Examining the effect of class size on classroom engagement and teacher-pupil interaction: Differences in relation to pupil prior attainment and primary vs. secondary schools

Learning and Instruction

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 715-730

  Blatchford, Peter ^a   Bassett, Paul ^a   Brown, Penelope ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Class size; Classroom engagement; Classroom observations; Classroom processes; Teacher pupil interaction

Indexed keywords

EID: 80051804861     PISSN: 09594752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Achilles C.A. Let's put kids first, finally: Getting class size right 1999, Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks, California.
2. Anderson L.W. Why should reduced class size lead to increased student achievement?. How small classes help teachers do their best 2000, 3-24. Temple University Center for Research in Human Development, Philadelphia. M.C. Wang, J.D. Finn (Eds.).
3. Bennett N. Class size in primary schools: Perceptions of head teachers, chairs of governors, teachers and parents. British Educational Research Journal 1996, 22(1):33-55.
4. Betts J.R., Shkolnik J.L. The behavioral effects of variations in class size: the case of math teachers. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 1999, 21(2):193-213.
5. Biddle B.J., Berliner D.C. What research says about small classes and their effects. In Pursuit of better schools: What research says 2002, Part of series, Downloadable from, http://edpolicyreports.org. http://www.WestEd.org/policyperspectivesor.
6. Blatchford P. The class size debate: Is small better? 2003, Open University Press, Maidenhead, U.K. and Philadelphia, U.S.A.
7. Blatchford P. A systematic observational study of teachers' and pupils' behaviour in large and small classes. Learning and Instruction 2003, 13(6):569-595.
8. Blatchford P., Goldstein H., Mortimore P. Research on class size effects: a critique of methods and a way forward. International Journal of Educational Research 1998, 22:691-710.
9. Blatchford P., Baines E., Kutnick P., Martin C. Classroom contexts: connections between class size and within class grouping. British Journal of Educational Psychology 2001, 71(2):283-302.
10. Blatchford P., Baines E., Rubie-Davies C., Bassett P., Chowne A. The effect of a new approach to group-work on pupil-pupil and teacher-pupil interaction. Journal of Educational Psychology 2006, 98:750-765.
11. Blatchford P., Bassett P., Brown P. Teachers' and pupils' behaviour in large and small classes: a systematic observation study of pupils aged 10/11 years. Journal of Educational Psychology 2005, 97(3):454-467.
12. Blatchford P., Bassett P., Brown P., Martin C., Russell A., Webster R. The deployment and impact of support staff (DISS) project. Research brief 148 2009, Department for Children, Schools and Families (DCSF), Available from. http://www.schoolsupportstaff.net.
13. Blatchford P., Bassett P., Goldstein H., Martin C. Are class size differences related to pupils' educational progress and classroom processes? Finding from the Institute of Education Class Size Study of children aged 5-7 Years. British Educational Research Journal 2003, 29(5):709-730. Special Issue 'In Praise of Educational Research', Guest Editors: S. Gorrard, C. Taylor & K. Roberts.
14. Blatchford P., Kutnick P., Baines E., Galton M. Toward a social pedagogy of classroom group work. Special Edition of International Journal of educational research 2003, Vol. 39:153-172. P. Blatchford, P. Kutnick (Eds.).
15. Blatchford P., Lai K.C. Class size: arguments and evidence. International encyclopedia of education 2010, Elsevier. 3rd edition. B. McGraw, E. Baker, P.P. Peterson (Eds.).
16. Blatchford P., Moriarty V., Edmonds S., Martin C. Relationships between class size and teaching: a multi-method analysis of English infant schools. AmericanEducational Research Journal 2002, 39(1):101-132.
17. Blatchford P., Mortimore P. The issue of class size in schools: what can we learn from research?. Oxford Review of Education 1994, 20(4):411-428.
18. Blatchford P., Russell A., Brown P. Teaching in large and small classes. International handbook of research on teachers and teaching 2009, 779-790. Springer, New York, (ISBN: 978-0-387-73317-3). L.J. Saha, A.G. Dworkin (Eds.).
19. Bourke S. How smaller is better: some relationships between class size, teaching practices, and student achievement. American Educational Research Journal 1986, 23(4):558-571.
20. Bronfenbrenner U. The Ecology of human development 1979, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
21. Bruhwiler C., Blatchford P. Effects of class size and adaptive teaching competency on classroom processes and academic outcome. Learning and Instruction 2011, 21:95-108.
22. Cooper H.M. Does reducing student-to-teacher ratios affect achievement?. Educational Psychologist 1989, 24(1):79-98.
23. Creemers B. The effective classroom 1994, Cassell, London.
24. Croll P. Systematic classroom observation 1986, Falmer, London.
25. Delamont S., Hamilton D. Revisiting classroom research: a continuing cautionary tale. Controversies in classroom research 1986, 25-43. Open University Press, Milton Keynes, England. M. Hammersley (Ed.).
26. Dunkin M.J., Biddle B. The study of teaching 1974, Holt, Reinhart and Winston, New York.
27. Ehrenberg R.G., Brewer D.J., Gamoran A., Willms J.D. Class size and student achievement. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 2001, 2(1):1-30.
28. Evertson C.M., Randolph C.H. Teaching practices and class size: a new look at an old issue. Peabody Journal of Education 1989, 67(1):85-105.
29. Finn J.D., Achilles C.M. Tennessee's class size study: findings, implications, misconceptions. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 1999, 21(2):97-109.
30. Finn J.D., Pannozzo G.M., Achilles C.M. The "why's" of class size: student behavior in small classes. Review of Educational Research 2003, 73(3):321-368.
31. Galton M. Class size: a critical comment on the research. International Journal of Educational Research 1998, 29:809-818.
32. Glass G., Cahen L., Smith M.L., Filby N. School class size 1982, Sage, Beverley Hills, C.A.
33. Goldstein H. Multilevel statistical models 1995, Hodder Arnold, London.
34. Goldstein H., Rasbash J., Plewis I., Draper D., Browne W., Yang M., et al. A user's guide to MLwiN 1998, Multilevel Models Project, Institute of Education, University of London, London.
35. Graue E., Rauscher E., Sherfinski M. Using multiple data sources to understand the synergy of class size reduction & classroom practice in Wisconsin 2008, Paper to American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New York.
36. Grissmer D. Class size effects: assessing the evidence, its policy implications, and future research agendas. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 1999, 21(2):231-248.
37. Hanushek E.A. Some findings from an independent investigation of the Tennessee STAR experiment and from other investigations of class size effects. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 1999, 21(2):143-163.
38. Hattie J. The paradox of reducing class size and improving learning outcomes. International Journal of Educational Research 2005, 43:387-425.
39. Konstantopoulos S. Do small classes reduce the achievement gap between low and high achievers? Evidence from Project STAR. The Elementary School Journal 2008, 108(4):275-291.
40. Kounin J.S., Gump P.V. Signal systems of lesson settings and the task-related behavior of pre-school children. Journal of Educational Psychology 1974, 66(4):554-562.
41. McIntyre D., Macleod G. The characteristics and uses of systematic observation. Controversies in classroom research 1986, Open University Press, Milton Keynes, England. M. Hammersley (Ed.).
42. Mitchell D.E., Beach S.A., Badarak G. Modeling the relationship between achievement and class size: a re-analysis of the Tennesse Project STAR data. Peabody Journal of Education 1989, 67(1):34-74.
43. Molnar A., Smith P., Zahorik J., Palmer A., Halbach A., Ehrle K. Evaluating the SAGE program: a pilot program in targeted pupil-teacher reduction in Wisconsin. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 1999, 21(2):165-177.
44. Does class size in first grade relate to children's academic and social performance or observed classroom processes. Developmental Psychology 2004, 5:651-664. NICHD Early Child Care Research Network.
45. Pate-Bain H., Achilles C.M., Boyd-Zaharias J., McKenna B. Class size makes a difference. Phi Delta Kappan 1992, 74(3):253-256.
46. Paterson L., Goldstein H. New statistical methods for analyzing social structures: an introduction to multilevel models. British Educational Research Journal 1991, 17(4):387-393.
47. Prais S.J. Class size and learning: the Tennessee experiment - what follows?. Oxford Review of Education 1996, 22:399-414.
48. Shapson S.M., Wright E.N., Eason G., Fitzgerald J. An experimental study of the effects of class size. American Educational Research Journal 1980, 17:144-152.
49. Slavin R.E. Class size and student achievement: small effects of small classes. Educational Psychologist 1989, 24(1):99-110.
50. Wilson V. Does small really make a difference? An update. A review of the literature on the effects of class size on teaching practice and pupils' behaviour and attainment 2006, Scottish Council for Research in Education (SCRE) Centre: University of Glasgow.
51. Yodder P., Symons F. Observational measurement of behaviour 2010, Springer, New York.