In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods for obtaining quadrant dental impressions

Clinical Oral Investigations

Volumn 20, Issue 7, 2016, Pages 1495-1504

  Ender, Andreas ^a   Zimmermann, Moritz ^a   Attin, Thomas ^a   Mehl, Albert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Accuracy; CAD CAM; Digital impression; Precision; Quadrant impression

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS;

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DENTAL PROCEDURE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; SOFTWARE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MODELS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84946780774     PISSN: 14326981     EISSN: 14363771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-015-1641-y     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Wostmann B, Rehmann P, Balkenhol M (2009) Accuracy of impressions obtained with dual-arch trays. Int J Prosthodont 22:158–160
2. Small BW (2012) Revisiting impressions using dual-arch trays. Gen Dent 60:379–381
3. de Lima LM, Borges GA, Junior LH, Spohr AM (2014) In vivo study of the accuracy of dual-arch impressions. Journal of International oral Health: JIOH 6:50–55
4. Reddy JM, Prashanti E, Kumar GV, Suresh Sajjan MC, Mathew X (2009) A comparative study of inter-abutment distance of dies made from full arch dual-arch impression trays with those made from full arch stock trays: an in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res Off Publ Indian Soc Dent Res 20:412–417. doi:10.4103/0970-9290.59437
5. Goldstein JH, Werrin SR (2007) InLab CEREC restorations from a dual-arch impression. Dent Today 26(62):64
6. Ceyhan JA, Johnson GH, Lepe X, Phillips KM (2003) A clinical study comparing the three-dimensional accuracy of a working die generated from two dual-arch trays and a complete-arch custom tray. J Prosthet Dent 90:228–234. doi:10.1016/S0022391303002373
7. Cayouette MJ, Burgess JO, Jones Jr RE, Yuan CH (2003) Three-dimensional analysis of dual-arch impression trays. Quintessence Int 34:189–198
8. Abrams SH (2002) Benefits of the dual-arch impression technique. Accurate impressions and fewer than 1 % remakes. Dent Today 21:56–59
9. Breeding L, Dixon D (2000) Accuracy of casts generated from dual-arch impressions. J Prosthet Dent 84:403–407. doi:10.1067/mpr.2000.110266
10. Cayouette M, Burgess J, Jones RJ, Yuan C (2003) Three-dimensional analysis of dual-arch impression trays. Quintessence Int 34:189–198
11. Larson T, Nielsen M, Brackett W (2002) The accuracy of dual-arch impressions: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 87:625–627
12. Mormann W (2006) The evolution of the CEREC system. J Am Dent Assoc 137(Suppl):7S–13S
13. Reich S, Peltz I, Wichmann M, Estafan D (2005) A comparative study of two CEREC software systems in evaluating manufacturing time and accuracy of restorations. Gen Dent 53:195–198
14. Mattiola A, Mormann W, Lutz F (1995) The computer-generated occlusion of cerec-2 inlays and onlays. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 105:1284–1290
15. Patzelt SB, Emmanouilidi A, Stampf S, Strub JR, Att W (2014) Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners. Clin Oral Investig 18:1687–1694. doi:10.1007/s00784-013-1132-y
16. Ender A, Mehl A (2014) In vitro evaluation of the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining full-arch dental impressions. Quintessence Int. doi:10.3290/j.qi.a32244
17. Ender A, Mehl A (2013) Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision. J Prosthet Dent 109:121–128. doi:10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60028-1
18. Patzelt SB, Lamprinos C, Stampf S, Att W (2014) The time efficiency of intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparative study. J Am Dent Assoc 145:542–551. doi:10.14219/jada.2014.23
19. Jaschouz S, Mehl A (2014) Reproducibility of habitual intercuspation in vivo. J Dent 42:210–218. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2013.09.010
20. Christensen G (2008) Will digital impressions eliminate the current problems with conventional impressions? J Am Dent Assoc 139:761–763
21. Chandran D, Jagger D, Jagger R, Barbour M (2010) Two- and three-dimensional accuracy of dental impression materials: effects of storage time and moisture contamination. Biomed Mater Eng 20:243–249. doi:10.3233/BME-2010-0638
22. Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D, Klein C, Cerny B, Brodesser J (2010) Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent 38:553–559. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2010.03.015
23. Luthardt R, Loos R, Quaas S (2005) Accuracy of intraoral data acquisition in comparison to the conventional impression. Int J Comput Dent 8:283–294
24. Ziegler M (2009) Digital impression taking with reproducibly high precision. Int J Comput Dent 12:159–163
25. Ender A, Mehl A (2014) Accuracy in dental medicine, a new way to measure trueness and precision. J Vis Exp JoVE. doi:10.3791/51374
26. Flügge TV, Schlager S, Nelson K, Nahles S, Metzger MC (2013) Precision of intraoral dental impression with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 144:471–478. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.04.017
27. Seelbach P, Brueckel C, Wostmann B (2013) Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow. Clin Oral Investig 17:1759–1764. doi:10.1007/s00784-012-0864-4
28. Silva JS A e, Erdelt K, Edelhoff D, Araujo E, Stimmelmayr M, Vieira LC, Guth JF (2014) Marginal and internal fit of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses based on digital and conventional impression techniques. Clin Oral Investig 18:515–523. doi:10.1007/s00784-013-0987-2
29. Keul C, Stawarczyk B, Erdelt KJ, Beuer F, Edelhoff D, Guth JF (2014) Fit of 4-unit FDPs made of zirconia and CoCr-alloy after chairside and labside digitalization–a laboratory study. Dent Mater 30:400–407. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2014.01.006
30. Ng J, Ruse D, Wyatt C (2014) A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods. J Prosthet Dent 112:555–560. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.12.002
31. Wettstein F, Sailer I, Roos M, Hammerle C (2008) Clinical study of the internal gaps of zirconia and metal frameworks for fixed partial dentures. Eur J Oral Sci 116:272–279. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00527.x
32. Brosky M, Pesun I, Lowder P, Delong R, Hodges J (2002) Laser digitization of casts to determine the effect of tray selection and cast formation technique on accuracy. J Prosthet Dent 87:204–209
33. Delong R, Heinzen M, Hodges J, Ko C, Douglas W (2003) Accuracy of a system for creating 3D computer models of dental arches. J Dent Res 82:438–442
34. Rudolph H, Luthardt R, Walter M (2007) Computer-aided analysis of the influence of digitizing and surfacing on the accuracy in dental CAD/CAM technology. Comput Biol Med 37:579–587
35. Mehl A, Ender A, Mormann W, Attin T (2009) Accuracy testing of a new intraoral 3D camera. Int J Comput Dent 12:11–28
36. Yuzbasioglu E, Kurt H, Turunc R, Bilir H (2014) Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients’ perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes. BMC Oral Health 14:10. doi:10.1186/1472-6831-14-10
37. Jedynakiewicz N, Martin N (2001) CEREC: science, research, and clinical application. Compend Contin Educ Dent 22:7–13
38. Arnetzl G (2006) Different ceramic technologies in a clinical long-term comparison. Book title, Quintessenz London
39. Reiss B, Walther W (2000) Clinical long-term results and 10-year Kaplan-Meier analysis of cerec restorations. Int J Comput Dent 3:9–23
40. Hoyos A, Soderholm K (2011) Influence of tray rigidity and impression technique on accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane impressions. Int J Prosthodont 24:49–54
41. Ceyhan J, Johnson G, Lepe X, Phillips K (2003) A clinical study comparing the three-dimensional accuracy of a working die generated from two dual-arch trays and a complete-arch custom tray. J Prosthet Dent 90:228–234. doi:10.1016/S0022391303002373
42. Rudolph H, Graf MR, Kuhn K, Rupf-Kohler S, Eirich A, Edelmann C, Quaas S, Luthardt RG (2015) Performance of dental impression materials: benchmarking of materials and techniques by three-dimensional analysis. Dent Mater J. doi:10.4012/dmj.2014-197
43. Ender A, Mehl A (2013) Influence of scanning strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanning systems. Int J Comput Dent 16:11–21
44. Kim SY et al. (2013) Accuracy of dies captured by an intraoral digital impression system using parallel confocal imaging. Int J Prosthodont 26:161–163
45. Ting-Shu S, Jian S (2014) Intraoral digital impression technique: a review. J Prosthodont. doi:10.1111/jopr.12218