Making flexible magnetic aerogels and stiff magnetic nanopaper using cellulose nanofibrils as templates

Nature Nanotechnology

Volumn 5, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 584-588

  Olsson, R T ^a   Azizi Samir, M A S ^a,b   Salazar Alvarez, G ^a,c,d   Belova, L ^a   Strom V ^a   Berglund, L A ^a   Ikkala, O ^e   Nogues J ^c   Gedde, U W ^a  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b Nanocomposites and Bioconcepts Sarl   (Morocco)

^c UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

^d STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^e AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; CELLULOSE; FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS; MAGNETISM; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; NANOFIBERS; WOOD;

BACTERIAL CELLULOSE; CELLULOSE NANOFIBRILS; COBALT FERRITE NANOPARTICLES; ELECTRONIC ACTUATORS; HIGH POROSITY; MICROFLUIDICS DEVICES; NANO-STRUCTURED; SWOLLEN GELS;

AEROGELS;

CELLULOSE; COBALT; FERRITE; FERROMAGNETIC MATERIAL; NANOMATERIAL; NANOPAPER; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AEROGEL; ARTICLE; FREEZE DRYING; GEL; GLUCONACETOBACTER XYLINUS; MICROFLUIDICS; NONHUMAN; POROSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURFACE PROPERTY;

EID: 77956421847     PISSN: 17483387     EISSN: 17483395     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2010.155     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Mann, S. Molecular tectonics in biomineralization and biomimetic materials science. Nature 365, 499-505 (1993).
2. Fratzl, P. Biomimetic materials research: what can we really learn from Natures structural materials? J. R. Soc. Interface 4, 637-642 (2007).
3. Meyers, M. A., Chen, P.-Y., Lin, A. Y.-M. & Seki, Y. Biological materials: structure and mechanical properties. Prog. Mater. Sci. 53, 1-206 (2008).
4. Iguchi M., Yamanaka, S. & Budhiono, A. Bacterial cellulose-a masterpiece of Natures arts. J. Mater. Sci. 5, 261-270 (2000).
5. Henriksson, M., Henriksson, G., Berglund, L. A. & Lindström, T. An environmentally friendly method for enzyme-assisted preparation of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) nanofibers. Eur. Polym. J. 43, 3434-3441 (2007).
6. Saito, T., Kimura, S., Nishiyama, Y. & Isogai, A. Cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation of native cellulose. Biomacromolecules 8, 2485-2491 (2007).
7. Pääkkö, M. et al. Long and entangled native cellulose I nanofibers allow flexible aerogels and hierarchically porous templates for functionalities. Soft Matter 4, 2492-2499 (2008).
8. Henriksson, M., Berglund, L. A., Isaksson, P., Lindström, T. & Nishino, T. Cellulose nanopaper structures of high toughness. Biomacromolecules 9, 1579-1585 (2008).
9. Yano, H. et al. Optically transparent composites reinforced with networks of bacterial nanofibers. Adv. Mater. 17, 153-155 (2005). (Pubitemid 40242462)
10. Berglund L. A. & Peijs T. Cellulose biocomposites-from bulk moldings to nanostructured systems. MRS Bull. 35, 201-207 (2010).
11. Majetich, S. A. in Nanostructured Materials; Processing, Properties and Applications (ed. Koch, C. C.) 439-485 (William Andrew, 2007).
12. Okano, T. Biorelated Polymers and Gels (Academic Press, 1998).
13. Zrínyi, M., Barsi, L. & Büki, A. Ferrogel: a new magneto-controlled elastic medium. Polym. Gels Netw. 5, 415-427 (1997).
14. Bonini, M., Lenz, S., Giorgi, R. & Baglioni, P. Nanomagnetic sponges for the cleaning of works of art. Langmuir 23, 8681-8685 (2007).
15. Fuhrer, R., Athanassiou, E. K., Luechinger, N. A. & Stark, W. J. Crosslinking metal nanoparticles into the polymer backbone of hydrogels enables preparation of soft, magnetic field-driven actuators with muscle-like flexibility. Small 5, 383-388 (2009).
16. Ajayan, P. M., Schadler, L. S. & Braun, P. V. Nanocomposite Science and Technology (VCH-Wiley, 2004).
17. Balazs, A. C., Emrick, T. & Russell, T. P. Nanoparticle polymer composites: where two small worlds meet. Science 314, 1107-1110 (2006).
18. Mackay, M. E. et al. General strategies for nanoparticle dispersion. Science 311, 1740-1743 (2006).
19. Warren, S. C. et al. Ordered mesoporous materials from metal nanoparticle- block copolymer self-assembly. Science 320, 1748-1752 (2008).
20. Millan, A., Palacio, F., Snoeck, E., Serin, V. & Lecante, P. in Polymer Nanocomposites (eds Mai, Y. W. & Yu, Z.-Z.) 441-484 (Woodhead Publishing, 2006).
21. Prozorov, T., Prozorov, R. & Gedanken, A. Does the self-assembled coating of magnetic nanoparticles cover individual particles or agglomerates. Adv. Mater. 10, 1529-1532 (1998).
22. Zhao, Y. et al. Small-molecule-directed nanoparticle assembly towards stimuliresponsive nanocomposites. Nature Mater 8, 979-985 (2009).
23. Lin, Y. et al. Self-directed self-assembly of nanoparticle/copolymer mixtures. Nature 434, 55-59 (2005).
24. Iwamoto, S., Kai, W., Isogai, A. & Iwata, T. Elastic modulus of single cellulose microfibrils from tunicate measured by atomic force microscopy. Biomacromolecules 10, 2571-2576 (2009).
25. Belford, D. S., Myers, A. & Preston, R. D. A study of the ordered adsorption of metal ions on the surface of cellulose microfibrils. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 34, 47-57 (1959).
26. Olsson, R. T. et al. Controlled synthesis of near-stoichiometric cobalt ferrite nanoparticles. Chem. Mater. 17, 5109-5118 (2005).
27. 4+d nanoparticles prepared in large batches. Chem. Mater. 19, 4957-4963 (2007).
28. 4) nanoparticles prepared by wet chemical route. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 308, 289-295 (2007).
29. Chinnasamy, C. N. et al. Synthesis of size-controlled cobalt ferrite particles with high coercivity and squareness ratio. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 263, 80-83 (2003).
30. Gich, M. et al. High-coercivity ultralight transparent magnets. Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 4307-4309 (2003).