Nanocellulose and its composites for biomedical applications

Current Medicinal Chemistry

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2017, Pages 512-528

  Dumanli, Ahu Gümrah ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bacterial cellulose; Cellulose nanocrystals; Diagnostics; Drug delivery; Implants; Nanocellulose; Tissue engineering; Wound healing

Indexed keywords

CELLULOSE; NANOCELLULOSE; NANOCOMPOSITE; NANOCRYSTAL; NANOMATERIAL; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; BIOMEDICINE; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; HUMAN; HYDROGEL; IMPLANT; MECHANICS; MOLECULAR STABILITY; NANOFABRICATION; NONHUMAN; REVIEW; TISSUE ENGINEERING; WOUND DRESSING; WOUND HEALING; YOUNG MODULUS; ANIMAL; BANDAGE; CHEMISTRY; GENETIC PROCEDURES; MAGNET; MAGNETISM; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROSTHESES AND ORTHOSES; THREE DIMENSIONAL PRINTING; TISSUE SCAFFOLD; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ANIMALS; BANDAGES; BIOSENSING TECHNIQUES; CELLULOSE; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS; HUMANS; MAGNETICS; MAGNETS; NANOSTRUCTURES; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PRINTING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 85017586506     PISSN: 09298673     EISSN: 1875533X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2174/0929867323666161014124008     Document Type: Review

References (138)

1. Czaja, W.; Krystynowicz, A.; Bielecki, S.; Brown, R. M., Jr Microbial cellulosethe natural power to heal wounds. Biomaterials, 2006, 27(2), 145-151.
2. Habibi, Y.; Lucia, L. A.; Rojas, O. J. Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-assembly, and applications. Chem. Rev., 2010, 110(6), 3479-3500.
3. Shi, Z.; Zang, S.; Jiang, F.; Huang, L.; Lu, D.; Ma, Y.; Yang, G. In situ nano-assembly of bacterial cellulosepolyaniline composites. RSC Adv., 2012, 2(3), 1040-1046.
4. Tashiro, K.; Kobayashi, M. Theoretical evaluation of three-dimensional elastic constants of native and regenerated celluloses: role of hydrogen bonds. Polymer (Guildf.), 1991, 32(8), 1516-1526.
5. Dumanli, A.; Windle, A. Carbon fibres from cellulosic precursors: a review. J. Mater. Sci., 2012, 47(10), 4236-4250.
6. Andersen, N.; Johansen, K.; Michelsen, M.; Stenby, E.; Krogh, K.; Olsson, M. Hydrolysis of cellulose using monocomponent enzymes shows synergy during hydrolysis of phosphoric acid swollen cellulose (PASC), but competition on Avicel. Enzyme Microb. Technol., 2008, 42, 362-370.
7. Heinze, T.; Koschella, A.; Liebert, T.; Harabagiu, V.; Coseri, S. Cellulose: Chemistry of Cellulose Derivatization. In: The European Polysaccharide Network of Excellence (EPNOE): Research Initiatives and Results; Navard, P., Ed.; Springer Vienna: Vienna, 2013; pp. 283-327.
8. Iguchi, M.; Yamanaka, S.; Budhiono, A. Bacterial cellulosea masterpiece of nature's arts. J. Mater. Sci., 2000, 35(2), 261-270.
9. Revol, J. F.; Bradford, H.; Giasson, J.; Marchessault, R. H.; Gray, D. G. Helicoidal self-ordering of cellulose microfibrils in aqueous suspension. Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 1992, 14(3), 170-172.
10. Dumanli, A. G.; van der Kooij, H. M.; Kamita, G.; Reisner, E.; Baumberg, J. J.; Steiner, U.; Vignolini, S. Digital color in cellulose nanocrystal films. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2014, 6(15), 12302-12306.
11. Mariano, M.; El Kissi, N.; Dufresne, A. Cellulose nanocrystals and related nanocomposites: Review of some properties and challenges. J. Polym. Sci., B, Polym. Phys., 2014, 52(12), 791-806.
12. Rusli, R.; Eichhorn, S. J. Determination of the stiffness of cellulose nanowhiskers and the fiber-matrix interface in a nanocomposite using Raman spectroscopy. Appl. Phys. Lett., 2008, 93(3), 033111.
13. Sturcová, A.; Davies, G. R.; Eichhorn, S. J. Elastic modulus and stress-transfer properties of tunicate cellulose whiskers. Biomacromolecules, 2005, 6(2), 1055-1061.
14. Orsolini, P.; Michen, B.; Huch, A.; Tingaut, P.; Caseri, W. R.; Zimmermann, T. Characterization of Pores in Dense Nanopapers and Nanofibrillated Cellulose Membranes: A Critical Assessment of Established Methods. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2015, 7(46), 25884-25897.
15. Simão, C. D.; Reparaz, J. S.; Wagner, M. R.; Graczykowski, B.; Kreuzer, M.; Ruiz-Blanco, Y. B.; García, Y.; Malho, J. M.; Goñi, A. R.; Ahopelto, J.; Sotomayor Torres, C. M. Optical and mechanical properties of nanofibrillated cellulose: Toward a robust platform for next-generation green technologies. Carbohydr. Polym., 2015, 126, 40-46.
16. Cranston, E. D.; Eita, M.; Johansson, E.; Netrval, J.; Salajková, M.; Arwin, H.; Wågberg, L. Determination of Youngs modulus for nanofibrillated cellulose multilayer thin films using buckling mechanics. Biomacromolecules, 2011, 12(4), 961-969.
17. Czaja, W.; Romanovicz, D.; Brown, R. M. Structural investigations of microbial cellulose produced in stationary and agitated culture. Cellulose, 2004, 11(3), 403-411.
18. Czaja, W. K.; Young, D. J.; Kawecki, M.; Brown, R. M., Jr The future prospects of microbial cellulose in biomedical applications. Biomacromolecules, 2007, 8(1), 1-12.
19. Watanabe, K.; Tabuchi, M.; Morinaga, Y.; Yoshinaga, F. Structural Features and Properties of Bacterial Cellulose Produced in Agitated Culture. Cellulose, 1998, 5(3), 187-200.
20. Nishi, Y.; Uryu, M.; Yamanaka, S.; Watanabe, K.; Kitamura, N.; Iguchi, M.; Mitsuhashi, S. The structure and mechanical properties of sheets prepared from bacterial cellulose. J. Mater. Sci., 1990, 25(6), 2997-3001.
21. Marhöfer, R. J.; Reiling, S.; Brickmann, J. Computer simulations of crystal structures and elastic properties of cellulose. Ber. Bunsen-Gesellschaft Physikalishe Chemie, 1996, 100(8), 1350-1354.
22. Sakurada, I.; Nukushina, Y.; Ito, T. Experimental determination of the elastic modulus of crystalline regions in oriented polymers. J. Polym. Sci., 1962, 57, 651.
23. Tashiro, K.; Kobayashi, M. Calculation of crystallite modulus of native cellulose. Polym. Bull. (Berlin), 1985, 14, 213-218.
24. Eichhorn, S.; Young, R. J. The Young's modulus of a microcrystalline cellulose. Cellulose, 2001, 8, 197.
25. Bielecki, S.; Krystynowicz, A.; Turkiewicz, M.; Kalinowska, H. Bacterial cellulose. In: Polysaccharides and Polyamides in the food industry; Steinbüchel, A.; Rhee, S. K., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2005.
26. Wan, W. K.; Hutter, J. L.; Milton, L.; Guhados, G. Bacterial Cellulose and Its Nanocomposites for Biomedical Applications. In: Cellulose Nanocomposites. American Chemical Society, 2006; pp. 221-241.
27. Petersen, N.; Gatenholm, P. Bacterial cellulose-based materials and medical devices: current state and perspectives. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2011, 91(5), 1277-1286.
28. Revol, J-F.; Godbout, L.; Dong, X-M.; Gray, D. G.; Chanzy, H.; Maret, G. Chiral nematic suspensions of cellulose crystallites; phase separation and magnetic field orientation. Liq. Cryst., 1994, 16(1), 127-134.
29. Li, D.; Liu, Z.; Al-Haik, M.; Tehrani, M.; Murray, F.; Tannenbaum, R.; Garmestani, H. Magnetic alignment of cellulose nanowhiskers in an all-cellulose composite. Polym. Bull., 2010, 65(6), 635-642.
30. Hoeger, I.; Rojas, O. J.; Efimenko, K.; Velev, O. D.; Kelley, S. S. Ultrathin film coatings of aligned cellulose nanocrystals from a convective-shear assembly system and their surface mechanical properties. Soft Matter, 2011, 7(5), 1957-1967.
31. Abdul Khalil, H. P.; Davoudpour, Y.; Islam, M. N.; Mustapha, A.; Sudesh, K.; Dungani, R.; Jawaid, M. Production and modification of nanofibrillated cellulose using various mechanical processes: a review. Carbohydr. Polym., 2014, 99, 649-665.
32. Guhados, G.; Wan, W.; Hutter, J. L. Measurement of the elastic modulus of single bacterial cellulose fibers using atomic force microscopy. Langmuir, 2005, 21(14), 6642-6646.
33. Hsieh, Y-C.; Yano, H.; Nogi, M.; Eichhorn, S. J. An estimation of the Young's modulus of bacterial cellulose filaments. Cellulose, 2008, 15, 507-513.
34. Le May, I.; Lappi, V. G.; White, W. E. Materials for biomedical applications. Polym. Eng. Sci., 1975, 15(11), 789-794.
35. Miyamoto, T.; Takahashi, S.; Ito, H.; Inagaki, H.; Noishiki, Y. Tissue biocompatibility of cellulose and its derivatives. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 1989, 23(1), 125-133.
36. Zhu, C.; Li, F.; Zhou, X.; Lin, L.; Zhang, T. Kombuchasynthesized bacterial cellulose: preparation, characterization, and biocompatibility evaluation. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A, 2014, 102(5), 1548-1557.
37. Helenius, G.; Bäckdahl, H.; Bodin, A.; Nannmark, U.; Gatenholm, P.; Risberg, B. In vivo biocompatibility of bacterial cellulose. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A, 2006, 76(2), 431-438.
38. de Oliveira Barud, H. G.; da Silva, R. R.; da Silva Barud, H.; Tercjak, A.; Gutierrez, J.; Lustri, W. R.; de Oliveira, O. B.; Ribeiro, S. J. A multipurpose natural and renewable polymer in medical applications: Bacterial cellulose. Carbohydr. Polym., 2016, 153, 406-420.
39. Qiu, Y.; Qiu, L.; Cui, J.; Wei, Q. Bacterial cellulose and bacterial cellulose-vaccarin membranes for wound healing. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl., 2016, 59, 303-309.
40. Lin, W. C.; Lien, C. C.; Yeh, H. J.; Yu, C. M.; Hsu, S. H. Bacterial cellulose and bacterial cellulose-chitosan membranes for wound dressing applications. Carbohydr. Polym., 2013, 94(1), 603-611.
41. Tang, J.; Bao, L.; Li, X.; Chen, L.; Hong, F. F. Potential of PVA-doped bacterial nano-cellulose tubular composites for artificial blood vessels. J. Mater. Chem. B Mater. Biol. Med., 2015, 3(43), 8537-8547.
42. Littunen, K.; Snoei de Castro, J.; Samoylenko, A.; Xu, Q.; Quaggin, S.; Vainio, S.; Seppälä, J. Synthesis of cationized nanofibrillated cellulose and its antimicrobial properties. Eur. Polym. J., 2016, 75, 116-124.
43. Alexandrescu, L.; Syverud, K.; Gatti, A.; Chinga-Carrasco, G. Cytotoxicity tests of cellulose nanofibril-based structures. Cellulose, 2013, 20(4), 1765-1775.
44. Roman, M.; Dong, S.; Hirani, A.; Lee, Y. W. Cellulose Nanocrystals for Drug Delivery, in Polysaccharide Materials: Performance by Design. American Chemical Society, 2009; pp. 81-91.
45. Catalán, J.; Ilves, M.; Järventaus, H.; Hannukainen, K. S.; Kontturi, E.; Vanhala, E.; Alenius, H.; Savolainen, K. M.; Norppa, H. Genotoxic and immunotoxic effects of cellulose nanocrystals in vitro. Environ. Mol. Mutagen., 2015, 56(2), 171-182.
46. Kovacs, T.; Naish, V.; O'Connor, B.; Blaise, C.; Gagné, F.; Hall, L.; Trudeau, V.; Martel, P. An ecotoxicological characterization of nanocrystalline cellulose (NCC). Nanotoxicology, 2010, 4(3), 255-270.
47. Roman, M. Toxicity of Cellulose Nanocrystals: A Review. Ind. Biotechnol. (New Rochelle N. Y.), 2015, 11(1), 25-33.
48. Mahmoud, K. A.; Mena, J. A.; Male, K. B.; Hrapovic, S.; Kamen, A.; Luong, J. H. Effect of surface charge on the cellular uptake and cytotoxicity of fluorescent labeled cellulose nanocrystals. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2010, 2(10), 2924-2932.
49. Lin, N.; Dufresne, A. Nanocellulose in biomedicine: Current status and future prospect. Eur. Polym. J., 2014, 59, 302-325.
50. Jorfi, M.; Foster, E. J. Recent advances in nanocellulose for biomedical applications. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2015, 132(14), 41719.
51. Zhong, Z.; Qin, J.; Ma, J. Cellulose acetate/hydroxyapatite/chitosan coatings for improved corrosion resistance and bioactivity. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl., 2015, 49, 251-255.
52. Shen, T.; Gnanakaran, S. The stability of cellulose: a statistical perspective from a coarse-grained model of hydrogenbond networks. Biophys. J., 2009, 96(8), 3032-3040.
53. Kim, C. H.; Youn, H. J.; Lee, H. L. Preparation of crosslinked cellulose nanofibril aerogel with water absorbency and shape recovery. Cellulose, 2015, 22(6), 3715-3724.
54. Bäckdahl, H.; Esguerra, M.; Delbro, D.; Risberg, B.; Gatenholm, P. Engineering microporosity in bacterial cellu lose scaffolds. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med., 2008, 2(6), 320-330.
55. Klemm, D.; Kramer, F.; Moritz, S.; Lindström, T.; Ankerfors, M.; Gray, D.; Dorris, A. Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-based materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 2011, 50(24), 5438-5466.
56. Magnocavallo, C.; Baratti, C.; Lavezzari, M.; Pamparana, F.; Pellegrini, C. [The use of a synthetic film (Bioprocess) in abrasions and second degree burns. Preliminary study in the emergency room]. Minerva Chir., 1993, 48(13-14), 773-778.
57. Fontana, J. D.; de Souza, A. M.; Fontana, C. K.; Torriani, I. L.; Moreschi, J. C.; Gallotti, B. J.; de Souza, S. J.; Narcisco, G. P.; Bichara, J. A.; Farah, L. F. Acetobacter cellulose pellicle as a temporary skin substitute. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., 1990, 24-25(1), 253-264.
58. Czaja, W. K.; Young, D. J.; Kawecki, M.; Brown, R. M., Jr The future prospects of microbial cellulose in biomedical applications. Biomacromolecules, 2007, 8(1), 1-12.
59. Czaja, W.; Krystynowicz, A.; Kawecki, M.; Wysota, K.; Sakiel, S.; Wróblewski, P.; Glik, J.; Nowak, M.; Bielecki, S. Biomedical Applications of Microbial Cellulose in Burn Wound Recovery. In: Cellulose: Molecular and Structural Biology: Selected Articles on the Synthesis, Structure, and Applications of Cellulose; Brown, R. M.; Saxena, I. M., Eds.; Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht, 2007; pp. 307-321.
60. Wei, B.; Yang, G.; Hong, F. Preparation and evaluation of a kind of bacterial cellulose dry films with antibacterial properties. Carbohydr. Polym., 2011, 84(1), 533-538.
61. Wiegand, C.; Moritz, S.; Hessler, N.; Kralisch, D.; Wesarg, F.; Müller, F. A.; Fischer, D.; Hipler, U. C. Antimicrobial functionalization of bacterial nanocellulose by loading with polihexanide and povidone-iodine. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med., 2015, 26(10), 245.
62. Rabea, E. I.; Badawy, M. E.; Stevens, C. V.; Smagghe, G.; Steurbaut, W. Chitosan as antimicrobial agent: applications and mode of action. Biomacromolecules, 2003, 4(6), 1457-1465.
63. Lin, W-C.; Lien, C-C.; Yeh, H-J.; Yu, C-M.; Hsu, S. H. Bacterial cellulose and bacterial cellulose-chitosan membranes for wound dressing applications. Carbohydr. Polym., 2013, 94(1), 603-611.
64. Li, Y.; Jiang, H.; Zheng, W.; Gong, N.; Chen, L.; Jiang, X.; Yang, G. Bacterial cellulose-hyaluronan nanocomposite biomaterials as wound dressings for severe skin injury repair. J. Mater. Chem. B Mater. Biol. Med., 2015, 3(17), 3498-3507.
65. Maneerung, T.; Tokura, S.; Rujiravanit, R. Impregnation of silver nanoparticles into bacterial cellulose for antimicrobial wound dressing. Carbohydr. Polym., 2008, 72(1), 43-51.
66. Wu, J.; Zheng, Y.; Song, W.; Luan, J.; Wen, X.; Wu, Z.; Chen, X.; Wang, Q.; Guo, S. In situ synthesis of silvernanoparticles/bacterial cellulose composites for slowreleased antimicrobial wound dressing. Carbohydr. Polym., 2014, 102(1), 762-771.
67. Ghule, K.; Ghule, A. V.; Chen, B-J.; Ling, Y-C. Preparation and characterization of ZnO nanoparticles coated paper and its antibacterial activity study. Green Chem., 2006, 8(12), 1034-1041.
68. Jia, B.; Mei, Y.; Cheng, L.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, L. Preparation of copper nanoparticles coated cellulose films with antibacterial properties through one-step reduction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2012, 4(6), 2897-2902.
69. Mohite, B. V.; Patil, S. V. In situ development of nanosilverimpregnated bacterial cellulose for sustainable released antimicrobial wound dressing. J. Appl. Biomater. Funct. Mater., 2016, 14(1), e53-e58.
70. Lu, Y.; Tekinalp, H. L.; Eberle, C. C.; Peter, W.; Naskar, A. K.; Ozcan, S. Nanocellulose in polymer composites and biomedical applications. Tappi J., 2014, 13(6), 47-54.
71. Wanna, D.; Alam, C.; Toivola, D. M.; Alam, P. Bacterial cellulose-kaolin nanocomposites for application as biomedical wound healing materials. Adv. Nat. Sci.: Nanosci. Nanotechnol., 2013, 4(4), 045002.
72. Svensson, A.; Nicklasson, E.; Harrah, T.; Panilaitis, B.; Kaplan, D. L.; Brittberg, M.; Gatenholm, P. Bacterial cellulose as a potential scaffold for tissue engineering of cartilage. Biomaterials, 2005, 26(4), 419-431.
73. Domingues, R. M.; Gomes, M. E.; Reis, R. L. The potential of cellulose nanocrystals in tissue engineering strategies. Biomacromolecules, 2014, 15(7), 2327-2346.
74. Li, W.; Guo, R.; Lan, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Xue, W.; Zhang, Y. Preparation and properties of cellulose nanocrystals reinforced collagen composite films. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A, 2014, 102(4), 1131-1139.
75. Li, W.; Lan, Y.; Guo, R.; Zhang, Y.; Xue, W.; Zhang, Y. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a novel collagen/cellulose nanocrystals scaffold for achieving the sustained release of basic fibroblast growth factor. J. Biomater. Appl., 2015, 29(6), 882-893.
76. Huang, J. W.; Lv, X. G.; Li, Z.; Song, L. J.; Feng, C.; Xie, M. K.; Li, C.; Li, H. B.; Wang, J. H.; Zhu, W. D.; Chen, S. Y.; Wang, H. P.; Xu, Y. M. Urethral reconstruction with a 3D porous bacterial cellulose scaffold seeded with lingual keratinocytes in a rabbit model. In: Biomed. Mater., (Bristol); 2015, 10(5), 055005.
77. Saska, S.; Teixeira, L. N.; Tambasco de Oliveira, P.; Minarelli Gaspar, A. M.; Lima Ribeiro, S. J.; Messaddeq, Y.; Marchetto, R. Bacterial cellulose-collagen nanocomposite for bone tissue engineering. J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22(41), 22102-22112.
78. Zhou, H.; Lee, J. Nanoscale hydroxyapatite particles for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater., 2011, 7(7), 2769-2781.
79. Grande, C. J.; Torres, F. G.; Gomez, C. M.; Bañó, M. C. Nanocomposites of bacterial cellulose/hydroxyapatite for biomedical applications. Acta Biomater., 2009, 5(5), 1605-1615.
80. Zimmermann, K. A.; LeBlanc, J. M.; Sheets, K. T.; Fox, R. W.; Gatenholm, P. Biomimetic design of a bacterial cellulose/hydroxyapatite nanocomposite for bone healing applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 2011, 31(1), 43-49.
81. Yamaguchi, K.; Prabakaran, M.; Ke, M.; Gang, X.; Chung, I. M.; Um, I. C.; Gopiraman, M.; Kim, I. S. Highly dispersed nanoscale hydroxyapatite on cellulose nanofibers for bone regeneration. Mater. Lett., 2016, 168, 56-61.
82. Favi, P. M.; Ospina, S. P.; Kachole, M.; Gao, M.; Atehortua, L.; Webster, T. J. Preparation and characterization of biodegradable nano hydroxyapatite-bacterial cellulose composites with well-defined honeycomb pore arrays for bone tissue engineering applications. Cellulose, 2016, 23(2), 1263-1282.
83. Martínez, H.; Brackmann, C.; Enejder, A.; Gatenholm, P. Mechanical stimulation of fibroblasts in micro-channeled bacterial cellulose scaffolds enhances production of oriented collagen fibers. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A, 2012, 100(4), 948-957.
84. ® - The cellulose based hydrogel for 3D cell culture. Available from: http://www.upmbiochemicals.com/growdex/Pages/Default.aspx, 09.05. 2016
85. Fink, H.; Ahrenstedt, L.; Bodin, A.; Brumer, H.; Gatenholm, P.; Krettek, A.; Risberg, B. Bacterial cellulose modified with xyloglucan bearing the adhesion peptide RGD promotes endothelial cell adhesion and metabolisma prom ising modification for vascular grafts. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med., 2011, 5(6), 454-463.
86. Brumer, H. III.; Zhou, Q.; Baumann, M. J.; Carlsson, K.; Teeri, T. T. Activation of crystalline cellulose surfaces through the chemoenzymatic modification of xyloglucan. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126(18), 5715-5721.
87. Bodin, A.; Ahrenstedt, L.; Fink, H.; Brumer, H.; Risberg, B.; Gatenholm, P. Modification of nanocellulose with a xyloglucan-RGD conjugate enhances adhesion and proliferation of endothelial cells: implications for tissue engineering. Biomacromolecules, 2007, 8(12), 3697-3704.
88. Klemm, D.; Schumann, D.; Udhardt, U.; Marsch, S. Bacterial synthesized cellulose - artificial blood vessels for microsurgery. Prog. Polym. Sci., 2001, 26(9), 1561-1603.
89. Hong, F.; Wei, B.; Chen, L. Preliminary study on biosynthesis of bacterial nanocellulose tubes in a novel doublesiliconetube bioreactor for potential vascular prosthesis. BioMed. Res. Int., 2015, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/560365.
90. Schumann, D. A.; Wippermann, J.; Klemm, D. O.; Kramer, F.; Koth, D.; Kosmehl, H.; Wahlers, T.; Salehi-Gelani, S. Artificial vascular implants from bacterial cellulose: Preliminary results of small arterial substitutes. Cellulose, 2009, 16(5), 877-885.
91. Klemm, D.; Udhardt, U.; Marsch, S.; Schumann, D. Method and device for producing shaped microbial cellulose for use as a biomaterial, especially for microsurgery; Google Patents, 2003.
92. Nimeskern, L.; Martínez Ávila, H.; Sundberg, J.; Gatenholm, P.; Müller, R.; Stok, K. S. Mechanical evaluation of bacterial nanocellulose as an implant material for ear cartilage replacement. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 2013, 22, 12-21.
93. Monllau, J. C.; Pelfort, X.; Tey, M. Collagen Meniscus Implant: Technique and Results. In: The Meniscus; Beaufils, P.; Verdonk, R., Eds.; Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010; pp. 373-382.
94. Rodkey, W. G.; DeHaven, K. E.; Montgomery, W. H.; Baker, C. L.; Beck, C. L.; Hormel, S. E.; Steadman, J. R.; Cole, B. J.; Briggs, K. K. Comparison of the Collagen Meniscus Implant with Partial Meniscectomy. A Prospect. Random. Trial, 2008, 90(7), 1413-1426.
95. Bodin, A.; Concaro, S.; Brittberg, M.; Gatenholm, P. Bacterial cellulose as a potential meniscus implant. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med., 2007, 1(5), 406-408.
96. Bhattacharya, M.; Malinen, M. M.; Lauren, P.; Lou, Y-R.; Kuisma, S. W.; Kanninen, L.; Lille, M.; Corlu, A.; GuGuen-Guillouzo, C.; Ikkala, O.; Laukkanen, A.; Urtti, A.; Yliperttula, M. Nanofibrillar cellulose hydrogel promotes three-dimensional liver cell culture. J. Control. Release, 2012, 164(3), 291-298.
97. Markstedt, K.; Mantas, A.; Tournier, I.; Martínez Ávila, H.; Hägg, D.; Gatenholm, P. 3D Bioprinting Human Chondrocytes with Nanocellulose-Alginate Bioink for Cartilage Tissue Engineering Applications. Biomacromolecules, 2015, 16(5), 1489-1496.
98. Gatenholm, P.; Mantas, A.; Gonzalez, G. T.; Haag, D. Biocompatible Nanocellulose Hydrogels for 3D Bioprinting of Tissue Constructs. In: New Materials from Trees; Stockholm, 2015.
99. Crowley, M. M.; Schroeder, B.; Fredersdorf, A.; Obara, S.; Talarico, M.; Kucera, S.; McGinity, J. W. Physicochemical properties and mechanism of drug release from ethyl cellulose matrix tablets prepared by direct compression and hotmelt extrusion. Int. J. Pharm., 2004, 269(2), 509-522.
100. Inghelbrecht, S.; Remon, J. P. Roller compaction and tableting of microcrystalline cellulose/drug mixtures. Int. J. Pharm., 1998, 161(2), 215-224.
101. Saša, B.; Odon, P.; Stane, S.; Julijana, K. Analysis of surface properties of cellulose ethers and drug release from their matrix tablets. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci., 2006, 27(4), 375-383.
102. Wang, C.; Huang, H.; Jia, M.; Jin, S.; Zhao, W.; Cha, R. Formulation and evaluation of nanocrystalline cellulose as a potential disintegrant. Carbohydr. Polym., 2015, 130, 275-279.
103. Kolakovic, R.; Peltonen, L.; Laaksonen, T.; Putkisto, K.; Laukkanen, A.; Hirvonen, J. Spray-dried cellulose nanofibers as novel tablet excipient. AAPS PharmSciTech, 2011, 12(4), 1366-1373.
104. Kolakovic, R.; Laaksonen, T.; Peltonen, L.; Laukkanen, A.; Hirvonen, J. Spray-dried nanofibrillar cellulose microparticles for sustained drug release. Int. J. Pharm., 2012, 430(1-2), 47-55.
105. Lin, N.; Huang, J.; Chang, P. R.; Feng, L.; Yu, J. Effect of polysaccharide nanocrystals on structure, properties, and drug release kinetics of alginate-based microspheres. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces, 2011, 85(2), 270-279.
106. Zhang, F.; Wu, W.; Zhang, X.; Meng, X.; Tong, G.; Deng, Y. Temperature-sensitive poly-NIPAm modified cellulose nanofibril cryogel microspheres for controlled drug release. Cellulose, 2016, 23(1), 415-425.
107. Lin, N.; Gèze, A.; Wouessidjewe, D.; Huang, J.; Dufresne, A. Biocompatible Double-Membrane Hydrogels from Cationic Cellulose Nanocrystals and Anionic Alginate as Complexing Drugs Codelivery. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2016, 8(11), 6880-6889.
108. Lin, N.; Dufresne, A. Supramolecular hydrogels from in situ host-guest inclusion between chemically modified cellulose nanocrystals and cyclodextrin. Biomacromolecules, 2013, 14(3), 871-880.
109. Spaic, M.; Small, D. P.; Cook, J. R.; Wan, W. Characterization of anionic and cationic functionalized bacterial cellulose nanofibres for controlled release applications. Cellulose, 2014, 21(3), 1529-1540.
110. Akhlaghi, S. P.; Tiong, D.; Berry, R. M.; Tam, K. C. Comparative release studies of two cationic model drugs from different cellulose nanocrystal derivatives. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm., 2014, 88(1), 207-215.
111. Gao, J.; Li, Q.; Chen, W.; Liu, Y.; Yu, H. Self-assembly of nanocellulose and indomethacin into hierarchically ordered structures with high encapsulation efficiency for sustained release applications. Chempluschem, 2014, 79(5), 725-731.
112. Valo, H.; Kovalainen, M.; Laaksonen, P.; Häkkinen, M.; Auriola, S.; Peltonen, L.; Linder, M.; Järvinen, K.; Hirvonen, J.; Laaksonen, T. Immobilization of protein-coated drug nanoparticles in nanofibrillar cellulose matricesenhanced stability and release. J. Control. Release, 2011, 156(3), 390-397.
113. Valo, H.; Arola, S.; Laaksonen, P.; Torkkeli, M.; Peltonen, L.; Linder, M. B.; Serimaa, R.; Kuga, S.; Hirvonen, J.; Laaksonen, T. Drug release from nanoparticles embedded in four different nanofibrillar cellulose aerogels. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci., 2013, 50(1), 69-77.
114. Kolakovic, R.; Peltonen, L.; Laukkanen, A.; Hirvonen, J.; Laaksonen, T. Nanofibrillar cellulose films for controlled drug delivery. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm., 2012, 82(2), 308-315.
115. Zhao, J.; Lu, C.; He, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, X. Polyethylenimine-grafted cellulose nanofibril aerogels as versatile vehicles for drug delivery. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2015, 7(4), 2607-2615.
116. Galkina, O. L.; Ivanov, V. K.; Agafonov, A. V.; Seisenbaeva, G. A.; Kessler, V. G. Cellulose nanofiber-titania nanocomposites as potential drug delivery systems for dermal appli cations. J. Mater. Chem. B Mater. Biol. Med., 2015, 3(8), 1688-1698.
117. Diagnostics for All. Available from: http://dfa.org/, cited 2016
118. Martinez, A. W.; Phillips, S. T.; Whitesides, G. M.; Carrilho, E. Diagnostics for the developing world: microfluidic paperbased analytical devices. Anal. Chem., 2010, 82(1), 3-10.
119. Connelly, J. T.; Rolland, J. P.; Whitesides, G. M. Paper Machine for Molecular Diagnostics. Anal. Chem., 2015, 87(15), 7595-7601.
120. Orelma, H.; Filpponen, I.; Johansson, L-S.; Österberg, M.; Rojas, O. J.; Laine, J. Surface functionalized nanofibrillar cellulose (NFC) film as a platform for immunoassays and diagnostics. Biointerphases, 2012, 7(1-4), 61.
121. Carrick, C.; Wågberg, L.; Larsson, P. A. Immunoselective Cellulose Nanospheres: A Versatile Platform for Nanotheranostics. ACS Macro Lett., 2014, 3(11), 1117-1120.
122. Edwards, J.; Prevost, N.; French, A.; Wu, Q. Nanocellulosebased biosensors: design, preparation, and activity of peptidelinked cotton cellulose nanocrystals having fluorimetric and colorimetric elastase detection sensitivity. Engineering, 2013, 5(9), 20-28.
123. Olsson, R. T.; Azizi Samir, M. A.; Salazar-Alvarez, G.; Belova, L.; Ström, V.; Berglund, L. A.; Ikkala, O.; Nogués, J.; Gedde, U. W. Making flexible magnetic aerogels and stiff magnetic nanopaper using cellulose nanofibrils as templates. Nat. Nanotechnol., 2010, 5(8), 584-588.
124. Habibi, Y. Key advances in the chemical modification of nanocelluloses. Chem. Soc. Rev., 2014, 43(5), 1519-1542.
125. Liu, S.; Luo, X.; Zhou, J. Magnetic Responsive Cellulose Nanocomposites and Their Applications. In: Cellulose - Medical, Pharmaceutical and Electronic Applications; Van De Ven, T. G., Ed.; InTech, 2013.
126. Zhang, W.; Chen, S.; Hu, W.; Zhou, B.; Yang, Z.; Yin, N.; Wang, H. Facile fabrication of flexible magnetic nanohybrid membrane with amphiphobic surface based on bacterial cellulose. Carbohydr. Polym., 2011, 86(4), 1760-1767.
127. Arias, S. L.; Shetty, A. R.; Senpan, A.; Echeverry-Rendón, M.; Reece, L. M.; Allain, J. P. Fabrication of a functionalized magnetic bacterial nanocellulose with iron oxide nanoparticles. J. Vis. Exp., 2016, 2016 (111)
128. Nanotechnology for Cerebral Aneurysm Treatment. In: The Textbook of Nanoneuroscience and Nanoneurosurgery; CRC Press, 2013; pp. 259-282.
129. Kempaiah, R.; Arias, S. L.; Pastrana, F.; Alucozai, M.; Reece, L. M; Pav, J.; Allain, J. P. A new nanostructured material for regenerative vascular treatments: Magnetic bacterial nanocellulose (MBNC). In: Health Care Exchanges (PAHCE), 2013 Pan American, 29 April-4 May 2013.
130. Arias, S.; Rendón, M. E.; Pavón, J. J. Development of New Endovascular Stents for Damaged Blood Vessels in Neurological and Cardiovascular Diseases and Traumas. 2013.
131. Luo, X.; Liu, S.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, L. In situ synthesis of Fe3O4/cellulose microspheres with magnetic-induced protein delivery. J. Mater. Chem., 2009, 19(21), 3538-3545.
132. Luo, X.; Zhang, L. Immobilization of penicillin G acylase in epoxy-activated magnetic cellulose microspheres for improvement of biocatalytic stability and activities. Biomacromolecules, 2010, 11(11), 2896-2903.
133. Nkansah, M. K.; Thakral, D.; Shapiro, E. M. Magnetic poly (lactide-co-glycolide) and cellulose particles for MRIbased cell tracking. Magn. Reson. Med., 2011, 65(6), 1776-1785.
134. Nypelö, T.; Rodriguez-Abreu, C.; Kolenko, Y. V.; Rivas, J.; Rojas, O. J. Microbeads and hollow microcapsules obtained by self-assembly of pickering magneto-responsive cellulose nanocrystals. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2014, 6(19), 16851-16858.
135. Zhu, W.; Ma, W.; Li, C.; Pan, J.; Dai, X. Well-designed multihollow magnetic imprinted microspheres based on cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) stabilized Pickering double emulsion polymerization for selective adsorption of bifenthrin. Chem. Eng. J., 2015, 276, 249-260.
136. Peng, S.; Fan, J.; Chang, J. Characterization of magnetic cellulose microspheres reconstituted from ionic liquid. Adv. Mater. Res., 2013; pp. 913-917.
137. Rajwade, J. M.; Paknikar, K. M.; Kumbhar, J. V. Applications of bacterial cellulose and its composites in biomedicine. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2015, 99(6), 2491-2511.
138. Guise, C.; Fangueiro, R. Biomedical Applications of Nanocellulose. In: Natural Fibres: Advances in Science and Technology Towards Industrial Applications: From Science to Market; Fangueiro, R.; Rana, S., Eds.; Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht, 2016; pp. 155-169.