Tale of two science teachers' formative assessment practices in a similar school environment

Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2016, Pages

  Sathasivam, Renuka V ^a   Daniel, Esther G S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Environment; Formative assessment; Primary school; Science teacher

Indexed keywords

EID: 85020846590     PISSN: 16094913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Baird, J. (2010). Beliefs and practice in teacher assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(1), 1-5.
2. Bell, B. & Cowie, B. (2001). Formative Assessment and Science Education. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
3. Berry, R. (2011). Assessment trends in Hong Kong: seeking to establish formative assessment in an examination culture. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practices. 18(2), 199-211.
4. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B. & Wiliam, D. (2004). Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(1), 8-21.
5. Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7-74.
6. Blanchand, J. (2008). Learning awareness: constructing formative assessment in the classroom, in the school and across schools. The Curriculum Journal, 19(3), 137-150.
7. Blatchford, P., Bassett, P. & Brown, P. (2011). Examining the effect of class size on classroom engagement and teacher-pupil interaction: Differences in relation to pupil prior attainment and primary vs. secondary schools. Learning and Instruction, 21(6), 715-730.
8. Bloxham, S. & Price, M. (2015). External examining: Fit for purpose? Studies in Higher Education, 40(2), 195-211.
9. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1995). Developmental ecology through space and time: A future perspective. In P. Moen & G.H. Elder, Jr., (Eds.), Examining lives in context: Perspectives on the ecology of human development (pp. 619-647). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
10. Bronfenbrenner U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 37, 513-531.
11. Brown, T. L. G., Kennedy, K., Fok, K., Chan, J. & Yu, M. (2009). Assessment for student improvement: Understanding Hong Kong Teachers' Conceptions and Practices of Assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practices, 16(3), 347-363.
12. Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 509-535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Clark, I. (2015). Formative assessment: translating high-level curriculum principles into classroom practices, Curriculum Journal, 26(1), 91-114.
14. Cizek, G. (2010). An introduction to formative assessment: History, characteristics, and challenges. In H. Andrade & G. Cizek (eds.), Handbook of formative assessment, (pp. 3-17). New York, NY: Routledge.
15. Forte, A.M. & Flores, M.A. (2013). Teacher collaboration and professional development in the workplace: a study of Portuguese teachers. European Journal of Teacher Education, 37(1), 91-105.
16. Hattie, J. & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
17. Glaser, B.G. & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York, NY: Aldine De Gruyter.
18. Martin, M.O. & Mullis, I.V.S. (Eds.). (2013).TIMSS and PIRLS 2011: Relationships Among Reading, Mathematics, and Science Achievement at the Fourth Grade-Implications for Early Learning. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
19. McMillan, J.H. & Hearn, J. (2008). Student self-assessment: The key to stronger student motivation and higher achievement. Educational Horizons, 87(1), 40-49.
20. Miller, A. & Cunningham, K. (2011). Classroom Environment. Retrieved from: http://www.education.com/reference/article/classroom-environment/
21. Ministry of Education, Malaysia. (2013). Malaysia Education Blue-print 2013: Preliminary Report 2013-2025. Retrieved December 10, 2013, from http://www.moe.gov.my/en/pelan-pembangunan-pendidikan-malaysia-2013-2025
22. Marshall, B. & Drummond, M.J. (2006). How teachers engage with Assessment for Learning: lessons from the classroom. Research Papers in Education, 21(2), 133-149.
23. Nair, G.K.S., Setia, P., Nor Zaitolakma Abdul Samad, Raja Nurul Binti Raja Zahri, Azyanne Luqman, Thenmolli Vadeveloo & Haslina Che Ngah (2014). Teachers' knowledge and issues in the implementation of school-based assessment: A case of schools in Terengganu. Asian Social Science, 10(3), 186-194.
24. Pecek, M., Zuljan, M.V., Cuk, I. & Lesar, I. (2008). Should assessment reflect only pupils' knowledge? Educational Studies, 34(2), 73-82.
25. Printy, S.M. (2008). Leadership for teacher learning: A community of practice. Perspective Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(2), 187-226.
26. Rivkin, S.G., Hanushek, E. A. & Kain, J. K. (2005). Teachers, schools and academic achievement, Econometrica, 73(2), 417-458.
27. Robinson, J., Myran, S., Strauss, R. & Reed, E. (2014). The impact of an alternative professional development model on teacher practices in formative assessment and student learning. Teacher Development, 18(2), 141-162.
28. Sach, E. (2012). Teachers and testing: An investigation into teachers' perception of formative assessment. Educational Studies, 38(3), 261-276.
29. Schneider, C. & Randel, B. (2010). Research on characteristics of effective professional development programs for enhancing educators skills in formative assessment. In H. Andrade & G. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment. (pp. 251-276). New York, NY: Routledge.
30. Smith, K. (2011). Professional development of teachers-A prerequisite for AfL to be successfully implemented in the classroom. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 55-61.
31. Smith, K. & Engelsen, K, S. (2012). Developing an assessment for learning (AfL) culture in school: the voice of the principals. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 16(1), 106-125.
32. Spiller, D. (2012). Assessment matters: Self-assessment and peer-assessment. Retrieve from: http://www.waikato.ac.nz/tdu/pdf/booklets/9_SelfPeerAssessment.pdf
33. Stein, M. K. & Nelson, B. S. (2003). Leadership content knowledge. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(4), 423-448.
34. Stiggins, R. J. & Chappuis, J. (2006). What a difference a word makes. Journal of StaffDevelopment, 27(1), 10-14.
35. Stiggins, R. J. & Dufour, R. (2009). Maximizing the power of formative assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(9), 640-644.
36. Swaffield, S. (2011). Getting to the heart of authentic Assessment for Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(4), 433-449.
37. Tan, K. & Leong, W.S. (2014). What (more) can, and should, assessment do for learning? Observations from successful learning context in Singapore. Curriculum Journal, 25(4), 593-619.
38. Wiliam, D. & Thompson, M. (2007). Integrating assessment with instruction: What will it take to make it work? In C.A. Dwyer (Ed.), The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning (p. 53-82). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. Yin, Y., Tomita, M. K. & Shavelson, R. J. (2014). Using formal embedded formative assessment aligned with learning progressions to promote conceptual change in science. International Journal of Science Education, 36(4), 531-552.