent 18 (2007), 29–33.
12. 12 Christensen, G.J., The state of fixed prosthodontic impressions: room for improvement. J Am Dent Assoc 136 (2005), 343–346.
13. 13 DeLong, R., Heinzen, M., Hodges, J., Ko, C.-C., Douglas, W., Accuracy of a system for creating 3D computer models of dental arches. J Dent Res 82 (2003), 438–442.
14. 14 Mandikos, M.N., Polyvinyl siloxane impression materials: an update on clinical use. Aust Dent J 43 (1998), 428–434.
15. 15 Ender, A., Mehl, A., In-vitro evaluation of the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining full-arch dental impressions. Quintessence Int 46 (2015), 9–17.
16. 16 Nedelcu, R.G., Persson, A.S., Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis. J Prosthet Dent 112 (2014), 1461–1471.
17. 17 Ender, A., Attin, T., Mehl, A., In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods of obtaining complete-arch dental impressions. J Prosthet Dent 115 (2016), 313–320.
18. 18 Jeong, I.D., Lee, J.J., Jeon, J.H., Kim, J.H., Kim, H.Y., Kim, W.C., Accuracy of complete-arch model using an intraoral video scanner: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 115 (2016), 755–759.
19. 19 Patzelt, S.B., Emmanouilidi, A., Stampf, S., Strub, J.R., Att, W., Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners. Clin Oral Investig 18 (2014), 1687–1694.
20. 20 Koch, G.K., Gallucci, G.O., Lee, S.J., Accuracy in the digital workflow: from data acquisition to the digitally milled cast. J Prosthet Dent 115 (2016), 749–754.
21. 21 Trifkovic, B., Budak, I., Todorovic, A., Vukelic, D., Lazic, V., Puskar, T., Comparative analysis on measuring performances of dental intraoral and extraoral optical 3D digitization systems. Measurement 47 (2014), 45–53.
22. 22 Flügge, T.V., Schlager, S., Nelson, K., Nahles, S., Metzger, M.C., Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 144 (2013), 471–478.
23. 23 Su, T.S., Sun, J., Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses made with either a conventional or digital impression. J Prosthet Dent 116 (2016), 362–367.
24. 24 Park, J.Y., Kim, H.Y., Kim, J.H., Kim, J.H., Kim, W.C., Comparison of prosthetic models produced by traditional and additive manufacturing methods. J Adv Prosthodont 7 (2015), 294–302.
25. 25 Meng, Z., Yao, X.S., Yao, H., Liang, Y., Liu, T., Li, Y., Wang, G., Lan, S., Measurement of the refractive index of human teeth by optical coherence tomography. J Biomed Optics 14 (2009), 034010–034014.
26. 26 International Organization for Standardization. ISO-5725-1. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results. Part 1: General principles and definitions. 1994, ISO, Geneva Available at: http://www.iso.org/iso/store.htm Accessed December 22, 2015.
27. 27 International Organization for Standardization. ISO-12836. Digitizing devices for CAD/CAM systems for indirect dental restorations - Test methods for assessing accuracy. 2012, ISO, Geneva Available at: http://www.iso.org/iso/store.htm Accessed December 22, 2015.