Swimming against the tide: Gender bias in the physics classroom

Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 15-36

  Graves, Amy L ^a   Hoshino Browne, Etsuko ^b   Lui, Kristine P H ^c  

^a SWARTHMORE COLLEGE   (United States)

^b NEUMANN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Montgomery College   (United States)

Author keywords

Gender and physics; Gender and teaching evaluations; Implicit gender bias

Indexed keywords

EID: 85019837143     PISSN: 10728325     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2017013584     Document Type: Article

References (120)

1. Aleamoni, L.M., Student rating myths versus research facts from 1924 to 1998, J. Pers. Eval. Educ., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 153-166, 1999.
2. American Institute of Physics (AIP), 4th IUPAP International Conference on Women in Physics, Am. Inst. Phys. Conf Proc., vol. 1517, pp. 69-168, 2013.
3. American Physical Society (APS), Gender Equity: Strengthening the Physics Enterprise in Universities and National Laboratories, College Park, MD: American Physical Society, 2007.
4. Anderson, K.J., and Smith, G., Students’ preconceptions of professors: Benefits and barriers according to ethnicity andgender, Hispanic J. Behav. Sci., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 184-201, 2005.
5. Arbuckle, J., and Williams, B.D., Students’ perceptions of expressiveness: Age and gender effects on teacher evaluations, SexRoles, vol. 49, no. 9/10, pp. 507-516, 2003.
6. Basow, S.A., Student evaluations of college professors: When gender matters, J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 656-665, 1995.
7. Basow, S.A., Student evaluations: The role of gender bias and teaching style, in Collins, L.H., Chrisler, J.C., and Quina, K., eds., Career Strategies for Women in Academe: Arming Athena, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 135-156, 1998.
8. Basow, S.A., Gender and STEM Course Evaluations: Teaching While Female, Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh University, 2011.
9. Basow, S.A., Codos, S., and Martin, J.L., The Effects of Professors’ Race and Gender on Student Evaluations and Performance, Coll. Stud. J., vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 352-363, 2013.
10. Basow, S.A., and Martin, J.L., Bias in student evaluations, in Kite, M.E., ed., Effective Evaluation of Teaching: A Guide for Faculty and Administrators, Washington, DC: Society for the Teaching of Psychology, 2013.
11. Basow, S.A., and Silberg, N.T., Student evaluations of college professors: Are female and male professors rated differently?, J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 308-314, 1987.
12. Bavishi, A., Madera, J.M., and Hebl, M.R., The effect of professor ethnicity and gender on student evaluations: Judged before met, J. Divers. High. Educ., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 245-256, 2010.
13. Bennett, S.K., Student perceptions of and expectations for male and female instructors: Evidence relating to the question of gender bias in teaching evaluation, J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 170-179, 1982.
14. Benton, S.L., and Cashin, W.E., Student ratings of instruction in college and university courses, in Paulsen, M.B., ed., Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, vol. 29, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Science, pp. 279-326, 2014.
15. Berkeley Center for Teaching and Learning, Course Evaluations Question Bank: Suggested Questions and Categories for Course Evaluations, Berkeley, CA: University of California Regents, 2015.
16. Biemat, M., Fuegen, K., and Kobrynowicz, D., Shifting standards and the inference of incompetence: Effects of formal and informal evaluation tools, Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 855-868, 2010.
17. Biemat, M., and Kobrynowicz, D., Gender and race based standards of competence: Lower minimum stan-dards but higher ability standards for devalued groups, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 544-557, 1997.
18. Blaha, C., Bug, A., Cox, A., Fritz, L., and Whitten, B., Why Does Mentoring End?, in Karukstis, K.K., Gourley, B.L., Rossi, M., and Wright, L.L., Eds., Mentoring Strategies to Facilitate the Advancement of Women Faculty, Washington, DC: American Chemical Society, pp. 107-122, 2011.
19. Blake-Beard, S., Bayne, M.L., Crosby, F. J., and Muller, C.B., Matching by race and gender in mentoring relationships: Keeping our eyes on the prize, J. Soc. Issues, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 622-643, 2011.
20. Braga, M., Paccagnella, M., and Pellizzari, M., Evaluating students’ evaluations of professors, Bank of Itali Temi di Discussione (Working Paper) No. 825, 2011.
21. Brescoll, V.L., Dawson, E., and Uhlmann, E.L., Hard won and easily lost: The fragile status of leaders in gender-stereotype-incongruent occupations, Psychol. Sci., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 1640-1642, 2010.
22. Carlone, H.B., and Johnson, A., Understanding the science experiences of women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens, J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 44, no.8, pp. 1187-1218, 2007.
23. Cames, M., Devine, PG, Baier Manwell, L., Byars-Winston, A, Fine, E., Ford, C.E., Forscher, P, Isaac, C., Kaatz, A., Magua, W., Palta, M., and Sheridan, J., The effect of an intervention to break the gender bias habit for faculty at one institution: A cluster randomized, controlled trial, Acad. Med., vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 221-230, 2015.
24. Carpenter, S.K., Wilford, M.M., Komell, N, and Mullaney, K.M., Appearances can be deceiving: Instructor fluency increases perceptions of learning without increasing actual learning, Psychon. B. Rev., vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 1350-1356, 2013.
25. Carrell, S.E., Page, M.E., and West, J.E., Sex and science: How professor gender perpetuates the gender gap, Nat. Bur. Econ. Res., 2009.
26. Ceci, S.J., and Williams, W.M., Understanding current causes of women’s underrepresentation in science, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., vol. 108, no. 8, pp. 3157-3162, 2011.
27. Chambers, D.W., Stereotypic images of the scientist: The draw-a-scientist test, Sci. Educ., vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 255-265, 1983.
28. Cheryan, S., Siy, J.O., Vichayapai, M., Drury, B.J., and Kim, S., Do female and male role models who embody STEM stereotypes hinder women’s anticipated success in STEM?, Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci., vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 656-664, 2011.
29. Committee on Women in Science, Engineering, and Medicine (CWSEM), Women in Science and Engineering Statistics, Washington, DC: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2014.
30. Cunningham, B., Blaha, C., Cox, A., and Whitten, B., Resonant phenomena: Mutual mentoring to combat isolation in physics, Proposal funded by NSF ADVANCE Plan D program, 2015-2020, 2015.
31. Danielson, C., The Framework for Teaching Evaluation Instrument, Princeton, NJ: The Danielson Group, 2013.
32. Davison, H.K., and Burke, M.J., Sex discrimination in simulated employment contexts: A meta-analytic investigation, J. Vocat. Behav, vol. 56, no.2, pp. 225-248, 2000.
33. Devine, P.G., Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 56, no. 1, pp.5-18, 1989.
34. Devine, PG, Forscher, P.S., Austin, A.J., and Cox, W.T.L., Long-term reduction in implicit race bias: A prejudice habit-breaking intervention, J. Exp. Soc. Psychol., vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1267-1278, 2012.
35. Downing, R.A., Crosby, F.J., and Blake-Beard, S., The perceived importance of developmental relationships on women undergraduates’ pursuit of science, Psychol. Women Quart., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 419-426, 2005.
36. Drury, B.J., Siy, J.O., and Cheryan, S., When do female role models benefit women? The importance of differentiating recruitment from retentionin STEM, Psychol. Inq, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 265-269, 2011.
37. Duguid, M.M., and Thomas-Hunt, M.C., Condoning stereotyping? How awareness of stereotyping prevalence impacts expression of stereotypes, J. Appl. Psychol., vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 343-359, 2015.
38. Eagly, A.H., and Karau, S.J., Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders, Psychol. Rev., vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 573-598, 2002.
39. Fazio, R.H., Jackson, J.R., Dunton, B.C., and Williams, C.J., Variability in automatic activation as an unob-trusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline?, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 1013-1027, 1995.
40. Gallagher, A., and Trower, C.A., The Demand for Diversity, Chron. High. Educ., 2009.
41. Georgi, H., Women and the Future of Physics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, 2004.
42. Ginther, D.K., The economics of gender differences in employment outcomes in academia, in National Academy of Sciences (US), National Academy of Engineering (US), and Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Maximizing the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering, Biological, Social, and Organizational Components of Success for Women in Academic Science and Engineering, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2006.
43. Glick, P., and Fiske, S.T., The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 491-512, 1996.
44. Mason, M.A., Goulden, M., and Frasch, K., Keeping Women in the Science Pipeline, Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. S. S., vol. 638, no. 1, pp. 141-162, 2011.
45. Greenwald, A.G., and Banaji, M.R., Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes, Psychol. Rev, vol. 102, no. 1, pp.4-27, 1995.
46. Greenwald, A.G., and Krieger, L.H., Implicit bias: Scientific foundations, Calif. Law Rev, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 945-967, 2006.
47. Greenwald, A.G., McGhee, D.E., and Schwartz, J.L.K., Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 1464-1480, 1998.
48. Hamermesh, D.S., and Parker, A.M, Beauty in the classroom: Instructors’ pulchritude and putative pedagogical productivity, Econ. Educ. Rev., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 369-376, 2005.
49. Harding, S., Feminist standpoint epistemology, in Letterman, M. and Bartch, I., eds. The Gender and Science Reader, London: Routledge, pp. 145-168, 2001.
50. Hazari, Z., Potvin, G., Lock, R.M., Lung, F., Sonnert, G., and Sadler, P.M., Factors that affect the physical science career interest of female students: Testing five common hypotheses, Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 9, no. 2, 2013.
51. Heilman, M.E., Wallen, A.S., Fuchs, D., and Tamkins, M.M., Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks, J. Appl. Psychol., vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 416-427, 2004.
52. Hill, C., Corbett, C., and StRose, A., Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics, Washington, DC: American Association of University Women, 2010.
53. Ho, A.K., Thomsen, L., and Sidanius, J., Perceived academic competence and overall job evaluations: Stu-dents’ evaluations of African American and European American professors, J. Appl. Soc. Psychol., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 389-406, 2009.
54. Hobson, S.M., and Talbot, D.M., Understanding student evaluations: What all faculty should know, Coll. Teach., vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 26-31, 2001.
55. Hoyt, C.L., and Simon, S., Female leaders Injurious or inspiring role models for women? Psychol. Women Quart., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 143-157, 2011.
56. Hughes, R., Gender conception and the chilly road to female undergraduates’ persistence in science and engineering fields, J. Women Min. Sci. Eng., vol. 18, no. 3, pp.215-234, 2012.
57. Huston, T., Research Report: Race and Gender Bias in Student Evaluations of Teaching, Seattle, WA: Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning, 2005.
58. Huston, T.A., Race and gender bias in higher education: Could faculty course evaluations impede further progress toward parity?, Seattle J. Soc. Just., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 591-611, 2006.
59. Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences, and National Academy of Engineering, Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2007.
60. Iowa State University, Student Evaluation of Teaching (SET): Guidelines and Recommendations for Effective Practice, Ames, IA: Iowa State University Center for Excellence in Learning and Teaching, 2015.
61. Isaac, C., Lee, B., and Cames, M., Interventions that affect gender bias in hiring: A systematic review, Acad. Med, vol. 84, no. 10, pp. 1440-1446, 2009.
62. Ivie, R., White, S., Garrett, A., and Anderson, G., Women among physics & astronomy faculty: Results from the 2010 survey of physics degree-granting departments, Amer Inst. Phys. Focus On, College Park, MD: API Statistical Research Center, 2013.
63. Jackson, D., Engstrom, E., and Emmers-Sommer, T., Think leader, think male and female: Sex vs. seating arrangement as leadership cues, Sex Roles, vol. 57, no. 9, pp. 713-723, 2007.
64. Johnson, A.C., Unintended consequences: How science professors discourage women of color, Sci. Educ., vol. 91, no. 5, pp. 805-821, 2007.
65. Johnson, S.K., Hekman, D.R., and Chan, E.T., If there’s only one woman in your candidate pool, there’s statistically no chance she’ll be hired, Harvard Bus. Rev, vol. 94, no. 4, 2016.
66. Joye, S., and Wilson, J.H., Professor age and gender affect student perceptions and grades, J. Scholarship Teach. Learn., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 126-138, 2015.
67. Kaschak, E., Sex bias in student evaluations of college professors, Psychol. Women Quart., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 235-243, 1978.
68. Keller, U., Retaining talented women scientists: Time to try harder, Opt. Photonics. News, pp. 18-19, 2011.
69. Kielich, S., and Zawodny, R., Laser beam intensity dependent, optical circular birefringence in crystals, Opt. Commun, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 267-272, 1975.
70. Koch, A.J., D’Mello, S.D., and Sackett, PR., A meta-analysis of gender stereotypes and bias in experimental simulations of employment decision making, J. Appl. Psychol, vol. 100, no. l, pp. 128-161, 2015.
71. Kosoko-Lasaki, O., Sonnino, R.E., and Voytko, M.L., Mentoring for women and underrepresented minority faculty and students: Experience at two institutions of higher education, J. Nat. Med. Assoc., vol. 98, no. 9, pp. 1449-1459, 2006.
72. Lemm, K., and Banaji, M.R., Unconscious attitudes and beliefs about women and men, in Pasero, U., and Braun, F., eds., Perceiving and Performing Gender, Koln, Germany: Verlag, pp.215-233, 1999.
73. Lepore, L., and Brown, R., Category and stereotype activation: Is prejudice inevitable?, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 275-287, 1997.
74. Levy, J., and Kimura, D., Women, men and the sciences, in Sommers, C.H., ed., The Science on Women and Science, Washington, D.C: AEI Press, pp. 202-284, 2009.
75. Linse, A.R., Student Ratings of Women Faculty: Data and Strategies, Seattle, WA: Center for Engineering Learning and Teaching, University of Washington, 2003.
76. Lockwood, P., “Someone like me can be successful”: Do college students need same-gender role models?, Psychol. Women Quart., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 36-46, 2006.
77. Lockwood, P., and Kunda, Z., Outstanding role models: Do they inspire or demoralize us?, in Tesser, A., Fel-son, R.B., and Suls, J.M., eds., Psychological Perspectives on Self and Identity, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 147-171, 2000.
78. MacNell, L., Driscoll, A., and Hunt, A.N., What’s in a name: Exposing gender bias in student ratings of teaching, Innov. High. Educ., vol. 40, no. 4, 2015.
79. Madera, J.M., Hebl, M.R., and Martin, R.C., Gender and letters of recommendation for academia: Agentic and communal differences, J. Appl. Psychol., vol. 94, no. 6, pp. 1591-1599, 2009.
80. Manke, K.J., and Cohen, G.L., More than inspiration: Role models convey multiple and multifaceted messages, Psychol. Inq, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 275-279, 2011.
81. Marsh, H.W., Students’ evaluations of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases and usefulness, in Perry, R.P., and Smart, J.C., eds., The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: An Evidence-Based Perspective, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, pp. 319-383, 2007.
82. Martin, G., An annotated bibliography of work related to gender in science, Retrieved from: Http://arxiv.org/ abs/1412.4104, 2015.
83. Marx, D.M., and Roman, J.S., Female role models: Protecting women’s math test performance, Pers. Soc. Psych. Bull, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 1183-1193, 2002.
84. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), A Report on the Status of Women Faculty in the Schools of Science and Engineering at MIT, Cambridge, MA: School of Science and School of Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2011.
85. Moody, J., Faculty Diversity: Problems and Solutions, New York: Routledge Falmer, 2004.
86. Moss-Racusin, C.A., Dovidio, J.F., Brescoll, V.L., Graham, M.J., and Handelsman, J., Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., vol. 109, no. 41, pp. 16474-16479, 2012.
87. Murphy, M.C., Steele, C.M., and Gross, J.J., Signaling threat: How situational cues affect women in math, science, and engineering settings, Psychol. Sci., vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 879-885, 2007.
88. National Science Foundation, Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2013, Special Report NSF 13-304, Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, 2014.
89. Neath, I., How to improve your teaching evaluations without improving your teaching, Psychol. Rep., vol. 78, no. 3c, pp. 1363-1372, 1996.
90. Nelson, DJ, A National Analysis of Minorities in Science and Engineering Faculties at Research Universities, Norman, OK: Diversity in Science Association and University of Oklahoma, 2007.
91. Newcomb, T.M., The prediction of interpersonal attraction, Am. Psychol., vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 575-586, 1956.
92. Newman, C.B., Engineering success: The role of faculty relationships with African American undergraduates, J. Women Minor. Sci. Eng., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 193-207, 2011.
93. Nosek, B.A., Smyth, F.L., Sriram, N, Lindner, N.M., Devos, T., Ayala, A., Bar-Anan, Y., Bergh, R., Cai, H., Gonsalkorale, K, Kesebir, S., Maliszewski, N, Neto, F., Olli, E., Park, J., Schnabel, K., Shiomura, K., Tulbure, B.T., Wiers, R.W., Somogyi, M., Akrami, N., Ekehammar, B., Vianello, M., Banaji, M.R, and Greenwald, AG., National differences in gender-Science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., vol. 106, no. 26, pp. 10593-10597, 2009.
94. Potvin, G., Hazari, Z., Tai, R.H., and Sadler, P.M., Unraveling bias from student evaluations of their high school science teachers, Sci. Educ., vol. 93, no. 5, pp. 827-845, 2009.
95. Reid, L.D., The role of perceived race and gender in the evaluation of college teaching on Rate My Professors. com, J. Diver. High. Educ., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 137-152, 2010.
96. Reuben, E., Sapienza, P., and Zingales, L., How stereotypes impair women’s careers in science, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci, vol. 111, no. 12, pp. 4403-4408, 2014.
97. Rolin, K., and Vainio, J., Gender in academia in Finland: Tensions between policies and gendering processes in physics departments, Sci. Technol. Stud., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 26-46, 2011.
98. Rowe, M.P., Barriers to equality: The power of subtle discrimination to maintain unequal opportunity, Employee Resp. Rights J, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 153-163, 1990.
99. Rudman, L.A., and Glick, P., Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 1004-1010, 1999.
100. Rudman, L.A., Greenwald, A.G., and McGhee, D.E., Implicit self-concept and evaluative implicit gender stereotypes: Self and ingroup share desirabletraits, Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull., vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 1164-1178, 2001.
101. Sandstrom, U., and Hallsten, M., Persistent nepotism in peer review, Scientometrics, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 175-189, 2008.
102. Schiebinger, L., Has Feminism Changed Science?, Cambridge, MA: First Harvard University Press, 1999.
103. Sinclair, L., and Kunda, Z., Motivated stereotyping of women: She’s fine if she praised me but incompetent if she criticized me, Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull., vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 1329-1342, 2000.
104. Sprague, J., and Massoni, K, Student evaluations and gendered expectations: What we can’t count can hurt us, Sex Roles, vol. 53, no. 11/12, pp. 779-793, 2005.
105. Sprinkle, J.E., Student perceptions of effectiveness: An examination of the influence of student biases, Coll. Student J., vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 276-293, 2008.
106. Stark, P.B., and Freishtat, R., An evaluation of course evaluations, ScienceOpen, 2014.
107. Steele, C.M., Spencer, S.J., and Aronson, J., Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat, Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol., vol. 34, pp. 379-440, 2002.
108. Stout, J.G., Dasgupta, N, Hunsinger, M., and McManus, M.A., STEMing the tide: Using ingroup experts to inoculate women’s self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM), J. Per. Soc. Psychol., vol. 100, no. 2, p. 255-270, 2011.
109. Trix, F., and Psenka, C., Exploring the color of glass: Letters of recommendation for female and male medical faculty, Discourse Soc., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 191-220, 2003.
110. Valian, V, Why So Slow? The Advancement of Women, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1998.
111. Wenneras, C., andWold, A., Nepotism and sex is min peer review, Nature, vol. 387, pp. 341-343, 1997.
112. Whitten, B.L., (Baby) Steps towards feminist physics, J. Women Min. Sci. Eng., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 115-134, 2012.
113. Whitten, B.L., Foster, S.R., and Duncombe, M.L., What works for women in undergraduate physics?, Phys. Today, vol. 56, no. 9, pp.46-51, 2003.
114. Williams, J.C., The 5 biases pushing women out of STEM, Harvard Bus. Rev. Blog, 2015.
115. Williams, J.C., Phillips, K.W., and Hall, E.V., Double Jeopardy? Gender Bias Against Women of Color in Science, San Francisco: UC Hastings College of the Law, 2014.
116. Williams, W.M., and Ceci, S.J., National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., vol. 112, no. 17, pp. 5360-5365, 2015.
117. Wilson, T.D., Lindsey, S., and Schooler, T.Y., A model of dual attitudes, Psychol. Rev., vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 101-126, 2000.
118. Yost, E., Winstead, V., Cotten, S.R., and Handley, D.M., The recruitment and retention of emerging women scholars in STEM: Results from a national web-based survey of graduate students, postdoctoral fellows, and junior faculty, J. Women Min. Sci. Eng., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 143-163, 2013.
119. Zalesny, M.D., and Kirsch, M.P., The effect of similarity on performance ratings and interrater agreement, Hum. Relat, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 81-96, 1989.
120. Zastavker, Y.V, Chachra, D., Lynch, C., Sarang-Sieminski, A.L., and Stein, L.A., Gender schemas, privilege, micro-messaging, and engineering education: Practical lessons from theory, Proc. ASEE Ann. Conf. Expo., pp. 22.740.1-22.740.10, June 2011.