Comparison of experience curves between two 3-dimensional intraoral scanners

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 116, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 221-230

  Kim, Jisun ^a   Park, Ji Man ^b   Kim, Minji ^a   Heo, Seong Joo ^b   Shin, Im Hee ^c   Kim, Miae ^a  

^a Ewha Womans University   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^c Catholic University of Daegu   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CASE REPORT; DENTAL ASSISTANT; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; HUMAN; LEARNING; MODEL; MOUTH CAVITY; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL HYGIENIST; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DENTAL PROCEDURE; DEVICES; IMAGE PROCESSING; LEARNING CURVE;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL HYGIENISTS; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MODELS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LEARNING CURVE; TOMOGRAPHY SCANNERS, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84962745918     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.018     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. 1 Syrek, A., Reich, G., Ranftl, D., Klein, C., Cerny, B., Brodesser, J., Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent 38 (2010), 553–559.
2. 2 Hajeer, M.Y., Millett, D.T., Ayoub, A.F., Siebert, J.P., Applications of 3D imaging in orthodontics: part I. J Orthod 31 (2004), 62–70.
3. 3 Lee, S.J., Betensky, R.A., Gianneschi, G.E., Gallucci, G.O., Accuracy of digital versus conventional implant impressions. Clin Oral Implants Res 26 (2015), 715–719.
4. 4 Hajeer, M.Y., Millett, D.T., Ayoub, A.F., Siebert, J.P., Applications of 3D imaging in orthodontics: part II. J Orthod 31 (2004), 154–162.
5. 5 Anh, J.W., Park, J.M., Chun, Y.S., Kim, M.A., Kim, M.J., A comparison on the precision of three-dimensional images acquired by two different digital intraoral scanners: effects of tooth irregularity and scanning direction. Korean J Orthod 46 (2016), 3–12.
6. 6 Ender, A., Mehl, A., Influence of scanning strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanning systems. Int J Comput Dent 16 (2013), 11–21.
7. 7 Benic, G.I., Elmasry, M., Hammerle, C.H., Novel digital imaging techniques to assess the outcome in oral rehabilitation with dental implants: a narrative review. Clin Oral Implants Res 26 Suppl 11 (2015), 86–96.
8. 8 Bird, D.L., Robinson, D.S., Modern dental assisting. 8th ed., 2005, Elsevier, London, 750–770.
9. 9 Birnbaum, N.S., Aaronson, H.B., Dental impressions using 3D digital scanners: virtual becomes reality. Compend Contin Educ Dent, 29, 2008, 494 6, 8–505.
10. 10 van Noort, R., The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater 28 (2012), 3–12.
11. 11 Londono, J., Abreu, A., Baker, P.S., Furness, A.R., Fabrication of a definitive obturator from a 3D cast with a chairside digital scanner for a patient with severe gag reflex: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 114 (2015), 735–738.
12. 12 Mistry, G.S., Borse, A., Shetty, O.K., Tabassum, R., Digital impression system—virtually becoming a reality. J Adv Med Dent Scie 2 (2014), 56–63.
13. 13 Patzelt, S.B., Lamprinos, C., Stampf, S., Att, W., The time efficiency of intraoral scanners: An in vitro comparative study. J Am Dent Assoc 145 (2014), 542–551.
14. 14 Reich, S., Vollborn, T., Mehl, A., Zimmermann, M., Intraoral optical impression systems–an overview. Int J Comput Dent 16 (2013), 143–162.
15. 15 Gimenez, B., Ozcan, M., Martinez-Rus, F., Pradies, G., Accuracy of a digital impression system based on parallel confocal laser technology for implants with consideration of operator experience and implant angulation and depth. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 29 (2014), 853–862.
16. 16 Chance, P., Learning and behavior. 7th ed., 2013, Cengage Learning, Boston, 34–55.
17. 17 Schunk, D.H., Learning theories. 6th ed., 2012, Pearson Education, Boston, 38–40.
18. 18 Schmidt, R.A., Lee, T.D., Motor control and learning: a behavioral emphasis. 5th ed., 2011, Human Kinetics, Champaign IL, 237.
19. 19 Sammon, J., Perry, A., Beaule, L., Kinkead, T., Clark, D., Hansen, M., Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: learning rate analysis as an objective measure of the acquisition of surgical skill. BJU Int 106 (2010), 855–860.
20. 20 Blavier, A., Gaudissart, Q., Cadiere, G.B., Nyssen, A.S., Comparison of learning curves and skill transfer between classical and robotic laparoscopy according to the viewing conditions: implications for training. Am J Surg 194 (2007), 115–121.
21. 21 Yohannes, P., Rotariu, P., Pinto, P., Smith, A.D., Lee, B.R., Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic skills: is there a difference in the learning curve?. Urology 60 (2002), 39–45.
22. 22 Feldman, L.S., Cao, J., Andalib, A., Fraser, S., Fried, G.M., A method to characterize the learning curve for performance of a fundamental laparoscopic simulator task: defining “learning plateau” and “learning rate”. Surgery 146 (2009), 381–386.
23. 23 Prasad, S.M., Maniar, H.S., Soper, N.J., Damiano, R.J. Jr., Klingensmith, M.E., The effect of robotic assistance on learning curves for basic laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg 183 (2002), 702–707.
24. 24 Lin, W.S., Harris, B.T., Morton, D., The use of a scannable impression coping and digital impression technique to fabricate a customized anatomic abutment and zirconia restoration in the esthetic zone. J Prosthet Dent 109 (2013), 187–191.
25. 25 Andriessen, F.S., Rijkens, D.R., van der Meer, W.J., Wismeijer, D.W., Applicability and accuracy of an intraoral scanner for scanning multiple implants in edentulous mandibles: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 111 (2014), 186–194.
26. 26 Lee, S.J., Gallucci, G.O., Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res 24 (2013), 111–115.
27. 27 Yuzbasioglu, E., Kurt, H., Turunc, R., Bilir, H., Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients’ perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes. BMC Oral Health, 14, 2014, 10.
28. 28 Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.G., Buchner, A., G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 39 (2007), 175–191.
29. 29 Tsafrir, Z., Korianski, J., Almog, B., Many, A., Wiesel, O., Levin, I., Effects of fatigue on residents’ performance in laparoscopy. J Am Coll Surg 221 (2015), 564–570.
30. 30 Kim, W., Kim, K., Correct methods for using alginate impression materials. J Korean Dent Assoc 43 (2005), 576–581.
31. 31 Sakaguchi, R.L., Powers, J.M., Craig's restorative dental materials. 13th ed., 2012, Elsevier Mosby, Philadelphia, 283–291.