In situ development of nanosilver-impregnated bacterial cellulose for sustainable released antimicrobial wound dressing

Journal of Applied Biomaterials and Functional Materials

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2016, Pages e53-e58

  Mohite, Bhavana V ^a   Patil, Satish V ^a  

^a NORTH MAHARASHTRA UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Antimicrobial activity; Cellulose; Nanocomposite; Nanoparticles; Sustainable release

Indexed keywords

BACTERIA; IMPREGNATION; METAL NANOPARTICLES; SILVER COMPOUNDS; SILVER NANOPARTICLES; SODIUM BOROHYDRIDE; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS; SYNTHESIS (CHEMICAL);

ANTI-MICROBIAL ACTIVITY; BACTERIAL CELLULOSE; NANO SILVER; SODIUM BORO HYDRIDES; SODIUM BOROHYDRIDES; SUSTAINABLE RELEASE; TOLLENS REACTIONS; WATER-HOLDING CAPACITY; WOUND DRESSING MATERIALS; WOUND DRESSINGS;

CELLULOSE;

BIOMATERIAL; NANOSILVER IMPREGNATED BACTERIAL CELLULOSE; SILVER NANOPARTICLE; SODIUM BOROHYDRIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; CELLULOSE; DELAYED RELEASE FORMULATION; METAL NANOPARTICLE;

ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL MEMBRANE; BACTERIAL STRAIN; CHEMICAL REACTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENERGY DISPERSIVE SPECTROSCOPY; FIELD EMISSION SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; GLUCONACETOBACTER; GLUCONACETOBACTER HANSENII; GROWTH INHIBITION; NONHUMAN; SILVER IMPREGNATION; SPECTROSCOPY; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOLLENS REACTION; ULTRAVIOLET VISIBLE SPECTROSCOPY; WOUND DRESSING; BACTERIUM; BANDAGE; CHEMISTRY; DELAYED RELEASE FORMULATION;

BACTERIA; BANDAGES; CELLULOSE; DELAYED-ACTION PREPARATIONS; METAL NANOPARTICLES;

EID: 84963527827     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22808000     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5301/jabfm.5000257     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Shiraishi Y, Toshima N. Oxidation of ethylene catalyzed by colloidal dispersions of poly (sodium acrylate)-protected silver nanoclusters. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2000; 169(1-3): 59-66.
2. Schierholz JM, Lucas LJ, Rump A, Pulverer G. Efficacy of silver-coated medical devices. J Hosp Infect. 1998;40(4): 257-262.
3. Czaja W, Romanovicz D, Brown RM Jr. Structural Investigations of Microbial Cellulose Produced in Stationary and Agitated Culture. Cellulose. 2004;11(3/4):403-411.
4. Klemm D, Schumann D, Udhardt U, Marsch S. Bacterial cellulose artificial blood vessels for microsurgery. Prog Polym Sci. 2001;26(9):1561-1603.
5. Czaja WK, Young DJ, Kawecki M, Brown RM Jr. The future prospects of microbial cellulose in biomedical applications. Biomacromolecules. 2007;8(1):1-12.
6. Legnani C, Vilani C, Calil VL, et al. Bacterial cellulose membrane as flexible substrate for organic light emitting devices. Thin Solid Films. 2008;517(3):1016-1020.
7. Maneerung T, Tokura S, Rujiravanit R. Impregnation of silver nanoparticles into bacterial cellulose for antimicrobial wound dressing. Carbohydr Polym. 2007;72(1):43-51.
8. Jung R, Kim Y, Kim HS, Jin HJ. Antimicrobial properties of hydrated cellulose membranes with silver nanoparticles. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2009;20(3):311-324.
9. deSantaMaria LC, Santos ALC, Oliveira PC, Barud HS, Messaddeq Y, Ribeiro SJL. Synthesis and characterization of silver nanoparticles impregnated into bacterial cellulose. Mater Lett. 2009; 63(9-10):797-799.
10. Atiyeh BS, Costagliola M, Hayek SN, Dibo SA. Effect of silver on burn wound infection control and healing: review of the literature. Burns. 2007;33(2):139-148.
11. Sutherland IW. Novel and established applications of microbial polysaccharides. Trends Biotechnol. 1998;16(1):41-46.
12. Evans BR, O’Neill HM, Malyvanh VP, Lee I, Woodward J. Palladium-bacterial cellulose membranes for fuel cells. Biosens Bioelectron. 2003;18(7):917-923.
13. Cannon RE, Anderson SM. Biogenesis of bacterial cellulose. Crit Rev Microbiol. 1991;17(6):435-447.
14. Maria LCS, Santos ALC, Oliveira PC, et al. Preparation and antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles impregnated in bacterial cellulose. Polímeros. 2010;20(1):72-77.
15. Dobre LM, Stoica A, Stroescu M, et al. Characterization of composite materials based on biocellulose membranes impregnated with silver particles as antimicrobial agent. U P B Sci Bull, Series B. 2010; 72(4):55-64. http://www.scientificbulletin.upb.ro/rev_docs/arhiva/rez683.pdf Accessed March 16, 2013.
16. Mohite B, Kamalja K, Patil S. Statistical optimization of culture conditions for enhanced bacterial cellulose production by Gluconoacetobacter hansenii NCIM 2529. Cellulose. 2012;19(5): 1655-1666.
17. Bae S, Sugano Y, Shoda M. Improvement of bacterial cellulose production by addition of agar in a jar fermentor. J Biosci Bioeng. 2004;97(1):33-38.
18. Kirby WMM, Yoshihara GM, Sundsted KS, Warren JH. Clinical usefulness of a single disc method for antibiotic sensitivity testing. Antibiot Annu. 1956-1957;892:892-897.
19. Sonnichsen C, Franzl T, Wilk T, et al. Plasmon resonances in large noble-metal clusters. New Journal of Physics. 2002;4(1): 93.1-93.8. http://www.njp.org Accessed February 27, 2015.
20. Wonga SS, Kasapis S, Tan YM. Bacterial and plant cellulose modification using ultrasound irradiation. Carbohydr Polym. 2009;77(2):280-287.
21. Mohite BV, Patil SV. Physical, structural, mechanical and thermal characterization of bacterial cellulose by G. hansenii NCIM 2529. Carbohydr Polym. 2014;106:132-141.
22. 2 nanoparticles and Ag–TiO2–chitosan complex and their application to antibiosis and deodorization. Materials Research Society. 2004;820:161-166.
23. Yamanaka S, Watanabe K, Kitamura N, et al. The Structure and mechanical properties of sheets prepared from bacterial cellulose. J Mater Sci. 1989;24(9):3141-3145.
24. Iguchi M, Yamanaka S, Budhiono A. Bacterial cellulose a masterpiece of nature’s arts. J Mater Sci. 2000;35(2):261-270.